Sunday 8th of September 2024

NATO SUMMIT: Alliance Emissions Fuel Climate Breakdown.....

The militaries of North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries emitted an estimated 233 million metric tons of greenhouse gases in 2023, a sharp uptick that exacerbates climate breakdown and serves only to enrich weapons manufacturers, according to a briefing issued Monday by the Transnational Institute, a research and advocacy organization, and several other nonprofits. 

 

By Edward Carver
Common Dreams

 

The 32 national militaries together emitted more carbon than the country of Colombia, which has a population of about 52 million people, the briefing says. NATO countries’ military spending increased from about $1.21 trillion in 2022 to $1.34 trillion in 2023, thanks in part to the conflicts in Ukraine and Palestine. TNI used a spend-emission conversion factor to estimate the carbon cost of the spending.

The briefing’s authors warn that NATO’s spending targets must be abandoned or its emissions will continue to rise significantly in the next few years — despite a pledge to reduce emissions by 45 percent by 2030. Member countries have pledged to spend at least 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense, and many have have already met or surpassed the target. 

The authors note that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change determined that all sectors of the economy need to reduce emissions by 43 percent by 2030 from 2019 levels to keep global warming at or below the Paris agreement’s 1.5°C target. 

“By 2030, we have to make a radical cut in emissions,” Nick Buxton, TNI’s communications manager, told The Guardian. “But the biggest investment we’re making worldwide, and in particularly NATO, is in military spending, which isn’t just not addressing the problem, but actually worsening the problem.”

The United States accounts for more than two-thirds of NATO countries’ military spending and one-third of the world’s, which also surged in 2023. U.S. military spending increased by 24 percent from 2022 to 2023, and some leading Republicans in Congress have recently called for large increases. 

A 2022 report from the Conflict and Environment Observatory, a research and advocacy group, estimated that military emissions accounted for 5.5 percent of all global carbon emissions. Estimates are difficult because lack of transparent reporting practices by many militaries, experts say. 

The new briefing suggests that military spending could be diverted to climate finance for developing countries, which have been the subject of intense international negotiations in recent years, with rich countries slow to provide funding even as they spend profligately on their militaries, critics have argued. 

“The climate is caught in the crossfire of war,” TNI said on social media. “We need peaceful solutions to conflicts if we are to defend our world. There is no secure nation on an unsafe planet.”

The “only winners” from NATO’s spending policy are weapons manufacturers, says the briefing, which states that backlogs of weapons orders at the 10 largest arms companies based in NATO member countries went up by an average of 13 percent in 2023. 

 

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/07/11/nato-summit-alliance-emissions-fuel-climate-breakdown/

NATO is preparing to rob china....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qBQUB3bMRI

ECONOMIC WAR: NATO Threatens to Nationalize Assets Owned by China the EU

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MZUrDI2dsk

Ray McGovern EXPOSES: How NATO's Actions Are SHATTERING Any Hope for World Peace!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIFu20LFeeY

“Peace, Not NATO”: German MP Decries NATO’s 75 Years of War & Hypocrisy

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6r1I_7uCec

Viral Ibrahim Traore Speech Sends SHOCKWAVES Worldwide!

 

 

 

NOTE: IT SEEMS THAT THE P&I WEBSITE HAS BEEN TARGETTED BY THE INTERNET "REGULATORS"

 

arctic efforts.....

Whether the latest effort by the US, Canada and Finland to build a fleet of icebreakers to challenge Russo-Chinese cooperation in the Arctic will succeed is a fairly complicated question, says Alexander Vorotnikov, coordinator of Russia’s Project Office for the Development of the Arctic.

On one hand, he notes, Finland has considerable experience building icebreaker hulls – in fact, a number of Soviet and Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker hulls were built at Finnish shipyards – while the United States has the technology and experience needed to construct nuclear propulsion systems.

On the other hand, this project faces some not inconsiderable hurdles.

“Firstly, it’s personnel. In order to make all this, you need personnel,” Vorotnikov says, pointing out that building nuclear icebreakers is one thing but training skilled personnel is another. “Secondly, it’s technologies: the Americans have [nuclear] propulsion systems for aircraft carriers, but adapting them for icebreakers would be a whole different matter.”

While the United States should have enough money to finance this project, the US economy slowing down, as well as the current geopolitical situation, does not help this icebreaker construction venture.

Meanwhile, this trilateral pact between the US, Canada and Finland aimed at challenging Russia and China in the Arctic is not going to benefit anyone, Vorotnikov warns. According to him, Russia would not be able to ignore threats to its security and attempts to disrupt its plans in the Arctic.

“So, we are going to have to pay considerable attention to our defense capabilities,” Vorotnikov remarks.

Reporting in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz offers the most significant evidence to date that Israel killed its own citizens in an effort to prevent Hamas fighters from returning to Gaza after the Palestinian group’s armed operation.

He also notes that Russia possesses unparalleled knowledge of the Arctic (thanks to all the research expeditions that started during the Soviet era) which, coupled with the prospects of establishing drone bases in the region, would make a confrontation with Russia in the Arctic a very challenging prospect.

“When the Cold War started, the USSR constructed ‘ice airfields’ in the Arctic in order to bring in aircraft and pilots to shoot down anyone who might fly to us, because the Arctic is the shortest route to us [from North America] via the North Pole,” Vorotnikov says.

Thus, he suggests, Russia might establish air bases in the Arctic, just like the aforementioned ‘ice airfields’ but equipped with drones instead of manned aircraft.

“Bring drones there, which could be used as a counterbalance for our opponents,” Vorotnikov explains.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240715/us-attempts-to-threaten-russia-in-arctic-wont-be-a-cakewalk-1119381320.html

 

READ FROM TOP.....