SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
the US hypocrisy on the war on "climate".......The world’s first scientific estimate of global military emissions is here: they are not only nearly the same as the carbon emitted from all the cars in the world, but they are also higher than the world’s biggest oil and gas exporter – Russia. Stupendous amounts of carbon dioxide emitted by the world’s militaries are playing a huge but invisible role in driving humanity toward climate catastrophe according to a new report published by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) with the Conflict and Environment Observatory (CEOBS). Nafeez Ahmed. 10 November 2022
The research concludes that global military emissions are so high that if the world’s militaries were categorised as a country, they would be equivalent to the fourth highest carbon footprint in the world, just behind China, the United States and India – and higher than Russia’s. The Invisible War on Planet Earth This conclusion is only an estimate. Report authors Dr Stuart Parkinson – former military engineer turned climate scientist – and chartered environmentalist Linsey Cottrell, developed an innovative methodology to estimate the likely scale of military carbon emissions by gathering the sparse data available on emissions from military vehicles, bases, and industrial supply chains from a small number of nations. This data was then used to estimate totals for the world and the main geopolitical regions. The new SGR and CEOBS report, titled Estimating the Military’s Global Greenhouse gas Emissions, estimates global military emissions at about 5.5% – and perhaps as high as 7% – of total greenhouse gas emissions. To get a sense of how massive this is, consider that it is about 85% of the carbon emitted by all the world’s passenger cars in 2019. “The world’s militaries and wars are a very significant but neglected source of carbon pollution – and these emissions are almost certainly rising with the Ukraine war and the resulting international increase in military spending”, said Dr Parkinson. “We urgently need governments and militaries to more accurately measure their emissions and more openly report them – and, just as urgently, these need to be reduced. And the most effective way of doing this is to reduce war.” Riding BlindMilitary institutions around the world inhabit a kind of ‘no man’s land’ when it comes to climate change. They do not keep track of their own carbon emissions, and there is no obligation on them to do so. As a result, data on military emissions is usually low quality, incomplete, masked by other civilian categories – or simply not even collected. Governments have resisted committing to firm carbon accounting to avoid the prospect that climate action might entail restrictions on military activities. This has had feedback effects on the wider climate science community. For instance, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has barely discussed the implications of military emissions. This means that we don’t really know how high these emissions are. What we do know for certain is that the world’s biggest carbon polluters are also the world’s biggest military spenders. The report points out that some 60% of all global greenhouse gas emissions come from just ten countries: China, the US, India, Indonesia, Russia, Brazil, Japan, Iran, Canada and Saudi Arabia. All of them – except Indonesia – are among the top 20 countries in terms of their military expenditure. The report’s findings are highly conservative because they exclude some key carbon emission sources such as “the impacts of warfighting”, such as fires, infrastructure and ecosystem damages, post-conflict reconstruction, and health-care for survivors; as well as “the additional heating effects which are caused by non-CO2 exhaust gases in the stratosphere”. The Urgent Need for Military Accountability Without understanding the still largely hidden role of the world’s militaries, we won’t be able to get meaningful control over rising global carbon emissions. There is therefore an “urgent need for all militaries to report emissions using consistent, unambiguous, transparent, and robust data collection methodologies – and to take action to reduce them”, conclude Parkinson and Cottrell. This urgency is particularly heightened in light of the escalation of military activities since the breakout of war in Europe: “With the ongoing escalation of military expenditure – especially in the wake of the war in Ukraine – commitments by governments to tackle this largely ignored contribution to global GHG emissions are urgently needed”. That is why the researchers are calling for policymakers at COP27 to look at strengthening reporting requirements under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). “As a first step, we need the UNFCCC to strengthen its reporting protocols for governments’ militaries”, said Linsey Cottrell.
READ MORE:
SEE ALSO: https://yourdemocracy.net.au/drupal/node/4441
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.....................
|
User login |
jailing coco.....
By Guest author Robert Hunziker
Australia has achieved international infamy through the decision to jail climate protestor, Violet Coco, for 15 months. Allow me to add evidence to support her stance that emergency action is demanded of us to avert the climate crisis.
A major raison d’être for a nation state structure, and its diaspora of intelligence and security agencies is to correctly interpret the threat environment and devise strategy for collective safety and security. However, despite the urgency of the climate and ecological crisis, nowhere in the world is any agency or institution engaged in developing concepts for a seismic and fast-tracked response – which matches the true scale of the problem. But it gets worse. A concept for crisis response, PLAN E (the world’s first climate and eco-centred security), developed in Australia has been deliberately sidelined. This is despite the extraordinary public mandate for rapid climate action delivered through the May 2022 election. It is also despite new logic which reveals our current threat posture is incoherent. My exasperation with this situation, which calls into question the very nature of Australian democracy, led me to publish ‘Cancelled Woman’. The decision by ‘power’ to silence PLAN E, to hide from the public alternate security narratives or concepts for emergency response, reveals intentionality; a lack of ethics and rigor to honestly explore all options. PLAN E finds a pathway to relative safety. It dares to look the problem square in the eye and say we will take it on. Humanity can think big. We can be agile. We can do something different from the shameful turning of heads, as young folk plea for a future.
– E. G. Boulton, December 6, 2022
The Foreboding Hyperthreat Looms Large
First published by Counterpunch.
The hyperthreat is a combination of impending ecological carnage influenced in large measure by hidden behind-the-scenes human forces that drain the vigour and lifeblood of reasonable solutions.
A major exposé of the hyperthreat is the essence of a recently released book by E.G. Boulton, PhD: Cancelled Woman, Destination Safe Earth Publishing, 2022.
READ MORE:
https://johnmenadue.com/the-foreboding-hyperthreat-looms-large/
READ FROM TOP.
NOTE:
The U.S. outpaces all other nations in military expenditures. World military spending totaled more than $1.6 trillion in 2015. The U.S. accounted for 37 percent of the total.
U.S. military expenditures are roughly the size of the next seven largest military budgets around the world, combined.
READ MORE:
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/campaigns/us-military-spending-vs-world/
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....................