Wednesday 27th of November 2024

not waving but drowning .....

not waving but drowning .....

Volunteers cleaning a beach in Louisiana

 

Nobody heard him, the dead man,

But still he lay moaning:

I was much further out than you thought

And not waving but drowning.

 

Poor chap, he always loved larking

And now he's dead

It must have been too cold for him his heart gave way,

They said.

 

Oh, no no no, it was too cold always

(Still the dead one lay moaning)

I was much too far out all my life

And not waving but drowning.

 

- Stevie Smith

 

I'm sure you'll be shocked by this: acting on behalf of her Republican colleagues (and some oil-friendly Democrats like Mary Landrieu), Alaska's Republican U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski today blocked legislation that would have lifted the $75 million liability cap protecting big oil companies like BP from paying for economic damage caused by their oil spills.

The legislation, dubbed "The Big Oil Bailout Prevention Act," was written by Robert Menendez, Bill Nelson, and Frank Lautenberg. It would have raised the cap to $10 billion, a figure Murkowski said was far too high.

Murkowski complained that the bill's new limit is "133 times the size of the current strict liability limit," arguing that a higher cap would freeze out small oil companies. She then undercut her argument by saying the higher cap was not needed because oil companies already face unlimited damages under state laws. (Not only does that argument undercut her demand that there be liability limits, but it also assumes that state laws haven't limited oil company liability as well.)

Shocker: GOP Blocks Effort to Hold Oil Companies Accountable for Economic Damage from Spills

elsewhere .....

In the first of what will be an ongoing series of hearings on the disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, leaders at BP, Transocean and Halliburton played an interesting form of the ever-popular corporate blame game.

In news accounts previewing the hearing before the Senate Energy Committee Tuesday, the published testimony of the three witnesses was interpreted as a circuitous effort to deflect blame onto one another.

The CEOs' testimony was interpreted to mean that BP would try to lay the blame on Transocean, the operator of the sunken rig now spewing thousands of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico daily. Testimony from Transocean's CEO Steven Newman criticized BP back, but also called into question the concrete work completed by Halliburton just hours before the deadly explosion. And Halliburton would tell the Senate they were only operating under the requirements of the other two, and therefore had no liability for the spill.

"I can see the liability chase that's going to go on," predicted Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), adding that he was looking forward to seeing "who's going to 'fess up to what."

"The message I hear is, 'Don't blame me,'" said Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) said before the panel appeared before the committee.

BP, Transocean and Halliburton Play the Dodge Ball Version of the Blame Game at Senate Hearing on Gulf Oil Spill

meanwhile .....

With a quick solution ominously uncertain, the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is on track to become an unprecedented economic and environmental disaster with millions of gallons of oil destroying an ecosystem as well as a way of life.

BP America said Monday that it would take another 75 days to finish one of two relief wells it's drilling to shut down the flow.

By then, if the spill doesn't worsen and the relief well stops the leak, some 20 million gallons of oil will be swirling in the Gulf, nearly double the Exxon Valdez spill in 1989.

Unlike the Alaska spill, which coated a rock-strewn bay, BP's oil will cling to a spongelike coast, entering the pores of mangrove forests and sea-grass beds and the breeding grounds for crabs, shrimp and oysters.

Already some of the richest fishing grounds of the Gulf are off-limits, idling thousands of commercial fishermen.

Gulf Oil Spill Turning 'Unbelievably Bad'

 

trust who .....

Scientists are finding enormous oil plumes in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, including one as large as 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and 300 feet thick in spots. The discovery is fresh evidence that the leak from the broken undersea well could be substantially worse than estimates that the government and BP have given.

"There's a shocking amount of oil in the deep water, relative to what you see in the surface water," said Samantha Joye, a researcher at the University of Georgia who is involved in one of the first scientific missions to gather details about what is happening in the gulf. "There's a tremendous amount of oil in multiple layers, three or four or five layers deep in the water column."

The plumes are depleting the oxygen dissolved in the gulf, worrying scientists, who fear that the oxygen level could eventually fall so low as to kill off much of the sea life near the plumes.

Dr. Joye said the oxygen had already dropped 30 percent near some of the plumes in the month that the broken oil well had been flowing. "If you keep those kinds of rates up, you could draw the oxygen down to very low levels that are dangerous to animals in a couple of months," she said Saturday. "That is alarming."

The plumes were discovered by scientists from several universities working aboard the research vessel Pelican, which sailed from Cocodrie, La., on May 3 and has gathered extensive samples and information about the disaster in the gulf.

Scientists studying video of the gushing oil well have tentatively calculated that it could be flowing at a rate of 25,000 to 80,000 barrels of oil a day. The latter figure would be 3.4 million gallons a day. But the government, working from satellite images of the ocean surface, has calculated a flow rate of only 5,000 barrels a day.

BP has resisted entreaties from scientists that they be allowed to use sophisticated instruments at the ocean floor that would give a far more accurate picture of how much oil is really gushing from the well.

Giant Plumes of Oil Found Under Gulf

the tipping point .....

A sobering new report warns that oceans face a "fundamental and irreversible ecological transformation" not seen in millions of years as greenhouse gases and climate change already have affected temperature, acidity, sea and oxygen levels, the food chain and possibly major currents that could alter global weather.

The report, in Science magazine, doesn't break a lot of new ground, but it brings together dozens of studies that collectively paint a dismal picture of deteriorating ocean health.

"This is further evidence we are well on our way to the next great extinction event," said Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the director of the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland in Australia and a co-author of the report.

John Bruno, an associate professor of marine sciences at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the report's other co-author, isn't quite as alarmist, but he's equally concerned.

"We are becoming increasingly certain that the world's marine ecosystems are reaching tipping points," Bruno said, adding, "We really have no power or model to foresee" the effect.

The oceans, which cover 71 percent of the Earth's surface, have played a dominant role in regulating the planet's climate. However, even as the understanding of what's happening to terrestrial ecosystems as a result of climate change has grown, studies of marine ecosystems have lagged, the report says. The oceans are acting as a heat sink for rising temperatures and have absorbed about one-third of the carbon dioxide produced by human activities.

http://www.kjonline.com/news/report-oceans-demise-near-irreversible_2010-07-03.html