I cannot but agree with your comments John.  What I can’t understand, at the age of seventy nine, is why people are so gullible!

Obviously the photo you have printed has a double meaning? While it demonstrates the Nazi methods of their concentration camps – it highlights the result of such fascism and at the same time – shows that inmates are not bearing the Star of David?

The striped uniform of those unfortunate people was mostly universal – as much as the orange “jump suits” that contemporary US prisons use.

I have seen and noted that many photographs of the starving inmates of the Nazi concentration camps do have a significant number who do not have the Star of David?

Just a thought.  If we are to believe that ALL of the inmates of ALL concentration camps were mainly Jewish, why were they not identified for special treatment by the insignia of the Star of David? As they were indeed before their incarceration?  It makes one think that the number of Jews killed by the Nazis must include those who died from starvation as well?  Like the Warsaw Ghetto among others.  Couldn't at least a significant number in Warsaw be considered "war dead"?

Like I have said – the carnage and unbridled evil of the Zionists in occupied Palestine has the opposite effect to the “we are badly treated syndrome” on which they have prospered for many centuries. What it has done is to alert people like me to research the stories and myths of the original Hebrew/Canaanites only to find that they were written by Jews and have not been confirmed by scientific fact. For example, just recently scientists found a piece of metal which the Jews claimed “could” prove the existence of Solomon’s Temple.

Must have been some doubt there John - at least?

INHO the truth of this post of yours does meet the majority opinions even though we can assume that the Jewish lobbies in some 28 countries would have shut them down if they could.

Now that the Jew Murdoch has decided to use his media to elect a Conservative government in the UK, (who are more in tune with the Zionists) perhaps now the Labour party will have a more condemning attitude to the slaughter in occupied Palestine?

Cheers mate.  God bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, urged the Palestinian Authority (PA) not to accept the findings of a UN report into Israel's war on Gaza because of fears it might scupper attempts to restart peace talks, Palestinian sources have told Al Jazeera.

Clinton reportedly called Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, on Thursday to encourage him to withdraw PA support for the report, which heavily criticised the conduct of Israeli forces during the December-January conflict.

The UN Human Rights Council had been due to vote on Friday on the report by Richard Goldstone, an investigator appointed by the world body.

Though the PA did not reject the Goldstone report, it backed moves to postpone a vote on the findings until March, triggering widespread condemnation from Palestinian groups and human rights organisations.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/10/20091039613281857.html

meanwhile .....

Palestinian factions in the Gaza Strip have condemned the decision by the UN to defer voting on the Goldstone report, that highlighted war crimes by Israel and Hamas during the formers' offensive on the territory in December.

The factions, including Hamas, Fatah and Islamic Jihad, met in Gaza City on Sunday and will form a joint committee to investigate why the vote was delayed.

Bassem Khuri, the Palestinian economy minister, resigned on Saturday, reportedly in protest at the Palestinian Authority's (PA) agreement not to discuss the document.

The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) postponed a vote to endorse the report until March after Pakistan made a request to do so on the behest of several Arab, African and Muslim nations.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/10/2009104101950899415.html

The Cairo-based League of Arab States has denounced a July 13 decision by the Israeli Transport Ministry to eliminate Arabic and English names of cities and towns on its road signs and use only Hebrew ones.

In a press release, Mohammed Sobeih, the 22-member organization's deputy secretary general in charge of Palestinian affairs, described the new Israeli policy as "a grave racist move."

Israeli road signs currently are trilingual, in Hebrew, Arabic and English. Occupied Jerusalem, for example, is identified as "Yerushalaim" in Hebrew, "Jerusalem" in English and "Al Quds" in Arabic. Under the new policy the Holy City will be identified only as "Yerushalaim" in all three scripts.

"This decision is part of a series of measures and Israeli policies aimed at imposing the 'Jewish state' motto," Sobeih stated. He urged "all international organizations...to oppose, as firmly as possible, this racist decision."

Israeli historian Ilan Pappe, author of the 2006 book The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (available from the AET Book Club), said of the Israeli move: "It is part of an overall strategy to rob the Palestinians in Israel of their basic human and civil rights....There is little difference between [the Israeli political] 'Left' and 'Right' on this. The 'Right' cares less about public opinion abroad and is more open about its intention to dispossess the Palestinians in Israel. It even believes that more explicit language helps to accelerate the process of dispossession."

Ironically, the Jewish state will be discriminating not only against its minority Christian and Muslim citizens, but against Jewish Israelis as well-those from Arab countries who often find themselves treated as second-class citizens, relegated to separate schools and at times housing and jobs as well. To be Semitic, after all, is to be of Arabic ancestry and speak one of the five ancient Semitic languages. By eliminating Arabic-language names and replacing them with modern Hebrew, the state of Israel is in essence cleansing the land of its Semitism as well.

http://www.washington-report.org/component/content/article/5756.html

The good old Jerusalem Post claims 'Religion is often blamed as an obstacle to peace between Muslims and Jews. However, the demand for lulavim (palm fronds) ahead of Succot may now foster trade with the Gaza Strip'. ...

So, the Israelis know when and how to manipulate everything including religion, at one point their religion demand that they should kill those Gaza people who are beneath them, and when they need something from Gaza they discover at once that there are no obstacle for peace. Satan himself could not come with such theory.

And what triggers one's anger is the journalistic language of the Jerusalem Post that dares to confess that 'Gazans will be permitted to export lulavim to Israel after Religious Services Minister Ya'acov Margi received special permission to do so from Defense Minister Ehud Barak'.

GAZANS WILL BE PERMITTED they say, so they know that Gazans are suffering a total control on everything coming or leaving their strip of land, their Defence Minister who ordered burning down everything in Gaza including its farms and orchards now is kind enough to exchange his few filthy Shekels to buy a Jewish must for the festivities...isn't that wonderful? Especially that he knows that money means nothing to Gaza people any way since his total control on Gaza air, sea, and land means the people of Gaza can't buy from any source.

The Jews demand for lulavim (palm fronds) is rising ahead of their festivities of their religious festivities of Succot, and since money is more important than God himself for them, they decided to foster trade with the Gaza Strip to buy Gaza palm fronds for a cheaper price as the Jerusalem post reported today.

God's chosen people are willing to allow the palm fronds leave Gaza but they are not willing to allow a dying Gaza children go through the barriers to hospitals. They are willing to allow an accessory for their celebrations cross the border of Gaza, but not willing to allow any food or medicine needed urgently for a suffering child to cross. Isn't that wonderful? Isn't that what faith is all about? Kindness, sympathy, or is it about sticking to rituals and their accessories of celebrations.

http://www.uruknet.de/?s1=1&p=58517&s2=03

The European Union backed on Thursday a contentious UN report blasting Israel's military offensive in Gaza, praising its chief author and saying the document is "worthy of consideration."

Israel immediately expressed disappointment at the support from Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt -- whose country holds the EU presidency -- and said it showed that Bildt had either not read the report or misunderstood it.

"It is worthy of consideration needless to say, I think Mr Goldstone is a person of high credibility and high integrity and accordingly his report carries weight," Bildt told reporters in Stockholm.

The report by a fact-finding mission led by former international war crimes prosecutor Richard Goldstone accused both Israel and Palestinian armed groups of committing war crimes in the three-week Gaza war that erupted on 27 December, 2008.

"It is now in the Human Rights Council (based in Geneva) and that's where we think it should be deliberated, it is an independent report," Bildt added.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091008/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictgazaisraeluneu

G'day John,

Home again from Hospital after a bout with pneumonia and I note with obvious satisfaction that at least you are still arguing against the Jewish Nazi behavior in occupied Palestine.  Well done.

If I may, I would like to write a précis about my research regarding the untruths; misleading claims; myths and downright lies of the Zionist Hebrew/Canaanites.

Regarding the false claim that Palestine was originally theirs. 

Firstly, they don’t specify whether it was the map of the Kingdom of Israel, the “state” created by two of the wandering Arab Hebrew tribes. It was named after I believe, Jacob, who received that name from his God after wrestling with God’s Angel and defeating same.  (Fair dinkum – who should be obeying who?)

Secondly, they do not differentiate with Judea, from whence the name Jew came (which is Judas in Greek). This was the second Hebrew Kingdom and was created by the remaining ten tribes of the recorded 12 Hebrew Arabs that conquered Canaan. Those 10 tribes were eventually called the “Ten lost tribes”.

Thirdly, the world’s independent authorities on the history of that land have dismissed the various and sometimes outrageous maps of the Zionists.

So my opinion is that - apart from being in the “Middle East” maps and having survived some disturbances over the centuries and - being a nation primarily of peaceful farmers without any aggressive or military history at all –  Palestine was seen as a prime target for the Zionists long before WW 2.

Regarding the Zionist fascist actions in Arab Palestine with the Gaza Holocaust and the effect that will have on any sympathy for the fascist Jewish Holocaust.  It may also cause a concentration of indignity at the unpunished crimes of the Zionists and may carry a burden to all Jews, regardless of living peacefully in the many other nations of the world.

The only resolution to the illegal occupation of Palestine is that the original owners of the land are given back their rightful inheritance, even though they do not have nuclear weapons like the Zionists, and the criminals on both sides, face the International Court.

The unholy US/Zionist alliance must surely raise opposition by force – sooner or later.  Even a rat fights when it is cornered.

Cheers mate.  God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

Hi Ernest,

Sorry to hear that you haven't been well but glad you're back & that you haven't lost any of your incisive way with thought & words .... you might appreciate the following piece .....

Early Zionism was indeed a cheerful dream. It was all about the transformation of the 'Jew' into a 'civilised, respectful and authentic human being'. The founders of Zionism were inspired by the notions of 'people like any other people' and 'nation amongst nations'. Reading early Zionists such as Nordau, Borochov and Gordon provides us with some very contemptuous references to Jewish character and identity that would make Nazi ideology look mildly liberal.

However, one is advised to take a short break for a second and to contemplate critically over the above Zionist dream. One may wonder what kind of people dream of 'becoming human beings'. Can anyone imagine a French, English or Chinese man or woman who dreams of becoming an ordinary 'human'? We can easily think of oppressed human beings who demand to be treated as humans (Palestinians, Civil Rights movements, anti Apartheid and so on). Yet, the Zionist dream is rather different. It is not just about the desire for recognition or equality, it is not just about being treated appropriately, it is also a dream of 'self-transformation'. In fact, it is all about a miraculous metamorphosis from a morbid 'abnormal' state of being into an acceptable decent human form.

Within the context of a fictional fable we can easily imagine a cow that fantasises to become a dairy farmer, a pig who 'dies to' become a Kosher schnitzel, a snake who aspires to take over the Labour party and then to launch a new Zionist illegal war. And yet, it is pretty unusual to think of people who have managed to develop an aspiration to become 'ordinary humans'.

An intelligible way to explain or interpret that very unusual dream is probably to assume that those who succumb to the Zionist dream are those who happen to believe that, as far as their natural state of being is concerned, they are indeed remotely human. One would rightly assume that those who dream to become humans must be convinced that humanity is somehow not exactly a characteristic that they happen to possess.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23700.htm