Valérie Bugault holds a doctorate in law from the University of Paris — Panthéon-Sorbonne. In her thesis on business law, she developed a unified legal theory, described as "iconoclastic", of company law.

She worked as a tax lawyer in the field of financial exchange as well as in internal tax law before ceasing her career as a lawyer to devote herself to the analysis and sanitation of geopolitical economic issues.

In 2016, on the French-Saker website, she published a series of essays entitled "decrypting the global economic system", where she exposed tax havens and the international monetary system. She also co-wrote a book "The New SPIRIT of Laws and Money”, published in June 2017 by Sigest.

Valérie Bugault is counting on a financial and economic cleaning up of the planet, believing that it is high time to get out of the current state of affairs which favours tax havens.

TRANSLATION/ADAPTATION BY JULES LETAMBOUR

——————————

BY Valérie Bugault

At the express request of the Charles-de-Gaulle Foundation, I have agreed to clarify somewhat the legal and political context in which a new, legally very preposterous form of business, the “company WITH A MISSION STATEMENT".

Published on April 16, 2023 by Le Saker Francophone.

With such friends [WITH A MISSION], “participation” no longer needs enemies.

Contextualisation of the debate

The mission of the business company results naturally from its unique SOCIAL position.

We must start by specifying that giving companies a “mission” is in no way an innovation in relation to the existence of the corporate purpose. Indeed, it is the corporate purpose that explains the mission of the company, there is no need to add other missions; except, of course, to pursue a political objective that has nothing to do with the free and honest organisation of the economy, via the concept of enterprise.

This new “company mission” is in fact an additional regulatory constraint intended to weigh on entrepreneurs – who are already tired of all the existing ones. In order not to appear for what it is, this new constraint is deployed on a “voluntary basis”, at least initially, during a test period.

There is no doubt that this volunteering will, one day, be transformed into a compulsory legal form in order to respond, under the pretext of climate change, to the ecological objective known as "zero carbon", widely conveyed at the global level by organisations such as the IPCC, COP 21, the UN and Davos.

[GUSNOTE: CLIMATE CHANGE IS AN IMPORTANT ISSUE, BUT THIS ISSUE IS USED AS AN UNDERHANDED CONTROL MECHANISM OF MAKING THE RICH RICHER AND TRANSFORMING THE WORKING CLASS INTO SUBSERVIENT SLAVES.] 

Infiltration of Anglo-Saxon law in continental law countries

When we have EXPOSED for a long time, the methods of infiltration of Anglo-Saxon commercial and maritime law into our traditional [EUROPEAN] law, it is easy to detect the methodology that the Anglo-Saxons improperly call soft law (non-binding legal instruments). Improperly because, if the first appearance presents itself as being soft — understanding not obligatory — the final result never is: on the contrary, we are indeed in binding law, or hard law.

In this case, with the "mission society" we are in an intermediate phase of optional positive law, in other words optional hard law. The regulatory creativity of the economic dominators definitely has no limits.

Imperialist and globalist origin of Anglo-Saxon commercial-maritime law

This commercial-maritime law was developed for the needs of the imperialist cause developed by Olivier Cromwell; it was entirely ab initio under the financial control of the City of London.

[THE CITY OF LONDON IS LIKE A FREEPORT WITHIN THE ENGLISH SYSTEM OF TRADE. IT CONTROLS MORE THAN 50 PER CENT OF THE TAX HAVENS AROUND THE WORLD]

This type of “law” has spread widely at the international level, via numerous ad hoc institutions. Among these institutions, the British “East-India Company” occupies a special place: that of developing a model for the extraterritorial development of the British financial state. This pattern is found today in the “World Economic Forum” (WEF) which meets regularly in Davos. This “WEF” is nothing other than the global synthesis of “international chambers of commerce” acting under the direction of British high finance.

This entity, the WEF, aims to achieve widespread wealth grabbing. Its traditional modes of expression are genocide and slavery, on the precise model of what were the India Companies, particularly the British and Dutch companies, which historically developed around what is agreed today to call the "public-private partnership" (PPP).

Remember that this term PPP really and precisely means the privatisation of profits, which only benefit the bankers who provide financing, and the pooling of losses, which are exclusively borne by the citizen taxpayers who are victims, who have never had any control over the decisions that generated the said losses.

It must be considered that if France had, during the 17th and 18th centuries, its own trading companies — in India and others countries — the latter, which accounted for their actions to the French political power, were never the extraterritorial development of the state itself. Quite different was the British model in which the Company projected, beyond the borders, the British Crown itself.

The nomadic and integrated version of a State without borders, specific to the Dutch-British model of the East India Company (EIC), which is fully found in the WEF, has never existed in France. In the French case, there can be no question of a world government, whereas the Dutch-British model itself conveys a model of a nomadic and stateless financial world controlling state.

The mission company is the exact negation of the French continental law model

The “mission Company” role-playing game

The “Mission Company” plays the same game that the “Trust” played in its day: the smooth integration of the grabbing of the economy by the small caste of stateless bankers developed from the City of London.

Remember that in matters of war, it is always preferable for its instigators to follow the model of voluntary servitude and to advance its pawns with the consent of the victims.

Economic enslavement via the company is done by means of the termination of all the principles at the origin of continental civil law, followed by their replacement by the commercial-maritime regulations carried by Anglo-Saxon law, as it has developed since the time of the East India Companies.

The pre-eminence of commercial law over civil law, presently promoted both by European authorities and by French lawyers misguided by the commercialist cause, is not stricto sensu Law, it is a concept of regulation, for and by private interests, which is the exact opposite of the traditional concept of law carried by continental law.

The company with a mission — an underhanded means for the disappearance of the "freedom of enterprise"

The "company with a mission" plays the role of trickster, of “avant guarde" allowing the French to get used to the future disappearance of the "freedom of enterprise" since the banking support of these companies will depend on the future conformity of their claimed mission to the “zero carbon” cause newly invented and promoted by the great fundraisers of this world!

It should be noted, because the thing is both typical and pathetic, that this "mission society" has precisely adorned itself with the virtues of the need to liberate the company in order, in fine, to advance towards the opposite objective, that to bind companies permanently.

The fair denunciation of financialisation and capitalistic appropriation by the initiators of this law has, in the end, for only purpose the disappearance of freedom of enterprise since the existence of any society will henceforth be officially dependent of the financial "fait du prince” [arbitrary decision], that is to say of the bank providing credit and engaged in the race for "zero carbon".

Thus, business as usual (we do not change a winning method), the alleged need to free the company will serve to facilitate the definitive chaining of the latter to the goodwill, as surreal as it is dystopian, of the big money-makers, very concentrated, of this world. This “good will” will only revolve around a single objective: that of the [say fake] decarbonisation that they arbitrarily impose on the world.

The mission-driven enterprise is the exact negation of participation

It is interesting to note that the promoters of the “mission society” also claim, nothing less, than an imaginary filiation with the social doctrine of the Church at the origin of the concept of participatory society.

Once again, it is a question of promoting an image in total non-correlation, in radical opposition, with reality. Neither the social doctrine of the Church, nor the participatory enterprise have ever had as their objective the disappearance of the freedom of enterprise or its enslavement — to any objective other than the free choice of the determination of the social object by its creators.

The sole objective of the concept of "participation", which finds its source in the social doctrine of the Church of the 19th century, is to give back to the people — who act daily in the company, by contributing their work and their creative force — the status that has been stolen from them because of the statutory monopolisation of decision-making power by shareholders contributing capital.

Claiming to transform, as the company with a mission does, shareholder capitalism into stakeholder capitalism, known as “stakeholders”, has the sole objective, in the current state of capitalism, of further concentrating finances, by placing the system entirely in the hands of the bankers providing funds, who are now focusing on a single cause: decarbonisation. 

[Note: Stakeholder capitalism is the idea that businesses have a responsibility that extends beyond their shareholders. Employees, the media, and investors are urging businesses to take a stand on issues that affect their wider communities and create greater equality. This is a deceit to concentrate money in the hands of the rich and corporations.]

On the merits, it is obvious for any jurist trained in continental law that the company is, in itself and without any other subterfuge, a form of social organisation, by hypothesis included in political society. It is just as obvious that in traditional continental law the public entity that is the State has sole responsibility for regulating the economy, in particular by regulating business, and that the objective of this regulation is to develop the political group, understood as a collective principle.

On the contrary, the mission society conveys the idea that globalist bankers regulate the business and economy of nations according to their sole supranational categorial interest; this interest is now displayed as being that of “decarbonisation”.

Society, whether civil or commercial, naturally has as its spontaneous objective the development of the community, of the group in the political sense of the term; which is also – by the way – the primary purpose of money. This collective interest is realised through the development of entrepreneurs who implement an idea, who carry out a project.

Business and currency have been misguided by Anglo-Saxon non-law which never ceases to subvert all the concepts of Civil Continental Law backed by natural law, based on autonomous and sovereign Nations, which have made "European civilisation" . This regulatory principle, which there would be no question of calling "Law", aims to make commercial companies dependent solely on the objectives of the high finance, identified and disseminated by the WEF, which met in Davos at the same time of writing this text.

Conclusion

By way of conclusion, it is interesting to note the names of the FRENCH organisations which promoted the untimely and inopportune "society with a mission": in addition, of course, to the Parliament composed of "representatives of the people" always ready to betray national interests, we find the Collège des Bernardins, the Montaigne Institute from the AXA group, the School of Mines in Paris. A whole industrial-financial program under the aegis of a Catholicism which has denied both its initial principles and the continental law of which it was the origin.

Behind the scenes of the "mission society", we find the vast program of the disappearance of free will, of the subversion of our State, our Law and our sovereignty, by categorical interests, which have become supranational, relayed by international organisations. such as the WEF and the UN.

Valérie Bugault

https://www.legrandsoir.info/la-societe-a-mission-antithese-de-la-participation.html 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....