SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
a time in history.... as remembered from a giles cartoon...Margaret Thatcher's courting of the Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was a complex diplomatic affair involving accusations of violence, unannounced visits and a strained Marxist joke, according to a top secret file released on Friday. Preparations for Gorbachev's first official visit to the UK in 1984 reveal the significance attached by Downing Street to improving personal relations with the man expected to be the next Soviet head of state. Thatcher had asked the Foreign Office to invite senior politburo members to London. In a handwritten comment on a letter from her foreign policy adviser, Charles Powell, she remarked: "Do not invite Mr Chernenko [then general secretary of the Communist party]. It is much too soon." The British ambassador in Moscow had warned in a telegram about his experience of meeting Konstantin Chernenko. "It was not the performance of an automaton," Sir Iain Sutherland wrote, "but it was pretty inept and confirmed the impression that, at least on international issues, the central figure in the Soviet leadership lacks authority and sophistication of thought." Gorbachev, by contrast, was recognised as being "intelligent and confident". His visit to the UK, Powell informed Thatcher, "will be a unique opportunity to try and get inside the minds of the next generation of Soviet leaders". Britain's objectives, another note suggested, "should be to teach him something about how a western democracy works, to establish personal and political links, [and] raise UK profile in Soviet eyes". Among preparatory briefing papers contained in the file, released to the National Archives in Kew, is a tentative note by Powell to the then prime minister. "I don't know if you intend to make any sort of speech at lunch," he inquires, "but I attach some notes which might serve as a basis. I'm not sure jokes will be appropriate, but in one of his letters to Engels (written in May 1868), Marx recalled that his mother once said: 'If only Karl had made Capital instead of just writing about it.'" It is not clear whether she ever used the line. There appears to have been a diplomatic misunderstanding over security guards. A message from the UK embassy in Moscow two weeks before the visit records that Gorbachev "was grateful for the PM's … agreement to increasing the numbers at the Chequers lunch. He claimed to have no knowledge of the problem of side-arms for his bodyguards." Gorbachev and his party arrived in London on 16 December. Minutes of their private lunchtime conversation show it was a frank exchange in which Thatcher accused Gorbachev of funding the miners' strike in Britain. "The Soviet Union's fellow communists who could not get their own way through the ballot box were opting for violence," she told him. "They were also getting help with finance from outside." Gorbachev countered her attack by insisting that the Soviet Union "had transferred no funds to the National Union of Mineworkers". Thatcher and the mineworkers were engaged in a bitter dispute. The note adds: "After a sideways glance at Mr Zamyatin, he amended this to: 'as far as I'm aware'." A detailed note by the British translator, KA Bishop, present at that and other meetings, provided further insights. Gorbachev, he said, had "great reserves of energy in him, well-harnessed". Bishop added: "A roguish twinkle was never far from his eye. (He even winked at me over his shoulder as I interpreted a neat parry of his to one of the prime minister's verbal thrusts.)" On two occasions, when the fate of dissidents inside the USSR was raised, the "unemotional mask" slipped. At the official opposition lunch Neil Kinnock, then Labour leader, provoked "an intemperate outburst of obscenities and threats by Gorbachev against 'turds' and spies like [the dissident Natan] Sharansky, who was in prison, 'that is where he will stay'." Gorbachev explained that his candour was a sign of the comradely nature of the meetings. "But the chill impression left by these instances remains," Bishop recorded. "We had glimpsed beneath the surface a man conscious of power and ready if needs be to exploit it ruthlessly." The day before he left, Gorbachev was being driven along Whitehall when he asked to make an unscheduled stop at Downing Street. The prime minister was away. "The accompanying Special Branch officer negotiated access to [Downing Street] with the policeman at the barrier (without informing us) and Gorbachev and party walked up." They were admitted to the front hall of Number 10. "They had gone before any private secretary reached the spot – reportedly in good humour." Gorbachev became general secretary of the Communist party in March 1985. ....What happens now? Further threats to Vladimir Putin’s rule? More signs of the Ukraine war spilling across the border into Russia? Mounting instability in the world’s foremost nuclear power? Whatever happens, we’ll be there, covering every minute of this war and its consequences, as we have since day one. Our reporters on the ground have endured personal risk to produce thousands of articles, films and podcasts. We know it’s crucial that we stay until the end - and beyond. There is no substitute for being there, as we did during the 1917 Russian Revolution, the Ukrainian famine of the 1930s, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the first Russo-Ukrainian conflict in 2014. We have an illustrious, 200-year history of reporting throughout Europe in times of upheaval, peace and everything in between. We won’t let up now.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jan/03/thatcher-courting-gorbachev-top-secret-file
SEE ALSO: https://www.rt.com/news/585045-boris-johnson-russophile-ukraine/
THE GUARDIAN HAS DRIFTED FROM ITS ORIGINAL INSIGHTFUL FEARLESSNESS AND NOW PROVIDES A CUSHY PLATFORM FOR THE FASCIST ESTABLISHMENT. IT HAS PROVIDED VERY SLANTED VIEWS ABOUT THE UKRAINE/RUSSIA CONFLICT AND HAS BEEN FEARLESSLY ANTI-ASSANGE FOR QUITE A FEW YEARS. SHOCKING...
|
User login |
cartoon bells...
AND MENTIONING THE GUARDIAN (ABOVE) BECOMING AN ORGAN FOR THE FASCIST ESTABLISHMENT:
British newspaper The Guardian has ended its four-decade working relationship with cartoonist Steve Bell, who said his work criticizing the Israeli government’s stance on Gaza was rejected for using a supposedly anti-Semitic trope.
“The decision has been made not to renew Steve Bell’s contract,” a spokesman for the outlet told The Telegraph on Sunday.
The offending picture depicts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu preparing to perform surgery on himself. He is seen wearing boxing gloves and holding a scalpel, poised to make a Gaza-shaped incision.
“Spiked again. It is getting pretty nigh impossible to draw this subject for the Guardian now without being accused of deploying ‘antisemitic tropes’,” Bell wrote on X (formerly Twitter) last week.
He claimed he received “an ominous phone call from the desk” after submitting the cartoon and was told: “Jewish bloke; pound of flesh; antisemitic trope”.
The cartoon was apparently perceived as an allusion to Shylock, the Jewish antagonist in Shakespeare’s play ‘The Merchant of Venice’, who demanded a pound of flesh from his Christian rival if he failed to repay a debt.
Bell said the comparison made no sense to him. The image included the caption “After David Levine,” referring to the late cartoonist of The New York Review of Books.
Levine’s 1966 work ‘Johnson’s Scar’ parodies a contemporary photo, in which then-US President Lyndon Johnson demonstrated the mark left after having his gallbladder removed. The cartoonist depicts the scar shaped as Vietnam, in reference to the US invasion.
https://www.rt.com/news/585126-guardian-fires-cartoonist-netanyahu/
READ FROM TOP.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
british terror.....
BY KIT KLARENBERG·
The former diplomat’s detention is just the latest example of British terror laws being used to harass and intimidate dissidents, while brazenly prying into their private affairs.
On the morning of October 16, counter-terror police in Glasgow Airport detained journalist, whistleblower, human rights campaigner, and former British diplomat Craig Murray upon his return from Iceland. After grilling him intensively about his political beliefs, officers seized Murray’s phone and laptop.
Murray, a proud Scottish nationalist, flew back to Glasgow after several days in Reykjavik, where he attended a popular Palestine solidarity event, and also met with high-ranking representatives of the Assange Campaign, which raises awareness about the plight of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Once his travel documents were processed at passport control, the officer informed him he would be detained for questioning. They then led him to a small backroom to be grilled by three nameless British counter-terror agents.
Murray told The Grayzone that British police warned him he would be committing a criminal offense and would be prosecuted if he refused to answer questions, answered untruthfully, deliberately withheld information, or refused to provide passcodes for his electronic devices. After his phone and laptop were seized for analysis, the interrogation began.
“First, they grilled me about the private Assange Campaign meeting,” Murray told The Grayzone. “You might think they would ask who was there, but they didn’t,” he said, adding, “my guess is they somehow knew already.”
Instead, “all the questions were financial,” Murray says. According to the former British ambassador, officers wanted to know “whether I get money for my contributions to the Campaign, if I get paid by WikiLeaks, Don’t Extradite Assange, even Julian’s family.”
“The answer each time was ‘no,’” Murray says, explaining: “My sources of income and where my money comes from were of particular interest to the officers.”
The one-time diplomat’s popular personal blog was also of interest to the officers, who reportedly demanded Murray tell them whether anyone else had access to it or could publish content on the platform, and if anyone other than himself authored any of its posts.
Strangely, Murray said he was not asked about a single article published on his website. Equally puzzling, he remarked, were the questions about the Palestine solidarity event he attended.
Officers apparently wanted to know why Murray had attended in the first place — “a strange question to ask of someone attending a protest,” he told The Grayzone. Nonetheless, he made it clear that he had gone because he was friends with one of the speakers, a former Icelandic interior minister.
Police reportedly also demanded details on the content of various speakers’ addresses at the event — information which Murray says he could not offer as he doesn’t speak Icelandic. When asked if he planned to attend any similar pro-Palestine events in Britain, he told them, “probably.”
“The weirdest question was, ‘how do I judge whether to share a platform with someone or not?’” Murray says, adding: “I do so based on who’s organizing the event.”
In this particular case, Murray continued, “it was [the] Palestine Solidarity Committee, so I was confident I was in safe hands.” Still, it struck the former ambassador as a bizarre line of questioning.
“My lawyer has never heard of such a question being asked during interrogations before,” Murray said, adding that “they speculate police have a surveillance photo of me in the proximity of someone they consider a ‘terrorist.’”
“I’ve no idea who that could be,” the outspoken human rights campaigner admitted. But, as he quickly observed: “If you attend a rally where 200,000 people are present, you can’t know who everyone is!”
Murray has since consulted with lawyers, who informed him that according to Section 7 of the 2000 Terrorism Act — the draconian legislation under which he was subjected to the intensive questioning — he would be legally entitled to consult a lawyer if the interrogation lasted longer than an hour.
‘A sledgehammer to crack a nut’Once the hour of questioning was up, the officers sent him on his way, but failed to return his phone or laptop. “I’m used to the idea of British and American spies having my computers,” Murray said.
On a trip to Germany at the end of 2022, two laptops belonging to Murray were stolen in separate locations. The second laptop happened to have been a locally-bought replacement for the first. He believes the thefts were “probably” carried out by “security services,” an interpretation reinforced by the fact the first laptop was stored in a bag containing a large sum of cash, along with vital heart medicine. The culprits inexplicably ignored the former, while pocketing the latter.
When probed by counter-terror cops about the contents of his laptop, Murray says he openly disclosed that device contained copies of leaked private emails of Stewart McDonald, a hawkish, deep state-connected Scottish National Party.
But “I’m not worried about any content on there,” he explained, so “it’s not a problem they have it.”
“I told the officers I pitied whichever poor bastard has to wade through McDonald’s emails,” he joked.
“Interestingly,” Murray notes, “one of them volunteered in response that the contents of seized digital devices are sifted electronically, rather than an individual going over the whole contents.”
“Presumably, algorithms run by keyword searches do the legwork, and whatever that throws up is studied and shared with different agencies,” he speculates.
Murray’s lawyers are now looking into the stop, with an eye on whether his interrogators told him the truth before his questioning began.
This April, British counter-terror police detained the French publisher and political activist Ernest Moret, who had led large protests in Paris against the neoliberal reforms of President Emmanuel Macron. Moret was detained under the same powers as Murray, then arrested when he refused to hand over passcodes to his electronic devices. He was ultimately held in British custody for almost 24 hours.
In July, a damning report by Britain’s terror legislation watchdog concluded the officers who detained Moret had made “exaggerated and overbearing” threats when they claimed that he would never again be able to travel overseas if he didn’t disclose information, as he’d be listed as a terrorist in international intelligence databases. The report also found police grilled him illegitimately regarding legally privileged conversations he had with his lawyer during the interrogation.
Schedule 7 is “powerful” and “must therefore be exercised with due care,” the reviewer said, before ultimately comparing police’s usage of the legislation to interrogate Moret to “using a sledgehammer to crack a nut”:
“This was an investigation into public order for which counter-terrorism powers were never intended to be used,” the report noted, concluding “the rights of free expression and protest are too important in a democracy to allow individuals to be investigated for potential terrorism merely because they may have been involved in protests that have turned violent.”
But when it comes to carrying out political detentions, the legislation in question is not the only one in British officers’ arsenal.
Absent from the report was any reference to Schedule 3, Section 4 of Britain’s 2019 Counter-Terrorism and Border Act, which was used to authorize the detention of this journalist at London’s Luton Airport this May. The provision grants authorities sweeping powers to delve into the personal and professional affairs of dissidents. According to Murray, British counter-terror cops appear to have approached him using “the same playbook” they employed with me.
Under the 2019 Counter-Terrorism and Border Act, which has been harshly criticized by the UN, an individual can be said to be serving “hostile” foreign powers without even knowing or intending to — or the powers in question being aware they are. This Orwellian precept was reinforced by London’s new National Security Act, which was passed in July 2023.
Anyone who has agitated the British national security state and plans on traveling to the UK may want to be careful what they keep on their devices. As one of Ernest Moret’s interrogators boasted to him, Britain is “the only country where authorities can download and keep information from private devices” forever.
https://thegrayzone.com/2023/10/17/assange-craig-murray-detained-uk-terror/
READ FROM TOP.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....