SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
scrambling idiots….Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison declared on Sunday that a Chinese military base on the Solomon Islands would be an unacceptable “red line,” without adding how Canberra would retaliate. Morrison’s government and the United States are scrambling to respond to a recently-signed security deal between the islands and Beijing, which they consider an “aggressive” move. “Working together with our partners in New Zealand and of course the United States, I share the same red line that the United States has when it comes to these issues,” Morrison said. “We won’t be having Chinese military naval bases in our region on our doorstep.” A tiny archipelago sitting around 2,000km off the northeastern coast of Australia, the Solomon Islands made international news last week when it signed a security pact with China. With the island nation reeling from violent protests last year, the deal – according to a leaked draft of the agreement – promises Chinese assistance in “maintaining social order” and allows China’s warships to dock at its ports. Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare insists that the deal was necessary to beef up security and was “guided by our national interests.” He stated last week that the agreement does not allow China to set up a military base on the islands, something that Beijing has also stressed. However, Australia and her allies fear otherwise. “The reality is that China has changed. China’s incredibly aggressive, the acts of foreign interference, the preparedness to pay bribes to get an outcome... that’s the reality of modern China,” Australian Defense Minister Peter Dutton told Sky News on Sunday. Beijing so far has not responded to these allegations of corruption. In a joint statement, the US, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand said the pact poses “serious risks to a free and open Indo-Pacific,” and the White House warned that “if steps are taken [by China] to establish a de facto permanent military presence, power-projection capabilities, or a military installation… the United States would then have significant concerns and respond accordingly.” However, like Morrison, the nature of a potential US response was not spelled out. With Australians set to vote in federal elections next month, Morrison has taken a hammering at home for allowing the deal to proceed. While he has defended his actions by arguing that “we don’t go stomping around telling leaders in [the] Pacific islands what they should and shouldn’t do,” Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong of the Labor Party argued that foreign aid to the Solomons could have lured its government away from China’s influence.
READ MORE: https://www.rt.com/news/554434-australia-morrison-solomon-china/
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.........
|
User login |
the empire of lies...
Of all the hegemonic powers of the United States, a dominance and control over the flow and means of information has been largely weaponized.
The Russia-Ukraine crisis is an example. A review of the history of Ukraine crises will reveal that the US, other NATO countries, IMF and financial players had been working for long to get hold of this special Russian neighbor.
First, IMF provided loan to Ukraine, which were unpayable in nature. Then IMF started to pressurized Ukraine to compromise on the welfare of people. Former Ukrainian president Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych was pressed to remove gas subsidies and open the Ukrainian for international financial giants or investors. He refused to abolish gas subsidy and turned to Russia for rescue.
Then he encountered Western powers' game through information warfare. They used information system to ignite a "color revolution" in the name of liberal values. Yanukovych was portrayed as solely responsible for Ukrainian problems and removed from office. And the new government eventually embraced international financial players and the US-led NATO.
The reality is the US is leading NATO in exploiting Ukraine as new front of conflict against Russia. The US-led West disdain Russian concerns by breaking own pledges of no-more NATO expansion, aggravate Ukrainian debts and sufferings, shore Ukraine up against Russia with empty promises, and prolong the killings with more deliveries of multi-billion-dollar batches of US and UK weaponry.
All along the US and other Western countries deployed media outlets to build biased narrative by hiding or ignoring facts. Anonymous information sources are feeding the media with one-sided and wrong information. They have cultivated an environment in which it seems that US-led West are champions of human rights and that they had never acted against such values despite the havoc they had wreaked on other peoples.
Following sanctions imposed by the US and other nations, Russian TV and news agencies have been banned in some Western lands. Although it is against the spirit of freedom of speech touted by the West, it does not matter. Bombarding the public with one-sided stories from Ukraine is part of the disinformation to meet preferences of some politicians.
Weeks ago US media magnified so-called non-pledge of NATO to expand its membership eastward to Russia since the end of the Cold War in early 1990s. But a simple review of their files would come up with repeated answers of US and other NATO country leaders to Russia leadership that NATO had no plan to go further east. Strangely, the world witnessed five rounds of NATO expansion closing in to Russian border since the end of the Soviet Union.
The Western media further ignored that the Russia-Ukraine conflict could have been easily avoided if only the US and NATO had eased Russian worry simply by denying Ukraine's potential NATO membership. But the US did the opposite and kept sending weapons to Ukraine and now even enticing Russian neighbor Finland to join NATO, which will certainly escalate European tension further for the US to benefit from yoking Europe tighter and profiting from more weapon sales.
Sadly the US methodology has repeatedly worked. The human tragedy unfolded in Afghanistan by US-led NATO has successfully faded from the Western public. Now their media have made Ukraine talk of the town and top priority of world. No wonder there is fear that once the objectives of US-led NATO are achieved, Ukraine will meet the fate of Afghanistan.
The situation prompts the rest of the world, especially China to examine circumstances diligently and to counter such kind of disinformation. It is necessary for China because the US has kept provocative activities around it after singling it out with Russia as "competitors". That also explains Western pressure on China to condemn Russia.
Thus, the developing world including China will have to erect their own system and work on multiple fronts. The starting point should be to expand the reach of their own media outlets and social media tools. Then they have to build own means of information like think tanks and non-government organizations. The Chinese initiative of New Type of Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristics is promising.
Moreover, ideological work would be key to counter information warfare. The US-led West has been using its dominance to create false impression of their greatness and self-rightness, creating disturbances and even instigating "color revolutions'' in West and South Asia, Latin America and Africa in the name of democracy and freedom.
China is already victim of such US machinations on Chinese regions of Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Taiwan. And China's investment and assistance to the developing world have been smeared at as "debt trap", "resource taking" among others.
In this context, the developing world and China have to act against disinformation, and act immediately and decisively.
READ MORE:
https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202204/24/WS6265202ca310fd2b29e58f76.html
READ FROM TOP.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.....
SEE ALSO:
the heartland explained...