During a meeting with foreign press, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned the West against thoughtless conflict escalation, stressing that Moscow could repel NATO attempts to threaten its sovereignty both asymmetrically and directly.

Russian President Vladimir Putin held a meeting with foreign journalists on June 5 within the framework of the 27th annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF).

Addressing the Ukraine conflict the Russian president noted that Western weapon deliveries to the Kiev regime, coupled with the approval to hit targets deep inside Russia, is fraught with severe escalation risks. 

"How do you respond to this use of weapons and allowing them to attack and basically violate the sovereignty of Russia itself?" Earl Rasmussen, a retired US Army lieutenant colonel and international consultant told Sputnik. "If we look at these attacks, they're not targeting military targets, or they're targeting strategic targets. They're targeting civilians, many of them, or strategic targets as well. It's essentially, basically authorizing and supporting terrorism."

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240606/us-military-vet-its-scary-how-west-pushes-world-to-precipice-of-nuclear-war-1118809778.html

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uesyZ8Z6zQ

Theodore Postol is Professor of Science, Technology and National Security Policy in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT. He did his undergraduate work in physics and his graduate work in nuclear engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. After receiving his Ph.D., Dr. Postol joined the staff of Argonne National Laboratory, where he studied the microscopic dynamics and structure of liquids and disordered solids using neutron, x-ray and light scattering, along with computer molecular dynamics techniques. Subsequently he went to the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment to study methods of basing the MX Missile, and later worked as a scientific adviser to the Chief of Naval Operations. After leaving the Pentagon, Dr. Postol helped to build a program at Stanford University to train mid-career scientists to study developments in weapons technology of relevance to defense and arms control policy. In 1990 Dr. Postol was awarded the Leo Szilard Prize from the American Physical Society. In 1995 he received the Hilliard Roderick Prize from the American Association for the Advancement of Science and in 2001 he received the Norbert Wiener Award from Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility for uncovering numerous and important false claims about missile defenses.

 

WATCH AGAIN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xV5qVEV-HY

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VynUDAvMEHI

 

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

 

 

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

THESE WILL ALSO INCLUDE ODESSA, KHERSON AND KHARKIV.....

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

TRANSNISTRIA WILL BE PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

 

EASY.

 

THE WEST KNOWS IT.

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

 

US President Joe Biden has once again disparaged his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, calling him a “dictator” in an ABC News interview on Thursday in Normandy, France, where he was attending a ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-Day.

While trying to insult Putin, Biden also made an apparent mental stumble, claiming he has known the Russian leader for more than four decades and has been concerned about him all that time because he’s “not a decent man.”

Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov addressed the latest remarks by the US president on Thursday, making it clear that Biden won’t drag Putin down to his level.

The statements of the US president about Putin only harm Biden’s own reputation… Putin does not react to such insults, therefore he will not respond in this way,”Peskov said.

Biden has repeatedly insulted Putin, as well as other world leaders, including Chinese President Xi Jinping. For instance, he called Putin a “crazy son of a b*tch.”in February, and he claimed last year that China was run by “bad folks.” In March, he called Putin a “butcher” in connection with the Ukraine conflict.

When asked about the US leader’s insulting remarks earlier this year, Putin quipped they proved he was “absolutely right” to say it would be better for Russia if Biden stayed in office.

When you asked me our preference for the next US president, I said we would work with any, but for us, for Russia, Biden was better,” Putin told Russian journalist Pavel Zarubin.

Thus, Biden's insults was an “appropriate reaction to what I said,” Putin continued. “It’s not like he could say ‘Good job, Volodya, thank you for the helping hand’.” In terms of who Moscow would like to see in the White House, he added, “I can say it again: Biden.”

https://www.rt.com/russia/598899-biden-insults-putin-kremlin/ 

THIS IS CLEVER PUTINESQUERIE.... EVERYONE KNOWS — EXCEPT THE BIDEN SUPPORTERS — THAT BIDEN ID TOO OLD AND TOO SENILE TO HOLD OFFICE FOR MUCH LONGER THAN TOMORROW...

SHOULD BIDEN BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT, AMERICA WILL GO DOWN THE TOILET AT A RATE OF KNOTS... HENCE FOR PUTIN, THE BEST WAY TO GET AMERICA TO FADE INTO THE SUNSET OF HISTORY, IS TO "SUPPORT" BIDEN... 

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjurDFzmvvk

Did Joe Biden Really Crap His Pants At 80th Anniversary Of D-Day In France?

 

LOOKING AT THE ATTITUDE OF JILL BIDEN PINCHING HER NOSE, JOE DID....

 

BUT WE DON'T CARE ABOUT JOE'S PANTS... WE ONLY CARE ABOUT HIS BRAIN FARTS THAT ARE MORE AND MORE SENILE DAILY — AND DANGEROUS, AS THE NEO-CONS SEIZING THE OPPORTUNITY, HAVE PITCHED THEIR BIGGER TENTS INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE .... BEWARE! WW3! NUCLEAR BIFFO! ETC... IF THERE IS AN ETCETERA...

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

How to justify NATO’s aggression against Russia
by Thierry Meyssan

Joseph Stalin had old official photographs corrected to remove any trace of his opposition. Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron and their allies, too, are rewriting history. They have just staged, under the name of the "Normandy landings", events that happened otherwise. They hide the serious conflict that arose, from June to August 1944, between the French organizations that fought against the Nazi occupation – the National Council of the Resistance and the French Committee of National Liberation – and US president Franklin D. Roosevelt. They also obscure the fact that General Charles de Gaulle refused to take part in the landing... and they even invented Ukrainian participation.

We’ve just witnessed a vast rewriting of history, aimed at manipulating public opinion to justify NATO’s current treatment of Russia. A misleading vision of the June 6, 1944 landings has given rise to a commemoration of events that never existed as they were presented to us.

According to the organizers of the commemorations - in other words, according to Nato, which supplied most of the extras, including heads of state and government - the Allies were united in the fight against Nazism and the defense of freedom. In reality, the aim of the Anglo-Saxon landings was not to liberate France, but to replace Nazi occupation with the Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories (AMGOT).

 

While the United Kingdom had accepted the presence of Charles De Gaulle and his Free French on its territory, the United States never recognized him as the leader of the French Resistance during the Second World War. On the contrary, it maintained an embassy in Vichy until April 27, 1942, four months after entering the war. Worse still, on November 22, 1942, they negotiated an agreement with Admiral François Darlan, representing the collaborationist government. It would prevent De Gaulle from coming to North Africa and transfer, in Philippe Pétain’s name, colonial authority from France to the United States at the end of the war.

The Anglo-Saxons had already imposed AMGOT on Italy, and had tried to install it in the territories of the French Empire in North Africa. They were about to extend it to Norway, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium and Denmark. To this end, they trained civil administrators in Charlottesville and Yale.

Informed of what the Anglo-Saxons were up to, Charles De Gaulle rushed back to London from Algiers. Three days before D-Day, on June 3, 1944, he transformed the French Committee for National Liberation (CFLN), which he had chaired, into the Provisional Government of the French Republic (GPRF). He quarrels harshly with the British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill. He refused to record a speech written by the Anglo-Saxons outlining their vision of the landings, and to send the 120 FFL liaison officers alongside the landing troops. Likewise, he rejected the Anglo-Saxon project for a United Nations Organization (UNO), which was to establish a directoire of the United States and the United Kingdom over the whole world [1]; a project that resurfaced in 1950 with the Korean War, in 1991 with "Desert Storm", and again in 2001 with the attacks in the United States. In the end, he agreed to register vague support for the landing, but not for AMGOT, to send only 20 liaison officers, and succeeded in thwarting the Anglo-Saxon plan for Onu [2]

In his Mémoires de guerre, Charles De Gaulle writes: "President Roosevelt kept the document [the proposed agreement between the CFLN and the Allies for the liberation of France] on his table from month to month. Meanwhile, in the United States, an Allied military government (AMGOT) was being set up to take over the administration of France. All kinds of theorists, technicians, businessmen, propagandists and former Frenchmen naturalized as Yankees flocked to this organization. The steps [Jean] Monnet and [Henri] Hoppenot thought should be taken in Washington, the observations the British government was making to the United States, the urgent requests Eisenhower was sending to the White House, all failed to bring about any change. However, since something had to be done, Roosevelt decided in April to instruct [Dwight] Eisenhower that the Commander-in-Chief would have supreme power in France. As such, he was to choose the French authorities who would collaborate with him. We soon learned that Eisenhower was urging the President not to burden him with this political responsibility, and that the British disapproved of such an arbitrary procedure. But Roosevelt, with a few changes to the letter of his instructions, had maintained the essence of them.
To tell the truth, the President’s intentions seemed to me to be of the same order as Alice in Wonderland’s dreams. Roosevelt had already ventured into North Africa, under conditions far more favourable to his designs, with a political enterprise similar to the one he was contemplating for France. Nothing remained of this attempt. My government exercised unfettered authority in Corsica, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Black Africa. The people Washington had counted on to stand in the way had disappeared from the scene. No one cared about the Darlan-Clark agreement [transfer of power from the French colonial Empire to the United States], which was considered null and void by the Comité de la Libération Nationale [Free France], and which I had solemnly declared at the Consultative Assembly that, in France’s eyes, did not exist. I regretted for him and for our relations that the failure of his policy in Africa had not been able to overcome Roosevelt’s illusions. But I was sure that his project, carried over to Metropolitan France, would not even begin to be applied there. The Allies would meet in France no other ministers and no other civil servants than those I would have set up. They would find no French troops other than those under my command. I could confidently challenge Eisenhower to deal validly with someone I had not appointed. In fact, he wouldn’t even dream of it.

 

In the end, 30,000 Allied soldiers took part in the landings on June 6, 1944, of whom only 177 were French (the fusiliers marins of the Kieffer commando). It wasn’t until August 1 that the 20,000 men of General Philippe Leclerc de Hauteclocque’s 2nd Armored Division (2° DB) landed in Normandy, between Sainte-Marie-du-Mont and Quinéville, an area the Allies called "Utah Beach". They rush to Paris, which rises up and liberates itself.

........

Oath of Ukrainian soldiers during the Second World War
"Faithful son of my Fatherland, I voluntarily join the ranks of the Ukrainian Liberation Army, and with joy I swear that I will faithfully fight Bolshevism for the honour of the people. We fight alongside Germany and its allies against a common enemy. With loyalty and unconditional submission, I believe in Adolf Hitler as leader and supreme commander of the Liberation Army. At any time, I am ready to give my life for the truth".

........

 

The commemoration of the falsified version of the D-Day landings was an opportunity for President Joe Biden and his master of ceremonies, President Emmanuel Macron, to draw a parallel with their equally falsified presentation of the current war in Ukraine.

For the record, no Russian delegation was invited. On the contrary, the Ukrainian army, which fought alongside the Nazis, was.

Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron and their guests presented the United States as the victors of the Second World War, whereas it was the Soviet Union that took Berlin and overthrew the Third Reich. They ignored the sacrifice of 8,6 million Soviet soldiers. On the contrary, they have focused their narrative on the 292,000 dead soldiers of the United States (mainly in the battle against Japan after the defeat of the Nazis). Two completely different war efforts.

In passing, they recalled the murder of 6 million Jews by the Nazis, whether in the "Shoah by bullets" or, from 1942 onwards, in concentration camps. A way of ignoring the murder of 18,2 million Soviet Slavic civilians (distinct from the 8,6 million deaths mentioned above), also considered "sub-human" and designated as the main targets of the Nazi extermination project. Not a word either about all the other target categories, such as other Slavs or Gypsies.

Speaking to Volodymyr Zelensky, US President Joe Biden declared: "Ukraine is being invaded by a tyrant, and we will never give up on him (...) We cannot give up on dictators, it’s unimaginable (...) The soldiers of D-Day did their duty, will we do ours? (...) We must not lose what has been done here".

Far from being a "dictator", Russian President Vladimir Putin was re-elected in March with 88.5% of the vote. The ballot was conducted in a sincere manner, even if, according to Westerners, the election campaign left little room for his opposition. On the contrary, Volodymyr Zelensky has not been President of Ukraine since his term expired on May 21. He has banned the 12 opposition political parties [3], sent his rival, General Valeri Zaloujny, to the UK as ambassador, and failed to hold elections. He remains in power, however. He may be considered the head of Ukraine’s provisional government, but certainly not the elected president.

He illegally commands his country’s armed forces, whose main leaders are "integral nationalists". The latter claim to be the founder of "integral nationalism" [4], Dmytro Dontsov, and his henchman, the Nazi Stepan Bandera. During the Second World War, Dontsov was administrator of the Reinhard Heydrich Institute, responsible for implementing the Final Solution of the Jewish and Gypsy questions, while Bandera, at the head of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), massacred at least 1.6 million Ukrainians, mainly from Donbass and Novorossia. Former Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky took part in this masquerade as a Nazi follower.

 

Thierry Meyssan Translation
Roger Lagassé https://www.voltairenet.org/article221018.html ------------------- MEANWHILE:  D-Day: An indecent 80th anniversaryby Guy Mettan, freelance journalist Thirty years ago, on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Allied landings, I conducted a long interview with a Serbian-French resistance fighter who had survived eighteen months in the Neuengamme camp and miraculously survived an English bombing of the ship on which the SS had imprisoned the deportees in the last days of April 1945. He passed away today, but he gave me the following advice: “Never forget that it was the Russians and the Red Army who liberated us from National Socialism. Not the British or the Americans.”
  A statement that could still be heard in the 1990s from the mouths of the surviving GIs of Omaha Beach, who knew that they owed their lives to the Soviet fighters who died on the Eastern Front to prevent Hitler from bringing his divisions back to Normandy. The figures speak for themselves: 37,000 Allied casualties in the Battle of Normandy contrasted with more than 178,000 dead and 600,000 wounded on the Soviet side in the parallel Russian Operation Bagrationduring the same period.
  Who remembers this today? Almost nobody in the West, because we are so often told, under the influence of NATO propaganda, that it was the Americans who won the war.
  Between ‘The Longest Day’ (Darryl F. Zanuck, 1962) and ‘Saving Private Ryan’ (Steven Spielberg, 1998)1, the cinematic narrative made in the USA has prevailed in the European psyche and everything else, i.e. the most important things, have been interpreted away.
  Needless to say, for Russians who do not forget the 15 million dead in the conflict (26 million in the whole of Soviet Russia), this ‘forgetting’ is worse than an affront: it is an outrage that is crowned by the refusal to invite Vladimir Putin to Normandy and at the same time roll out the red carpet for Zelensky as a bitter cherry on a spoilt cake. And if, in order to tie the wreath, the Germans are invited to the victors’ banquet as if they were innocent victims, while those to whom the victory is owed are excluded, one can seriously question the sincerity and honesty of this approach (even if one is of the opinion that the Germans of today are not to blame for the criminal mistakes of their ancestors in 1945).
  For it cannot be repeated often enough that although the Ukrainians and the other now independent republics that formed the USSR at the time also shed their blood to liberate Europe from fascism – including Zelensky’s grandfather, a hero of the Red Army who is probably turning in his grave today – many of them largely collaborated with the Nazi invaders. Who remembers that of the 300 murderers in the Treblinka death camp, thirty were Germans and all the others were Lithuanians and Ukrainians? Who remembers that Simone Veil recently denounced on French television the active involvement of the Banderites, who are now Zelensky’s allies, in the Holocaust by shooting in Ukraine? To invoke the famine of 1932 to justify collaboration with the SS in 1943, as one hears all too often from the mouths of those who support Ukraine, is a shameful sophism. When the Estonian President proudly displays her memorial to the victims of communism while at the same time erasing the memorials to the victims of Nazism and denying the existence of the local collaborators who took part in the extermination of some of her fellow citizens, she is doing nothing other than rewriting history in a way that can only provoke nausea.
  Historical revisionism is at work everywhere. You can make fun of the Russians who practise theirs and denounce them when they rewrite their history books and march through the streets with St. George’s ribbons and portraits of their grandfathers who died in battle. But we do the same, if not worse. When Ukrainian school textbooks summarise the Second World War as a valiant fight of the Banderites against two evil foreign dictators, Hitler and Stalin, who wanted to occupy their territory, then you have to ask yourself questions.
  Whatever one thinks about the current war and the responsibilities of one side or the other, one cannot deny the facts, twist history and replace the truth with a lie. Ultimately, the credibility of what you claim to be defending is called into question. Those who claim to be defending democracy and civilisation in Ukraine should remember this.  • https://www.zeit-fragen.ch/en/archives/2024/nr-12-11-juni-2024/d-day-ein-unanstaendiger-80-jahrestag  --------------------------- DOCUMENTATION HAS RECENTLY EXPOSED HOW THE ALLIES PUHSED HITLER TO RENEGE ON HIS NON-AGGRESSION AGREEMENT WITH STALIN. THE AIM WAS:1. CREATE AN EASTERN FRONT.2. DESTROY RUSSIA AS WISHED BY AMERICAN SINCE 1917. RESULT: 80 PER CENT OF THE GERMAN MILITARY WAS DESTROYED BY RUSSIA. WITHOUT THIS THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A D-DAY LANDING...... GL — POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951....  READ FROM TOP.