Tuesday 21st of March 2023

Murray-Darling Mismanagement ...

Murray-Darling Mismanagement ...

While then Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Agriculture and Water Barnaby Joyce was busy building up his "private" media brand enough to rival the Kardashians, under his watch, management of the Murray-Darling Basin was steadily careering out of control.

Back in August 2018, the Productivity Commission completed a review of the $13 billion Murray-Darling Basin Plan’s governance entitled, 'Murray-Darling Basin Plan: Five-year assessment'.

The Draft Report revealed the Plan's absence of transparency, lack of oversight and direction, and that it was lagging well behind schedule and wasting taxpayer dollars:

An immediate improvement is nevertheless required in two important elements of the Plan.

– The development and accreditation of Water Resource Plans is behind schedule...

– Basin Governments should substantially revise the Basin Plan Evaluation Framework and develop a monitoring strategy...

...There are major shortcomings in the current institutional and governance arrangements and these pose a significant risk to successful implementation. Now is the time for Basin governments to do some heavy lifting and provide strategic direction…

This is an opportunity to make important "stitch in time" changes to ensure an effective Plan. Failure will be costly for the environment and tax-payers and undermine confidence that the significant investment in the Basin Plan has been worthwhile.


It doesn't appear as though any of this advice was heeded in the months leading up to the fish kill disaster.

As well, serious allegations that Joyce signed off on unsecured water purchases known as “ghost water” transactions at inflated prices – which provided large irrigators, such as agribusiness big irrigator and $300 million water portfolio owner, Webster Limited, huge profits – remain unanswered. 

Back in June 2017, IA published an investigative report from Mark Zanker'The Murray-Darling Basin: Water, markets and money', which indicated an exorbitant overpayment for water in Tandou and Menindee. It prompted a sharp dressing down and request from the Department of Agriculture that IA remove the article on the grounds it was 'inaccurate'. Since the Department did not provide further information about these alleged inaccuracies, however, we did not take Mark's well-researched article down. 

This excerpt highlights the magnitude of Murray-Darling water buy-backs:

The price of the sale was not mentioned in the media release, but the ABC reported that Tandou stated that it would receive $78 million from the transaction. That would be used by Tandou (Webster Limited) to retire debt. 

The ABC interviewed Tom Rooney, one of the founding directors of the water broking firm Waterfind Australia, based in Adelaide. He was asked for his assessment of the price paid and whether the deal was a good one for Webster Ltd. Rooney described the deal as a “fantastic deal” for Webster. The reason for that was that the purchase price paid by the Commonwealth was, roughly, $3,500 per megalitre, whereas the running average price of water in the Lower Darling traded on the water market over recent years was $140 per megalitre. 

The following month, in July 2017, an ABC Four Corners  program provided further evidence of the extent of government mismanagement at both a Federal and NSW State Level, revealing that: 

'... just two irrigators, Webster and prominent cotton farmer Peter Harris, own about 70 per cent of all licenced water in Barwon-Darling.'

Four Corners also divulged that according to the head of the Commonwealth Environmental Water Office at that time, David Papps:

'... the NSW Government had "legally embodied" increased access to water and "unsustainable irrigation practices", describing its attitude to the Basin Plan as "openly hostile."'

An excellent op-ed in The Age by Helen Vivian (March 2018) also supported Mark Zanker's observations and highlighted the importance of this magnificent waterway:

It's like a giant neon emergency signal flashing across the four most populous states in the country. Depleted, despoiled, often poisonous and since 2001 frequently dry, the Darling River is an emblem of poor government, mismanagement, greed and anti-democratic activity.

The first of these was the purchase of $34 million of supplementary water rights, described locally as "empty buckets of water", sold to the Federal Government during the millennium drought in 2008 by Tandou Station, 100 kilometres south-east of Broken Hill and just south of the Menindee Lakes. A further water sale to the Federal Government was made last year by the same station, $78 million for their entire 21,900-megalitre water right and for business readjustment.

As was reported last month, that deal – personally negotiated by Barnaby Joyce – was at more than twice the market price for water.

That’s $112 million of taxpayer funds to one station, Tandou. Webster Limited has owned Tandou since 2015. The company also owns several large cotton properties upstream at Bourke and Moree.

Scratching around for something to point his incompetent fingers at after the mass fish deaths disaster, Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Drought Preparation and Response, David Littleproudblamed it on the drought, calling it a "natural event".

But aquatic ecosystem expert, Professor Fran Sheldondisagreed, saying:

‘Put simply, ecological evidence shows the Barwon-Darling River is not meant to dry out to disconnected pools — even during drought conditions. Water diversions have disrupted the natural balance of wetlands that support massive ecosystems.’

The obvious lack of governance and accountability prompted even one of the Nationals' political collaborators, Liberal Party Wagga branch president Colin Taggart, to respond:

“The Nats are plagued by scandal, vested with bullies and riddled with incompetence ... The one thing they were supposed to be good at were [sic] looking after farmers and they have failed at that. Look at the management of the Murray-Darling."

Indeed. Back to you then, Mr Littleproud and Mr Joyce. 

Prime Minister Morrison tried to argue that despite the "devasting ecological event", the Government had been "operating in accordance with scientific evidence" provided back in 2012 — except it has not.

A leaked 2012 memo from Fisheries NSW refutes this claim:

'There appears to have been no consideration of any scientific information on the impact of extraction or changes to the environment that have been detailed in the last decade.'

Actually, the plan IGNORED the advice from scientists, who warned that this would happen.


But all of this, of course, does not mean that anything will change anytime soon and, if past "achievements" are anything to go by, the gross mismanagement of the Murray-Darling Basin, upon which the livelihood of so many depends, will continue.

Perhaps the most damning part of this whole stinking mess is best summed up with this one little detail concerning the chief beneficiary of Coalition Government water policy, Webster Limited:

'Webster, a Tasmanian company, is also one of Australia’s biggest water traders. Its shareholders include Australian Food and Fibre, which is controlled by the Robinson family, a major donor to the National Party.

Independent Australia