Search
Recent comments
- I am the storm....
3 min 19 sec ago - biden is a crook....
9 min 9 sec ago - disinfo française......
1 hour 37 min ago - colonial warming.....
1 hour 45 min ago - deserter or double asgent?....
5 hours 35 min ago - bibi's interest.....
8 hours 39 min ago - war and money....
10 hours 3 min ago - lost trust....
11 hours 36 min ago - case dropped....
11 hours 55 min ago - profligate carbon....
12 hours 12 min ago
Democracy Links
Member's Off-site Blogs
orwell man .....
To bolster his argument that the Guantanamo detainees should be denied the right to prove their innocence in federal courts, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissent in Boumediene v. Bush: "At least 30 of those prisoners hitherto released from Guantanamo have returned to the battlefield." It turns out that statement is false.
According to a new report by Seton Hall Law Center for Policy and Research, "The statistic was endorsed by a Senate Minority Report issued June 26, 2007, which cites a media outlet, CNN. CNN, in turn, named the DoD [Department of Defense] as its source. The '30' number, however, was corrected in a DoD press release issued in July 2007, and a DoD document submitted to the House Foreign Relations Committee on May 20, 2008, abandons the claim entirely."
The largest possible number of detainees who could have "returned to the fight" is 12; however, the Department of Defense has no system for tracking the whereabouts of released detainees. The only one who has undisputedly taken up arms against the United States or its allies, "ISN 220," was released by political officers of the DoD against the recommendations of military officers.- By John Richardson at 27 Jun 2008 - 10:40pm
- John Richardson's blog
- Login or register to post comments
spying on you...
U.S. and Europe Near Agreement on Private Data
By CHARLIE SAVAGE
WASHINGTON — The United States and the European Union are nearing completion of an agreement allowing law enforcement and security agencies to obtain private information — like credit card transactions, travel histories and Internet browsing habits — about people on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.
The potential agreement, as outlined in an internal report obtained by The New York Times, would represent a diplomatic breakthrough for American counterterrorism officials, who have clashed with the European Union over demands for personal data. Europe generally has more stringent laws restricting how governments and businesses can collect and transfer such information.
Negotiators, who have been meeting since February 2007, have largely agreed on draft language for 12 major issues central to a “binding international agreement,” the report said. The pact would make clear that it is lawful for European governments and companies to transfer personal information to the United States, and vice versa.
But the two sides are still at odds on several other matters, including whether European citizens should be able to sue the United States government over its handling of their personal data, the report said.