SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
making global warming irrelevant....
From October 13 to 23, 2026, Italy is hosting NATO’s annual nuclear deterrence exercise Steadfast Noon. The exercise will take place at air bases in Aviano and Ghedi in northern Italy. Flight operations and training involving mock nuclear weapons will take place in designated airspace over the Tyrrhenian Sea and other areas under NATO jurisdiction in Southern and Western Europe.
American bombs, European pilots: Who does what in NATO’s nuclear club? Steadfast Noon brings 17 allies to the exercise – though joining the drills and carrying American bombs are very different commitments BY Dmitry Kornev
The purpose of these exercises is to prepare NATO aircraft for the potential deployment of US nuclear weapons stationed at European airbases. This year’s exercise boasts a record number of participants – 17 NATO countries, compared to 14 in 2025 and 13 in 2024. While the complete list of participating nations hasn’t been disclosed, it is confirmed that the US, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, and Türkiye will take part. Romania and Poland will likely provide fighter support and ensure integration along NATO’s eastern flank. New NATO members – Sweden and Finland – are fully engaged in the training missions. Finland may host US nuclear weapons in the future and has already started acquiring F-35 carrier aircraft. Notably, France does not participate in NATO’s nuclear planning group and is not involved in these exercises, likely due to its own air-delivered nuclear capabilities. The exercise involves around 70 military aircraft and over 2,000 service personnel. The main focus is on dual-capable aircraft, which can carry both conventional and nuclear payloads. In Europe, this currently includes F-35A Lightning II multi-role fighters, German Tornado IDS strike aircraft, and F-16 multi-role fighters. Under the US Nuclear Sharing program, these European planes are equipped to carry US nuclear bombs. Additionally, Swedish JAS 39 Gripen jets will also be involved in the exercise, although these planes are not equipped to carry American nuclear bombs. Strategic support for the tactical air units is provided by American B-52H bombers. Air-to-air refueling during the exercises over the Tyrrhenian and Mediterranean seas will be carried out by KC-135 Stratotanker and KC-767A aircraft. Coordination of aircraft operations will be managed by NATO’s E-3A Sentry AWACS aircraft. Logistic support will be provided by Airbus A400M military transport planes. The official tactical scenario for the exercises is fully classified. However, it can be inferred that the drills focus on the repositioning of nuclear-capable strike aircraft, aerial refueling operations, and coordination among NATO air forces from various countries. Military personnel are being trained to safely transport mock nuclear warheads from underground storage facilities, attach them to aircraft, carry out aerial refueling, and coordinate efforts between air forces and ground services in the event of a nuclear alert. It’s important to note that these exercises use mock bombs rather than real ones; no actual nuclear weapons are mounted on aircraft or involved in the training. All strikes and nuclear weapon deployments are simulated electronically. What types of nuclear munitions could be involved in the 2026 exercise? It is known that B61-series US thermonuclear tactical bombs are stored in Europe, including at Aviano Air Base. B61-3 and B61-4 bombs belong to the penultimate generation of nuclear bombs. These are free-fall (gravity) nuclear bombs. Their yield can be adjusted – from a minimum of 0.3 kilotons to a maximum of 45–50 kilotons in TNT equivalent – depending on the mission requirements set before takeoff. The B61-12 represents the latest modification in the US arsenal. A particular feature of this model is the tail kit produced by Boeing, which transforms a conventional bomb into a guided precision weapon. The high level of precision allows for reduced explosive yield while maintaining destructive power against heavily fortified command centers and other critical targets. Additionally, lowering the yield significantly mitigates collateral radioactive contamination of the surrounding area. The B61-12 is gradually replacing older munitions in the American nuclear stockpile. The primary delivery systems for B61-12 bombs include US F-16C/D Fighting Falcon fighters, as well as fifth-generation F-35A fighters, which are gradually being integrated into the air forces of European NATO members. As previously mentioned, Exercise Steadfast Noon takes place regularly. However, given the current geopolitical landscape, any routine military activity takes on added significance and is viewed by observers through the lens of a potential East-West confrontation. On the one hand, NATO emphasizes the defensive nature of these exercises, and there is a relatively small number of participating aircraft – for example, only three German Tornado aircraft. On the other hand, the number of participating nations is steadily increasing, and many NATO countries now possess nuclear-capable aircraft, particularly F-35 fighters. While today, Finland may participate in these maneuvers more as a student and observer, Finnish F-35s could soon be ready to transport nuclear bombs. There’s a growing sense that this ‘train’ is headed in the wrong direction. And it’s unlikely that the growing number of ‘Chekhov’s guns’ will contribute to fostering lasting peace in Europe. Perhaps it would be wiser for Europe to focus on peaceful initiatives rather than militarization and the proliferation of potential nuclear platforms. https://rt-english.com/news/647253-american-bombs-european-pilots/
PLEASE VISIT: YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005. Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951. RABID ATHEIST. WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….
|
User login |
kaliningrad......
The Estonian government reportedly plans to seek neighboring Latvia’s cooperation in shutting down a gas pipeline that serves as a backup supply route to Kaliningrad Region, the Russian exclave that Western officials recently called a strategic vulnerability for Moscow.
The government of Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal was surprised to learn that local operator Elering was maintaining the pipeline in working condition, Eesti Ekspress reported on Wednesday. Tallinn now intends to work with Riga to close the route, the outlet said.
The Estonian section of the pipeline consists of two parallel pipes, each 70 centimeters in diameter, running just 22 km through Voru County in the southeast of the country. The connection is clearly marked on a pipeline map published on Elering’s website. According to Eesti Ekspress, it was last used in fall 2024.
Michal reportedly hopes to persuade the Latvian government to close a valve and physically prevent gas from flowing through the connection. If Riga refuses, Tallinn could impose sanctions on Russian gas transit, potentially creating legal complications for Latvia and Lithuania, through which the backup route passes before reaching Kaliningrad Region. Estonian Energy Minister Erkki Keldo told Eesti Ekspress he feared Moscow would exploit such a move to publicly criticize Tallinn.
Officials in several NATO members, including Estonia, have recently described Kaliningrad Region as a Russian vulnerability due to its geographic position. Moscow has warned that any escalation where the US-led military bloc threatened Russia’s territorial integrity, including that of its westernmost region, could result in a nuclear war.
Kaliningrad’s principal overland gas supply route is the Minsk-Vilnius-Kaunas-Kaliningrad pipeline, which first entered service in 1985 and has an annual capacity of 2.5 billion cubic meters. Russia’s Gazprom renewed its transit agreement with Lithuania’s Amber Grid in 2025, securing the arrangement through the end of 2030.
Nevertheless, Moscow has long considered the Baltic states unreliable transit partners, fearing they could cut off supplies for political reasons. In 2019, Gazprom commissioned an LNG receiving terminal near Kaliningrad, complementing the region’s underground gas storage facilities. The maritime supply system uses the Marshal Vasilevskiy, an LNG carrier equipped to regasify its cargo.
READ MORE: Baltic states try secret dip into EU defense purse – mediaOriginally intended as insurance against geopolitical disruptions, the more expensive maritime route was activated last year as Western sanctions targeting Russian gas made deliveries from Leningrad Region to the isolated Russian territory commercially viable. In an emergency, the LNG system has sufficient capacity to meet Kaliningrad Region’s entire gas demand, which the regional government said totaled 2.24 billion cubic meters last year.
https://rt-english.com/russia/647223-estonia-kaliningrad-gas-pipeline/
======================
Russia sent a diplomatic memo to NATO member states on 30 September, warning that it is prepared to use its entire arsenal, including nuclear weapons, if the alliance attempts to blockade the Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad. It claimed to have “information that NATO is preparing an air and naval blockade” of the territory.
In the memo sent to NATO and seen by Reuters, Moscow accused the alliance of a “dangerous and reckless course” that carried “high risks of the outbreak of a direct armed conflict”. The document said this included the possibility of “Russian strikes against decision-making centers in the alliance’s member states right from the outset”.
“Russia will be ready to use the entire arsenal of forces and capabilities at its disposal, including nuclear weapons, in order to defend its territory should NATO countries undertake any attempt aimed at isolating the Kaliningrad Region from the rest of the country,” the diplomatic note said.
In its written response, also seen by Reuters, NATO said that it is a defensive alliance and none of its “exercises or activities pose a threat to the territory of the Russian Federation”. “We call upon the Russian Federation to end its unprovoked full-scale invasion of Ukraine. We urge the Russian Federation to refrain from increasingly reckless behaviour towards the Allies and to cease its irresponsible nuclear rhetoric,” it added.
Asked whether the risk of nuclear weapons being used against the Baltics was now real, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told a defence conference in Brussels, hosted by broadcaster Euronews: “No, it’s not. Putin knows that he can never win (against) NATO, so I don’t take this that seriously.” He added that he was “‘not at liberty to disclose what they sent us, but this is what they reported more or less to the media”. He also called the document “unhelpful” and said Russia should “stop the nuclear threats”.
In addition to this official diplomatic warning, Russian embassies in at least three European countries have reportedly issued statements accusing NATO of escalating tensions through military exercises and planning scenarios involving Kaliningrad.
This brief explains:
https://natowatch.org/default/2026/why-did-russia-warn-nato-it-would-use-nuclear-weapons-if-kaliningrad-blocked
NATO Watch is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation that works to promote public awareness and foster debate on the role of NATO in public life.
=======================
READ FROM TOP.
PLEASE VISIT:
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
RABID ATHEIST.
WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….