News that US forces stationed in Syria looted huge amount of oil has caught worldwide attention recently. In early August, the Syrian Oil Ministry said that the US and its mercenaries are stealing an average of 66,000 barrels of oil per day in Syria, about 80 percent of Syria's oil production.
By Global Times Published: Sep 14, 2022
"For the US, it is a game of high politics, but for the Syrians it is real suffering," said Syrian Ambassador to China Mhd. Hasanein Khaddam(Khaddam) in an exclusive interview with Global Times (GT) reporter Wang Wenwen.
GT: Recently, the US' stealing Syrian oil has attracted worldwide attention. Through which channel does the US steal? What does it do with the oil?
Khaddam: The US stealing Syrian national treasure is a long-time crime. In fact, the US' occupation forces on Syrian territories have continued what ISIS was doing - stealing and destroying oil fields and pipelines machinery. The US' occupation forces learned all that from ISIS, and followed the same ISIS deeds, no difference whatsoever, to steal the Syrian oil in tanks on weekly, and sometimes daily basis, and smuggle it outside the country.
Just search on the net you will read many quotes by former US president Donald Trump saying that the US army is in Syria for oil, while the current US administration has its own claims. The two administrations have been stealing Syrian oil and gas, the same way ISIS did.
What matters for the Syrian people is they are deprived of their natural wealth, which is stolen midday. The crime is stealing, and the thief is "the leader of the free world" or the worst terrorist group. They share the same vision and policies and commit the same crimes. Please notice that the US is the richest country in the world, stealing a third world country, and imposing illegal unilateral measures to suffocate the economy and people of this country , and "starve and freeze the people to death' as one US politician described US policies in Syria.
GT: The Syrian Oil Ministry once said that the US and its mercenaries are stealing an average of 66,000 barrels of oil per day in Syria, about 80 percent of Syria's oil production. What are the losses to Syria? What is the impact on the Syrian economy and society?
Khaddam: There are direct losses of $24.2 billion until the end of the first half of 2022. Among them, $18.2 billion result from extraction, smuggling and illegal trade in Syrian oil, gas and mineral resources under the auspices, protection and support of the US forces illegally present in Syria. $3.2 billion result from sabotage and theft of facilities for the extraction and transportation of Syrian oil, gas and mineral resources by armed terrorist groups, and $2.8 billion result from bombing and aggression carried out by the forces of the so-called illegal "international coalition" on the Syrian oil and gas facilities.
The indirect losses totaled $82.9 billion which represents the values of lost Syrian production of crude oil, natural gas, LNG, various oil derivatives, and mineral wealth. The decline in production of planned rates within the framework of normal working conditions, came as a result of the crimes of sabotage, destruction, theft and illegal trade, which are being committed by armed terrorist groups and separatist armed groups that exist and are active in the areas of oil, gas and mineral resources fields, under the cover of the illegal American forces occupation.
The US aim of stealing Syrian oil is to cut Syria from its own oil. While we used to export electricity to Jordan and Lebanon, now we don't have the oil to generate electricity. We were sufficient in gas. Now gas is a treasure for Syrian families that need about 70 days to change a gas cylinder. It's real suffering. In winter nights, the temperature is always minus in many parts of Syria. It's really cold. We don't have the heating oil, and we don't have the electricity to use for heating and cooking.
The losses are not about wealth. Syria is now importing. Instead of using your own, you are buying at the international market price. The Americans and their agents were also burning crops so that the Syrians don't have it.
GT: Where did the oil theft begin? Can Syria stop it? What can other countries do to stop the US from stealing oil?
Khaddam: If you wait for Western media to write about this crime, just look for the past seven years, there is hardly any coverage. In fact, Syria raised the issue repeatedly with the UNSG and the presidencies of the UNSC. But we are grateful to friendly countries such as China and Russia and many other friends, that expressly called on the US to stop their robbery of Syrian national wealth and asked the US to recompense the Syrian people their stolen national wealth.
I don't think the US feels ashamed of what it is doing, even if what they are doing is a replay of what ISIS did before. The way to stop them is when truth becomes more public knowledge.
Syria is a strategically independent country, and does not accept dictates from other countries. They want Syria to be an agent country of them. Syria seeks friendships with all countries of the world, based on mutual respect of national interests, and the principles of international laws, dialogues in the light of the day. We don't have anything to hide. What we have is the confidence that we will be winning in the end.
GT: As far as you know, is the US stealing oil also happening in other Middle East countries?
Khaddam: I don't want to give examples, but we know the record of American invasions and wars all over the world. You don't need more evidence.
GT: The US military has deployed troops and military equipment in northeastern Syria, and the Pentagon claims that it is to prevent oil fields in the region from falling into the hands of terrorists. What do you think is the real purpose of the US military?
Khaddam: It's self-contradictory, because they are hosting the terrorists and training them. The US uses terrorism as a tool in its foreign policy.
The Americans have their own agenda to reshape the region to fit their own interests. We really follow with amazement the US preaching of rules-based order in East Asia and other geographies, and compare their words with their deeds in the Middle East. It is hypocrisy of high caliber. Just look at the US policy in the Middle East and you can tell the real implementation of this rules-based order - robbery, destruction, perpetual wars for more than 60 or 70 years. They have managed and succeeded in creating the most unstable region in the world.
It's totally immoral, but they are masters of ambiguity and with ambiguity and playing with semantics, the devil becomes an angel. This is what's going on not only in the Middle East, but also in other areas, even in East Asia. They call it constructive ambiguity, which cannot be more destructive.
GT: The US military presence in Syria has been for more than seven years. What is the attitude of the Syrian people toward US military presence?
Khaddam: How do you believe the Syrian people would look at the country that is starving them and destroying and stealing their national treasures? If you ask, how do you feel if you are facing the thief that is robbing your country of his treasures? For the US, it is an international game for hegemony, i.e to divide this country because we couldn't handle it. For them it is a game of high politics, but for the Syrians it is real suffering.
GT: You have worked in the Syrian embassy in the US, and you have also worked in the Syrian embassy in China. In your opinion, what are the differences between China's diplomatic philosophy and that of the US?
Khaddam: There is in no way you can compare. There is a country that looks for peace, grew up after one century of humiliation from the same countries that we suffer humiliation from and arose peacefully and achieve economically and scientifically, and has its own deep civilization. It throughout its history never invaded anybody or any country. I don't think there is any country that achieved more added value like China. Tradesmen came to China to buy Chinese products.
Let me sum up for you in a simple story how you would feel. During my stay I worked on the Congress, there was a bill against Syria that passed as "Syria Accountability Act." Congressmen we met then said that the bill is not related to Syria-US relations, it is internal US politics. So countries are used as bargaining chips to settle internal US scores.
There is hope for Syria and all developing world, which is the rise of Asia, and China in particular. What will change is the changing dynamics in international relations and the rise of civilizations. This will make the civilized area much wider. We hope that certain Western countries cope with the changes peacefully and learn from other civilizations how hard their people work, how to have deep memory and respect your grandfathers. That is what we wish they learn from Asia in general, and China in particular. It is high time hegemon stops being the free-rider of the equation of losers and winners of WWII. We are looking for a fairer, more representative world order built on multipolarity, which is being shaped now.
READ MORE:
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202209/1275233.shtml
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
friendly visit.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsbGQmpvlgA
For the first time in more than a decade, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia welcomed a Russian warship armed with Tsirkon hypersonic missiles, Frigate "Admiral Gorshkov" in the Port of Jeddah. The ship docked there after visiting the Republic of Djibouti on a long-distance deployment to strengthen military cooperation.
NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)
THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.
CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954
A MEMORANDUM OF NON AGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.
EASY.
THE WEST KNOWS IT.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
US bomb syria.....
Could this just be a coincidence that the US has begun conducting airstrikes on Syria right after the announcement of a China brokered peace deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia? Following the announcement of this deal, it was revealed that the Saudis are also in talks with the Syrians to normalise ties. The China factor, it seems, is reshaping the Middle East in ways that leave little to no room for the US to manipulate the region’s geopolitics to its advantage. The US still has almost one-third of the Syrian territory under its control. With almost 900 troops, unaccounted-for Special Forces and contractors operating in Syria, the US has been able to prevent Syria’s unification for the past many years. But if Saudi Arabi’s ties with Syria become normal and if Turkey follows suit and withdraws its forces as well, it will further squeeze the space for the US to maintain its occupation of the Syrian territory. A military exit from Syria could further push the US out of the Middle East in a geopolitical sense. Hence, the US efforts to reignite the flares of conflict to sabotage normalisation.
The US has a significant military presence in Syria and it is able to maintain it via its airbases spread in the region, including the one in Qatar that Washington most recently used to strike the Iran-backed groups in Syria. The US officially justifies its military presence in Syria to prevent the “return” of the Islamic State (ISIS, banned in Russia). But we know the US actually uses its presence either a) to keep significantly large portions of the Syrian oil under its control to prevent the war-torn country from recovering from years of war, and b) to prevent Iran from consolidating its position in Syria and put geopolitical pressure on Israel.
But both of these objectives are likely to become a lot harder to achieve in a reshaped Middle East that China (and Russia) are keen to create. A major breakthrough is likely to happen later this year, when Beijing will host a meeting of the Gulf Cooperation Council and Iran. Were Iran’s relations with the GCC to become normal, it would become extremely difficult for Israel and the US to project Iran as a “threat” to the Middle East and/or sell Iran’s nuclear programme posing an existential challenge for the Arab states. Presumably, any understanding between Iran and the GCC via China will be incomplete without a comprehensive understanding regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions, i.e., the will to make the bomb.
For the GCC states, following the Trump administration’s unilateral withdrawal from the JCPOA and the subsequent failure of the Joe Biden administration to revamp the deal, China is the best-placed geopolitical player to devise a workable deal between Iran and the GCC to the exclusion of the US, EU, and Israel. Were Iran and the GCC ties to become normal and were Iran to be no longer seen as an enemy, the US will lose the support of its traditional allies in the region for maintaining a heavy military presence; hence, the US airstrikes in Syria on the Iran-backed militias to re-project Iran as the “real” enemy and troublemaker in the region.
The message the Biden administration has sent reads like this: if Iran can manage to attack the US forces, what’s going to prevent it from attacking other countries? But the message that the GCC is receiving from China (and Iran) is completely different. It reads: China needs a stable Middle East for its Belt and Road Initiative to come to fruition. Iran – like many other GCC countries – needs China for various reasons, including selling oil in return for investment. Therefore, it will make no sense at all for Iran to “attack” GCC countries directly or indirectly (e.g., via the Houthis based in Yemen), create instability, jeopardise Beijing’s interests, and compromise its vital economic interests tied to Beijing.
As far as Iran is concerned, it understands that Saudi ties with the US are far from ideal. Saudi is selling most of its oil to China and the former has repeatedly declined US “requests” to increase oil production to bring the prices down. In Riyadh, there seems to be a real political will to move decisively away from over-reliance on the US and align with China. Iran, therefore, also has a similar level of confidence in the China factor that the GCC countries have.
For Washington, this is a very serious development that it has no means to undo diplomatically. Due to very bad ties, Washington is unable to influence the Saudis and the latter being the most powerful state in the GCC, Washington is unable to influence the bloc as well. Since the US lacks the necessary diplomatic channels to exert influence, it is forced to resort to the only means it has on the ground: the military.
Will it succeed? Mere military strikes may not be enough for the US to influence the larger geopolitical process of normalisation. Therefore, the US might need to re-activate an old asset: jihadi militias. In fact, as media reports indicate, these groups are already trying to break into the territories under Syrian control. Oleg Gurinov, deputy chief of the Russian Center for Reconciliation of the Opposing Parties in Syria, said on last Friday that “Militants from the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham terrorist group (banned in Russia) tried to break through into the government-controlled territory near the settlement of Urum al-Sugra in the Aleppo governorate.”
Taking cues from the old playbook, Washington, by manufacturing instability in the region, is re-creating conditions where it can project its relevance. A key problem for Washington is that it is unlikely to find the support from regional countries that it had during the peak of the Syrian war to support these militias directly or indirectly. Therefore, the chances of Washington finding any meaningful success to sabotage the China-led process are grim.
Salman Rafi Sheikh, research-analyst of International Relations and Pakistan’s foreign and domestic affairs, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.“
READ MORE:
https://journal-neo.org/2023/04/06/whys-the-us-doing-air-strikes-on-syria/
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....