SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
so long, farewell, goodbye & good riddance …..There's one good reason for why Scotland should vote yes for independence: the breaking up of the United Kingdom would be an imminently good thing for the sake of world peace. Anything that lessens the power of the London-centred United Kingdom is bound to be a good thing. So, if Scots walk away from the Union on September 18 by voting to establish their own separate, sovereign nation, that will deliver a positive blow to further weaken Britain's legacy as an imperial power. British Prime Minister David Cameron has said so himself, albeit indirectly. This week Cameron has run up the Scottish flag over Downing Street and begged the Scots that he will be heartbroken if they should leave the “family of nations” that he euphemistically calls the United Kingdom. His desperation reflects the deep concern among the British ruling establishment over the impact Scottish independence will have on their power. If the No campaign should lose the referendum, the Conservative Party has the knives out for its leader. That’s how serious the London government is taking the potential loss of Scotland. Cameron has previously warned that Britain's standing in the world will be much diminished if Scotland goes independent. That's why the No campaign, spearheaded by the British prime minister, is called “Better Together.” Yes, better together, but for whom? The London-based British establishment, not “the plebs” north of the border. Cameron's view has been backed by other NATO allies. US President Barack Obama and Canada's premier Stephen Harper have both come out to endorse the British status quo and to hamper Scotland's independence. Anything these warmongers wish for, then the opposite is bound to be the right choice. Historically, the English ruling class has used the nations of Scotland, Wales and Ireland to expand their power base centred in London. That's why the English conquered and colonized its neighbouring nations first before setting out on its global conquest as the British Empire. The English rulers forced those nations through a series of “unions” into the so-called United Kingdom. Scotland was nailed in 1707, as was Ireland in 1801. The Irish partly seceded in 1922 but only after a cruel and bloody War of Independence. Britain still clings on to the territory of Northern Ireland. There is a searing reason why the London government has fought tooth and nail to maintain the Union down through the centuries and latterly over the upcoming Scottish referendum next week. London knows that without the outer territories its power will be greatly diminished. It will no longer be able to “punch above its weight” in the world, as the English establishment likes to put it. Great Britain lost its allure long ago, but with Scotland taking its leave that will surely deliver a crippling blow and reality-check to British pretensions. The Scots will also enliven separatist sentiments in the remainder of the UK: Northern Ireland, Wales and the remote English regions, such as Newcastle in the far northeast and Cornwall in the far southwest. All these regions have suffered economically and culturally from the centralizing power of the English establishment based in London. Scotland's oil wealth from the North Sea has been siphoned off for the past 40 years by a London government that has squandered it on tax cuts for the rich and reckless, criminal overseas wars of conquest. It's time for the Scots to harness that wealth for their own development. This year marks the 100th anniversary of the beginning of the First World War. Millions of Scots, Irish and Welsh were slaughtered in that war, sent into battle by English rulers. Many other wars have since been fought to prop up imperial Britain and give it a much-undeserved global status as is manifested by its position today on the Security Council of the United Nations. Britain is a warmongering, destructive entity that continually destabilizes world peace through its “special relationship” with the United States. Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Syria, Ukraine... anywhere you care to look in the world to see people suffering from conflict or duress you will see the nefarious presence of Britain. There are many positive reasons for why the Scottish nation should now create its own destiny. After centuries of subjugation under the English yoke, they deserve to chart their own path of freedom. But one good reason, among others, is this: Scottish independence is a vote for peace by delivering a hammer blow to Britain's imperial pretensions and warmongering. William Wallace, Robert the Bruce, Bonnie Prince Charlie would be proud of ye! Finian Cunningham (born 1963) has written extensively on international affairs, with articles published in several languages. He is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in journalism. He is also a musician and songwriter. For nearly 20 years, he worked as an editor and writer in major news media organisations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. Scotland: Vote yes for world peace
|
User login |
scottish independence...
GLASGOW, Scotland—In the British general election on Dec. 12, 2019, the Scottish National Party (SNP) won a resounding mandate from its constituents, taking 48 of Scotland’s 59 seats in the U.K. House of Commons and 45 percent of all ballots cast by Scottish voters. A week later, on Dec. 19, SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon sent a letter to Britain’s newly reelected Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson requesting the power to hold a second referendum on Scottish independence. (The first referendum, which took place in September 2014, resulted in a 10-point victory for the Anglo-Scottish union.)
On Jan. 14, the prime minister delivered his answer. “I cannot agree to any request … that would lead to further independence referendums,” he wrote in a formal memorandum to Sturgeon. “The people of Scotland voted decisively on that promise to keep our United Kingdom together … The U.K. government will continue to uphold the democratic decision [made in 2014].”
Johnson’s response came as no surprise to anyone, Sturgeon included. With the deadline for Brexit looming at the end of January and a raft of preelection spending pledges to implement, the last thing the Tory leader wants is a renewed battle over Scotland’s constitutional status and a scramble to shore up the U.K.’s increasingly tenuous political unity.
But that is precisely what he is going to get. Spurred by widespread Scottish opposition to leaving the European Union—and, after December, a fresh electoral mandate from the Scottish public—the SNP plans to intensify its campaign for independence in the coming months. The Tories are likely to boost U.K. public spending and redouble their attacks on the SNP in an attempt to contain Scottish discontent. But it may be too little, too late.
Even if Westminster continues to dismiss nationalist demands for another vote on separation from the U.K.—Alister Jack, the Conservative Secretary of State for Scotland, recently said Sturgeon should have to wait “a lifetime” before a rerun of the 2014 plebiscite—the Scottish party and its supporters seem convinced that their goal of an independent Scottish state is becoming more and more likely.
That confidence was on full display in Glasgow on Saturday, Jan. 11, when an estimated 80,000 Scots braved the winter rain to join a huge pro-independence march through the center of Scotland’s largest city. Amid a riot of blue and white Saltires—the Scottish national flag—protesters carried placards embellished with separatist and anti-Tory slogans.
The mood was populist and defiant. “The election reinforces the fact that England and Scotland are going in completely different directions,” Bob Duncan, a veteran SNP activist, told me as the crowd pressed toward Glasgow Green, a public park on the banks of the River Clyde. “The Tories have no mandate to do anything up here.”
Read more:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/24/a-new-scottish-independence-vote-se...
------------------
Heather McCartney was arrested shortly after her naughty stunt and spent the night in a police cell. The voluptuous model, who has more than 300,000 followers on her Instagram account, was fined $300.
Scottish model Heather McCartney has revealed the reason why she stripped naked during the 2014 AFL Grand Final. The 31-year-old revealed that at the time, she was suffering from aplastic anaemia, a deadly autoimmune disease and the stunt was on her bucket list. “Six months prior to that, I had just been told I had a couple of weeks to live. It was a bucket list thing, spur of the moment”, the model told the Daily Mail Australia.
Later, McCartney underwent marrow/stem cell treatment and went into remission. This was not the only good news for the model, as later she found out that she was expecting a baby.
Now, the 31-year-old, who is originally from Scotland but lives in Australia, revealed that she would strip naked again if her native country gains independence from the United Kingdom.
Read more:
https://sputniknews.com/viral/202001261078143230-scottish-model-reveals-...
Read from top.