Thursday 2nd of May 2024

turdy keeps whistling to a dog of a budget while the sheep are to be fleeced, calmly, from the previous budget leftover...

tranquil fleecing

With Labor and the Greens opposed to the changes, the government will need to secure crossbench support to get them through the upper house.

On Monday Ms Ley distanced herself from the proposal to increase PBS patient contributions, describing it as "a separate measure I inherited from the last budget", and stressing the $1 discount and other measures to make medicines cheaper would not be contingent upon the proposal.

She said her focus was on delivering a new package of measures which would "balance the need for consumers to have affordable access to medicines now with the need to fund new drugs in the future".

It is understood while Ms Ley remains committed to finding savings to offset the cost of new drug listings, she is considering alternatives to the increase to patient contributions.

Consumers Health Forum chief executive officer Leanne Wells said the proposals to make patients pay more for drugs were "a concern for consumers, particularly the chronically ill".

"This direction is at odds with the government's reform proposals aimed at resetting Medicare, particularly to improve care for the chronically ill," she said.

Greens leader Richard Di Natale​ accused the government of being "intent on balancing the budget on the back of the sick and vulnerable".

"You don't improve health by shifting costs onto patients," he said.

Labor health spokeswoman Catherine King said the proposal "exposed" Ms Ley's promises of cheaper medicines as "a lie".

"If the minister is serious about making medicines 'more affordable for consumers' she must abandon the hike in the costs of prescriptions and her cruel plan to force pensioners with the greatest health needs to spend even more on their essential medicines," she said.

read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/federal-budget-2015-sideeffect-means-sickest-patients-are-to-pay-more-for-drugs-20150520-gh55qb

 

turdy to be shirtfronted (or squashed) by a brick...

Lazarus: 'I will shirtfront Tony Abbott'

Senator Glenn Lazarus threatens to "shirtfront" the Prime Minister over the "human impact" of Coal Seam Gas mining.

http://media.smh.com.au/video-news/video-qld-news/lazarus-i-will-shirtfront-tony-abbott-6549424.html

 

Npte: one of Lazarus nicknames was the "brick with eye" as he played professional rugby league...

unfair and sad budget...

It’s sad to see the 2015 budget being measured against the 2014 budget instead of being measured by its impact on inequality and poverty.

Take, for example, the 2014 measure to force unemployed young people to survive on fresh air and sunshine for six months of every year. Such was the community outcry in the face of such viciousness that the 2015 budget has proposed Punishment Mark II, namely one month without income instead of six.

The change is a clear admission of the cruelty of this measure without actually abandoning it. This is like thanking someone for “only” cutting your fingers off after threatening to cut off your arm. And we are supposed to be grateful!

This year’s budget might be dull but it doesn’t dull the pain for people who struggle to make ends meet when a government presides over a growth in unemployment and inequality. It doesn’t dull the pain because it refuses to make the big end of town pay its share through progressive tax reform.

This budget can find the money to fund childcare and nannies for the rich but only at the expense of the poor. It refuses to lift the abysmally low unemployment benefit, resorting to income management instead of income adequacy. It refuses to reinstate and increase funding for social services, social housing, public health and public education slashed in last year’s budget.

If you wanted to prevent unemployment you wouldn’t rip the guts out of the Gonski education funding reforms or allow Tafe to be undermined or universities deregulated.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/21/are-the-unemployed-supposed-to-be-grateful-for-budget-2015-still-cruel

more bleeding cuts than on a bad shaving day...

 

By keeping most of the last year's budget cuts, and introducing new ones in the May budget, the Abbott government is stripping more than $15 billion over four years from families and lower-income Australians, new analysis by the Australian Council of Social Service shows.

The report, obtained by Fairfax Media, says most of the $800 million revenue increases projected over the next five years come from income tax bracket creep and projected economic growth.

The combined impact of the two budgets for low and middle income people was "devastating", ACOSS chief executive Cassandra Goldie said, with almost two thirds of the family payments cuts hitting low to middle-income households.

"The overall budget fails the fairness test because it keeps more than $15 billion in spending cuts from last year's budget and delivers new cuts to child dental and community health programs," Dr Goldie said. "There is a fair alternative path to budget repair – including through structural tax reform – but unfortunately the best options have been ruled out by the government in advance of the taxation review."

The report is focused on measures which mainly affect lower and middle income households, and does not include Prime Minister Tony Abbott's paid parental leave backflip.

The May budget had a $3.5 billion child care package. But the money, to be delivered over five years, has been linked back to last year's controversial family payments cuts. If passed by the Senate, the cuts would "disproportionately and adversely impact on low income families, particularly single-parent families".

 

 

read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/budget-stripped-more-than-15b-from-families-lowincome-people-acoss-analysis-20150522-gh6z2z

always hitting the poor on the head......