Wednesday 21st of October 2026

the path to social-sociopathy......

 

We have explore psychopathy and sociopathy in depth somewhere on this site with the caveats that about four per cent of men are psychopaths and one per cent of women are psychos as well…

Meanwhile social-sociopathy should be defined differently as sociopathy…

 

THIS ANALYSIS IS A SIMPLISTIC SHORT CUT TO A COMPLEX PROBLEM….

By Gus leonisky

 

Psychopaths are usually born with the symptoms and are difficult for a social construct to deal with them when they become dangerous. They usually are “uneducated” and end up in prison or an asylum for “mad” people, more often than not. 

These cases are usually self-contained individual vessels who interfere ALONE with their relationships — be with their family, neighbours or social networks.

Sociopaths learn to become ruthless users of the system in a way they often become at the top of the pile. Example would be Hitler and Stalin. Sociopath know how to manipulate social networks to achieve their superior controlling status. Some unwise people would place PUTIN in this lot, but this would be wrong. Putin is a careful manager of a difficult geopolitical situation which is created by Western sociopaths.

Social-psych-sociopathy should be viewed as a fuel of revolutions but not all revolutions are created by social-psychopathy.

It should be acknowledged that most of the social and property damages during a “legitimate” protest are the product of a social-socio-psychopathy in which individuals become TEMPORARILY psychopath/sociopaths en masse —i.e. as a GROUP.

The riots in France are an example of this. 

What leads people to become social sociopaths as a group?

We ALL have the seeds to become sociopath. 

This could range from simple anger to become aggressive eventually dangerous to ourselves and everyone, though most sociopaths know how to manage this fluid anger or any annoying situation by taking immediate advantage — or retreating, knowing that advantage over others can be taken “later on”. 

For a sociopath, care is only about ONESELF. Not about others, though one sociopath makes sure others obey one’s command.

As a group of protesters, there will be various levels of anti-social behaviour, including building up a group social-sociopathy. There will be social triggers to why people become angry enough to become anti-social and reach anarchistic level of behaviour. 

In the group there will be “educated” and “uneducated” anarchists — as well as looters [full-blown psychopaths] and agents provocateurs [agents of the system assigned to make sure any peaceful protests become violent]. 

This complicates any resolutions of the original seeds of the conflicts. Governments make sure protests become violent in order to hit back with the “law” AND THE POLICE in a “law and order” control which hides the sociopaths running the social system.

In a way, Emmanuel Macron is a mid-level sociopath who has learnt to manage his ambitions with a certain elegant arrogance of grandeur. As a former banker, he has learned the magic tricks of enrichment of his milieu, but the magic does not amuse/appease the crowds any more.

So what are the triggers for a “revolution” in France, 2026?

Why are the young people angry?

It is a complex perception of failure of education and of government policies at several levels:

— sociological with inequality become prevalent

— political with the wrong decisions being taken

— some religious platforms having become too simplistic to explain humanity 

— some religions pressuring certain sections of the community with excluding absolutism. 

ALL OF THESE REPRESENT A SOCIAL COHESION LIE. 

When people — especially young people — realise that they’ve been deceived since childhood, they can either become 

— depressed [sometimes leading to suicide]

— or angry. 

        At a personal level this leads to “rebellion” 

        At a group level this leads to “revolution”

 

Apart from perpetuating the misunderstanding the artificial purpose of social constructs, the deceit from from governments add to the confusion and the perception that WE ARE BEING LIED TO…

At a practical level, this is simple enough:

— Education budget is being slashed

— moneys are being wasted in supporting Ukraine

Whether the Kiev government is Nazi or not, or that Russia is correct or not — is not the issue. The issue is that BEING INVOLVED IN A WAR AFAR should not be the driver of social and budgetary decisions that hurt the population.

As well, the lies about the war in Ukraine are slowly being taken apart — like the “Saddam has weapons of mass destruction” deception of 2002/03… The Western lies about Ukraine have been constructed at least since 1945 and kept going crescendo until 2026, through the catalyst of 2022.

These lies have led to REDUCTION in local French social services, and to increases in the price of gas and diesel [the war against Iran is part of the greater war against RUSSIA]. These lies and reduction have also permeated other EUROPEAN countries, under the deceitful FASCIST fist of Ursula Von der Leyen.

As far as the kids — joined by the YELLOW VESTS and the socialists — are concerned, the governments which have turned to FASCISM in order to stay alive, should cope it.

One of the problem is such revolution end up destroying the delicate social fabric, with little to replace it except anger — or extreme right politics.

WE SHAL SEE… if reason prevails…

Most likely, a new breed of sociopaths will take the leadership.

 

WHAT FLAVOUR THE PUBLIC SERVICE?

THROUGHOUT HISTORY, THE MAIN QUESTION THAT HAS RARELY BEEN ASKED.

THE NEEDS OF ONE IS NOT NECESSARILY THE NEEDS OF OTHERS, THOUGH MOST NEEDS ARE BASICALLY SURVIVAL NECESSITY.

FOR HUMANS, MOST OF WHAT WE WANT IS STYLISTICALLY CONSTRUCTED AND THIS IS WHERE WE MOSTLY DIFFER. WE GET TEMPTED BY EQUAL VALUES BY MANIPULATION OF APPEARANCES.

MANAGING THESE DIFFERENCES HAS BEEN THE CHALLENGE OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS IN WHICH A TONAL BASELINE IS “PUBLIC SERVICE”. THE REST IS FLAVOUR.

ICECREAM: SUGAR CREAM, LEMON, STRAWB, VANILLA?

COFFEE: BITTERNESS VS AROMA?

SEE MICHAEL PARENTI

The essence of capitalism is to turn nature into commodities and commodities into capital. The live green earth is transformed into dead gold bricks, with luxury items for the few and toxic slag heaps for the many. The glittering mansion overlooks a vast sprawl of shanty towns, wherein a desperate, demoralized humanity is kept in line with drugs, television, and armed force.

 

You see there are people who believe the function of the police is to fight crime, and that's not true, the function of the police is social control and protection of property.

 

The problem with capitalism is that it best rewards the worst part of us: the ruthless, competitive, conniving, opportunistic, acquisitive drives, giving little reward and often much punishment-or at least much handicap-to honesty, compassion, fair play, many forms of hard work, love of justice, and a concern for those in need.

 

[The ruling elites] know who their enemies are, and their enemies are the people, the people at home and the people abroad. Their enemies are anybody who wants more social justice, anybody who wants to use the surplus value of society for social needs rather than for individual class greed, that's their enemy.

 

With unfailing consistency, U.S. intervention has been on the side of the rich and powerful of various nations at the expense of the poor and needy. Rather than strengthening democracies, U.S. leaders have overthrown numerous democratically elected governments or other populist regimes in dozens of countries ... whenever these nations give evidence of putting the interests of their people ahead of the interests of multinational corporate interests.

 

A nation as such does not give aid to another nation. More precisely, the common citizens of our country, through their taxes, give to the privileged elites of another country. As someone once said: foreign aid is when the poor people of a rich country give money to the rich people of a poor country.

                      Michael Parenti

 

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….

UN dystopia....

Conventional opinions fit so comfortably into the dominant paradigm as to be seen not as opinions but as statements of fact, as 'the nature of things.' The very efficacy of opinion manipulation rests on the fact that we do not know we are being manipulated. The most insidious forms of oppression are those that so insinuate themselves into our communication universe and the recesses of our minds that we do not even realize they are acting upon us.

                      Michael Parenti

 

 

SEE ALSO: 
FULL: 'Eight Countries Kept Silent...': Jeffrey Sachs Reveals How US Banned His Speech at UN!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqDSXgcYQqg

 

"Eight Countries Kept Silent...": On April 1, 2026, world-renowned economist and author Jeffrey Sachs delivered a blistering briefing revealing how he was blocked by the United Kingdom from delivering official testimony at an emergency U.N. Security Council session following U.S. and Israeli military strikes on Iran.

In this unfiltered geopolitical breakdown, Jeffrey Sachs exposes the deep hypocrisy inside the U.N. Security Council, detailing how eight member nations—including France, Denmark, Greece, and the UK—refused to acknowledge the initial strikes, claiming instead that Iran's response was completely "unprovoked." Sachs explains why every single country denying the attack hosts U.S. military bases, illustrating how Washington uses imperial regime control to strip European and allied nations of their independent foreign policy.

What You Need to Know:
• U.N. Security Council Gag Order: Jeffrey Sachs explains how he was invited by member governments to testify at U.N. Headquarters, only to have his speech blocked by the U.K. presidency.
• The 8-Nation Silence: How Denmark, France, Greece, Latvia, Bahrain, Panama, Colombia, and the UK omitted the initial U.S.-Israel strikes during official U.N. proceedings.
• Imperial Regime Control: Why nations hosting U.S. military bases act as instruments of the American security state rather than sovereign, independent diplomatic voices.
• Personal NATO Anecdote: Sachs shares private conversations with former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, revealing how European officials lose their independence while serving Washington.

 

READ FROM TOP.

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….