THE MINSK AGREEMENTS WERE A MASSIVE GRAND DECEIT... JULES AND OUR COHORT BELIEVE THAT PUTIN KNEW THIS BUT HE HOPED THAT THEY WOULD WORK NONETHELESS.... WE KNOW THAT WW1 WAS AN ENGLISH CONSPIRACY.  THIS STATEMENT IS A BIT BRUTAL BUT WE CAN EXPLAIN IT BY VISITING THE CORBETT REPORT REPOSTED HERE. 

WHAT OUR FRIEND JULES LETAMBOUR SUSPECTS IS THAT GENERAL DE GAULLE KNEW THAT WW2 WAS ALSO AN ENGLISH/US CONSPIRACY WHICH DID NOT GO ACCORDING TO PLAN, UNTIL THE “HAPPY” ENDING AFTER A HARD SLOG. IT COULD HAVE GONE EITHER WAY, WITHOUT THE RUSSIAN INTERVENTION THAT DEPLETED THE GERMAN ARMIES FAR MORE THAN THE WESTERN OFFENSIVES.

 

DE GAULLE DID NOT LIKE THE ANGLO/SAXONS AND WE THINK THESE FEELINGS WERE RETURNED IN KIND. THE ENGLISH DID NOT LIKE HIM BECAUSE HE WAS LIKE A FIFTH WHEEL ON THEIR TRICYCLE.

IT IS LIKELY THAT THE US, THROUGH THE CIA, TRIED HARD TO OUST THE GENERAL BY SECRETLY SUPPORTING HIS ENEMIES, ESPECIALLY THE ORGANISATIONS SUCH AS THE “OAS”. BUT HE NEVER LET ON, EXCEPT THROUGH VAGUE SPEECHES AND POSITIVE ALLIANCES WITH GERMANY TO CONSTRUCT AN INDEPENDENT EUROPE. MEANWHILE THE US WANTED TO CONSTRUCT EUROPE AS A SERVANT OF THE USA. THEY USED ALL KIND OF INCENTIVES AND TRICKS TO ACHIEVE THEIR AIMS, INCLUDING HAVING FUTURE FRENCH PRESIDENTS “POLITICALLY” EDUCATED IN THE USA.

THESE TWO WAYS OF REBUILDING EUROPE OFTEN CONFLICTED WITH DIPLOMATIC NICETIES. THE USA MADE GIFTS TO THE FRENCH ONE DAY AND MADE A DIFFERENT CONFLICTING OFFER TO THE GERMANS ON ANOTHER OCCASION. THE POWERFUL INVASION OF HOLLYWOOD’S SIMPLISTIC FANTASIES, VERSED INTO THE GOODIES VERSUS THE BADDIES — A THEME CULTIVATED BY THE JEWS SINCE THEIR YEAR DOT — ALSO CONTROLLED THE INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE EUROPEANS. AS WELL, THE US WERE PROMPT IN PATENTING, THUS CONTROLLING, THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES — AND MAKE BUDDY-BUDDY DEALS. THESE ARE PARTNERSHIPS IN WHICH THE (BIG) AMERICAN CONTROLS THE CASH AND THE IDEAS. 

DE GAULLE THREW THE AMERICANS OUT OF FRANCE N 1964, BUT BY NOW WE KNOW THAT EUROPE IS A 100 PER CENT AMERICAN EMPIRE LACKEY. 

IN AUSTRALIA, DREAMS OF INDEPENDENCE HAVE BEEN EXPRESSED BY KEATING AND FRAZER TO NAME TWO PRIME MINISTER BUT THEIR PLEAS HAVE GONE ONTO DEAF EARS IN THE LATEST PMs FROM TURDY ABBOTT AND SCOMO, TO NOW ALBO.

INDEPENDENCE DEMANDS EFFORTS AND VERY SMART INTELLECTUAL UNDERSTANDING. BEING ALIGNED TO THE EMPIRE MEANS THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE TO THINK MUCH, YOU SAY PLATITUDES WHILE STANDING LIKE MULLETS FOR THE PICTURES AND LIKE MACRON EAT THE LOBSTER YOU’RE FED FOR DINNER. 

CONTROL OVER THE PLANET BY THE US EMPIRE IS PROVIDED BY VARIOUS MEANS, OFTEN DISCUSSED HERE, SUCH AS MONEY AND THE MILITARY. IN THE 1960s, GENERAL DE GAULLE WANTED GOLD AS THE WORLD EXCHANGE STANDARD. THE US DUMPED THIS IDEA TO INSTALL FIAT PAPER MONEY — THE US DOLLAR — WHICH BECAME THE MEASURING STICK FOR DEBT. DEBT IS A WEAPON. LIKE IN MANY OTHER AREAS, MOST COUNTRIES DEBT ARE RIGOROUSLY CONTROLLED, WHILE THE US MAKE OTHER COUNTRIES PAY FOR THEIR OWN.

THE US HAVE 867 MILITARY BASES SPREAD OVER MOST CONTINENTS, IN ORDER TO INTIMIDATE RECALCITRANTS AND “PROTECT THE US INTERESTS”, MEANING STEALING OIL AND OTHER RESOURCES LIKE THEY ARE PRESENTLY DOING IN SYRIA UNDER FALSE PRETENCES.

 

READ:  

the heartland explained...

 

AND NOW FOR THE HIGH JUMP:

 

Capable of the worst, the union of certain rulers makes World War possible

 

by Thierry Meyssan 

While we react with fear to the resurgence of fascist, Nazi or Japanese imperial groups, we fail to see that it was not these ideologies that provoked World War, but the alliance of rulers ready for the worst. The same configuration is about to be repeated with other groups. In a few months, if we do not react now, a Third World War may be possible.

 

The Second World War can serve as a lesson to us. It did not appear in a serene sky. It was not a battle of the Good guys against the Bad guys. It was just triggered by an unforeseen gathering of forces capable of destroying everything.

After the economic crisis of 1929, the whole world was convinced, and rightly so, that the capitalism of that time was over. The Soviet Union alone offered an alternative, Bolshevism. Soon the United States came up with a second alternative, the structural reforms of the New Deal, and then Italy promoted a third alternative, fascism. The great Anglo-Saxon capitalists chose to support a new regime, close to fascism, Nazism. They thought that Germany would attack the USSR, thus preserving their interests threatened by both Bolshevik collectivisations and US economic reforms. However, nothing worked out as planned, since Italy, Germany and Japan formed the Axis with their own logic and the war was not started against the Soviets, but against the great fortunes that prepared it.

In the collective imagination, we do not hold responsible the great Anglo-Saxon capitalists who supported Nazism at its beginning. On the contrary, we remember the British and American people as having participated in the victory.

From this experience we must learn that the most skilful plans can escape their promoters. Peace was threatened by the alliance of three very different regimes, Fascism, Nazism and Hakkō ichiu. None of the international relations scholars and other geopoliticians of the time foresaw this union. All of them, without exception, were wrong.

What these three ideologies had in common was that they wanted to change the world order without regard to the human consequences of their actions. This does not mean that their opponents were democratic and peaceful, far from it, but only that they refrained from exterminating entire peoples.

Let’s not mistake the adversary. We must be very vigilant, not to a particular type of political regime, but to the fact that states governed by men capable of the worst ever unite. The current danger is neither fascism, nor Nazism, nor Hakkō ichiu, three ideologies marked by their time and which do not correspond to anything today. What we must protect ourselves from, above all, is a global alliance between ideologies capable of the worst.

This is exactly what is about to happen: the current leaders of the US State Department, the government in Kiev and the next government in Tel Aviv have no limits. The union of the "Straussians", the Ukrainian "integral" nationalists and the Israeli "revisionist Zionists" can, without any qualms, plunge the world into a Third World War. Fortunately, the CIA does not share their ideas, the government in Kiev is constrained by Russian military intervention, and the Israeli Prime Minister’s coalition has not yet formed its government.

 THE U.S. "STRAUSSIANS”

This small group of about a hundred people controls the foreign policy of the United States, including the Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, his deputy, Victoria Nuland, and the National Security Advisor, Jacob Sullivan.

It is in line with the thinking of the Jewish philosopher Leo Strauss [1] for whom democracies showed their weaknesses during the 1930s. The only way to ensure that the next anti-Semitic regime does not massacre them is for the Jews to set up their own dictatorship; to be on the side of the hammer and not of the nail.

The "Straussians" have already shown what they are capable of by organizing the 9/11 attacks and by launching various wars to destroy the "wider Middle East".

It is amazing that, despite the controversies that tore the US ruling class apart during the Bush Jr. administration, most of today’s politicians are unaware of who the Straussians are.

 

THE UKRAINIAN "INTEGRAL NATIONALISTS”

This is a group comprising hundreds of thousands of people, perhaps millions. It originated in the First World War, but solidified during the interwar period, the Second World War and the Cold War [2].

They identify with the poet and criminal against humanity Dmytro Dontsov. They see themselves as Vikings ready to fight the last battle against evil, that is, according to them, against Russian civilization.

The term "integral nationalist" should not be misleading. Dontsov chose it in reference to the thought of the Frenchman Charles Maurras. Dontsov was never a patriot, nor a nationalist in the classical sense. He never defended either the Ukrainian people or the Ukrainian land. On the contrary.

The Ukrainian "integral nationalists" have, since 1919, shown what they are capable of. They have murdered more than 4 million of their fellow citizens, including 1.6 million Jews. Since 2014, they have waged a civil war that has cost the lives of about 20,000 of their fellow citizens. They also, in 1921, amputated their land from Galicia and Volhynia to pay in advance the Polish army against the USSR.

They made an alliance with the Straussians, in 2000, during a big congress in Washington, where the Straussian Paul Wolfowitz was the guest of honor.
It is very dangerous to claim, as NATO does, that the "integral nationalists" are marginal in Ukraine. Certainly, in the spirit of this organization, it is only a question of discrediting Russia’s discourse and mobilizing for Ukraine. But these people are now murdering, without trial, those of their fellow citizens who find themselves in Russian culture.

It is particularly dangerous to participate in the delirium of the "integral nationalists" as the Bundestag has just done by adopting a resolution on the "Holodomor", i.e. the "genocide by hunger". The famine of 1932-33 was by no means caused by the Soviets in general, nor by Joseph Stalin in particular. It affected many other regions of the USSR than Ukraine. It is a climatic catastrophe. Moreover, in Ukraine itself, it did not affect the cities, but only the countryside because the Soviets decided to manage this shortage by feeding the workers rather than the peasants. To give credence to the myth of a planned genocide is to encourage anti-Russian hatred as the Nazis once encouraged anti-Jewish hatred.

ISRAELI "REVISIONIST ZIONISTS”

The "revisionist Zionists" represent about 2 million Israelis. They have managed to form a parliamentary majority by uniting several political parties behind Benjamin Netanyahu.
They claim to be inspired by the Ukrainian Vladimir Jabotinsky, the man who claimed that Palestine is "a land without a people, for a people without a land". In other words, Palestinian Arabs do not exist. They have no rights and must be expelled from their homes.

In September 1921, Jabotinsky formed a secret alliance with the Ukrainian "integral nationalist" anti-Semites, the first link in the developing Axis. This union aroused the indignation of the entire Jewish diaspora and Jabotinsky was expelled from the World Zionist Organization. In October 1937, Jabotinsky formed a new alliance with the anti-Semites of Marshal Rydz-Smigly, number 2 in Poland behind Józef Piłsudski. He was again rejected by the Jewish diaspora.

At the very beginning of World War II, Jabotinsky chose Bension Netanyahu, Benjamin’s father, as his private secretary.

It is appalling that, 75 years after the establishment of the State of Israel, most people continue to lump together different, and often opposing, views solely on the basis of the religion of those who profess them.

Revisionist Zionism" is the opposite of the Zionism of Nahum Goldman and the World Jewish Congress. It has no concern for the Jewish people and has therefore not hesitated to form alliances with anti-Semitic armed forces.

The "revisionist Zionists", including Menahem Beguin and Ariel Sharon, have shown what they are capable of with the Nakba; the forced expulsion of the majority of the Arab population of Palestine in 1948. It is this crime, whose memory haunts both Arabs and Israelis, that makes peace in Palestine impossible to this day.

Benjamin Netanyahu formed an alliance with the Straussians in 2003 at a large closed-door congress in Jerusalem [3]. Since the election of Volodymyr Zelensky, of whom he has become a personal friend, Netanyahu has also renewed Jabotinsky’s alliance with the "integral nationalists".

 

THE AXIS IS CONSTITUTED.

The common ideology of the new Axis

Just as Italian Fascism, German Nazism, and Japanese Hakkō ichiu had little to do with each other, so did the Straussians, the "integral nationalists," and the "revisionist Zionists" think differently and pursue distinct goals. Only the Nazis were so anti-Semitic as to seek to kill an entire people. The fascists despised the Jews, but did not seek to exterminate them. The Japanese never engaged in this hatred and even protected the Jews in their own country and in the territories they occupied. In the same way, today if the "integral nationalists" are obsessively against Russian culture and wish to kill all Russians, men, women and children, the Straussians despise them without wishing to exterminate them, and the "revisionist Zionists" pursue other objectives.

Each of these three isolated groups represents a danger to specific populations, but all three together threaten all of humanity. They share a cult of violence and power. They have shown that they can engage in wars of extermination. All three consider that their time has come. However, not only do they have to overcome their internal oppositions, but their axis is still uncertain. For example, the Straussians have just warned the "revisionist Zionists" about the possible expansion of Jewish settlements in the Palestinian territories.

 Thierry Meyssan Translation 
Roger Lagassé  READ MORE:https://www.voltairenet.org/article218494.html  IN GALICIAN "UKRAINE", THE JEWS AND THE FASCISTS (NAZIS) HAVE FORMED AN ALLIANCE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE IN ORDER TO DEFEAT THE RUSSIANS AND TAKE OVER THE HEARTLAND.  FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.................