Friday 27th of December 2024

history remembered by the morons...

moronsmorons

Western media and cultural figures have long compared the US’ official enemies to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler. Most recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin has been the target of such attacks, which have dramatically increased since the Kremlin launched its special military operation in Ukraine last month.

 

Among those accused of being similar to, or even worse than Hitler by Western leaders and corporate media at a time the US was either attempting to oust them for build a demonization campaign against them include: Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez; Iraqi President Saddam Hussein; Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi; North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un; Syrian President Bashar al-Assad; Chinese President Xi Jinping; and Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

 

“Putin’s attack on Ukraine echoes Hitler’s takeover of Czechoslovakia,” wrote the Washington Post on the morning the special military operation began, which aims at eliminating fanatically anti-Russian neo-Nazi elements in the country. An op-ed by infamous anti-Russian history writer Timothy Snyder published by the Boston Globe the same day was titled “Putin’s Hitler-like tricks and tactics in Ukraine.” An article in US state-funded media outlet Voice of America simply asked: “Is Putin the New Hitler?”

 

Michael McFaul, the former US ambassador to Russia who is also a professor of International Studies at Stanford University, told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that Putin was actually worse than Hitler because “there’s one difference between Hitler when he was coming in, and Putin. Hitler didn’t kill ethnic Germans. He didn’t kill German-speaking people.” The outlandish statement won a rebuttal from no less august a Holocaust authority than the Auschwitz Memorial and forced the Maddow Blog Twitter account to delete the tweet and apologize.

 

The latest offender was Lloyd Blankfein, a former CEO of Goldman Sachs who says on his Twitter account that he’s “on a gap year.” On Thursday, Blankfein retweeted a Wall Street Journal story in which US President Joe Biden was quoted as saying that the US would respond if Russia used chemical weapons in Ukraine.

 

“Worth noting even Hitler didn’t permit his military to use chemical weapons, though he had them,” Blankfein said.

 

Hitler may not have used chemical weapons on the battlefield in the west, where the Nazis regarded their foes as honorable, but on the Eastern Front, where the Nazi regime’s genocidal machine was unbridled in all its fury, no atrocity was off the table, including deploying poison gas. Here are a few examples to correct the historical record.

Invasion of Poland

The first use of poison gas came just three days into the war, when a flight of German bombers was attacking the outskirts of the Polish capital of Warsaw. One of the aircraft dropped several mustard gas bombs, reportedly by mistake. Several days later, the Poles reciprocated, defending a railway bridge over the River Jasiołka near Jasło with mustard gas landmines that killed two German soldiers.

Odessa Catacombs

In June 1941, Hitler ordered an all-out attack on the Soviet Union - the largest land invasion in history. The Soviet Ukrainian city of Odessa, known for its large Jewish population, was captured in October 1941. However, partisans continued to resist the fascist occupation, including by hiding out in the extensive network of stone mines beneath the city, which were dubbed catacombs. The Germans regularly used gas and smoke bombs in an attempt to flush the partisans out, with limited success.

Invasion of Crimea

The Nazis used poison gas in several battles in Soviet Crimea, including in the caverns beneath Sevastopol, where Soviet partisans hid out much like in Odessa; in the battle on the eastern Kerch Peninsula, and especially in the fight for the Adzhimushkay Quarry.

As many as 10,000 Red Army troops took shelter in the massive limestone mine’s labyrinth of tunnels in eastern Crimea, joined by refugees from nearby towns. In October 1942, the Nazis decided to simply gas the entire population to death, dropping gas bombs into the tunnels. Only 48 people survived.

The Kuban

Across the Kerch Strait from Crimea is the Kuban Peninsula and Krasondar Krai. After being pushed out of the Caucasus and away from Stalingrad by the Red Army’s vast Operation Uranus, German forces held onto a small bridgehead west of Novorossiysk. In February 1943, German troops are purported to have used poison gas against Soviet troops in the mountains, although only circumstantial evidence of the accusation exists.

All this is to say nothing, of course, of the vast and infamous use of poison gas in the Holocaust to execute prisoners, most of whom were Jews or other minorities, such as Romani.

 

READ MORE:

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

my name's chlorine….

 29 Hospitalized After London Olympic Pool Chlorine Gas Leak

 

Authorities say 29 people were taken to the hospital with breathing difficulties after a “high quantity of chlorine gas” leaked in a swimming pool at the London sports complex that hosted the 2012 Summer Olympics.

 

LONDON (AP) — Authorities said 29 people were taken to the hospital with breathing difficulties on Wednesday after a “high quantity of chlorine gas” leaked in a swimming pool at the London sports complex that hosted the 2012 Summer Olympics.

The London Fire Brigade said around 200 people were evacuated after the chlorine gas was discharged inside the Aquatics Center at the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park in east London due to a “chemical reaction.”

 

Read more:

https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2022-03-23/london-olympic-pool-evacuated-after-gas-release-incident

 

Gus is of the opinion that the industrial chlorine for swimming pool was accidentally(?) mixed or used with industrial acetic acid (vinegar) for cleaning. This will release the chlorine gas...

 

READ FROM TOP. 

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW ∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

false flag ahead...

With Washington and its NATO allies forced to watch from the sidelines as Russia’s military advances across Eastern Ukraine and encircles Kiev, US and British officials have resorted to a troubling tactic that could trigger a massive escalation. Following similar claims by his Secretary of State and ambassador the United Nations, US President Joseph Biden has declared that Russia will pay a “severe price” if it uses chemical weapons in Ukraine.

The warnings emanating from the Biden administration contain chilling echoes of those issued by the administration of President Barack Obama throughout the US-led dirty war on Syria.

Almost as soon as Obama implemented his ill-fated “red line” policy vowing an American military response if the Syrian army attacked the Western-backed opposition with chemical weapons, Al Qaeda-aligned opposition factions came forth with claims of mass casualty sarin and chlorine bombings of civilians. The result was a series of US-UK missile strikes on Damascus and a prolonged crisis that nearly triggered the kind of disastrous regime change war that had destabilized Iraq and Libya.

In each major chemical weapons event, signs of staging and deception by the armed Syrian opposition were present. As a former US ambassador in the Middle East told journalist Charles Glass, “The ‘red line’ was an open invitation to a false-­flag operation.”

Elements of deception were especially clear in the April 7, 2018 incident in the city of Douma, when an anti-government militia on the brink of defeat claimed civilians had been massacred in a chlorine attack by the Syrian army.

Veteran inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) found no evidence that the Syrian army had carried out any such attack, however, suggesting the entire incident had been staged to trigger Western intervention. Their report was subsequently censored by organization management, and the inspectors were subjected to a campaign of smears and intimidation.

Throughout the Syrian conflict, a self-proclaimed “chemical warrior” named Hamish de Bretton-Gordon was intimately involved in numerous chemical weapons deceptions that sustained the war and ratcheted up pressure for Western military intervention.

This February 24, just moments after Russia’s military entered Ukraine, de Bretton-Gordon surfaced again in British media to claim that Russia was preparing a chemical attack on Ukrainian civilians. He has since demanded that Ukrainians be provided with a guide he wrote called, “How To Survive A Chemical Attack.”

 

So who is de Bretton-Gordon, and does his sudden reappearance as an expert voice on the Russia-Ukraine war signal a return to the dangerous US-UK red line policy?

Hours after war erupts, a “chemical warrior” demands Western escalation

Following months of fevered speculation about an impending Russian invasion of Ukraine, when it finally came to pass on the early morning of February 24th, most were caught entirely by surprise. Media outlets and pundits scrambled to get their stories straight, while Western leaders rushed to construct a cohesive ‘response’.

By contrast, Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a British army veteran identified by UK media as a “former spy,” was in no such muddle. Within just three hours, he had a fiery op-ed prepared for The Guardian, demanding the US and Europe “show their steel in the face of Putin’s aggression.” Warning that Vladimir Putin was “much more willing to face off with NATO” than before, de Bretton-Gordon charged that the West “stood back and watched in Syria,” and “it must not do the same in Ukraine.”

“Syria shows what happens when you turn a blind eye and are too heavily influenced by peaceniks,” de Bretton-Gordon fulminated. “Those of us involved in interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past 30 years…we look at Syria and know we should have done better. That knowledge should inform our response to Putin’s aggression now.”

In reality, Washington and its allies did not stand back and watch in Syria; it waged a decade-long proxy war employing jihadist paramilitaries and airstrikes on Damascus, then occupied oil-producing portions of the country and subjected its citizens to crippling sanctions, which to this day deprive them of food, electricity and vital medical supplies. 

Of all people, de Bretton-Gordon – whose Twitter profile once identified him as a member of 77th Brigade, the British Army’s official psychological warfare division – is uniquely placed to know of these horrors. After all, he played a pivotal role in promoting and extending the dirty war through the management of information surrounding chemical weapons incidents.

Manipulation, absurdities and obvious fraud

As The Grayzone has revealed, the involvement of de Bretton-Gordon in the Syrian conflict dates back to at least 2013, when by his own admission he was engaged in a covert effort to smuggle soil samples out of the opposition-occupied areas. This work would have inevitably placed him in extremely close quarters with jihadist elements raking in Western funding while benefiting from NATO training weapons.

Contemporary media reports reveal the UK’s MI6 was engaged in a sample-gathering effort in the country at the very time time de Bretton-Gordon was inside Syria, strongly suggesting his linkage to the foreign intelligence agency. One article makes abundantly clear the purpose of the soil-sample exercise was to push the US into intervening by proving government culpability for alleged chemical weapons attacks.

Other forms of evidence were also collected on-the-ground by de Bretton-Gordon, and provided to a number of official investigations into chemical attacks. In at least one instance – an OPCW/UN Joint Investigative Mechanism (JIM) probe into a purported chemical strike in Talmenes, April 2014 – videos submitted by CBRN Taskforce, a shady organization he founded in Aleppo, were found to show clear signs of falsification.

De Bretton-Gordon threw his chemical weapons expertise into further doubt when he told British media that any common refrigerator could be transformed into a chemical weapon, falsely claiming that R22 refrigerant cylinders contained material for improvised chlorine bombs. “Somebody could go to a waste site where people chuck away fridges [in the UK] and get a whole bunch of those things and blow them up,” the supposed arms specialist claimed.

 

De Bretton Gordon has gone as far as claiming to a British tabloid that Russia could deploy missiles and hand grenades containing the highly deadly Soviet-era chemical agent Novichok “in any future war with the West.”

Such absurd commentary and subterfuge has done nothing to dent de Bretton-Gordon’s credibility, however. His mainstream profile has only grown over time, with outlets invariably presenting him as a courageous human rights defender risking his life to train local doctors and rescue workers. 

On more than one occasion, however, de Bretton-Gordon was directly involved Western journalists in MI6’s soil gathering efforts. For instance, during a 2014 podcast interview with Wilton Park, an NGO funded by the UK Foreign Officede Bretton-Gordon boasted of his responsibility for a story in the Times of London alleging a Syrian chemical attack in the town of Sheikh al-Maqsood.

“In March last year there was a reported sarin attack in Sheikh al-Maqsood and I helped the Times – chap called Anthony Lloyd who very sadly got shot two weeks ago – to cover this story and tried to get samples to the UK for analysis … I won’t go into the details of that,” he recalled.

Then-Prime Minister David Cameron invoked the Sheikh al-Maqsood incident to increase pressure on Damascus, citing “the picture as described to me by the Joint Intelligence Committee” as the basis for his assertion of a chemical attack against the town by the Syrian army.

Throughout the dirty war on Syria, de Bretton-Gordon routinely cropped up in the media attributing gas attacks and war crimes to Syrian and Russian forces, and fear-mongered about their implications for future conflicts with the West.

The latter role is one de Bretton-Gordon has enthusiastically resumed throughout the war in Ukraine, aggressively hyping the threat to Western countries. His messaging has tracked seamlessly with that of the US government, which initiated a program months before Russia’s military operation to prepare Ukraine’s security sector for an impending weapons of mass destruction attack. 

Months before war, US trains Ukrainians in the threat of “targeted weapons of mass destruction attacks”

Back in May 2021, the State Department announced that Washington had conducted a “virtual training exercise” with “partners” in Kiev, including domestic security services, law enforcement, and first responders, to “identify, respond to, and investigate assassinations involving weapons of mass destruction,” due to “recent events in Europe” highlighting “the real threat of government-sanctioned, targeted weapons of mass destruction attacks.”

Along the way, Ukrainians were tutored in “[identifying] the medical symptoms that indicate WMD material use, the attack cycle involved in WMD assassination attempts, and the specific measures that enable safe and secure detection and response to WMD incidents.” 

Quite why this instruction was given at this particular time is unclear, as was the “recent events in Europe” to which the press release referred. Perhaps the State Department was alluding to the alleged novichok poisoning of the Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny in August 2020. On what grounds that failed assassination necessitated a grand, multi-agency training exercise in dealing with “targeted WMD attacks” is anyone’s guess.

Whatever the purpose of the US training program was, Ukrainian security personnel can now claim they have the training to identify the precise “medical symptoms that indicate WMD material.”

This is significant, because ever since the conflict began, Kiev has exhibited an endless enthusiasm for lying, having distorted or even outright concocted events and facts whole-cloth to advance its objectives on countless occasions.

The most dangerous claims advanced by Ukrainian propagandists have been reinforced by the supposed authority of de Bretton-Gordon, who has argued that Russian chemical strikes were absolutely inevitable, based his prediction on his opinion that Moscow “has no morals or scruples.”

The self-styled chemical weapons expert has even cautioned that Putin could deploy nuclear weapons or create a pandemic “more deadly than Covid” with an Ebola weapon. He has further speculated that Russian forces may unleash a deadly virus seized from one of several Pentagon-funded biolabs in Ukraine, then blame it on the US. 

From Syria to Ukraine, it is happening again

In a typical media appearance, on March 10th, de Bretton Gordon told London’s LBC radio show that “nothing is off the table at this stage.” Among the horrors he forecast was the use of white phosphorous “to set towns and cities on fire.”

Justifying his certainty, de Bretton-Gordon forcefully asserted, “the only way to take a large city or town ultimately is to use chemical weapons.” He pointed to Syria to prove his point – but without referencing his own pivotal role in escalating that conflict through the manipulation of evidence and scientifically bereft fear-mongering in the media.

Now, de Bretton-Gordon has resurfaced at the center of the aggressive push for escalation with a nuclear armed Russia. If his role in Syria is any guide, a series of cynical deceptions could be on the way.

 

READ MORE:

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/march/25/british-intelligence-operative-s-involvement-in-ukraine-crisis-signals-false-flag-attacks-ahead/

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW...................