Wednesday 24th of April 2024

justice4assange...

assangeassangeAssange Verdict: Vengeance Is Ours, Saith the Agency

by  Posted on December 11, 2021

Are the CIA and its contractors able to bully not only the U.S. Department of Justice, but also the UK judiciary? This is not hard to conclude after the High Court decision announced early Friday to bow to the US and extradite Julian Assange.

Underneath the pettifoggery, the decision demonstrates that the British will lop the "juris" off jurisprudence and pay heed only to "prudence" in kowtowing to the security state in Washington and its junior partner in London.

The objective, of course, is to warn any journalist or publisher tempted to investigate and and expose U. S. war crimes or political sabotage, US"Justice" is going to get you, no matter who you are or where you live. (Call it a new wrinkle on the concept of "universal jurisdiction", if you will.)

All According to (Updated) Plan

Assange’s lawyers have said they intend to appeal the High Court decision. But, as Glenn Greenwald pointed out, "today’s victory for the US means that Assange’s freedom, if it ever comes, is further away than ever: not months but years even under the best of circumstances." That, of course, has been the plan for a decade or more.

Glenn also noted that post-Obama Democrats and their security state allies have a particularly potent reason to exact vengeance on Assange, who published those DNC emails showing that Bernie Sanders was cheated out of the nomination in 2016. Add the indignity suffered by the CIA, when an insider apparently leaked a treasure trove of unique documents on cyber warfare. WikiLeaks promptly published parts of "Vault 7", the family jewels of offensive cyber tools, in which the CIA and NSA has invested Billions. The security state had a witches’ brew.

In early July, I pointed to some graphic evidence that this was about bloodlust as well as vengeance, noting that the British were following the detailed ‘Washington Playbook” approach that was exposed by WikiLeaks itself in Feb. 2012.

Some readers may recall that WikiLeaks-revealed confidential emails from the US private intelligence firm Stratfor mentioned that the US already had a secret indictment against the WikiLeaks founder. Bad enough.

Inspector Javert

What also showed up in the Stratfor emails was the unrelenting, Inspector-Javert-type approach taken by one Fred Burton, Stratfor’s Vice-President for Counterterrorism and Corporate Security. (Burton had been Deputy Chief of the Department of State’s counterterrorism division for the Diplomatic Security Service.)

Here’s Javert – I mean Burton:

“Move him [Assange] from country to country to face charges for the next 25 years. But seize everything he and his family own, to include every person linked to Wiki.” [my comment: “country to country”, or – equally effective – court to court]

“Pursue conspiracy and political terrorism charges and declassify the death of a source, someone which could link to Wiki.”

“Assange is a peacenik. He needs his head dunked in a full toilet bowl at Gitmo.”

"Take down the money. Go after his infrastructure. The tools we are using to nail and de-construct Wiki are the same tools used to dismantle and track al-Qaeda.”

“Bankrupt the arsehole first; ruin his life. Give him 7-12 years for conspiracy.”

“Assange is going to make a nice bride in prison. Screw the terrorist. He’ll be eating cat food forever … extradition to the US is more and more likely.”

Nice people – once sworn under oath “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic”. Since comparisons are invidious, apologies to “Javert” and Victor Hugo.

"The Truth Will Always Win"

This saying of Julian’s is one that we strong supporters are determined to hang onto – and believe, even when it stretches credulity. Throwing in the towel is not an option. Inspiration can also be taken from the dismal-sounding, but nonetheless uplifting words of I. F. Stone:

"The only kinds of fights worth fighting are those you’re going to lose, because somebody has to fight them and lose and lose and lose until someday, somebody who believes as you do wins.

The late Kurt Vonnegut may seem like a strange person with which to close in this way, since he was the quintessential "humanist".

“How do humanists feel about Jesus? I say of Jesus, as all humanists do, ‘If what he said is good, and so much of it is absolutely beautiful, what does it matter if he was God or not?’ 

“But if Christ hadn’t delivered the Sermon on the Mount, with its message of mercy and pity, I wouldn’t want to be a human being.

“I’d just as soon be a rattlesnake.”

I imagine that one part of that Sermon on the Mount Vonnegut may have had in mind was this.

People are going to insult you and persecute you and utter every kind of slander against you because you tell the truth. What it means is that the truth is too close for comfort and they are uncomfortable. Know that you are in good company. They persecuted the prophets before you in the very same way.

 

 

 

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. His 27-year career as a CIA analyst includes serving as Chief of the Soviet Foreign Policy Branch and preparer/briefer of the President’s Daily Brief. He is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

 

 

READ MORE:

https://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2021/12/10/assange-verdict-vengeance-is-ours-saith-the-agency/

conspiracy?...

Released On: 02 Dec 2021Available for over a year 

Why do so many of us believe in quackery and conspiracy?

 

In his guide to thinking better, Professor Steven Pinker tries to make sense of the senseless. Steven is joined by Jonathan Rauch, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and the author, most recently, of ‘The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of the Truth’ and by Ellen Cushing, Senior and Special Projects Editor at The Atlantic.

 

What was it that finally convinced her that there isn’t really a global organisation communicating in cryptic symbols and masterminding world events by planting agents in governments and corporations.

 

Producers: Imogen Walford and Joe Kent Editor: Emma Rippon Think with Pinker is produced in partnership with The Open University. 

 

See more crap: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001214x#xtor=CS8-1000-%5BPromo_Box%5D-%5BNews_Promo%5D-%5BNews_Promo%5D-%5BPS_SOUNDS~N~m001214x~P_ThinkwithPinkerConspiracy%5D

 

As noted on this site, there are conspiracies and conspiracies... There are the crackpots conspiracies, such as the fake moon landings and the organised management of your decisions to believe in "freedom" or not. For Gus, religions are conspiracies, designed to "conquer the world". IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS, read your bible or k'ran again and ask questions.

 

At government levels, whether they succeed or not, there are many "conspiracies" to control your actions. Some are overt, like laws — while others are devious powerfully conspiratorial ways to corrupt the system in which you believe to be pure, but are designed to benefit the rich, ahead of you. 

THERE IS A US/UK/Australian CONSPIRACY TO KEEP ASSANGE IN PRISON. If you don't understand this, you're a dope. 

 

Oh and please understand the tools of relative "global" conspiracies are the CIA, the NSA and "The Patriot Act", MI6, etc... The US is on course to fight Russia and China in a US conspiracy (morally modified by a superiority complex) to "conquer the planet". If you don't understand this, you're as thick as a brick.

 

See also:

spilling the beans on "the dismissal"...

 

In regard to the Covid-19 spectacle, the jury should still deliberate about the possibility of this having been an opportune "conspiracy"... See 

designed or accidental covid caper?...

 

 

he shouldn't be tried ANYWHERE...

In a liberal democracy, care must be taken to avoid laws that stumble around how basic rights may come and go. How a state deliberates over one person’s rights is an indication of the clarity, consistency and authenticity it applies over all.

 

Julian Assange is a current case in point. As an individual, whether you like him or despise him, it is beyond him, given his circumstances, to protect his rights by himself. So we must hope for the British courts to do so, and we will judge its society accordingly.

I have never met him and, from observation, don’t respect him. I presume I would not like him. And I view these facts as a clarion call to be all the more vigilant that he is treated just as one of my most powerful colleagues or dearest friends would be.

 

BARNABY JOYCE...

 

---------------------------------

 

Yep, Barnaby would not like Assange... Why? Because, unlike Barnaby Joyce, Assange tells the truth and demonstrates that we all are victims of bullshit from governments that want to hide their caca. The anti-turd perfume apology from Barnaby is a poor attempt at making the ScoMo government look decent with a little bit of a soul... It has no soul. For example the ScoMo government is DOING THE SAME THING TO WITNESS X AND Bernard Collaery ... BARNABY IS A HYPOCRITICAL IDIOT... His article shows he has understood NOTHING...

 

Read from top.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW Ç√Ç√Ç√≈≈ΩΩΩ≈ΩÇǩΨÇ∞´≈ ®ˆ ¨†Øˆ†ˆ®Ïˆ!!!!