Wednesday 8th of May 2024

in the quicksands of time...

spinspin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no good solution to the Afghan dilemma that US President Joe Biden inherited from his predecessors. As one of his last acts in office Donald Trump had already announced that he intended to withdraw all US troops from Afghanistan. And his predecessor Barack Obama missed the opportunity to prepare the withdrawal with the valid argument that the invasion had actually become obsolete after Osama bin Laden's death.

 

Joe Biden was under great domestic pressure to finally end this war. The majority of Americans do not want to risk any more lives or spend billions more dollars on a country where the majority of the population does not celebrate the US and its allies as liberators but fights them as occupiers.

And Biden desperately needs success. If many US presidents have started wars to win elections, this president needs to end a war to avoid losing his fragile majority in both chambers of the US Congress in next year's midterm elections.

Western civilians in grave danger

All of this must be factored into any assessment of the current situation. But complexity cannot be an excuse for the drama and humanitarian disaster currently unfolding in Afghanistan.

Not only have thousands of Afghans who have supported Western servicemen and women over the past two decades been left defenseless with their families, the military alliance also seems unable to even bring its own civilians to safety. How can it be that embassy staff, NGO workers, and other groups are not being flown out first, before the military has abandoned large parts of the country, clearing the way for the Taliban to triumph?

How can it be that just a few days ago, so-called experts in the White House were claiming that Kabul would not fall anytime soon? Now there is sheer panic in the capital because, of course, the Afghan military has immediately changed its flags.

They have done this out of fear of Taliban superiority, but also because it is not worth fighting for a government led by a President Ashraf Ghani who could hardly be more corrupt.

What does that say about the quality of the intelligence services and their knowledge of the country? And against this backdrop, what value are the words of Joe Biden, who recently declared that Afghanistan no longer posed a terrorist threat and that the country could therefore be left to its own devices?

 

Local workers abandoned

The war in Afghanistan was launched in response to the attack on the United States on September 11, 2001. With baffling logic, Joe Biden had announced that the withdrawal would end on the 20th anniversary of the attack. He probably did this in the hope of finally closing an inglorious chapter of US military invasions and declaring the fight against international terrorism as won at the memorial in New York.

Nothing has been won in these 20 years. At the same time, however, a great deal of credibility has been squandered. Particularly among those who, by their willingness to support the Western military alliance, have put not only their lives but also those of their families at risk, and who are now being so shamefully abandoned. This concerns us all. And must shame us all.

 

Read more:

https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-the-us-has-failed-in-afghanistan/a-58872360

 

BUSH, BLAIR AND HOWARD should be in prison... All this is their chicken coming back to roost as dragons. Our own ScoMo-toad of Marketing has not a clue and is a disgrace on this subject (as well as everything else he touches — Note: great that he did not "hold a hose, mate" because it would have been likely connected to a petrol pump by mistake). Our only shame here is to have made satire out of very sad deadly situations, but our goal has always been and will always be to point out that the morons mentioned above (and the new ones) were (are) creating these sad dangerous situations. It's time for the US to get out of Syria, and all other countries where their foot prints are like colonial dictums...

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.... MR BIDEN... YOU MIGHT GET SOME REDEEM POINTS FOR YOUR SHITTY PRESIDENCY..... ! 

1991. US invades iraq...

30 years ago: U.S. imperialism provoked war with Iraq 

 

Published Jan. 15 in Il Manifesto. Translation: John Catalinotto. 

                                      

At 2:20 a.m. on Jan. 17, 1991 (Gulf time), U.S. helicopters penetrated Iraqi territory, destroying two radar stations with Hellfire missiles. Immediately afterwards, Tomahawk cruise missiles and F-117A stealth fighters struck other nerve centers, blinding the air defenses of the capital. CNN broadcasted to the whole world the images of the Baghdad sky illuminated by antiaircraft tracers firing blindly, a “spectacle” that the reporter compared to the festive fireworks of the 4th of July.

Thus began what the Pentagon described as the most destructive military action ever carried out in such a short time with nonnuclear weapons, a model for future wars.

 

Paradoxically, war broke out at the moment when “peace broke out” (according to the slogan of the time). After the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union itself were about to dissolve. “The Cold War is over, we have entered a new era that offers great hope,” President George H.W. Bush announced, but “the Gulf crisis reminds us that there are still autonomous sources of turbulence in the world.”

In fact, the “turbulence” was triggered by Washington to take full advantage of the fact that, with the breakup of the Soviet bloc, the United States, as it officially declares, remained “the only state with truly global strength, reach and influence in every dimension — political, economic and military: There is no substitute for  [U.S.] American leadership.”

After having supported Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in the 1980s in the war against Khomeini’s Iran, the U.S. pushes Kuwait, which has helped Iraq to fight Iran, to demand from Baghdad the immediate repayment of a loan of tens of billions of dollars and to exploit beyond measure, damaging Iraq, the oil field that extends under both national territories.

U.S. springs trap on Iraq

While the tension between Kuwait and Iraq grows, on July 25, 1990, the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad, April Glaspie, assures Saddam Hussein that she has direct instructions from President Bush to “seek better relations with Iraq” and that “we have no opinion about your border dispute with Kuwait.”

A week later, in a colossal error of political calculation, Iraq invaded Kuwait. Later, Iraq proposed its withdrawal in exchange for certain concessions, including access to the Gulf [which was] denied to it when Britain had redrawn the map of the Middle East in the 1920s.

The trap was sprung. The United States — which had been preparing the war for some time, observing with military satellites the deployment of Iraqi forces and identifying the targets to be hit — formed an international coalition that sent a large army of 750,000 troops to the Gulf under the command of the U.S. General Norman Schwarzkopf.

In November 1990, the Security Council of the U.N. approved — with 12 votes in favor (including the USSR), 2 against (Cuba and Yemen) and the abstention of China — Resolution 678, which authorized the use of “all necessary means” against Iraq.

The Gulf War was the first war in which the Italian Republic participated under U.S. command, violating Article 11 of the Constitution. NATO, although not participating officially as such, provided its forces and bases.

Immediately after the war, NATO launched, along the lines of the new U.S. strategy, the “new strategic concept of the Alliance,” which Italy copies with the “new model of defense.” It went from war to war, presenting them as “humanitarian operations for the export of democracy” — Yugoslavia 1999, Afghanistan 2001, Iraq 2003, Libya 2011, Syria 2011 and others.

This was the war that President Bush declared in 1991 would open “a better future — a new world community united by the growing consensus that force cannot be used,” and that for this reason “the Gulf crisis will go down in history as the crucible of the new world order.”

Witness the millions of dead, disabled, orphans and refugees caused by the Gulf War, plus the 1.5 million deaths, including half a million children, caused by the subsequent 12-year embargo on Iraq and the long-term effects of depleted uranium shells, plus the many more caused by the new war in 2003. The trail of death that began 30 years ago in the first post-Cold War war continues to spread.

War by the numbers

In the war called “Desert Storm,” the U.S. and allied aviation carried out in 43 days, with 2,800 aircraft, over 110,000 sorties, dropping 250,000 bombs, including cluster bombs that released over 10 million submunitions.

Some 700-to-800 tons of depleted uranium shells were used by air and ground forces, including 1 million 30mm shells, fired from aircraft and helicopters, and 14,000 120mm shells, fired from tanks. Thousands of depleted-uranium warheads were also used, with which cruise missiles and rockets are equipped.

British (36,000 troops) and French (15,600) forces flank the U.S. forces. Saudi Arabia deployed 67,500 personnel; Egypt 35,600; Syria 20,800; the Emirates 14,000; Pakistan 10,000 (plus 2,000 Afghan mujahideen); Canada 2,200; Bangladesh 2,000; Italy 1,300; Morocco 1,200; Australia 600; Spain 500; Holland and Belgium 400 each; Greece 200. And Turkey, Denmark, Norway, Bulgaria, New Zealand, Sierra Leone, Argentina, Honduras, Senegal and Niger also participated with military forces.

It was an unprecedented deployment, from the Second World War onwards, composed of forces from all continents.

Italy participated in the war with 12 Tornado fighter-bombers which carried out 226 sorties, dropping 566 bombs in missions decided and coordinated by the U.S. command. The U.S. base of Camp Darby supplies air and ground forces in the Gulf from Italy.

The Pentagon, which supplied 70% of the 750 thousand men of the coalition, deployed to the war 75% of its tactical aircraft (1,950 out of 2,600); 42% of its most modern tanks (2,500 out of 6,000); 46% of its aircraft carriers (6 out of 13); 37% of its ground forces (280,000 out of 761,000); 46% percent of its marines (90,000 out of 195,300).

The cost of the Gulf War in terms of military spending, destruction and economic losses amounted to trillions of dollars. The U.S. military expenditure alone for the second war on Iraq is estimated by the Congressional Budget Office as about 2 trillion dollars.

 

* Dinucci contributes regularly to the Italian daily web newspaper, Il Manifesto, writing often on military matters. Workers World met him for the first time at the Iraq War Crimes Tribunal held in New York City in February 1992, presided over by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark. Dinucci represented the antiwar movement in Italy that participated in the condemnation of the crimes led by U.S. imperialism and its allies and client states, taking advantage of the collapse of the USSR. WWP members played key roles in the tribunal. 

 

Read more: https://www.workers.org/2021/01/54037/

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.!!!!!!!

a shocker of a speech...

It is obvious that Joe Biden was reading from a teleprompter when he made his speech today. It was a shocker of a speech, making all kind of excuses and twists of the truth. I hope there will be a transcription of the speech available — and that the pundits will analyse it.

 

Yes we know, the "liberal" media will praise the president for a frank assessment of the situation... The Right wing media will and should expose this speech as a violin laden sad song that glorifies the USA while walking away with shit on their shoes...

"The buck stops with me" Joe ends with, while having blamed Ashraf Ghani for the present mess in Afghanistan "for not wanting to negotiate with the Taliban"... The writers of Joe's speech are clever enough not to gloss too much on the "nation building" stuff, yet after 20 years of occupation, one has to wonder what was this all about.

At least, the Deep State chose their president well: A puppet who may not remember a single word of what he said as he read a teleprompter, and got a message in his ear-piece to leave the platform as soon as possible, and not answer any question, of which there are many.... Little stumbles across a few words, tell the story: JOE DID NOT WRITE THIS SHITTY SPEECH. Pathetic.

 

And not a word (or not much — I could have missed this part) about the poor people of Afghanistan who were given hope... Most of the end of the speech was about "protecting the US army from further death", etc...

 

Read from top.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!! Make yourself feel good, Mr Biden, before you forget your own name.

a graveyard?...

Yes, Joe Biden blamed corruption in Afghanistan for the downfall of the US Mission whcih was only that of killing Bin Laden... In regard to Corruption he blamed Ashraf Ghani for not doing anything about it...

 

The Wikipedia entry for Ashraf Ghani is a glorification of an intellectual giant..

 

Ghani was born on 19 May 1949[15] in the Logar Province in the Kingdom of Afghanistan. He belongs to the Ahmadzai Pashtun tribe.[16][17]

As a foreign exchange student, Ghani attended Lake Oswego High School in Lake Oswego, Oregon and graduated with the class of 1967. He initially wanted to study law but then changed his major to cultural anthropology. Ghani attended the American University in Beirut where he earned his bachelor's degree in 1973, and after that, he won a government scholarship to attend Columbia University, where he earned his master's degree in 1977. He only intended to be away for two years. However, after pro-Soviet forces came to power, most of the male members of his family were imprisoned, and Ghani stayed at Columbia, earning a PhD degree in 1983. He met his future wife, Rula, while studying there.[16] His doctoral thesis was titled ‘Production and domination: Afghanistan, 1747-1901’.[18] His thesis advisors included Conrad M. Arensberg, Richard Bulliet, Morton Fried, and Robert F. Murphy.[19]

 

Yet there is a flipside... The Netizens are quick to point out a few things as "he left Kabul with suitcases of cash"...

 

Internet pundits have expressed great amusement after discovering a 30-year-old article in which just-deposed Ashraf Ghani was anticipating the rapid downfall of the Afghan government following the Soviet military’s exit in 1989. 

The former Afghan president, who relinquished power to the Taliban in Kabul on Sunday, reportedly escaped the city with enormous quantities of money and other loot, provoking accusations of grift and betrayal.

But the surprisingly swift downfall of his US-backed government – which occurred even before the US military was able to fully withdraw from the country – was particularly momentous for history buffs. Within hours of Ghani’s unceremonious departure, internet sleuths dug up an old classic that the now-ousted president had penned for the Los Angeles Times, which rejoiced at the Soviet military’s withdrawal from Afghanistan in February 1989.

 

Read more:

https://www.rt.com/news/532183-ghani-afghanistan-collapse-soviet-regime-article/

 

Yes, EVEN BIDEN SPEECH MENTIONED AFGHANISTAN "AS THE GRAVEYARD OF EMPIRE"... Hello, who exhumed this crap? YES! We know this, but to place it in the middle of what should have been an apology to the Afghan people that the US gave hope too?... A better deal should have AND COULD HAVE been provided for these people — especially after 20 years of.... 

 

 

Read from top.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!