Ladies and gentlemen, journalists and news watchers of the Western world, lend me your biased ear….

I have a question for you. Why do you hate Russia?

YOU HATE RUSSIA, DON’T YOU? Putin?…

What’s not to hate about invading a neighbouring country and killing many people, you might say for starters…

I know with a very high degree of certainty that you are wrong, but I also know that you wont change your mind easily. You have been well trained.... 

BY GUS LEONISKY

You might listen to my alternative point of view, but, considering that you have been “propagandised” to the max by the “colonial residue” that still controls Western thinking that gives you a belief in traditional superiority, you wont change your mind…

I had a very limited conversation with a journalist recently. He has a friend in Hungary and they both hated Viktor Orban… I MEAN HATED! The name Putin was briefly mentioned in the tirade… I just listened and said nothing. The time and place was not suitable to raise the interesting argument that Hungary and Russia have revived and adapted the traditional value system that had brought success to the Western nations till the mid 1960s. 

What has changed in the Western nations? Is there a sense of diminishing strength in this change, which because of growing uncertainty, we increase the blame on Russia and China, for it?

In the last 55 years, some deceitful managements of civilisation concepts were performed in order to maintain control of the narrative of Western geopolitical superiority — while these challenging changes have been happening. 

Thus deceit — always present in civilisations since the year dot — has been intensified for you being “propagandised” to the point of subconsciously accepting that DECEIT has been “necessary”… Your controllers make you distort their deceit into accidental mistake while it has been full-on deception from the start… In this process, the system makes you retain your sense of disdain for others, especially Russia, in order to maintain your “fragile” sense of superiority. I say “fragile” because if you accept that others can be as good as you, you would feel that your Western superiority is as good as a floating turd in a blocked dunny. 

Let me remind you of 2003…

In 2003, the President of the “free” (the Western) world, George W Bush, and his team of lapdogs (Blair and Howard, plus a multitude of sycophants — including Downer and Powell), concocted a fake motive to go and attack Iraq. The mantra “Saddam has weapons of mass destruction” was a lie but it was promoted by the Western media, with various sauces, all relating to the main lie — as a truth. The western media deceived you. You, journalists and news-watchers alike believed the lie. At some point, the lie was not enough. “Saddam is not a nice person” was added to the sauce. He was a ruthless dictator who was killing his own people and deserved to be taken out… What is not often mentioned is that the West (America) supported him in this venture, because the people he kept under the thumb were Shia muslim, aligned with Iran, another country which we hate. WHY?

Iran defies “Western pressures” forcing it to be like us… It has its own corruption system, while the Western system is corrupt to favour some people over others… I am sure you know this — or at least, you feel/see it: poor people stay poor, while the rich enrich by the bucket load… You may think that this happens because poor people don’t work hard enough, but you would be deluded to think along that line. There are lazy people at all level of society, but most poor people work hard to stay afloat. The system is designed to give the illusion of democratic equality… As mentioned on this site a long time ago, this is a pipe dream sold by the most deceitful country on earth: America.

So, there are many lies, conspiracies and traditional beliefs that we value as truth, in order to define ourselves. Thus Russia is bad, we’re good.

We dismiss the lies of NATO as “freedom of choice”. We postulate that Ukraine has the right to become a member of NATO. We will bomb CUBA if it harbours RUSSIAN missiles. We’re hypocrites, of course. 

We have PROVOKED Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine but we will deny that we provoked it… How do we live with these lies? Easy? We’re top dog and we control the narrative to do as we please. And this is WHAT THE MEDIA WANT US TO BELIEVE. Actually most of the media sources come from inside the CIA, the NSA and the 16 other “intelligence” agencies of America which communicate with the other five eyes to promote disinformation. 

Most lefty comedians like Stephen Colbert promote this disinformation by using anti-Trumpism.

With the Trump administration comes a different form of disinformation: unsettled chaos, low immediate focus but the similar goal: defeat Russia. Records show that Russophobia goes back nearly 500 years in the UK.

REMEMBER the Anglo-Russian War? No you do not, because it’s not in our interest to know… It was a war between the United Kingdom and the Russian Empire from 2 September 1807 to 18 July 1812 during the Napoleonic Wars. During the war, military engagements were limited primarily to minor naval actions in the Baltic Sea and Barents Sea.

After Napoleon Bonaparte defeated the Russians at the Battle of Friedland (14 June 1807), Tsar Alexander I of Russia signed the Treaty of Tilsit. Although the treaty was unpopular within the Russian court, Russia had no alternative as Napoleon’s armies could cross the Neman river (then the Russian border in present day Belarus) and invade Russia.

The terms of the treaty obliged Russia to cease maritime trade with Great Britain. This was part of Napoleon's efforts to establish the Continental System, strengthening economic ties between the different countries in Europe under French domination. Napoleon's objective was to close one of Britain's most important markets and thus force it economically into submission.

On 26 October 1807, Emperor of all the Russias Alexander formally declared war on the United Kingdom after the British attack on Copenhagen in September 1807. Alexander did not actively wage the war… restricted Russia's contribution to the bare requirement to close off trade. The British, understanding his position, limited their military response to the declaration. However, there were a few notable incidents.

British authorities declared an embargo on all Russian vessels in British-controlled ports. The crews of approximately 70 British ships profited from the seizure of the 44-gun Russian frigate Speshnoy, which was at anchor in Portsmouth Harbour.

The Russian storeship Wilhelmina was also seized at the same time. Speshnoy had sailed from Kronstadt with the payroll for Vice-Admiral Dmitry Senyavin’s squadron in the Mediterranean, together with Vilgemina. Found on board were more than 600,000 Spanish doubloons and more than 140,000 Dutch ducats. Consequently, able seamen on the 70 British vessels were given 14 shillings and 71⁄2 pence in prize money each. 

So, there is history in Britain including the EU/West) stealing Russia’s cash. 

The history of Ukraine is complicated. Ukraine as its 1991 borders stood, was a conglomerate of various Oblasts (provinces) with various ethnic background. Imagine the UK before Eire (Ireland) became independent… Imagine Scotland trying to secede a few years ago.

As an aside, The EU is presently on a high-level charm offensive, according to Reuters, to meet Hungarian minorities in Ukraine to help smooth Ukraine ascension to European Union which Hungary is opposing for various valid reasons — including that Ukraine (the Kiev Regime) is not far from being the most corrupt country on earth and runs on nazi energy. I suppose we can forgive this because the Ukrainian of the Kiev regime have to do all they can to fight the Russians… We won’t mention that Ukraine has been corrupt since before 1922, which pushed the Russians to add the RUSSIAN Donbass region as part of the Ukrainian communist region to tone things down a bit.

So, by 1954, Ukraine being a “good communist country” (it was not — the Galician nazis were still fighting Russia) Khrushchev added CRIMEA as a “gift”… Apparently this was never properly approved by the USSR government… Both the Donbass, where Khrushchev was born as a Ukrainian/RUSSIAN, and CRIMEA were (and still are) mostly populated by Russians. 

We must make a detour via the 19th century Crimean war, where the British got involved against the Russians once more...

Gus Leonisky

MORE TO COME

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.