Thursday 18th of June 2026

pauline wants to kill SBS and probably muzzle the ABC....

 

One Nation says leader Pauline Hanson’s safety was compromised when activist group GetUp was able to unfurl a stunt banner behind her as she delivered her first-ever speech at the National Press Club in Canberra.

Hanson pushed on to outline plans to clamp down on Muslim migration, end multiculturalism and axe the climate change department.

Speaking after Wednesday’s event, Hanson’s chief of staff, James Ashby, said, “there are safety concerns around Pauline’s security”. He demanded the club impose a lifetime ban on the activist group, including the organisation’s media and campaigns lead, David Sharaz.

The club issued an apology to Hanson and said neither its staff nor its contractors had any involvement in the incident and that it was the work of third parties. Footage has been handed to the Australian Federal Police.

After the speech, GetUp claimed responsibility for the stunt, which involved remotely unfurling a banner that said, “I opposed a pay rise for workers while I took a $100,000 pay rise for myself”. The banner was unfurled shortly after Hanson started speaking.

Hanson was momentarily distracted by the banner’s appearance but pushed on with her speech.

Ashby later said he had been assured on Tuesday and Wednesday “by members of the Press Club and the AFP that she had the same level of security as was provided to Israeli dignitaries who were recently here, which is one step above the security provided to the PM”.

“What signal does this send to dignitaries if vigilante groups and protesters like GetUp are allowed to do that? I think the National Press Club should be looking very closely at their constitution for a way in which to impose a lifetime ban on GetUp and its members who were there, and I am pointing my finger specifically at David Sharaz.”

Sharaz came to prominence working with his partner, Brittany Higgins, when she went public with her claims she had been raped by fellow political staffer Bruce Lehrmann.

Sharaz was at the National Press Club for the event but has not responded to a request for comment.

The club said in a comment released at 5.20pm: “At time of writing, we understand he [Sharaz] is yet to be interviewed by the AFP. It appears that two persons entered the club building yesterday afternoon without permission and installed a separate drop-down screen in front of our media wall/light box.

“It is evident that a further person present during the address activated a remote device to trigger the unfurling of the coiled banner. David Sharaz was seen filming the incident on his phone and, after the banner had lowered, left abruptly. We understand that this is likely to form part of the AFP investigation.

“When the investigation has concluded, the club will consider its legal options against the perpetrators including recovering costs for the significant damage to the media wall/light box.”

The club’s president, Sky News presenter Tom Connell, told his employer that preliminary vision suggested someone had set the stunt up much earlier.

“It appears from vision we’ve looked at so far that people were able to get access to the building yesterday, not today, and somebody who bought a ticket pressed a button during the address,” he told Sky News.

Hanson’s colleagues, including Barnaby Joyce and senators Malcolm Roberts, Sean Bell and Tyron Whitten, were also in the room for the speech, which ran about 15 minutes over time, and One Nation staff and supporters were also present, many of whom repeatedly cheered the party leader.

Hanson also attacked Guardian Australiajournalist Sarah Martin for asking why her daughter, Lee Hanson, was working for NSW senator Bell while the younger Hanson lived and worked in Tasmania – where she is the party’s Senate candidate at the next election – and whether Pauline Hanson had had any role in her daughter being hired.

“Honestly, you never give up,” Hanson said. “I’ve never seen a person that’s such a trashy journalist, you know, and what you put out all the time, you’ve got this obsession with constantly trying to pull down myself, my party, or Mrs [Gina] Rinehart,” she said.

Rinehart is a major donor to One Nation, including recently giving the party leader a small plane.

SBS journalist Anna Henderson also received a blast after asking about Hanson’s plan to shut down the network, with the One Nation leader saying: “You’re going to be without a job, certainly.”

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/getup-stunt-at-hanson-speech-referred-to-police-as-one-nation-says-leader-safety-compromised-20260617-p607j8.html

 

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….

 

Independent Australia – through managing editor David DonovanVince O’GradyRoss Jones and many others – has spent hundreds of hours of investigating and researching the James Ashby / Peter Slipper scandal — a covert political conspiracy by the Coalition to bring down the Parliamentary Speaker, Peter Slipper, and through him the Federal Government of Australia.

This dedicated Ashbygate page will be updated as new information comes to light and more articles are published.

The page is arranged in reverse chronological order — meaning the oldest stories will be found at the bottom of the page.

To get the full story, scroll to the bottom of the page and read upwards.

STOP PRESS: Want to help investigate Ashbygate. Pledge your support to the Ashbygate Trust.

https://independentaustralia.net/ashbygate/ 

 

GUSNOTE: [WORDS] IN BRAKETS IN THE CARTOON INDICATE WHAT GUS THINKS OF PAULINE'S FASCIST AGENDA — NOT WHAT ASHBY SAYS....

illusion...

 

Centrism and the illusion of independent thought

By Matthew Peel

 

Many self-described centrists see themselves as independent thinkers, but their political views often reflect the assumptions and narratives of the media they consume, writes Matthew Peel.

HERE'S A DISTINCTLY 2026 Australian phenomenon: someone declares themselves “not left or right, just sensible”. Then, without a hint of irony, they repeat the previous night's commercial news bulletin word‑for‑word.

This isn't Centrism. It's a media habit wearing a disguise.

Across the country, the self‑proclaimed “centrist” label has become a social survival strategy. But most people using it haven't contrasted competing arguments. They aren't pragmatic thinkers who've read widely across the political spectrum.

They are, in practice, people who watch or read only corporate-backed news – maybe Sky News After Dark7 News, perhaps, a taste of ABC Drive on the way home – and then confidently announce that they “just call it as they see it”.

They firmly believe they have the monopoly on common sense. But common sense, in this context, isn't a product of independent thought. It's a feeling. And that feeling has been manufactured.

We've all heard it: a friend or family member insists they're too sensible for the shouting match. Then, within minutes, they regurgitate a near‑perfect transcript of last night's news headlines — negative gearing outrage, the supposed environmental destruction of renewables, union “thuggery”. They don't know they're repeating drip‑fed narratives. They genuinely believe these are their own conclusions.

But let's be blunt: these people are not centrists. Not even close. They have never looked into what a centrist actually is — historically, philosophically, or policy‑wise.

And here's the kicker: in Australia's concentrated media landscape, that commercial news diet is often the only thing they consume. They mistakenly believe The Project or the ABC are progressive platforms — another corporate line they've swallowed without question. They have simply absorbed a narrow, billionaire‑backed information flow and mistaken its boundaries for the entire playing field.

Why does this matter? Because the “centrist” label has become a shield that lets people bypass the hard work of political consideration. When you say “I'm a centrist”, you don't have to justify your sources. You don't have to explain why you never read or listen to anything outside your usual bubble. You just get to feel superior – calm, reasonable, above it all – while parroting the exact talking points that serve the status quo.

In 2026, this isn't harmless. Rents are crushing young families. Groceries are a daily stress test. Climate instability is no longer a future warning. And the “common sense” middle, the one so many feel safely perched in, isn't an objective anchor. It's a boundary line drawn by media monopolies that profit from keeping you comfortable, uninformed and convinced you've figured it out on your own.

The truly uncomfortable truth is this: if your entire political worldview comes from one flavour of commercial news, you don't have a political philosophy. You have a media habit. And calling that habit “centrism” doesn't make you an independent thinker; it makes you a loyal consumer oblivious to your servitude.

So next time someone tells you they're a centrist, ask them gently: What have you read or watched this week that challenged your usual sources? What's your definition of left‑leaning or progressive media? If the answer is a blank stare or a defensive shrug, you're not talking to a moderate. You're talking to someone who has outsourced their thinking to a commercial news bulletin and called it common sense.

The middle ground isn't wherever your remote control lands at 6 PM. Real centrism, if it exists at all, requires seeking out discomfort, not avoiding it. It requires knowing what both poles actually argue, not just the version fed to you by a single corporate lens. Until then, “I'm a centrist” is just a polite way of saying: “I stopped listening, but I'd like the credit for still caring.”

The majority of self‑proclaimed “centrists” should stop mistaking familiarity for wisdom and accept the “common sense” label for what it is: a very convenient ignorance.

Matthew Peel is a physiotherapist with an interest in the importance of critical thinking, exposing media bias and promoting progressive policy. 

https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/centrism-and-the-illusion-of-independent-thought,21181

 

READ FROM TOP.

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….