Kremlin outlines criteria for new Ukraine peace summit
Moscow is open to dialogue with Kiev but needs to know exactly what would be on the agenda, spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said

There must be an understanding about what the exact agenda of a new Ukraine peace summit would be in order for Russia to participate, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. 

The first international summit on the Ukraine crisis was held in Burgenstock, Switzerland last month. Over 90 countries participated in the event, but Russia did not receive an invitation while some others, including China, refused to attend, arguing that Moscow needed to be part of the process.  

The meeting focused on three points of Vladimir Zelensky’s so-called ‘peace formula’. A joint declaration was made at the end of the summit, although many of the attendees refused to sign it and some even withdrew their signatures shortly after the event. Nevertheless, Zelensky hailed the summit a success and suggested that a representative from Moscow could be allowed to attend the second round of talks later this year.  

During a press briefing on Thursday, Peskov stressed that Russia remains open to dialogue with Ukraine but noted that it must first understand what would be discussed during this second peace summit. 

“From the very beginning, we said that NATO expansion into the territory of Ukraine is unacceptable for us, an unacceptable threat to our existence, to our security,” Peskov said.  

The Kremlin spokesman emphasized that Russia will not discuss any specific details that are detached from the overall question of national security.

“[President Vladimir] Putin has already explained that we are ready and willing to discuss the situation as a whole, all aspects related to security on the continent, the security of our side, and with security guarantees for other nations. All of this should be discussed at the same time,” Peskov said.  

Moscow has repeatedly stressed that it would not participate in any international peace summits based on Zelensky’s ‘peace formula’, which it has dismissed as detached from reality. Zelensky’s plan includes demands such as a full Russian withdrawal from all territories Kiev claims as its own, reparation payments, and a war crime tribunal for Russia’s leadership.  

Instead, Putin has set out his own set of terms for initiating a ceasefire and launching peace negotiations with Kiev. These include a full withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from all Russian territories, including the Donbass republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, and the regions of Kherson and Zaporozhye, as well as a legal commitment from Kiev never to join NATO.

https://www.rt.com/russia/600881-russia-ukraine-peace-summit-criteria/

READ FROM TOP....

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kq5TqFxmTTE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYrpDOv9LU0

SEE ALSO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhAUaJb1rps

One of the reasons why the G7 countries have not yet decided to confiscate frozen Russian assets is a hint from Saudi Arabia, which has privately threatened to respond to such actions by selling European debts. On this subject, citing sources, writes Bloomberg.

While protecting Russian assets, Riyadh's representative expressed disagreement with the very idea of ​​letting them help Ukraine and separately hinted at the fate of French securities. According to two agency interlocutors, the wording could be considered a veiled threat.

As noted in the document, Riyadh's assets in the European currency and French public debt amount to several tens of billions of euros, but they are not large enough to seriously affect the situation. However, European officials may fear that Saudi Arabia's example could be followed by other bondholders.

In addition, the agency's source was not able to say the reason that prompted the Kingdom to join the Russian assets. This may have been solidarity with Moscow, but it is possible that Saudi Arabia did not want to accept a precedent, fearing for its own investments.

Later, Saudi authorities said that they did not threaten the “seven” because of a plan to withdraw assets from Russia. “Our relations with the G7 and other countries are based on mutual respect, and we continue to discuss all issues that contribute to global growth and increase the stability of the international financial system", said the Kingdom's Ministry of Finance.

At the same time, two interviewed experts questioned the credibility of the threat, because after the freezing of Russian assets, which was also an unprecedented step, the reduction of the role of G7 currencies and the fall of their debt n didn't happen. The main problem remains the lack of alternatives, and Saudi Arabia has nothing to change in dollars and euros.

The White House has admitted the lack of consensus within the G7 on the issue of seizing Russia's frozen assets. “Currently, there is absolutely no consensus within the G7 on what to do with the base amount“, confirmed the director of European affairs of the United States National Security Council, Michael Carpenter. He encouraged the continuation of the collective debate on this issue, emphasizing that only this solution would achieve the desired result. Before that, the “Big Seven” agreed to provide Kiev with a loan of $50 billion. It was agreed that the entire payment amount would be repaid through interest on Russian assets.

Previously, US Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Eurasia James O'Brien noticed that the income from Russian assets blocked in Western Ukraine should be enough to carry out hostilities until 2025. He promised that the decision to allocate Kiev a loan in the amount of 50-60 billion dollars , which will be returned from the income of Russian assets, formalize officially.

The $300 billion in Russian assets frozen by the West will probably never be returned. This probability was allowed by the director of the department of control of external restrictions of the Ministry of Finance of Russia Dmitry Timofeev.

«It is unlikely that anyone expects the West to return money to Russia in the foreseeable future“said the official.

«In general, we can honestly say that this money for us has been lost for a long time, if not forever» – Dmitry Timofeev, Representative of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that attempts to seize Russian assets will be theft and will not go unpunished. He stressed that the frozen Russian reserves of Western countries “are now thinking about how to summarize at least some kind of legal basis for definitively assigning them».

source: Lentu via News Pravda

https://en.reseauinternational.net/les-avoirs-russes-geles-ont-trouve-un-defenseur-pourquoi-larabie-saoudite-sest-elle-opposee-a-la-confiscation/

READ FROM TOP.