A panel of United Nations (UN) experts has described Israel's continuing military operations in the Gaza Strip as "one of the most ostentatious and merciless manifestations of the desecration of human life and dignity," and demanded international action to avert the "annihilation" of Palestinians in the enclave.

The statement by more than 20 independent UN experts came after rescuers in the Palestinian territory said Israeli bombardments on Wednesday had killed 59 more people — 48 of them in Gaza City.

The Gaza Health Ministry, which is run by the Palestinian militant group Hamas, said at least 2,545 people have been killed since Israel resumed its campaign after a two-month ceasefire collapsed on March 18, bringing the war's overall death toll in Gaza to 52,653. The death toll cannot be independently verified, but many NGOs and the United Nations have regarded the figures as reliable.

"While states debate terminology — is it or is it not genocide? — Israel continues its relentless destruction of life in Gaza, through attacks by land, air and sea, displacing and massacring the surviving population with impunity," the UN experts said. "No one is spared — not children, persons with disabilities, nursing mothers, journalists, health professionals, aid workers, or hostages."

Imploring the international community to avert a descent into a "moral abyss," the experts said political leaders around the world faced a "stark decision" over Israel and Gaza: either to "remain passive and witness the slaughter of innocents" or "take part in crafting a just resolution."

 Macron: Situation in Gaza 'most critical'

French President Emmanuel Macron on Wednesday called the situation in Gaza "the most critical we have ever seen,"while British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said developments in Gaza and the occupied West Bank were "increasingly intolerable."

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said Madrid would present a draft resolution at the UN General Assembly aimed at "proposing urgent measures to stop the killing of innocent civilians and ensure humanitarian aid" in Gaza.

Israel's military operations in Gaza followed the terrorist attacks on October 7, 2023, in which Hamas militants killed 1,218 Israelis, mostly civilians, and abducted another 251 people. Hamas is designated a terrorist organization by Israel, Germany, the United States and several other countries.

Israel has demanded the return of all hostages seized in the attack, and the disarmament and dissolution of Hamas. Nationalist hardliners in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government have this week also expressed long-held ambitions of territorial expansion.

Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Monday, "We are finally going to conquer the Gaza Strip." He said he envisioned Gaza being "completely destroyed" and its residents displaced.

On Wednesday, the foreign ministers of Spain, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Norway and Slovenia released a joint statement in which they said they "firmly reject any demographic or territorial change in Gaza."

UN rights chief Volker Turk said Israel's expanded plans "will almost certainly cause further mass displacement, more deaths and injuries of innocent civilians" and create would create conditions which would threaten the "continued existence" of Palestinians in Gaza.

Edited by Sean Sinico

https://www.dw.com/en/gaza-un-experts-warn-of-annihilation-by-israeli-strikes/a-72468724

 

====================

 

The US military’s humanitarian pier mission in Gaza last year resulted in far more injuries, damage, and operational failure than previously publicly acknowledged, an investigation has found.

The mission, formally known as Operation Neptune Solace, was launched under the administration of former President Joe Biden in 2024 after the US failed to persuade Israel to expand overland access for humanitarian deliveries. The US military constructed a temporary offshore pier and floating causeway to transfer aid from ships to the Gaza shoreline without entering Israeli or Gazan ports.

The Pentagon had since acknowledged that the mission encountered certain challenges, such as rough weather conditions, which caused damage to the pier but did not disclose the full scope of the problems.

According to the Department of Defense Inspector General’s report, which was published last week, the mission caused 62 injuries among personnel, including the death of Army Sergeant Quandarius Stanley, who was critically injured aboard a Navy vessel in May 2024 and died five months later.

“The Army and Navy did not meet Service-level standards for equipment and unit readiness for their watercraft units,” the report stated, adding that neither service organized, trained, and equipped their forces to meet common joint standards. It also faulted the Transportation Command for shortcomings in logistics planning and exercises.

The report also concluded that the mission cost approximately $230 million and led to $31 million in repair costs after more than two dozen watercraft and equipment pieces were damaged. It further underlined the questionable value of the operation, given that it ran for a total of three months but was actually functional for only about 20 days.

During that time, the US military said it had delivered approximately 20 million pounds of food and supplies via the pier. However, aid groups had stated that Gaza required that amount on a daily basis to avert famine.

The humanitarian situation in Gaza has deteriorated sharply as a result of Israel’s military response to the attack on its territory by Hamas militants in 2023. Israel has been accused of indiscriminate bombings, deliberate destruction of civilian infrastructure, and obstruction of humanitarian aid, which have reportedly led to the deaths of over 50,000 Palestinians. The imposed blockade has led to severe shortages of food, medical supplies, and other essential resources, according to international organizations.

Humanitarian organizations have repeatedly criticized both the US and Israeli governments for failing to unblock overland aid deliveries to Gaza and dismissed Washington’s efforts to open alternative routes as politically motivated.

https://www.rt.com/news/616983-us-gaza-aid-israel/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

 

At least 48 people were killed in Israeli air strikes on a school that housed families displaced by the conflict and which was located close to a crowded market and restaurant in Gaza City, local health authorities said.

Medics said two strikes targeted the Karama School in Tuffah, a suburb of Gaza City, killing 15 on Wednesday. Later in the day, an Israeli strike near a restaurant and market in the city killed at least 33 people, including women and children, medics said.

There was no immediate Israeli comment.

https://thenightly.com.au/world/middle-east/missile-strikes-on-gaza-school-market-israel-says-were-harbouring-terrorists-kill-at-least-48-c-18619599

 

THE WORLD IS WATCHING-BY THIS UGLY ISRAELI JEWISH NAZI WAR MACHINE AS IF ONE IS EXPECTING OR EVEN DESIRES THE WORST OUTCOME TO END THIS CONTEST STARTED IN 1927 (OR SO THEY SAY)... 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

את הדברים האלה צייץ ינון מגל לפני כשבוע. באותו יום פרסם שר הביטחון, ישראל כ"ץ, הודעה מוקלטת עם הדברים הבאים: "תושבי עזה, זאת פניית אזהרה אחרונה. הסינוואר הראשון הרס את עזה, והסינוואר השני יחריב אותה לחלוטין. תקיפת חיל האוויר נגד מחבלי החמאס היתה רק הצעד הראשון. ההמשך יהיה קשה בהרבה ואתם תשלמו את מלוא המחיר. בקרוב יתחיל שוב פינוי האוכלוסייה מאזורי הקרבות. אם לא ישוחררו כל החטופים הישראלים והחמאס לא יסולק מעזה – ישראל תפעל בעוצמות שעוד לא הכרתם. קבלו את עצת נשיא ארה"ב. תחזירו את החטופים ותסלקו את החמאס וייפתחו לכם אופציות אחרות – כולל יציאה למקומות אחרים בעולם למי שירצה. האלטרנטיבה היא הרס וחורבן מוחלט".

הדמיון בין שתי ההצהרות הוא גדול, ולא מופרך להניח שגם אם מגל לא שוחח ישירות עם כ"ץ, הוא שמע ממקורות בכירים בצבא מהי תוכנית המלחמה בעזה של כ"ץ ושל הרמטכ"ל אייל זמיר. יואב זיתון הסב במאמר ב-ynet את תשומת הלב לאמירה של תא"ל במילואים ארז וינר, אחרי שהודח בגלל שאיבד מסמכים מסווגים. "עצוב לי שאחרי שנה וחצי של 'דחיפת העגלה' במעלה ההר, כשסוף סוף נראה שהגענו לישורת והלחימה תקבל את התפנית (שנדרש היה לתת לה לפני שנה) הנכונה, אני לא אהיה ליד ההגה", כתב וינר.

וינר, כותב זיתון, הוא לא סתם קצין. הוא היה אחראי על תכנון מהלכי ההתקפה של צה"ל ברצועת עזה (וגם על הדלפות לכאורה לשר האוצר בצלאל סמוטריץ'), ודחף לכונן ממשל צבאי ישראלי ברצועה. אם הוא אומר 

 

 

Two weeks ago [¿MARCH 15TH], the right-wing Israeli journalist Yinon Magal posted the following on X: “This time, the IDF intends to evacuate all residents of the Gaza Strip to a new humanitarian zone that will be arranged for long-term stay, will be enclosed, and anyone entering it will first be checked to ensure they are not a terrorist. The IDF will not allow a rogue population to refuse evacuation this time. Anyone remaining outside the humanitarian zone will be implicated. This plan has American backing.”

The very same day, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz released a video statement hinting at something similar. “Residents of Gaza, this is your final warning,” he said. “The Air Force’s attack on Hamas terrorists was just the first step. The next phase will be far harsher, and you will pay the full price. Soon, the evacuation of the population from combat zones will resume. 

“If all Israeli hostages are not released and Hamas is not removed from Gaza, Israel will act with unprecedented force,” Katz continued. “Take the advice of the U.S. president: return the hostages and remove Hamas, and other options will open for you — including relocation to other countries for those who wish. The alternative is complete destruction and devastation.”

The parallels between the two statements are clearly no coincidence. Even if Magal did not learn about Israel’s new war plan directly from Katz or the army’s new chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, it is reasonable to assume he heard it from some other senior military sources.

In yet another piece of foreshadowing, journalist Yoav Zitun of Israeli news site Ynet drew attention to remarks made by Brig. Gen. Erez Wiener after his recent dismissal from the army for mishandling classified documents. “It saddens me that after a year and a half of ‘pushing the cart uphill,’ just when it finally seems like we’ve reached the final stretch and the fighting will take the right turn (which should have happened a year ago), I won’t be at the helm,” Wiener wrote on Facebook.

As Zitun noted, Wiener is no ordinary officer. Before his firing, he played a pivotal role in planning the army’s operations in Gaza, where he consistently pushed to impose full Israeli military rule over the territory. If Wiener, who was reportedly implicated in leaks to far-right minister Bezalel Smotrich, says that “the fighting will take the right turn,” one can infer what kind of turn he means. This also aligns with the apparent desires of Chief of Staff Zamir, as well as details of an attack plan that were allegedly leaked to the Wall Street Journal earlier last month. 

Connecting all these dots leads to a fairly clear conclusion: Israel is preparing to forcibly displace the entire population of Gaza — through a combination of evacuation orders and intense bombardment — into an enclosed and possibly fenced-off area. Anyone caught outside its boundaries would be killed, and buildings throughout the rest of the enclave would likely be razed to the ground. 

Without mincing words, this “humanitarian zone,” as Magal so kindly put it, in which the army intends to corral Gaza’s 2 million residents, can be summed up in just two words: concentration camp. This is not hyperbole; it is simply the most precise definition to help us better understand what we are facing.

An all-or-nothing principle

Perversely, the plan to establish a concentration camp inside Gaza may reflect Israeli leaders’ realization that the much-touted “voluntary departure” of the population is not realistic in the current circumstances — both because too few Gazans would be willing to leave, even under continued bombardment, and because no country would accept such a massive influx of Palestinian refugees.

According to Dr. Dotan Halevy, a researcher of Gaza and co-editor of the book “Gaza: Place and Image in the Israeli Space,” the concept of “voluntary departure” is based on an all-or-nothing principle. “Consider this hypothetical,” Halevy told me recently. “Ask Ofer Winter [the military general who, at the time of our conversation, looked set to be tasked with heading the Defense Ministry’s “Voluntary Departure Directorate”] whether evacuating 30 percent, 40 percent, or even 50 percent of Gaza’s residents would be considered a success. Would Israel really care if Gaza had 1.5 million Palestinians rather than 2.2 million? Would that enable the annexation fantasies of Bezalel Smotrich and his allies? The answer is almost certainly no.”

Halevy’s book features an essay by Dr. Omri Shafer Raviv exposing Israel’s plans to “encourage” Palestinian emigration from Gaza after the 1967 War. The title, “I Would Like to Hope That They Leave,” borrows a quote from then-Prime Minister Levi Eshkol. Published in January 2023 — a full two years before President Donald Trump would announce his “Gaza Riviera” plan — it reflects how deeply the notion of transferring Gaza’s population has been ingrained in Israeli strategic thinking.

The article reveals Israel’s two-pronged approach to reduce the number of Palestinians in Gaza: first, encouraging them to move to the West Bank, and from there to Jordan; and second, seeking countries in South America willing to absorb Palestinian refugees. While the first strategy saw some success, the second failed completely.

According to Shafer Raviv, the plan ended up backfiring on Israel. Though tens of thousands of Palestinians left Gaza for Jordan after Israel deliberately lowered living standards in the enclave, most of them remained. But crucially, the deteriorating conditions gave rise to unrest — and, as a result, armed resistance.

Realizing this, Israel decided by early 1969 to ease the economic situation in the Strip by allowing Gazans to work in Israel, thus relieving the pressure to emigrate. Additionally, Jordan began to close its borders, further slowing Palestinian flight from the Strip. Ironically, some of the Gazans who moved to Jordan as part of Israel’s displacement plan later participated in the Battle of Karameh in March 1968 — the first direct military confrontation between Israel and the nascent Palestinian Liberation Organization which further cooled Israel’s enthusiasm for encouraging emigration from Gaza. 

Ultimately, Israel’s security establishment reached the conclusion that it was preferable to contain Palestinians in Gaza, where they could be monitored and controlled, rather than to disperse them across the region. According to Halevy, this perception has guided Israeli policy vis-à-vis Gaza until October 2023, and explains why Israel did not seek to force residents out of the Strip during its 17-year blockade. Indeed, until the start of the war, leaving Gaza was an extremely difficult and costly process, available only to Palestinians with wealth and connections who could reach foreign embassies in Jerusalem or Cairo to obtain visas.

Today, Israeli thinking regarding Gaza has seemingly flipped: from external control and containment to full control, expulsion, and annexation. 

In Shafer Raviv’s essay, he recounts a 2005 interview with Maj. Gen. Shlomo Gazit, the architect of Israel’s post-1967 occupation policy and the first head of the army’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT). When asked about the original Gaza expulsion plan, which he himself helped formulate 40 years earlier, his response was: “Anyone who talks about this should be hanged.” Twenty years later, with the current right-wing government, the prevailing sentiment is that anyone who doesn’t talk about “voluntary departure” of Gaza’s residents should be hanged.

And yet, despite the dramatic shift in strategy, Israel remains firmly trapped by its own policies. For “voluntary departure” to be sufficiently successful to enable annexation and re-establishment of Jewish settlements in the Strip, one would think that at least 70 percent of Gaza’s residents would have to be removed — meaning more than 1.5 million people. This goal is utterly unrealistic given the current political circumstances, both within Gaza and across the Arab world.

What’s more, as Halevy points out, even discussing such a proposal could reopen the question of freedom of movement in and out of Gaza. After all, if the departure is “voluntary,” Israel would in theory be required to guarantee that those who leave can also return. In an article on the Israeli news site Mako last week, describing a pilot program where 100 Gazans are set to leave the enclave for construction work in Indonesia, it was explicitly stated that “according to international law, anyone who leaves Gaza for work must be allowed to return.”

Whether or not Smotrich, Katz, and Zamir have read Halevy and Shafer Raviv’s articles, they likely understand that “voluntary departure” is not an immediately executable plan. But if they truly believe that the solution to the “Gaza problem” — or to the Palestinian issue as a whole — is for there to be no Palestinians left in Gaza, then it will certainly not be possible all in one go. 

In other words, the idea appears to be: first, corral the population into one or more closed-off enclaves; then, let starvation, desperation, and hopelessness do the rest. Those locked inside will see that Gaza has been completely destroyed, that their homes have been leveled, and that they have neither a present nor a future in the Strip. At that point, the Israeli thinking goes, Palestinians themselves will begin pushing for emigration, forcing Arab countries to take them in. 

Obstacles to expulsion

It remains to be seen whether the military — or even the government — is willing to go all the way on such a plan. It would almost certainly lead to the deaths of all the hostages, carrying the potential for major political fallout. Moreover, it would be fiercely resisted by Hamas, which has not lost its military capabilities and could inflict heavy losses on the army, as it did in northern Gaza right up until the final days before the ceasefire.

Other obstacles to such a plan include the exhaustion of Israeli army reservists, with growing concerns about both “silent” and public refusal to serve; the civil unrest being generated by the government’s aggressive efforts to weaken the judiciary will only intensify this phenomenon. It is also firmly opposed (at least for now) by both Egypt and Jordan, whose governments could go as far as suspending or canceling their peace agreements with Israel. Finally, there’s the unpredictable nature of Donald Trump, who one day threatens to “open the gates of hell” on Hamas and the next sends envoys to negotiate with the group directly, calling them “pretty nice guys.”

At present, the Israeli army is continuing to pummel Gaza with airstrikes and seize more territory around the Strip’s perimeter. Israel’s declared goal in its renewed assault is to pressure Hamas into extending phase one of the deal, meaning the release of hostages without committing to ending the war. Hamas, aware of Israel’s strategic limitations, refuses to budge from its position: any hostage deal must be tied to ending the war. Meanwhile, Zamir, who is perhaps genuinely fearful that he won’t have an army left to conquer Gaza, has remained conspicuously quiet, avoiding substantive statements about the military’s intentions.

Still, the combined pressure for a deal — from the population of Gaza, which is demanding for this nightmare to end and turning against Hamas, and from Israeli society, which is exhausted from the war and wants the hostages back — may not lead to a new ceasefire. On Monday, the Israeli army ordered all residents of Rafah to relocate to the so-called “humanitarian zone” in Al-Mawasi; in the Israeli media, this was presented as part of the pressure campaign on Hamas to agree to release the remaining hostages, but it could very well be the first step toward establishing a concentration camp.

Perhaps the government and the military believe that a “voluntary departure” of Gaza’s population will erase Israel’s crimes — that once Palestinians find a better future elsewhere, past actions will be forgotten. The sad truth is that while forced transfer of this scale is not practically feasible, the methods Israel might use to implement it could lead to even graver crimes — concentration camps, systematic destruction of the entire enclave, and possibly even outright extermination.

A version of this article was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Our team has been devastated by the horrific events of this latest war. The world is reeling from Israel’s unprecedented onslaught on Gaza, inflicting mass devastation and death upon besieged Palestinians, as well as the atrocious attack and kidnappings by Hamas in Israel on October 7. Our hearts are with all the people and communities facing this violence. 

We are in an extraordinarily dangerous era in Israel-Palestine. The bloodshed has reached extreme levels of brutality and threatens to engulf the entire region. Emboldened settlers in the West Bank, backed by the army, are seizing the opportunity to intensify their attacks on Palestinians. The most far-right government in Israel’s history is ramping up its policing of dissent, using the cover of war to silence Palestinian citizens and left-wing Jews who object to its policies.

This escalation has a very clear context, one that +972 has spent the past 14 years covering: Israeli society’s growing racism and militarism, entrenched occupation and apartheid, and a normalized siege on Gaza.

We are well positioned to cover this perilous moment – but we need your help to do it. This terrible period will challenge the humanity of all of those working for a better future in this land. Palestinians and Israelis are already organizing and strategizing to put up the fight of their lives.

Can we count on your support ? +972 Magazine is a leading media voice of this movement, a desperately needed platform where Palestinian and Israeli journalists, activists, and thinkers can report on and analyze what is happening, guided by humanism, equality, and justice. Join us.

https://www.972mag.com/israel-gaza-concentration-camp-expulsion/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.