SearchDemocracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
a matter of balance ....Duncan Storrar is a hero. He made a pretty obvious point. A lift in the tax free threshold would improve his life. He survives on the minimum wage and benefits related to his disability. His comment and question on Q&A on Monday night was: “I’ve got a disability and a low education, that means I’ve spent my whole life working for minimum wage. You’re gonna lift the tax-free threshold for rich people,” he said, addressing federal minister O’Dwyer. “If you lift my tax-free threshold, that changes my life,” he went on. “That means that I get to say to my little girls, ‘Daddy’s not broke this weekend. We can go to the pictures’. Rich people don’t even notice their tax-free threshold lift. Why don’t I get it? Why do they get it?” Assistant monster Kelly O’Dwyer told him it was all about balance (seriously!) and business now being able to buy $6000 toasters. Toorak toasters anyone?
Spokesthing for the Australian Industry Group, Innes Willox. slithered out from under his rock and showed his caring side. He said: “Duncan, I’ll be harsh in my message. If you’re on the minimum wage and with a family, you would not pay much tax, if any at all. Would you? You would not pay much tax.” Duncan replied: “I pay tax every time I go to the supermarket. Every time I hop in my car.” It was a classic put down of an arrogant dismissive out of touch ruling class blood sucker. The vultures of the press, the capitalist class and the politicians who don’t understand, or worse attack Duncan, like Willox did, say he is already getting more for the State than he pays in tax. This is not correct. Duncan, as he pointed out, pays GST, and as a percentage of his income pays lots more GST than either Willox or O’Dwyer (on average about 34% of his income compared to 5% or 6% for Willox and O’Dwyer.) Second, tax and spending are two matters that are not susceptible of being netted off. One represents raising revenue and the other represents spending to achieve societal or other goals. Third, Duncan’s position has worsened in comparison to O’Dwyer and Willox over time. His wages have grown at a rate well below the rate the remuneration of the top 1% has grown. Fourth, Duncan’s wages and support payments mean he is close to the poverty line (which, for a couple with 2 children, was $841 per week in 2014. Every day is a struggle to make ends meet, even with government support. Fifth, the income the ruling class are taxed lightly on is not theirs. It is the unpaid labour of workers, workers like Duncan. The answer is not to play games like business and the media do and net off Government payments against tax paid. The answer is to increase Duncan’s wages and the government support payments he receives so he can take his daughters to the pictures on the weekend.
|
User login |
Recent comments
42 min 44 sec ago
1 hour 58 min ago
3 hours 38 min ago
6 hours 4 min ago
6 hours 20 min ago
6 hours 30 min ago
11 hours 8 min ago
11 hours 17 min ago
11 hours 26 min ago
11 hours 46 min ago