Sunday 19th of May 2024
Home » Blogs » Gus Leonisky's blog

in the bins of history.....

Current international events confirm the correctness of the direction observed within the multipolar world order main forces and their closest allies. Namely, a full-fledged dialogue with the Western minority is absolutely not necessary in order to achieve the contemporary multipolar world supporters objectives. The Western planetary minority still lives in a completely different and parallel reality. This therefore means that there is absolutely no point in wasting precious time. 

 

BY Mikhail Gamandiy-Egorov

 

The collective West has no intention to accept the multipolar world order in a foreseeable future. All previous calls and invitations for dialogue from the supporters and main forces of the multipolar world were not only ignored by this hypocritical and arrogant minority, but also clearly demonstrated that the West is only interested in one thing – maintain its dictatorship over the overwhelming humanity majority. Something that won’t happen.

In fact, and to a certain extent, it is appropriate to thank the planetary minority represented by Western regimes, since it is precisely their actions of recent decades and years that have definitely convinced the representatives of the majority of countries – of the non-Western world – constituting together the absolute majority of humanity – that all these beautiful “pictures” and words about democracy, equality and the like – are nothing but blatant lies when it comes to the states and peoples belonging to the world majority. All the more so when these countries and peoples have considerable resources, in the enormous difference and in the vast majority of cases, from the West, and even more when these states pursue an independent policy, not following the Western regimes orders.

Of course, this applies, particularly to our country. To whom and in every sense have been giving lies since the late 1980s and early 1990s. Including the fact that there will be no NATO expansion towards the East, right up to our borders. And what can be said about the more recent years events, particularly with regard to the total non-implementation of the Minsk Agreements? Although and if we had to go in details – about the violations within the framework of the obligations “assumed” by the West – it would take too long to continue the list. And there – only as far as our country is concerned.

But the problems are actually truly global in nature. When the Western minority speaks about a “rules-governed order”, it is not, as some may sometimes think, the world order founded after the Second World War – for us the Great Patriotic War. During the Cold War, established almost immediately after the Victory over the brown plague – Nazism – within the framework of a bipolar world – there were precisely rules, which limited the colonial and neocolonial vehemence of the Western minority. And it is also thanks to these rules that the large part of the world majority was able to free themselves from colonial oppression. Moreover, and during that stage of world non-Western peoples liberation – enormous merit goes precisely to our country. Likewise with regard to the processes of resistance to new forms of Western neocolonialism, or even quite simply ordinary fascism.

Many people from Africa, Asia and Latin America remember it. And all the Western propaganda, once powerful, has never succeeded in eradicating this memory. Coming back to the world order question, on several occasions during my childhood on African soil I had to hear that the collapse of the USSR, the so-called “end” of the Cold War, – has been a disaster for many peoples of the world – belonging to the non-Western global majority. It is here that it is then appropriate to remember that this pseudo “rules-based” world order that the West is referring to – is nothing other than the unipolar world of Western minority dictatorship, which, unfortunately, became a reality in the period following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

More precisely, the “order” of Western arbitrariness, total impunity and colossal suffering for a large number of countries and peoples from the global majority of humanity. Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Central African Republic, Libya, Mali – and the list would go on. But a lot has changed since then. A multipolar world has become, to the great joy of the world majority in large part, a reality. Precisely a reality and not a perspective. But this reality faces a radical confrontation on the part of the West pseudo-elites who, having fully preserved the mentality of slave traders and those who exterminated entire nations during last centuries, cannot accept the end of their dictatorship, domination and impunity on planet Earth.

In this situation, and probably more than ever, it is time to realize and accept a simple truth – that there is no point in having a full-fledged dialogue with the incorrigible Western minority. Apart from a few points which may be of interest for the main forces and allies of the multipolar world order. Of course, we must not forget that a considerable number of people in the West support the multipolar world – this is a fact. And certainly, it is useful to maintain contact and dialogue with them. But as far as the representatives of Western regimes and those who serve them are concerned, it is high time to turn this page forever.

Until the West finally recognizes its crimes on a global scale and unconditionally accepts the multipolar world order, and most probably also in the future – resolutely post-Western world order. There is a time for everything, but what is extremely important today – is not to waste precious time on those who simply do not deserve it. And on the contrary, it is necessary to focus on joint and active work within the framework of all actors representing the world majority.

https://journal-neo.su/2024/05/06/a-genuine-dialogue-with-the-western-minority-is-not-possible-and-above-all-not-necessary/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.............

divide and rule....

 

BY Tito Ben Saba  Containing China means breaking the Beijing-Moscow-Tehran axis

 

In line with the American strategy of “divide and rule”, characteristic of US hegemonic aims, the objective of Washington’s Chinese strategy is to compartmentalize rival geopolitical powers by exacerbating antagonisms, with the aim of breaking down geographical continuities, economic and security partnerships, and ideological affinities between the various regional blocs.

Behind the American strategy of containing China lies the aim of preventing the Asian giant’s economic, technological and scientific development at low-energy cost. In this context, it is appropriate to look closely at Washington’s actions towards Beijing’s strategic partners, Moscow and Tehran, across the entire Eurasian space.

Breaking trans-regional geopolitical continuities

In its standoff with Beijing, the United States is pursuing a strategy of compartmentalizing the world’s major regions, denying the geopolitical interests that bind these regions together.

Several top Western leaders have claimed that the US is being dragged unwillingly into the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, while its main concern is to contain China’s growing power in the Indo-Pacific region.

This amounts to saying that the United States has not invested long years, fueled by artificially colored revolutions and coups d’état propelled by hundreds of millions of dollars, to provoke its geostrategic adversary Russia, through NATO and Ukraine. It also means that Washington is a stranger to the conflicts involving Israel in West Asia, and has never vetoed Israel’s countless international condemnations by various UN bodies. This amounts to saying, above all, that these two hotbeds of conflict, Europe and West Asia, have no connection whatsoever with the American strategy of containing Beijing.

These theatrics by Washington and its affiliates cannot distract Beijing from the many ramifications of American strategy in the Eurasian space. America’s aggressive policies towards Beijing, aimed at encircling the Asian giant while subjugating its neighbors, are closely linked to Washington’s political, economic and military maneuvers in the neighborhood of Moscow and Tehran.

For Washington, hindering the “independence” ambitions of its geopolitical adversaries is tantamount to breaking the geostrategic continuity between China, Russia and Iran. We are thus witnessing a multi-frontal Eurasian confrontation, stretching simultaneously from the Mediterranean to the Arabian Sea, via the South Caucasus and the Indian Ocean, and extending as far as the East China Sea.

Breaking the Russia-China partnership in the Mediterranean and Red Seas

Faithful to its history as a hegemonic power that has never imposed itself except by armed force, the United States is committed to weaving a network of military alliances, inevitably threatening, around its geopolitical adversaries, foremost among them China. This modus operandi was first applied to Russia, Beijing’s strategic partner, forcing it out of its depth, that is, beyond its borders, to defend its vital security space in Europe.

Long before the conflict in Ukraine, countless American wars in the Middle East played a major role in reshaping the world’s security architecture. Situated at the crossroads of strategic sea lanes, and riddled with American military bases, the West Asian region is forcing emerging powers into major geostrategic planning, if only to guarantee the security of their trade and supply chains, particularly energy.

Washington, which has long enjoyed economic and military prepotency in the Mediterranean and Red Seas, is now attempting to sabotage the security of its geopolitical adversaries in these two sea lanes. Having failed to prevent the establishment of Russian military bases on the Syrian and Libyan coasts, or the Chinese military base in Djibouti, the United States is now attempting to hinder the creation of a Sino-Russian security line.

The US decision to build a port in Gaza coincides with Russia’s plans to build a military base in the Libyan port city of Tobruk. At the same time, the ongoing ethnic cleansing in Gaza reflects growing American concern about Russia’s military presence in the region. As for the deadly conflict in Sudan, it is clearly helping to prevent the establishment of a Russian naval base in Port Sudan, but also to hinder Moscow’s military breakthrough on the African continent. In other words, the Sudanese conflict seems to serve Washington’s interests, since it hinders Sino-Russian naval military continuity between the Bab-Al-Mandeb Strait and the Mediterranean Sea.

However, these events did not stop Russia’s naval presence in the Red Sea, as Moscow has signed an agreement with Eritrea to build a naval base in the Dahlak Islands. This project may partly explain the repeated bombardments of the Yemeni city of Hodeida, located opposite Eritrea, by the US-led Red Sea coalition.

Admittedly, the recent signing of a naval military agreement between Turkey and Somalia, adding to the Turkish naval base in Mogadishu, may be perceived by China as a blank check for NATO expansion in the Horn of Africa, gateway to the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean. Above all, however, this signature seems to be a response to the agreement concluded a month earlier between Somaliland and Ethiopia, which was supposed to guarantee Addis Ababa access to the Red Sea (at a lower cost than the port access granted by Djibouti) and, what’s more, a naval military presence.

As things stand, Sino-Russian security continuity is only partially guaranteed on the shores of the Mediterranean and the Red Sea. This, bearing in mind that Egypt, which dominates the strategic Suez Canal, and Saudi Arabia, whose territory stretches along the Red Sea, not to mention Ethiopia, the demographic giant of the Horn of Africa, have all just joined the BRICS.

Destabilizing security in Central Asia and around Iran

The American strategy of containing Beijing does not stop with Russia: it extends to the Persian Gulf and Central Asia, where oil and gas, China’s titanic “Belt and Road” projects, and China’s commercial and economic partners – first and foremost Iran – abound.

Its geographical position to the south of the Persian Gulf and to the north of the Caspian Sea makes Tehran an essential regional power, situated at the crossroads of China, Russia and Turkey – in other words, at the crossroads of today’s major geopolitical issues.

Admittedly, Iran has no offshore military bases, but it does possess a major geostrategic asset that enables it to project its power throughout Western Asia, from the Gulf of Aden, through the Ansar Allah Houthi movement, to the Eastern Mediterranean, through the Lebanese Hezbollah and factions in Iraq and Syria – not to mention armed Palestinian factions. This “Axis of Resistance” gives Tehran strategic depth in a number of regional theaters of operation, and indirectly gives China the power to undermine Washington’s hegemonic ambitions in the region.

The NATO bloc’s plans to deploy a military presence in Armenia along the Zangezur corridor, that is, on Iran’s northern border, are naturally perceived by Tehran as an unacceptable American provocation. This Azeri-Armenian corridor is supposed to link the South Caucasus to Europe (via Turkey), but also to China (via the Caspian Sea and Central Asia). Clearly, a NATO presence would compromise the security of regional trade. Yet it is vital for China to diversify its trade routes, given Washington’s militarization of the China Sea and Indian Ocean, the sea lanes through which the majority of Chinese trade with West Asia, Africa and Europe transits.

Under the guise of securing the South Caucasus, this plan to deploy NATO on Iran’s borders also aims to strengthen Israel’s position in the Mediterranean, by diverting Iran from the ethnic cleansing underway in Gaza.

It is through the prism of these geopolitical rivalries that we need to understand the drastic sanctions imposed on Iran, US support for armed uprisings calling for regime change in the country, terrorist attacks targeting nuclear and defense sites, and even diplomatic representations. As for the armed insurrections of the separatists in Sistan-Baluchistan, they have the advantage of creating tensions on the Iranian-Pakistani border, not far from the strategic Strait of Hormuz, but also of hindering the implementation of the economic corridor linking Pakistan to the Chinese region of Xinjiang. This trade corridor is of the utmost importance, as it would enable China to bypass American provocations in the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean, and save time by gaining direct access to the Gulf of Oman.

Like Iran and Russia, China has not escaped American methods of coercion: political, economic and military. These actions have reached such a level of hostility that the United States is even seeking to create tensions around the Strait of Malacca, vital to Beijing.

For the moment, Washington is compulsively pursuing the militarization of the entire Indo-Pacific region, sometimes threatening to equip South Korea with nuclear weapons, sometimes announcing the extension of the AUKUS to other countries in the region, or the reinforcement of American bases and troops. In this respect, the declarations of certain regional political figures, such as Shinzō Abe’s former special advisor, raise questions: rarely have we seen citizens so proud to see their country lose its sovereignty. But there are also clear-sighted voices, such as that of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, for whom “The Americans are the ones pushing the Philippine government to go out there and find a quarrel and eventually maybe start a war”.

In any case, Washington has deployed considerable resources to deprive China of its logistical and security support, and sabotage its global architecture of cooperation. Seeing its position threatened by Beijing’s multi-continental power projections, Washington is seeking to hinder the New Silk Road projects, the strengthening of the SCO and BRICS, the adjustment of the international order to the interests of the Global South, as well as the ongoing process of de-dollarization.

By responding to these major geostrategic challenges in an exclusively hawkish manner, eschewing all diplomatic avenues and disdaining the legitimate concerns of Moscow, Tehran and Beijing, the United States paradoxically appears very weakened, behind the times, and short on imagination for renewing its place in the world. An observation that EU leaders should ponder.

https://journal-neo.su/2024/05/05/containing-china-means-breaking-the-beijing-moscow-tehran-axis/

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

rethreadings....

 

BY Vladimir MARCIAC

 

At the beginning of May 2024, Chinese President Xi Jinping is visiting France as part of the celebration of sixty years of diplomatic relations between our two countries. Due to Covid, he had not been to Europe since 2019.

France is a stop on his European tour, which also passes through Serbia, a region of the world which reminds China of very bad memories. Indeed, on the night of May 7 to 8, 1999, its embassy in Belgrade was the target of five missiles launched by NATO. Two buildings had been destroyed, around twenty Chinese journalists stationed in Yugoslavia, the last communist country in Europe, were injured and three dead. The US government claimed it was an error due to bad information. This is the United States' favorite excuse when it commits (always far from home) what China has called "A barbaric act." Since this aggression, time has passed (a quarter of a century) and China has grown in power. It has asserted itself, better than ever, as a nation capable and willing to be respected.

The visit to France by the Chinese president is an opportunity to celebrate a major event, an indelible gesture of friendship which dates from 1964, when the France of General de Gaulle proclaimed that China, the one which should have a seat in the UN, could not be represented by Formosa, but by Beijing. Thus, France was the first Western country to establish diplomatic relations and exchange ambassadors with the People's Republic of China. Sixty years ago, “China and France broke the ice of the Cold War and crossed the camp divide, so as to establish diplomatic relations at the ambassadorial level,” declared President Xi Jinping.

It was not until 1979 that the United States established diplomatic ties with China.

Of course, over the years, better mutual knowledge has developed between our two countries, which has favored multiple cooperations, bilateral exchanges which affect the economy, the human sciences, culture, tourism, tourism. culture, green industry, clean energy, sport, etc., and even coordination on certain international subjects.

Peaceful and fraternal cooperation between France and China has therefore been established with the underlying idea of development in “a community of destiny”, an original concept in Chinese foreign policy, in total break with the discourse of States. -United States which proclaim themselves “the necessary nation”, the one which, according to the words spoken in November 2020 by Joe Biden, the brand new president “is ready to guide the world”.

In other words, the United States continues to affirm that it is invested with a global mission: that of promoting freedom and democracy after having put on a uniform: that of policeman of the world. Alas, their method of advancing the happiness of people consists of inserting pieces of steel into pieces of flesh.

This is why, in a context of fluctuating international relations that are uncertain, changing and subject to imbalances, the stability of Sino-French relations is a fundamental factor.

On January 31, 2024, Ms. Rachida Dati, French Minister of Culture and her Chinese counterpart, Mr. Sun Yeli met in France. From the Palace of Versailles, they launched the Franco-Chinese year of cultural tourism which will be marked by a series of events, in France and China to celebrate cultural cooperation between the two countries and “promote communion of spirit between peoples.”

Therefore, Chinese leaders call for “building a global community of shared future, aiming to create an open, inclusive, clean and beautiful world, enjoying lasting peace, universal security and common prosperity” .

On March 7, 2024, during the second session of the 14th National People's Congress held at the Media Center Hotel, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi affirmed that "China will continue to stand firmly on the right side of History and the progress of human civilization, to hold high the standard of peace, development, cooperation and win-win, and to work to promote its development through the safeguarding of peace in the world ". He recalled the words of President Xi Jinping: “We live in the same global village and we are on the same ship. Faced with global challenges of all kinds, different countries should transcend their differences in terms of history, culture, geopolitics and system, and together preserve and build planet Earth, the only habitable home of humanity.

If relations between our two countries have always been good, forever marked by the historic act of General de Gaulle, we must nevertheless avoid angelism. For reasons essentially of submission to the interests of the United States, anti-Chinese forces exist. They are active in our country.

In 2008, the Olympics took place in Beijing. The passing of the flame in Paris gave rise to multiple hostile acts against China, under the pretext of Tibet. Paralympic champion Jing Jing was attacked several times on her wheelchair where she was grabbed, scratched, kicked, but without letting go of the flame. The renewal of this type of affront is impossible today.

The 2024 Olympic Games will take place in Paris. The Olympic flame was lit, as it should be, in Greece, in the Peloponnese, a region famous for an episode in the war between Athens and Sparta and where the strategist Thucydides developed the theory which explains the true causes of many wars. . I tend to recall this story often, not because I am rambling, but because it is a teaching that comes to us from past centuries (around 400 years before our era) to enlighten the present and perhaps the future. According to Thucydides, the attack by a powerful country on another country in full expansion and likely to supplant it is a wise decision. It is not forbidden to think (in fact, American generals think so) that the only way to prevent the United States from being dispossessed of its rank as the first world power is a preventive war (under no circumstances). no matter what pretext) against China. The “temptation of Thucydides” hangs over the Pentagon where the “hawks” have so far failed to convince the White House, particularly due to China’s demographic, military (and nuclear) power. However, the figures could suggest that the United States is invincible. Their military budget for 2023 is more than a trillion dollars (including international military aid and retiree pensions). It exceeds the total military budgets of the nine military powers next in the ranking, including China and Russia. To give another point of comparison, their military aid to Ukraine is greater than Russia's entire military budget. But, you will say, what is the point of storing a plethora of nuclear warheads if a single one launched by the adversary can destroy you? Good question which explains the hesitations at the Pentagon.

In the perspective of a possible (desired?) conflict, the imperialist forces are working to try to weaken China. For several years, it is the region of Xinjiang (the Uyghurs) which has replaced Tibet in a media offensive, orchestrated from Washington and which involves almost the entire French political-media class.

If we want to have a fair idea of how China is seen in France, we must distinguish two elements which shape it, which distort reality:

1- The media. Most of them make speeches that are hostile to China. About 90% belong to pro-Atlanticist billionaires, sometimes not very patriotic. For example, the owner of the daily Libération and several other media, including the continuous television channel BFM-TV, is of Moroccan, French, Israeli, Portuguese, Christophian nationality (from Saint-Christophe, a tax haven in the Antilles) and he resides in Switzerland.

The detestable golden rule of our media is the merciless negation of all balanced international information. We know that in matters of justice, trials are carried out with defense lawyers, prosecution lawyers, witnesses and counter-witnesses, an impartial judge. This is the rule called, in Latin, “audi alteram partem” (hearing the other party) without which there are only unfair trials. In France, on our televisions, we can watch debates on China (and on Russia) where all the speakers and the host are of the same opinion: that of the United States. All.

2- Political leaders and opinion leaders. Many of them were trained in the United States to which they are often linked, through their membership, to American organizations such as the “International Visitor Leadership Program” (funded by the State Department) and the “Young foundation leaders” which includes the President of the Republic Emmanuel Macron, Prime Minister Gabriel Attal, the short-lived Minister of National Education, Amélie Oudéa-Castéra, today in charge of the Ministry of Sports and the Olympic and Paralympic Games of Paris…

In this context, we must humbly admit that our citizens are largely ignorant of what China is. What little millions of them know is misinformation sown by our propaganda outlets. The French are sensitive, depending on the times, to what is said to them about Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang. Most would be hard-pressed to name other Chinese regions.

However, another element exists, which is better informed and less subservient to Uncle Sam. It is the employers. Large French companies do not get information about China from the pro-US media or from our political leaders. For their business, our great capitalists do what the communist Lenin called “a concrete analysis of a concrete situation”. They study reality, they are pragmatic, they are insensitive to the emotional fakes manufactured, essentially, by the United States (their competitors).

I will give an example.

On November 14, 2023, the 2nd China/France forum was held at the Guimet Museum in Paris: “Sixty years of China/France relations, a new departure towards greater horizons”. The Guimet Museum is the national museum of Asian arts. Its president announced to the guests that Mandarin will henceforth be the third language of the museum (along with French and English).

Jean-Pierre Raffarin, former Prime Minister, spoke by video from China. Among the people physically present alongside His Excellency Lu Shaye, Chinese Ambassador to France, we were able to see and hear an “Economic Panel” with representatives of very large French groups: Jean-Paul Agon, president of the L'Oréal group , Philippe Houzé, Chairman of the Executive Board of the Galeries Lafayette Group, Francois Février, CEO (Chief Executive Officer) of Suez-Asia, François Marion, member of the Executive Committee of the Valeo Group.

The forum was enriched by a “Cultural Panel” on cultural and human exchanges, composed of Joël Bellassen, renowned sinologist and university professor, Julie Narbey, General Director of the Center Pompidou, Rodolphe Delord, CEO of the Park (zoo) de Beauval, Li Chunyan, Founder of Feida Consulting and author.

We see that Sino-French relations are torn by disparate entities, contradictory forces, among which some comply with the injunctions of American imperialism while others are sensitive to our own interests and disinclined to maintain a a sort of economic and cultural “cold war” against China, this great country which has never been our enemy.

In this imbroglio, everyone pulls their own way, “in all directions”:

– the media: towards Washington,

– elected officials: in the direction of the wind blown by their voters influenced by the media,

– employers: towards a “realpolitik”, that is to say towards a realistic policy (or reality policy) which puts business before emotions manufactured by fake news,

Taking into account the pressures exerted by these forces, the President of the Republic must determine France's position in its relations with China.

Here are two examples of very different cooperations

1- Cooperation for war. Under the leadership of Trump, then Biden, NATO demanded from European states a substantial increase in military spending in the stated perspective of a “high intensity conflict” with Russia and China. While General de Gaulle, with the support of the French Communist Party, had demanded the departure of US troops from French soil, President Macron is carrying out diplomatic and military injunctions from Washington and even wants to create a European army anchored to the NATO.

In 2025, a NATO Aerospace Center of Excellence, based in Toulouse, at the heart of the largest space ecosystem in Europe, will complement the creation of the United States Space Force (USSF) to militarize space (in violating international treaties).

In other words, the activity of the Toulouse Space Center (a city in the south of France where the Airbus is manufactured) will be strengthened by the reception of a new space warfare command which will operate with space resources. of national defense. This will bring together specialists trained by CNES (National Center for Space Studies) in a “NATO Center of Excellence” for the space domain. One of the stated objectives is to increase the technological advance of the United States, increasingly overtaken by China. Under the title “The space war strengthens the activity of the Toulouse Space Center”, the economic newspaper Les Echos was delighted (February 23, 2021): “This center for training and sharing of experience between NATO countries will welcome 50 permanent staff in 2025.

On April 25, 2024, the 32 NATO ambassadors (or deputies) boarded the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, the day before its first mission under NATO command in the context of the war in Ukraine. Even if this dispossession of our ship, bearing such a symbolic name, is not definitive, it is impossible not to see in it a public message, urbi et orbi, on the French conception of the evolution of its national defense . However, let us make no mistake, the war in Ukraine did not start in February 2022. On that date, the Ukrainian army had been bombing its Russian-speaking Ukrainian populations in the Donbass, a border region with Russia, for eight years. For kyiv, it was necessary to secure this region while volunteering to join NATO. But it was to encourage the installation of American missile launchers that could reach Moscow in five minutes. Nightmare hypothesis, unacceptable for the Kremlin.

Why attack Russia? Because its destruction would be a prerequisite for advancing the United States army (NATO, but it's the same thing) along the more than 4,000 kilometers of borders that separate Russia from China.

Suffice to say that Mr. Stéphane Séjourné, French Minister of Foreign Affairs, pleading, on April 1 in Beijing, for “a balance of power favorable to Ukraine”, was unlikely to be heard by declaring: “We expect China that it sends very clear messages to Russia.” Russian President Vladimir Putin will travel to China for an official visit in May 2024. At the risk of disappointing Mr. Stéphane Séjourné, we can bet that President Xi Jinping will not play the role of “little telegraph operator” for the Europeans.

2-Cooperation for peace and ecology

From September 2024, two hundred and fifty Chinese workers will live for two years in Cléty, near Saint-Omer, in Pas-de-Calais (northern France) to build a kiln in a cement factory. It is a job that requires specific expertise and skills that the French no longer have due to the closures of French cement factories. Concretely, the Chinese will install a new, low-polluting oven, in accordance with the decarbonization project of an existing cement plant.

These Chinese workers are the only ones in the world to possess the essential know-how. When they leave again, the operation of the new oven will require two hundred long-term jobs, occupied by French people this time.

Contacts will undoubtedly have been made with the population. She will discover China through workers. Of course, I am reporting cooperation on a modest scale. But it has universal value. It is a concrete step forward which will see others. She is a light that illuminates the future of our relations which I know will be increasingly close, fraternal and beneficial to both parties.

 

Vladimir MARCIAC Investig’Action

The opinions expressed in the articles published on the Investig’Action website are those of the author(s). Articles published by Investig’Action and whose source is “Investig’Action” may be reproduced by mentioning the source with a hyperlink to the original site. 

https://www.legrandsoir.info/si-tu-veux-la-paix-prepare-la-paix.html

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ck5kxkjpekgo

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....