SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
a mastercook...I have bagged Laurie Oakes a few times as the Bibendum of news for sometimes inflating the value of a political leak, designed and used to undermine a government's work... He's the king of leaks. In his reflective Andrew Olle address last night, I was told, he was somewhat contradictory despite a solid, though sometimes mumbling, performance. He was sweating under the spot light. He made good points about the relationship between the politicians and the public via the media... His bleak outlook for the future of news was contradicted by his own statement that people wanted better political news rather than the MacNugget soundbites in which politicians complain they do not have time to explain policies. To which he reiterated that awful but sharp statement by John Howard about "We will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come" which explained Howard's hard position in 5.9 seconds. Apparently Oakes bagged Lindsay Tanner for his Sideshow with one small example about Kate Blanchett which of course was quite cute, but in general, to me, Tanner is right: The media has dumbed down the value and the respect of political debate. In fact the biggest culprit is the media's love of Tony Abbott, who knows how to exploit the crassness of the media despite a negative brain full of pigeon poop. But that's my view... More to be said once the transcripts are in...
|
User login |
juicy titbits...
LAURIE OAKES has little time for those who believe there is a demand for more quality news and heavier current affairs, one unmet by the commercial media.
''They're dreaming,'' the self-described veteran said last night in the ABC's annual Andrew Olle Media Lecture. ''If that was the case, Four Corners would out-rate MasterChef, I'd still be doing interviews on the Sunday program and writing for The Bulletin magazine, and George Negus might still be on air.''
Network Ten dumped 6.30pm with George Negus this week, but Oakes argued against the view the dumbing down of political discourse is only getting worse.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/appetite-for-serious-news-well-fed-oakes-20111021-1mcge.html#ixzz1bSVIjHhc
I believe Oakes had a quick go at Crikey and other bloggers about "journalism", but he hardly touched (if ever he did?) on the powerful opinionators — those awful people who claim not to be journalists but who actually hold a great deal of the media outlets forums... Nor was the issue of advertisers (or "lobbyists") ever mentioned, nor their influence of the political tone expressed in the media. Thus Oakes was quite generalistic and anecdotal, but hardly gritty on the underground dynamics of the fourth estate, where allegiances to certain political views or the love of crumbs from pollies' table can render governing a country a bipolar demented affair ... For him it seems, politics is about juicy titbits... the great picture seems to have had a bypass. I may be wrong.