SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
chutzpah .....Some of us do not believe what our politicians say especially when the subject is Israel’s behaviour – its ongoing colonization of the occupied West Bank for the purpose of making peace impossible except, perhaps, on terms which require the Palestinians to surrender to Zionism’s will. The responses of some Jewish supporters of Israel right or wrong to one British MP who did dare to tell the truth illustrate why most politicians throughout the Western world won’t. That’s yesterday’s story but I am driven to comment by the hypocrisy on display, hypocrisy which takes chutzpah to wild extremes. For those readers who might not be fully familiar with chutzpah, let’s begin with a definition of it. Chutzpah is a Talmudic word that means many similar things, chief among them being shameless audacity, impudence and arrogance, each and all laced with incredible self-righteousness. In the context of the conflict in and over Palestine that became Israel, chutzpah represents an Israeli (Jewish) way of saying to the world without actually saying it something like: “We know we shouldn’t have done this. We know it’s wrong. But we’ve done it because we also know there’s nothing you can do about it.” As I say in my book Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, if there is one single word that sums up the whole Zionist enterprise, it is chutzpah. Sunday 27 January is Holocaust Memorial Day and this year marks the 68th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp where more than one million people, mostly Jews, died. As this day approached, the Holocaust Educational Trust placed a Book of Commitment in the House of Commons to give MPs the chance to sign it and honour those who were slaughtered during the Nazi holocaust and subsequent other genocides, and commit themselves to encouraging constituents “to work together to combat prejudice and racism today.” Among those who signed the book and pledged his commitment (I’d be somewhat surprised if there was a single available MP who didn’t sign) was David Ward, the Liberal Democratic member for Bradford East, a 59 year-old new comer to the House, elected in 2010. On his web site he then said this: “Having visited Auschwitz twice – once with my family and once with local schools – I am saddened that the Jews, who suffered unbelievable levels of persecution during the Holocaust, could within a few years of liberation from the death camps be inflicting atrocities on Palestinians in the new State of Israel and continue to do so on a daily basis in the West Bank and Gaza.” Then, in an update after he was condemned by his party and reviled by Jewish supporters of Israel right or wrong, he added this: “For my entire political career I have fought prejudice. I have just returned from Bradford’s Holocaust Memorial event where people across cultures and faiths joined together to say, “We bear witness to the horrors of the Holocaust and will never forget its lessons.” In the words of the Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, as quoted in the booklet Holocaust Memorial Day – Learning Lessons from the past to create a safer, better future, I swore never to be silent whenever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. The response of Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, included this: “We are outraged and shocked at these offensive comments about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and the suggestion that Jews should have learned a lesson from the experience.” If that means the Jews have nothing to learn from the Nazi holocaust – the slaughter of Jews and others by Europeans NOT Arabs or other Muslims – I am more than amazed. It was, however, the response of Karen Pollock, chief executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust that took my breath away. She said she was “deeply saddened” that the MP had “deliberately abused the memory of the Holocaust.” In my view that’s chutzpah taken to its wildest extreme. Why? There is no power on Planet Earth that has used and abused the obscenity of the Nazi holocaust more than Zionism. It has used the guilt of Europeans and the West as a whole to blackmail politicians and the mainstream media into silence on the matter of Zionism’s crimes and justify everything it did and does in defiance of international law and a string of UN Security Council resolutions. Footnote: I sent the following e-mail to MP David Ward: “You have my utmost respect and admiration, not only for your truth telling but for refusing to back down under fire, including fire from your own party which, like all others and the mainstream media, is terrified of offending Zionism.” At the time I sent my message to him, he had apparently received 80 unsolicited supportive e-mails and only two from detractors. But he must watch his back. He won his election to the House of Commons by the narrow margin of 365 votes. It will be interesting to see if he becomes a target for an organized Zionist campaign to defeat him at the next election.
|
User login |
genocide ....
Recommending a regime of economic sanctions against Israeli settlements, a scathing report from European Union consuls accuses Israel of illegally annexing East Jerusalem and “systematically undermining Palestinian presence” in the city.
It found settlement construction in East Jerusalem and the West Bank was “the biggest single threat to the two-state solution”, describing it as “systematic, deliberate and provocative”.
Israel was trying to drive Palestinians out of East Jerusalem with restrictive zoning and planning, demolitions and evacuations, discriminatory access to religious sites, an inequitable education policy, difficult access to health care and inadequate provision of resources, the report said.
The EU Heads of Mission Jerusalem Report recommends sanctions against settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank to “prevent, discourage and raise awareness about problematic implications of financial transactions including foreign direct investments, from within the EU in support of settlement activities, infrastructure and services.”
It says every effort must be made to ensure products manufactured in settlements do not receive preferential treatment or tariffs and that they are correctly labelled as settlement goods.
Israel would not provide any response to the non-binding EU report, written by consuls in Jerusalem and Ramallah and seen by Fairfax Media. A Foreign Ministry spokesman told Fairfax Media: “They have never presented it to us, so we cannot comment on it.”
The report highlighted what it labelled as the “most significant and problematic” settlement plans in East Jerusalem, including the expansion of Har Homa and Gilo and the building of Givat Hamatos.
It is also deeply critical of the plans to construct the settlement known as E1 – announced by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in response to the UN vote to upgrade Palestine to a “non-member observer state” last November.
“Together these settlements will form an Israeli buffer that once complete will virtually cut off East Jerusalem's southern flank from Bethlehem and the southern West Bank,” the report reads.
“The construction of these three settlements is part of a political strategy aimed at making it impossible for Jerusalem to become the capital of two states.”
It accused successive Israeli governments of pursuing a policy of transferring the Jewish population into the West Bank and East Jerusalem “in violation of international humanitarian law”.
“Out of a total of more than 500,000 Israeli settlers living in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, around 200,000 now live in settlements inside East Jerusalem,” the report found.
The report, which was delivered to the EU in Brussels and to the relevant foreign ministries of its 27 member states in January, also advocates closer supervision of joint Israel-EU technological research and development programs to ensure research grants, scholarships or other technological investments do not assist settlements.
Palestinian leaders welcomed the strongly-worded report from the EU counsels general, calling on the European Union and its members to “stand up to Israel”.
“With Israel's most recent escalation of settlement activities in and around Jerusalem, the rise of settler violence and Israeli violations of international law and Palestinian rights, it is of utmost urgency for European countries to follow this courageous assessment with concrete and tangible steps and with punitive measures,” said PLO Executive Committee member, Hanan Ashrawi.
“Israel's settlement campaign is the single most significant threat to the two-state solution, and now is the time to exercise the political will that is required to hold Israel accountable before any and all chances for peace are destroyed,” Dr Ashrawi said.
Israel captured east Jerusalem during the 1967 Six Day War and subsequently annexed it in a move that has never been recognised by the international community.
'Systematic, Deliberate & Provocative': EU Report Critical Of Israeli Settlements