Just a small part of Michael Neumann's article in Counterpunch:

"I am not the first Jew to find the founding concept of Zionism unacceptable, and long ago a much more committed Jew went further than I.   Lessing J. Rosenwald, president of the American Council for Judaism, expressed himself as follows - in 1944:  "The concept of a racial state - the Hitlerian concept- is repugnant to the civilized world, as witness the fearful  global war in which we are involved. . . , I urge that we do  nothing to set us back on the road to the past. To project at this time the creation of a Jewish state or commonwealth is to launch a singular innovation in world affairs which might well have incalculable consequences."

Mr. Neumann's complete article is, in my opinion, far less conciliatory than this paragraph appears to suggest.  However, the quote shows that the Zionists are well aware of what they are doing.

My research has not only convinced me that the Zionists have no legal, moral or religious right to the Palestine lands nor, in fact, to any other established nation but, the similarities of their arrogance and unbridled criminal acts are indeed reminiscent of the system they themselves have tried to paint as only anti-Jew. 

Deception is the biggest part of “successful” business and the historic Jewish dishonesty and exploitation demonstrated over the centuries must mark them as the experts.  As such one could suggest that IF they succeed in racially stealing an entire state they could possibly wipe themselves out? Unfortunately, I think not.

I remember when my sons were young that the police would always disperse them if they were involved in groups without any obvious objective.  Perhaps that is why the Diaspora was exercised so relentlessly on one race of people. 

More likely is the proposition, clearly exhibited by their extreme right government that any Jew is safe in their intended racist land since they do not recognize the laws of the civilized world and Jewish criminals will be “nuclear protected” if necessary – at a price?

Personally, with all of the discussions fortunately arising from the Gaza Holocaust as the “last straw” to the Zionist Hitlerism, I am disappointed with the “paper tiger” attitude of the UN.  I can only hope that the massive greed based world recession, foisted on the world by mainly Jewish Wall Street CEO’s, will cause the wiser and more competent nations to take over the world’s economic destiny.

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

 

 

 

When I was a teenager during WW 2 I can only remember the claims of Holocaust when the Concentration camps were liberated – I think my first one was Bergen-Belsen?  Of which we now hear very little.  I will elaborate in the future at the Jewish claims of 39 concentration camps, including even Hitler’s Bunker Site.  Fair dinkum.

 

With the research done by the experts on ancient history in the Middle East, I cannot find even one reason, explanation (or even a theory) for the Jewish claims of discrimination and persecution being perpetrated over most of recorded history.

 

Is it true that there is “no history – just historians?”

 

As I understand it, records of “western” ancient times have many masters, including the Egyptians; the other Arab scribes and their Koran; the breakaway Hebrews and their Torah and the Monks of the subsequent breakaway Christian Church and their Bible, just to mention only those of which I am aware.

 

Meanwhile, the East was apparently recording its own history until, contrary to the theory that “never the twain shall meet”, pioneers in search of the unknown, with their Priests from Christendom, began to explore the very corners of the planet.  In doing so they encountered the Easterners doing the same thing.

 

I cannot find any example of the Hebrew/Canaanites voluntarily leaving the lands they conquered when establishing their twin Kingdoms of Israel and Judea.  Nor can I find out if their current policy of “Jewish only” in occupied Palestine was even the standard of their xenophobic attitude to all things in that era and, did that at least in part, cause the existing “Establishment”  to finally enforce the Diaspora?

 

It is now firmly established that my question regarding whether the Hebrew/Canaanites were a race per se – or a religion.  They have now defined their Zionist attitude as to the fact that they consider themselves a RACE of a people who insist on having a state of their own and may I compare their fascist intentions with the reason that Emperor Hadrian must have realized in 135 BC ?

 

So I now believe that my reason for researching their history was ostensibly to try to understand WHY their RACE was so despised.

 

So far I have been convinced that their historians are possibly a little biased, even as the victors of the wars have the upper hand.

 

I don’t know what I can achieve by trying to expose what I consider to be Jewish propaganda; nor do I really know how much of our own history is correct.  Nevertheless, the Jewish history seems to be concerned with the old adage – “laugh and the world laughs with you – cry and you cry alone”.  You can’t cry wolf when you are the wolf.

 

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Britain and France today failed in an attempt to delay a crunch Middle East vote at the UN, amid warnings by Israel that it could derail the peace process.

The UN Human Rights Council in Geneva voted by 25 to six to refer a controversial report accusing Israel of war crimes during the Gaza offensive in January to the Security Council.

Eleven countries formally abstained, however Britain and France did not even take part, having unsuccessfully argued for more time to reach an agreed resolution.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "We did not participate in the vote. We were involved in discussions with Israel and the Palestinians about potentially substantive improvements in the situation on the ground and have therefore asked for a delay to the vote."

Earlier, Gordon Brown held fresh discussions with Israeli counterpart Binyamin Netanyahu after the two men had reportedly clashed over the report by Judge Richard Goldstone earlier in the week.

Mr Netanyahu was said to have been furious after Britain and other European countries warned they would abstain in today's vote.

In what were reported to be "robust exchanges" over the telephone, Mr Brown was said to have told the Israeli leader that his country needed to hold an independent inquiry into the Gaza offensive if it was to escape censure.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/defiant-un-backs-israel-war-crimes-report-1803987.html

Of course, the Milky Bar Kid's bunch of apologists for the crazy Zionists currently running Israel were shielded from the embarrassment of voting against the motion, in-line with Potomac policy, by the fact that good old Aussieland isn't even a member of the UN Human Rights Council .... hardly a surprise, of course, given the record of successive governments from both sides of politics in their dealings with indigenous Australians, refugees, Australians held illegally by our great & powerful friends & the occasional Australian citizen unfortunate enough to fall into the hands of our Immigration Department.

And does dopey Netanyahu really think anyone is really worried by his criminal threat that the vote could "derail the peace process" ..... Israel has been derailing the process 65 years & it still hasn't produced a skerrick of justice for the Palestinians?

meanwhile .....

Less than a week after Ankara cancelled an air exercise with Israel, Turkey's state-sponsored channel TRT1 broadcast "Ayrilik" ("Farewell"), a new prime-time TV show that depicts the true image of Israel's genocidal military operation in Gaza last January.

The Israelis are not happy. "Broadcasting this series is a serious case of state-sponsored incitement. ...," said Israel's Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman this morning.  "Such a series, which doesn't even have a weak connection to reality presents the IDF's soldiers as murderers of innocent children...." I wonder whether one should remind hardliner Lieberman, who happens to be an enthusiastic ethnic cleanser and a proud Judeo supremacist racist, that the reality on the ground last January was 'connected enough' to establish a genocidal war crime inquiry and a crime against humanity. It left over 1400 fatal casualties. It also left thousands more injured, most of them children, women and elders. However, for once Lieberman happens to read the map. The Turkish TV-show indeed depicts the IDF's soldiers as murderers of children women and elders for this is what Israeli soldiers are and this is exactly what Israel stands for politically, symbolically, ideologically and practically. 

Though Lieberman tries to appease his Israeli crowd and may even be successful in doing so, his chances to mount pressure on Turkish TV and the government are rather limited. By now we all happen to know Israel is all about the establishment of a 'Jew-only state' in a stolen land named Palestine.

As it happens we tend to spend a lot of time writing and analysing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But the facts on the ground are actually very simple. Zionism is an ideology aspired by the plunder of Palestine. Israel has put the robbery of Palestine and the Palestinians into practice. We are talking here about a national revival project that is taking place at the expense of another people. It is a murderous project inherently inspired by the bible and an unethical plundering project of 'home coming'. It is a lethal combination of some deadly interpretations of the Old Testament together with a non-ethical present. The only question to be asked is how have they got away with it? How do they continue to get away with plunder, murder, spreading white phosphorus and piling up nuclear weapons?

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23740.htm

and take a look at the ugly face of America's blind capitulation to zionism ..... bought & paid for by AIPAC .....

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23742.htm

My layman's research into the history of the Jewish race and in the hope of some answers to my questions as to WHY they claim to have been treated so unfairly over the centuries – and by people of power in many different nations and cultures.

One of my seemingly consistent factors is that the Jewish people were considered to be dangerous to the “powers that be” whether they were Monarchies; Empires or Dictatorships et al.

I have considered, as indeed has many others, that the Gaza Holocaust and the murders and fascism practiced by the Zionists in occupied Palestine is only a prelude to what they will do to the entire Middle Eastern nations which have been so callously weakened by the U.S. and a cowardly U.N.  Any civilised nation should stand up against them.

I have previously mentioned The Protocols of the learned Elders Of Zion and I would like to post the Translation of that by Victor E. Marsden who suffered at the hands of the Zionists of the Soviet Union.

Using my method of condensing the information….

Protocols 1 to XII.                                                  Protocols XIII to XXIV.

The Basic Doctrine.                                                Distractions.

Economic Wars.                                                     Assault on Religion.

Methods of Conquest.                                            Ruthless Suppression.

Materialism Replaces Religion.                                 Brainwashing.

Despotism and Modern Progress.                           Abuse of Authority.

Take-over Technique.                                             Arrest of Opponents.

World-wide Wars.                                                  Rulers and People.

Provisional Government.                                        Financial Programme.

Re-Education.                                                        Loans and Credit.

Preparing for Power.                                              Power of Gold.      

Totalarian State.                                                    Instilling Obedience.

Control of the Press.                                              Qualities of the Ruler.

COMMENT:

These sub-headings of Victor E. Marsden’s translation carry a lot of weight with independent students of the history of Zion.  Some of these seem to speak for themselves and would certainly upset any type of government.

To be continued.  God Bless Australia. NE OUBLIE.

 

 

PREFACE(Translated by Victor E. Marsden)

The author of this translation of the famous Protocols was himself a victim of the Revolution. He had lived for many years in Russia and was married to a Russian lady. Among his other activities in Russia he had been for a number of years a Russian Correspondent of the MORNING POST, a position which he occupied when the Revolution broke out, and his vivid descriptions of events in Russia will still be in the recollection of many of the readers of that Journal. Naturally he was singled out for the anger of the Soviet. On the day that Captain Cromie was murdered by Jews, Victor Marsden was arrested and thrown into the Peter-Paul Prison, expecting every day to have his name called out for execution. This, however, he escaped, and eventually he was allowed to return to England very much of a wreck in bodily health. However, he recovered under treatment and the devoted care of his wife and friends. One of the first things he undertook, as soon as he was able, was this translation of the Protocols. Mr. Marsden was eminently well qualified for the work. His intimate acquaintance with Russia, Russian life and the Russian language on the one hand, and his mastery of a terse literary English style on the other, placed him in a position of advantage which few others could claim. The consequence is that we have in his version an eminently readable work, and though the subject-matter is somewhat formless, Mr. Marsden's literary touch reveals the thread running through the twenty-four Protocols.

It may be said with truth that this work was carried out at the cost of Mr. Marsden's own life's blood. He told the writer of this Preface that he could not stand more than an hour at a time of his work on it in the British Museum, as the diabolical spirit of the matter which he was obliged to turn into English made him positively ill.

Mr. Marsden's connection with the MORNING POST was not severed by his return to England, and he was well enough to accept the post of special correspondent of that journal in the suite of H.R.H., the Prince of Wales on his Empire tour. From this he returned with the Prince, apparently in much better health, but within a few days of his landing he was taken suddenly ill, and died after a very brief illness.

May this work be his crowning monument! In it he has performed an immense service to the English-speaking world, and there can be little doubt that it will take its place in the first rank of the English versions of "THE PROTOCOLS of the Meetings of the LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION."

Comment:  Of course readers will judge for themselves - but I hope that the crimes being committed by the Zionists in occupied Palestine will not be forgotten nor forgiven.

To be continued.  God Bless Australia. NE OUBLIE.

 

Dear Ernest... Be alert to hoax, fiction and other disinformation conduits.

Yes the Zionists are not doing the Jewish people proud by their methods and actions. They should be pursued for their present actions in Gaza and all other offence against the UN resolutions since the time the UN "decided to allow Israel's existence". But the protocols is a hoax... They do appear in the same genre as "in Search of the Holy Grail" (that precurser to The Da Vinci Code" — itself a hoax/fiction) and other well-oiled conspiracy theories. Sure, there are conspiracies and the one thing for sure if the Zionists are after taking over the world, they are not the only group wishing to do so: the Catholics (Christians) for example... The Muslims too... The Chinese?...

------------------------------

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Russian: "Протоколы сионских мудрецов", or "Сионские протоколы" ; see also other titles) is a literary forgery, a political hoax and a piece of plagiarism, with a complex publication history.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

It appeared in print in the Russian empire (in Russian) as early as 1903. The anti-Semitic tract was published in Znamya, a "Black Hundreds" newspaper owned by Pavel Krushevan, as a serialized set of articles. It appeared again in 1905 as a final chapter (Chapter XII) of a second edition of Velikoe v malom i antikhrist ("The Great in the Small & Antichrist"), a book by Serge Nilus. In 1906 it appeared in pamphlet form edited by G. Butmi.[8]

These first three (subsequently more) Russian language imprints were published and circulated in the Russian Empire during 1903-1906 period as a tool for scapegoating Jews, blamed by the monarchists for the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War1905 Russian Revolution. Common to all three texts is the plot that Jews aim for world domination. Since "The Protocols" are presented as merely a document, it takes the front matter and back matter to explain its alleged origin. But the diverse imprints are mutually inconsistent. The general claim is that the document was stolen from a secret Jewish organization. Since the alleged original stolen manuscript does not exist, one is forced to restore a purported original edition. This has been done by the Italian scholar, Cesare G. De Michelis in 1998, a work which was translated into English and published in 2004.[1][2] As fiction in the gendre of literature the tract was further analyzed by Umberto Eco by his word, Foucault's Pendulum in 1988, and in English translation in 1989, and in 1994 in chapter 6, and the "Fictional Protocols", of his Six Walks in the Fictional Woods.

----------------------

Peace

Firstly - G'day Gus,

It seems to me that your post concerns itself mainly with truisms that there are indeed cases of Literary Forgery; Plagiarism; and many fictions portrayed as fact.  I don't think that anyone denies that.  However, it is also true that truth is sometimes stranger than fiction and the way some have fictionalized the Protocols doesn't confirm without doubt that they never really existed at all. Some people try to re-write history and the Zionists would be the front-runner in that business surely?

I think that you would agree that history has recorded the racist treatment of the Jewish race over many centuries - and I have always asked why?

When I read these Protocols I had the distinct feeling that there were far too many similarities in present and past Zionist activities, not only in occupied Palestine but in England, Germany and especially the U.S.

So, I continue my posts with the hope that the readers themselves will decide whether there is even a modicum of truth in the document which, by the way, is the only one of which I am aware, that does give an answer to my question as to why?  Cheers Gus.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INTRODUCTION

Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends. The first time Nilus published them was in 1901 in a book called The Great Within the Small and reprinted in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Soviet land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner's of being shot on sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.

Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:

"The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW."

Indeed they do!

The word "Protocol" signifies a precis gummed on to the front of a document, a draft of a document, minutes of proceedings. In this instance, "Protocol" means minutes of the proceedings of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. These Protocols give the substance of addresses delivered to the innermost circle of the Rulers of Zion. They reveal the converted plan of action of the Jewish Nation developed through the ages and edited by the Elders themselves up to date. Parts and summaries of the plan have been published from time to time during the centuries as the secrets of the Elders have leaked out. The claim of the Jews that the Protocols are forgeries is in itself an admission of their genuineness, for they NEVER ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE FACTS corresponding to the THREATS which the Protocols contain, and, indeed, the correspondence between prophecy and fulfillment is too glaring to be set aside or obscured. This the Jews well know and therefore evade.

COMMENT:  This is pasted from its Google source – especially the emphasis.

To be continued.  God Bless Australia. NE OUBLIE.

 

G'day Gus.  Before I start let me just say that I have often asked in another website (which seems to have been sold perhaps to silence it) are the Jewish people a race or a religion?  My posts were not printed because I had the audacity to suggest that IF they are not a race, then the Holocaust could not have been racist? Cheers Gus.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continued from Part 3 INTRODUCTION.

Captain A.H.M. Ramsay records in his classic, The Nameless War "According to a letter published in "Plain English" (a weekly review published by the North British Publishing Co. and edited by the late Lord Alfred Douglas) on 3rd September, 1921:- :

"The Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer period than they have perhaps suspected. My friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently sent me a letter containing two extracts from the Synagogue at Mulheim. The volume in which they are contained was lost at some period during the Napoleonic Wars, and has recently come into Mr. van Valckert's possession. It is written in German, and contains extracts of letters sent and received by the authorities of the Mulheim Synagogue. The first entry he sends me is of a letter received:-

16th June, 1647.

From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.

"In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living.

Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape."

In reply was dispatched the following:-

12th July, 1647.

To O.C. by E. Pratt.

"Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences."

Captain Ramsay quotes Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin, Earl of Beaconsfield, Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister, in his two volume "Life of Charles I", published in 1851: "The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one . . . From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of revolution." There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France. In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

In that document we read this remarkable sentence: "Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our hands." (See Protocol No. III, XIV).

In 1865 a certain Jewish Rabbi named Rzeichorn delivered a speech at Prague. It is a very accurate summary of many aspects of the Protocols which would come to light several decades later and was published eleven years later by Sir John Radcliff, who was assassinated shortly afterwards, giving testimony to the powers of the secret organisation of inner elite Jewry even then.

The presumption is strong that the Protocols were issued, or reissued, at the First Zionist Congress held at Basle in 1897 under the presidency of the Father of Modern Zionism, the late Theodore Herzl.

There has been recently published a volume of Herzl's "Diaries," a translation of some passages which appeared in the JEWISH CHRONICLE of July 14, 1922. Herzl gives an account of his first visit to England in 1895, and his conversation with Colonel Goldsmid, a Jew brought up as a Christian, an officer in the English Army, and at heart a Jew Nationalist all the time. Goldsmid suggested to Herzl that the best way of expropriating the English aristocracy, and so destroying their power to protect the people of England against Jew domination, was to put excessive taxes on the land. Herzl thought this an excellent idea, and it is now to be found definitely embodied in Protocol VI!

The above extract from Herzl's DIARY is an extremely significant bit of evidence bearing on the existence of the Jew World Plot and authenticity of the Protocols, but any reader of intelligence will be able from his own knowledge of recent history and from his own experience to confirm the genuineness of every line of them, and it is in the light of this LIVING comment that all readers are invited to study Mr. Marsden's translation of this terribly inhuman document.

Here is what Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, said in 1924, concerning the Protocols: "Long have I been well acquainted with the contents of the Protocols, indeed for many years before they were ever published in the Christian press. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the original Protocols at all, but a compressed extract of the same. Of the 70 Elders of Zion, in the matter of origin and of the existence of the original Protocols, there are only ten men in the entire world who know.

I participated with Dr. Herzl in the first Zionist Congress which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent figure at the Jewish World Congress. Herzl foresaw, twenty years before we experienced them, the revolution which brought the Great War, and he prepared us for that which was to happen. He foresaw the splitting up of Turkey, that England would obtain control of Palestine. We may expect important developments in the world."

And here is another very significant circumstance.The present successor of Herzl, as leader of the Zionist movement, Dr. Weizmann, quoted one of these sayings at the send-off banquet given to Chief Rabbi Hertz on October 6, 1920. The Chief Rabbi was on the point of leaving for HIS Empire tour of H.R.H., the Prince of Wales. And this is the "saying" of the Sages which Dr. Weizmann quoted: "A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world." (JEWISH GUARDIAN, Oct. 8, 1920.)

Now compare this with the last clause of but one of Protocol XI.

"God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world."

The remarkable correspondence between these passages proves several things. It proves that the Learned Elders exist. It proves that Dr. Weizmann knows all about them. It proves that the desire for a "National Home" in Palestine is only camouflage and an infinitesimal part of the Jew's real object. It proves that the Jews of the world have no intention of settling in Palestine or any separate country, and that their annual prayer that they may all meet "Next Year in Jerusalem" is merely a piece of their characteristic make-believe. It also demonstrates that the Jews are now a world menace, and that the Aryan races will have to domicile them permanently out of Europe..

COMMENT:  Again the above is cut and pasted. As an example between the US/Zionist alliance is the motto of the Mossad (counterpart CIA) is "By Way of Deception Thou Shalt do War".

To be continued. God Bless Australia. NE OUBLIE.

 

WHO ARE THE ELDERS?

This is a secret which has not been revealed. They are the Hidden Hand. They are not the "Board of Deputies" (the Jewish Parliament in England) or the "Universal Israelite Alliance" which sits in Paris. But the late Walter Rathenau of the Allgemeiner Electricitaets Gesellschaft has thrown a little light on the subject and doubtless he was in possession of their names, being, in all likelihood, one of the chief leaders himself. Writing in the WIENER FREIE PRESSE, December 24, 1912, he said:

"Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage."

In the year 1844, on the eve of the Jewish Revolution of 1848, Benjamin Disraeli, whose real name was Israel, and who was a "damped," or baptized Jew, published his novel, CONINGSBY, in which occurs this ominous passage:

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

And he went on to show that these personages were all Jews.

Now that Providence has brought to the light of day these secret Protocols all men may clearly see the hidden personages specified by Disraeli at work "behind the scenes" of all the Governments. This revelation entails on all peoples the grave responsibility of examining and revising AU FOND their attitude towards the Race and Nation which boasts of its survival over all Empires.

Notes I. - "Agentur" and "The Political."

There are two words in this translation which are unusual, the word "AGENTUR" and "political" used as a substantive, AGENTUR appears to be a word adopted from the original and it means the whole body of agents and agencies made use of by the Elders, whether members of the tribe or their Gentile tools.

By "the Political" Mr. Marsden means, not exactly the "body politic" but the entire machinery of politics.

Notes II - The Symbolic Snake of Judaism.

Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the Protocols, Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:

"According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned men already, in 929 B.C., thought out a scheme in theory for a peaceful conquest of the whole universe by Zion. As history developed, this scheme was worked out in detail and completed by men who were subsequently initiated in this question. These learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the Jewish people - the administration was always kept secret, EVEN FROM THE JEWISH NATION ITSELF. As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it undermined and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has encircled it - and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every endeavor to subdue the other countries by an ECONOMICAL CONQUEST. The return of the head of the Snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of all the Sovereign of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about a spiritual demoralization and a moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women masquerading as French, Italians, etc.. These are the surest spreaders of licentiousness into the lives of the leading men at the heads of nations. A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows: - Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C.. The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1814 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date of 1881. [This "Snake" is now being drawn through the Americas and in the United States of America, it has been partially identified as the "Council on Foreign Relations" (C.F.R.) and the "Trilateral Commission"]. All these States which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic conditions, England and Germany are spared, but only till the conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present [i.e., 1905] all its efforts are concentrated. The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kieft and Odessa. It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centres of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake's course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before the occurrence of the "Young Turk" - i.e., Jewish - Revolution in Turkey).

COMMENT:  Again this was cut and posted from the Google item.  I feel that there could be a lot of truth in these writings but, I think the uneccessary emphasis tends to make the document more like a political spin rather than a statement of facts.  Nevertheless, many of the Protocols seem to be so much in concert with the world-wide behaviour of the enormous number of Jewish organisations.  Far in excess of that which one would expect of only 0.2 % of world population. 

Again I ask WHY - does England; France and Germany - all sites of previous Imperial powers and empires - now feel contrained to support the anti-Semitic; massive contradictions of centuries of supposed advancing civilisation being perpetrated by the U.S/Zionist alliance with their crimes against other Semitic nations?

No Howard - we should sing God Bless AUSTRALIA.  NE OUBLIE.

 

 

 

 

G’day Gus,

I am reading a book entitled The Last of the Just by Andre Schwarz-Bart. I quote here from the Preface:  In every generation there are born among the Jews thirty-six men, whom God has chosen to bear the burden of the world’s suffering, and to whom He has granted the privilege of Martyrdom.  Such is an age-old Jewish belief. And such is the underlying theme of this novel, which spans the period between “just” men in York in the twelfth century to the death of the last “just” man, Ernie Levy, in the gas chambers of Auschwitz in 1943.

Is it possible that the belief in “Thirty-six Just men” may have been converted to the Elders of Zion?  Still looking for answers Gus.  Cheers.

 

All of the previous posts of mine were intended to debate the issue of whether or not the Protocols actually existed.  I am still none the wiser but that is, after all, in the minds of the readers.

 

I have read the Protocols and I don’t intend to ask this site to print them.  If any reader wishes to access them, it is easy to do so.  I have been a Freemason for 58 years and I cannot believe that they could possibly exist under the Old Testament.

 

My view is that these ancient and illogical intentions may have existed but I cannot come to terms with any civilized race of people really believing such “intentions” in totality and being prepared to conform.  Certainly there are parts which could apply to perhaps every dictator; politician and business person right down to the least educated of the world’s people - however, whilst I do not resile from my disgust with the fascist behavior of the Zionists in occupied Palestine and my contempt for their mentor the U.S. – I nevertheless find it difficult to believe that the other some 98% of the world’s population would allow those objectives to succeed or would be unaware of their progress.  But that situation seems to be gathering energy.

 

Certainly I am convinced that there is a disproportionate number of one small race who control enormous areas of public information but that problem should be up to the government of the nation concerned.   

 

Perhaps my dilemma could be resolved by the actions of the United Nations in applying equal justice to the Palestinians, as one would expect for any country invaded; occupied and disenfranchised of their native land, rather than continuing with their US controlled duplicity. One can only hope.

 

No Howard – we sing God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

 

On 21 October I wrote

"Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage."

In the year 1844, on the eve of the Jewish Revolution of 1848, Benjamin Disraeli, whose real name was Israel, and who was a "damped," or baptized Jew, published his novel, CONINGSBY, in which occurs this ominous passage:

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

And he went on to show that these personages were all Jews.

This man was a respected and elected Prime Minister of England.

On 23 October last I also wrote inter alia:

My view is that these ancient and illogical intentions may have existed but I cannot come to terms with any civilized race of people really believing such “intentions” in totality and being prepared to conform.  Certainly there are parts which could apply to perhaps every dictator; politician and business person right down to the least educated of the world’s people - however, whilst I do not resile from my disgust with the fascist behavior of the Zionists in occupied Palestine and my contempt for their mentor the U.S. – I nevertheless find it difficult to believe that the other some 98% of the world’s population would allow those objectives to succeed or would be unaware of their progress.  But that situation seems to be gathering energy.  (Emphasis added).

 

So, still without any positive proof, I feel that such an organization of “36 Just men” or “Three hundred men” along with so many other such claims over centuries (acknowledged by the Zionists) brings one to the point of “where there is smoke…?”

 

Even a Zionist female reporter in occupied Palestine noted that the Polish people have refused to apologize for the Jews killed in Poland during the WW 2 occupation until the Jews apologize for the Polish people murdered by the Jewish Communists during the same war.  The latter were led by the Commissar of Commissars the Jew Trotsky.

 

So, back to the present where we have the Zionist fascists, led by an American educated warmonger Netanyahu, literally applying some of the documented intentions of the Protocols.  Because they are so lengthy and unbelievable in modern civilization I hesitated to mention them but – I think with developments in the Middle East and another Iraqi lying WMDs war for the benefit of the Zionists – this time Iran – more nations should consider Turkey’s decisions of distrust in the Jews.

 

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.