SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
2023 — it's going to be a long slog....Every now and then, American voters get a reminder that they have no real voice in how their country is run. Mitch McConnell, the top-ranking Republican in the US Senate, made that abundantly clear a few days before Christmas, when he revealed that those constituents who wanted their real needs addressed would again be getting only coal in their stockings. “Providing assistance for the Ukrainians to defeat the Russians, that’s the No. 1 priority for the United States right now, according to most Republicans,” the 80-year-old Kentuckian told reporters on Capitol Hill while praising the $1.7 trillion spending bill that was then sailing through Congress. “That’s sort of how we see the challenges confronting the country at the moment.”
BY TONY COX
It wasn’t entirely clear which Republicans McConnell was talking about, those folks he sees wanting -- more than anything else -- for our government to help kill Russians. He couldn’t have meant the Republicans who are asked to vote for Team GOP every time an election rolls around. Heading into November’s US midterm elections, the Ukraine crisis wasn’t among the top dozen issues that voters cited as major concerns, according to polling by Rasmussen Reports. Rather, Americans were highly concerned about soaring inflation, the economy, violent crime, illegal immigration and energy policy. Only one in five respondents considered the Ukraine conflict “very important,” the lowest level among all 16 issues that Rasmussen listed. More recently, a Gallup poll conducted in December found that less than 1% of Americans see Russia as the top problem facing the US. Respondents were most troubled by their own government, inflation and the nation’s sputtering economy. The public’s growing indifference about the Eastern European crisis shows, yet again, that the legacy media has lost its ability to set the agenda. Republicans, in fact, are beyond being merely fed up with the Ukraine hype. Many have turned against continuing to fund what some of their representatives have promoted as a “proxy war.” A Morning Consult poll conducted just before the midterms showed that most Republicans wanted less US involvement in foreign military conflicts, fewer troop deployments overseas and reduced involvement in the affairs of other countries. Around the same time, a Wall Street Journal poll revealed that nearly half of Republican voters oppose US aid to Ukraine, up from only 6% when the same question was asked shortly after Russia’s military offensive began in February. That message clearly didn’t get through to McConnell’s Senate Republicans, and the party failed to win control of the chamber as its candidates fared worse than expected in the midterms. In the House of Representatives, Republicans swung from a seven-seat minority to a nine-seat majority, regaining control for the first time since Democrat Nancy Pelosi (California) took the speaker’s gavel in January 2019. The GOP’s gains came after McConnell’s counterpart in the House, Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, suggested three weeks before the midterms that Republicans might halt or slow the aid gravy train to Kiev when they regained control. “I think people are gonna be sitting in a recession, and they’re not going to write a blank check to Ukraine.” Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, went so far as to say that “not another penny will go to Ukraine”after the GOP wins back the House. However, the tune began to change when the politicians no longer needed to beg for votes. After the midterms, senior Republican congressmen Michael McCaul (Texas) and Mike Turner (Ohio) assured an ABC News interviewer that “majorities on both sides of the aisle” will still support infinite military aid to Ukraine. McCaul even suggested that it would be perfectly fine for Ukrainian forces to attack targets in Crimea, since the US and its allies didn’t recognize the region as Russian territory. When the $1.7 trillion spending bill, including $45 billion in additional aid for Ukraine, came up for a vote in the House on December 23, nine Republicans joined Democrats in voting for its passage. In the Senate, 18 of 50 Republicans voted in favor, giving Democrats the help they needed to pass the bill. Republicans haven’t even been able to impose basic oversight measures on Ukraine aid, much less shrink or suspend the effort. A bill to audit the $100 billion program was defeated in the House on December 8. When GOP Senator Rand Paul (Kentucky) demanded that an oversight provision be added to a $40 billion Ukraine aid bill in May, Democrats and Republicans alike steamrolled him and pushed through their legislation. Auditing measures might stand a better chance of passing the House with Republicans taking control of the chamber in January, but the Senate would likely block any such bill from becoming law. The Dems will get plenty of help, too, from McConnell and other neoconservative Republicans in the Senate. Republicans and Democrats can put on a good show when it comes to transgender restroom policies and other farcical issues. But when it comes to the most non-negotiable issue in Washington, war, political polarization evaporates. The establishment uniparty can always agree to send more rocket launchers, drop more bombs and overthrow more governments. That’s what former presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard discovered when she spoke out against US regime-change wars. Then a Hawaii Democrat branded by CNN as the “next superstar” in her party, the Iraq War veteran suddenly became persona non grata when she criticized America’s military interventions around the globe. Party leaders and media propagandists condemned her as a Russian agent. She quit the party in October. McConnell’s mocking of Republican voters – announcing that party leaders will prioritize the exact opposite of what constituents want and gaslighting them about what they’ve asked for – marks the latest window into Washington’s broken political system. America’s supposedly representative form of government has devolved into a ruling class that governs with no regard for the best interests of the people while playing divide-and-conquer games to keep the tribes distracted and warring with each other. Donald Trump threatened to shatter the status quo when he was elected president in 2016. Remember his pledge to “drain the swamp?” Well, the swamp won. Trump lacked the political courage to push through the “America First” agenda that he sold to voters, partly because of the Russia collusion hoax. Although he campaigned on a pledge to “get along with Russia,” collaborating on such common interests as fighting ISIS – and voters supported him, expressing their democratic will – Trump instead played tough with Moscow. With political opponents and media outlets accusing him of being a Russian agent, Trump foolishly backed away from what he promised to voters. He bragged in 2018 that “there’s never been a president as tough on Russia as I have been,” as if that was a measure of success. Russia policy was among several areas where Trump and his party declined or failed to represent voter desires and interests. Even while controlling the executive branch and both houses of Congress, the Republicans didn’t deliver on promises to build a border wall and repeal Obamacare. And less than a week after winning the 2016 election, Trump quashed any suggestion that he would actually seek to bring Hillary Clinton to justice, as his supporters wanted. The “lock her up” chants and his debate quip to the Democrat nominee that she’d be in jail if he were president were all just theatrics. When Trump ordered an end to the US military intervention in Syria, the Pentagon essentially thumbed its nose at the commander-in-chief. To this day, hundreds of US troops remain in Syria, without legal justification and in violation of that nation’s sovereignty. Trump’s signature legislative achievement was a $1.5 trillion tax cut. The federal budget deficit continued to rise, and the nation’s southern border remained porous. Deportations of illegal aliens were lower during Trump’s term, on average, than during Barack Obama’s eight years as president. It wasn’t the first time. For decades, Republicans have campaigned on promises to secure the border, but even when the GOP controlled the Congress and the White House, the illegal immigration crisis only got worse. Just as the ruling establishment demands that the war machine be kept humming, it insists on a steady inflow of cheap, illegal labor, suppressing the wages of US citizens. These policies clearly aren’t in the interests of rank-and-file Americans. Nor does it help US taxpayers – or the Ukrainian people – to prolong the fighting in Eastern Europe by sanctioning Moscow and continuing to funnel billions of dollars’ worth of weapons to Kiev. Nor was it in our interests to help overthrow Ukraine’s elected government in 2014 and undermine Russia’s national security by pushing for Kiev to join NATO. Voters can plainly see that the results of these tactics are ruinous. Consumers in the West, especially Western Europe, face a dark, cold and hungry winter amid energy shortages and the highest inflation rates in 40 years. Not to worry, though, because McConnell, President Joe Biden and other members of the pro-war uniparty insist that this struggle more than justifies the sacrifices they’re imposing on everyone. You see, they say, we have a “moral obligation” to defend freedom and democracy in Ukraine. Never mind that Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky’s corrupt regime has banned political opposition, shut down all independent media outlets and persecuted the country’s largest church. In the eyes of Washington’s uniparty, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom to politically oppose the ruling party aren’t necessary components of a free and democratic country. So we enter a new year with a new Congress and the same old sacred cows in Washington. The bigger problem this time is that escalating US involvement in Ukraine is pushing us all closer to a planet-ending war with Russia, holder of the world’s largest nuclear weapons arsenal. The stakes are higher than when Washington launches an illegal invasion in the Middle East or imports a few million additional illegal aliens. With such politicians as Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, calling for regime change in Moscow, the uniparty’s latest gambit in defiance of voter interests could cost us all a lot more than higher inflation and lower wages.
READ MORE: https://www.rt.com/news/569202-republicans-defy-voters-on-ukraine-policy/
|
User login |
generous half-price....
MOSCOW (Sputnik) - Russia's Finance Ministry on Friday published a list of conditions for the withdrawal of companies from unfriendly countries from Russia, obliging them to sell their stock at a discount of 50% of their market value.
The ministry's commission for monitoring foreign investment in Russia has defined the conditions, compliance with which will generally be taken into account when granting permission to companies from unfriendly countries to withdraw from Russian assets.
The first condition is "availability of independent assessment of market value of assets."
Second, the sale of assets should be carried out "with a discount of no less than 50% of the market value of the corresponding assets."
Third, it is necessary to "establish key performance indicators for new shareholders."
The fourth condition is "availability of installment payment for 1-2 years and (or) obligation to voluntarily transfer of funds to the federal budget in amount of not less than 10% of the amount of the transaction," the ministry's document read.
In addition, the amount of profit to be paid should not exceed 50% of the net profit for the previous year.
The commission will also take into account "the results of retrospective analysis of the payment of profit (dividends) for previous periods" and the willingness of foreign shareholders to continue commercial activities in Russia.
The positions of federal executive authorities and the Central Bank concerning the significance of the organization's activities and their impact on the technological and production sovereignty of Russia, its social and economic development, will also be taken into consideration.
Federal executive authorities should also establish "quarterly key performance indicators for organizations" and there should be "a possibility of quarterly payment of dividends if the organization fulfills the established key performance indicators."
Russian President Vladimir Putin previously imposed an overall ban restricting ability of investors from unfriendly countries to exit from Russian investments in certain industries without specific presidential permission.
READ MORE:
https://sputniknews.com/20221231/moscow-expects-unfriendly-states-companies-to-sell-stakes-in-russian-assets-at-half-price-1105942926.html
READ FROM TOP.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
the crystal ball.....
The Collins English Dictionary's word of the year for 2022 is permacrisis, which means the result of a series of disasters, prolonged through instability and insecurity. According to Alex Beecroft, this word "quite succinctly sums up how terrible 2022 has been for many".
On the edge of Europe, in the historical territory of Russia, the biggest armed conflict since the Second World War is taking place. The US proxy war in Ukraine has brought to the surface memories of the Cuban missile crisis and the nuclear war of the Cold War. Finland's bloodthirsty power (fake) media has been fully involved in the front of the information war in the West.
The sharp increase in food and energy costs has caused the highest inflation since the 1980s in many countries. This is described in The Economist magazine as "the biggest macroeconomic challenge of the modern era of central banking", although it is clear that big capital circles have caused yet another economic crisis by their own actions.
However, the biggest ongoing upheaval is geopolitical. The US-led post-war world order has been challenged; first by Vladimir Putin's Russia, but also with the ever-decreasing relations between Joe Biden's United States and Xi Jinping's China.
However, the United States quite easily harnessed the European countries into an almost self-destructive hybrid war against Russia; after all, the euro management is in the pocket of the same hostile elite as the politicians in Washington.
In the minds of some Finnish NATO fanatics, this new arrival of the "transatlantic alliance" has revived the idea of a defiant West, which would still rise from the midst of the current crises, to a new hegemonic flourish.
In reality, the gap between the West and other countries has only grown in recent years. Most of the world's people live in countries that do not support Western sanctions on Russia, and they are not interested in the "regional conflict" in Ukraine, let alone the constant begging for money, weapons and sympathy by the actor president of that corrupt non-state.
The Chinese leadership, on the other hand, openly rejects the "universal values" represented by the United States and its partners, on which the Western order is based. The separation of the world's two largest economies is becoming a reality. Cracks have also appeared in other long-term geopolitical certainties, such as the alliance of convenience between the United States and Saudi Arabia.
Climate issues have also been in the spotlight this year, from floods in Pakistan to heat waves in Europe and now winter storms in the US and Japan. Scientists are no longer allowed to talk about a "mini-ice age" caused by a possible temporary lull in solar activity, but capricious weather and snowy winters can still be expected. Despite such future prospects, the politicians pushing the green transition are ready to make decisions that are unsustainable in terms of energy policy.
The rise in energy prices has worsened macroeconomic instability. Consumer prices already accelerated in the beginning of 2022, when the reviving demand faced the post-coronavirus supply constraints. As energy and food prices skyrocketed, inflation turned from a temporary spike in prices into a longer-term problem.
So what will happen in 2023? Will the geopolitical, energy-political and economic-political crisis tangle become even more complicated? In the short term, the answer, according to many experts, is bleak. A large part of the world will be in recession in 2023, and in many places the weak state of the economy may also worsen the socio-political outlook.
There are numerous reasons why 2023 will be a dangerous year. If and when the narrative maintained by the western media falls apart, what will the "people of Tolku" think? Every crisis creates new opportunities, and in the midst of the current turmoil, a new international order is taking shape. What do central banks and asset management companies do? Will Eurasian counter-hegemonic forces rise, overturning the power of the West?
READ MORE:
https://markkusiira.com/2022/12/29/permakriisin-vuosi-ja-euraasian-vastahegemonia/
READ FROM TOP.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
old and fading....
WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell suddenly stopped speaking during a weekly Republican leadership news conference Wednesday afternoon, appearing to freeze, and then went silent and was walked away.
McConnell, R-Ky., had been making his opening remarks about an annual defense policy bill when he stopped talking. He was silent for 19 seconds. His Republican colleagues asked whether he was OK, and a top McConnell deputy, Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, a physician, escorted McConnell, 81, away from the cameras and reporters.
Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa made a hand gesture that initially appeared to resemble the sign of the cross. Her office later clarified that she was motioning for Senate Minority Whip John Thune of South Dakota.
A few minutes later, McConnell walked back to the news conferenceby himself. Asked about his health, he said he was fine. Asked whether he is fully able to do his job, he said, "Yeah."
Asked about the episode, an aide pointed to McConnell’s saying, “I’m fine,” but the aide added that McConnell “felt lightheaded and stepped away for a moment.”
"He came back to handle Q&A, which as everyone observed was sharp," the aide said.
McConnell spoke to reporters briefly Wednesday night as he left the Capitol and said, "The president called to check on me."
"I told him I got sandbagged," he joked.
A White House official and a spokesperson for the senator confirmed that President Joe Biden and McConnell spoke by phone Wednesday.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/watch-mitch-mcconnell-freeze-press-conference-rcna96486
READ FROM TOP.
SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REMvscvvrsw
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....