SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
so far, we got lucky that Joe biden did not get the presidency until 2020... though unlucky, he got it then...WHEN JOE BIDEN WAS IN FULL compos mentis MODE, HE WAS A DANGEROUS GUY. HE WAS VICIOUS AND DUPLICITOUS. NOW, A DUMB SHADOW OF AN OLD DERANGED SENILE KOOK IN A RETIREMENT VILLAGE (THE WHITE HOUSE), ONE CAN SEE HE IS ONLY A CARDBOARD FIGURE PLACED LIKE A FIGUREHEAD OF A SINKING SHIP. THE IMAGE ABOVE COMES FROM OUR EXPOSURE OF JOE BIDEN BEING PROUD OF HAVING MADE YOUR LIFE A DESTINATION FOR STATE SPYING. THE PATRIOT ACT IS A DISGRACE... Hastily passed 45 days after 9/11 in the name of national security, the Patriot Act was the first of many changes to surveillance laws that made it easier for the government to spy on ordinary Americans by expanding the authority to monitor phone and email communications, collect bank and credit reporting records, and track the activity of innocent Americans on the Internet. While most Americans think it was created to catch terrorists, the Patriot Act actually turns regular citizens into suspects. JOE BIDEN MAY BE THE MOST OBVIOUS CROOKED PRESIDENT OF THE EMPIRE YET, THOUGH QUITE A FEW ARE UP THERE WITH HIM... BILL CLINTON, THE GEORGE BUSHES AND LET'S NOT FORGET SUAVE OBAMA. (MORE TO COME) SEE: https://yourdemocracy.net/drupal/node/40358
SEE ALSO: JOE BIDEN IS A DORKY SENILE OLD KOOK WHO HAS DONE A LOT OF MALICIOUS THINGS IN THE PAST (SEE HIS LYING WHEN TEARING DOWN SCOTT RITTER DURING A SENATE HEARING)....
SO, WE GOT LUCKY WE HAD FOUR YEARS OF SILLY TRUMP DOING CRAZY THINGS BUT NOT DECLARING WAR ON ANYONE... WHILE DISCREETLY MOPPING UP THE SHIT OF THE FORMER PRESIDENTS... GEORGE W BUSH WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RISE OF OBAMA AND OBAMA WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RISE OF TRUMP. TRUMP WAS GOING TO WIN IN 2020, BUT THE CROOKED BIDEN MACHINE LIED ABOUT THE HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP CONTENT BEING OF RUSSIAN ORIGIN... WE KNOW THIS WAS COMPLETE DISINFORMATION BY BLINKEN AND MORELL GETTING TOGETHER TO FUDGE THE TRUTH.... IF THIS IS NOT STEALING AN ELECTION, WHAT IS?
|
User login |
steptoe and son....
Hunter Biden’s attorneys asked the Office of Congressional Ethics to investigate Rep.Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) for her inflammatory rhetoric about the president’s son on Monday, days before his legal team is expected to meet with Justice Department prosecutors weighing federal charges against him.
READ MORE: https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn...
SEE MORE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfZsY6wPJTc
READ FROM TOP.
JOE IS THE FIGUREHEAD OF A SINKING SHIP? I READ A BOOK ONCE ABOUT A FEMALE SHIP FIGUREHEAD THAT HAD AN AFFAIR WITH AN OLD MALE WOODEN COUNTERPART... THIS OF COURSE BROUGHT BAD LUCK TO THE SHIPS AND BOTH SANK....
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
deal now.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ6OxyxnTiY&t=1120s
READ FROM TOP.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
shameless and shameful......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2e5SzxC5Os
READ FROM TOP....
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
censorship complex.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbdrVuZfosE
Mollie Hemmingway, Russ Vought, Gene Hamilton, and Rep. Dan Bishop speak on a panel at Heritage's 50th Anniversary Leadership Summit.
SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mSYjUhF3NI
The First Amendment forbids public officials from censoring disfavored speech and speakers. But what happens if public officials enlist private parties to do the censorship? In recent years, public officials and agencies have pressed social-media platforms to silence dissenting views on public health and other “misinformation,” insurers and financial institutions to drop clients engaged in unpopular or controversial advocacy, and health-care providers to dismiss attorneys challenging government policy. Further, there’s no way to know how many private decisions to silence speech and speakers have been influenced or coerced by government actors.
Is this phenomenon inevitable in an age of unprecedented opportunity to reach large audiences? Should there be greater transparency when public officials wield their power to influence the exercise of First Amendment rights? What’s the line between encouragement and coercion, and is that the right line to separate constitutional from unconstitutional censorship? What are the prospects that agencies will police themselves and refrain from wielding their power and influence to suppress dissension and debate? Should Congress or the President address third-party censorship and, if so, how exactly? Our panelists will address these questions and more.
SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhR95A0mfaU
AS MY OLD FRIEND JULES LETAMBOUR SAYS: "TUCKER CARLSON PRAYS LIKE AN UNWOKE LEFTY."...
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
still there.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O13mWVO5sw
READ FROM TOP.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....