I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO VERIFY ALL OF THIS INFORMATION.... YET ONE CAN HOPEFULLY TRUST LARRY ROMANOFF AS A HISTORIAN OF THE HIDDEN TRUTHS BEHIND THE OFFICIAL VERSIONS OF HISTORY WHICH SUCK. SAME WITH THIERRY MEYSSAN (READ ABOVE). HIS VIEW OF EUROPE FALLING DOWN DUE TO THE STRAUSSIAN DOCTRINE IS CORRECT. LEO STRAUSS WAS A JEW OF COURSE, ONE OF THE FORMATIVE STEP-STONES OF THE JEWISHDOM CONTROLLING THE PLANET — WHICHEVER WAY. MY GUESS IS THAT OUR LITTLE SPY IN RUSSIA, VLADIMIR PUTIN, HAS INTIMATE KNOWLEDGE OF THIS HIDDEN HISTORY. THIS IS WHY HE IS FINALLY IGNORING THE WEST AND EMBRACING THE EAST IN A VERY OFFICIAL AND ELEGANTLY PROSPEROUS MANNER. 

Much of the so-called “history” we were taught in our schools has not been so accurate as we might have believed. In particular, the book publishers, with cunning aforethought, have managed to eliminate much of the most important information necessary to give us a real understanding of the world in which we live. After the elimination of perhaps 50% of the crucial facts, much of the remainder that has been presented to us is factually false. Even worse, they have managed to construct a disconnected historical narrative consisting of sound bytes that appear unrelated and thus prevent us from being able to connect the necessary dots to see the overall picture as it really is (or has been). To make matters worse, our teachers, having been educated in this same system, are themselves ignorant of most of the crucial facts. In this essay, I will attempt to present some major sections of an important segment of our history so the relations can be made and the picture discerned as a whole.

Contrary to our propagandised history texts, revolutions have seldom resulted from a ‘spontaneous combustion of the social order’ as someone wrote. Most often, the match is lit by some “secret agency that conceals itself in the shadowy sanctuaries of certain forms of Freemasonry” that inevitably has “a distinctly Jewish” origin. Our recorded history has in every case omitted the ethnic identities of the instigators and main players and, with few exceptions (France and Russia, most notably), has buried the fact of these revolutions altogether. The European countries had two waves of revolutions about 100 years apart, directed to the overthrow of monarchies, but this was only the beginning. Few seem aware today that the Communist movement was more or less 100% a Jewish creation, one bent on fostering revolutions not only in Europe but throughout the world. We had Trotsky and Lenin in Russia, the Jewish Masonic lodges in France, a successful coup in Mongolia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg in Germany, attempted Communist revolutions in the US (Emma Goldman) and Canada, China (Voitinsky), Bettelheim (Austria), and many more.

Some Historical Background

The paragraphs immediately following are an abbreviated extract from an earlier article titled, “It’s Time to Trash Democracy — Part 1 – The Origin”.[1]

Most everyone knows that the Jews have for centuries been expelled repeatedly from nation after nation, at least for the past 700 or 800 years, the expulsions often occurring every 50 years or so. This much is well-documented, but it is interesting that no one seems to have paid attention to precisely when these expulsions ceased or, more importantly, why they ceased. We need to retrace some history from Eastern Europe.

Many centuries ago, the Eastern confines of Europe between the Caucasus and the Volga were ruled by a Jewish state known as the Khazar Empire,[2]

[3]

 the peak of its power from the seventh to the tenth centuries, AD. The Khazars were a people of Turkish stock who, for reasons unclear, chose to adopt Judaism as their religion in about 750 AD, but of critical importance is that they were not Jews, not in any sense of the meaning of that word. They were entirely Turkic and Eastern European, genetically more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.[2]

 (p. 17)

The Khazars were nomadic warriors, “wild men with hideous faces and the manners of wild beasts, eaters of blood”. An Armenian writer refers to the “horrible multitude”. They were without doubt one of the most violent and cruel of the animal species that have ever inhabited the earth, with no use for life other than their own. The Khazars were so violent, brutal, and savage a people that they are described to be “feared and abhorred above all peoples in that region of the world”. Little is known of their origin because Jewish historians and book publishers have written them out of our history and do their best today to deny even the existence of these people. These Eastern European Khazars were without question the most hated and feared peoples of all Europe at the time, perhaps in all of history. Their blood-thirstiness and cruelty were legendary, to say nothing of their greed.[4]

[5]

 It will be of significance that prior to the time they adopted Judaism, the Khazar religion was one of phallic worship.

The Khazar Empire came to an end when the peoples of Europe, unable to tolerate their savage brutality, bound together, exterminated the Empire and scattered the surviving Khazars to the four winds. They were defeated primarily by the Russians in about 965 AD but persisted to some significant degree, suffering various additional exterminations until the late 1300s when Genghis Khan cleaned them out and occupied almost all their prior territory . The Khazars simply ‘disappeared’ from history, to be replaced by “Jews” who suddenly appeared almost everywhere at the same time. These dispersed survivors remained nomads, people of no nation and no place – and of no loyalty to any people, nation, or place. And, as Koestler points out, this is “the cradle of the numerically strongest and culturally dominant part of modern Jewry”. And indeed, I have read Jewish publications which state flatly that (to paraphrase, but accurately) “one might as well say there are no more ‘real Jews’ left in the world, that at least 95% of all Jews are European Khazars”. They give real Jews a bad name.

Greed drove this Khazarian diaspora to banking and money, while their native brutality lent itself well to slave-trading, all occupations they have pursued ever since. Their natural homelessness and fundamental dissimilarity with other human tribes were perhaps responsible for their lack of loyalty to any nation or peoples, and their apparently innate cruel brutality, along with their apparently also innate sexual perversions, accounted for their drift to occupations like slave-trading, kidnapping countless young women for sale in harems around the world and for kidnapping and castrating young men to serve as eunuchs in these same harems. The latter may also have accounted for their sudden shift to Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud resonating well with their sexual proclivities, a kind of ‘kindred spirit’ to which they were quite disposed and receptive. Their violent and independent nature also manifested in a powerful unwillingness to accept subjection or subordination to ruling power, and most definitely rejected assimilation.

Their problems were many. These Khazars (now our “so-called” Jews) were also bitterly hated for their tax-farming. The process was simple. They would approach a monarch with a proposition to pay the entire tax revenue of his kingdom annually in advance, in a lump sum, in return for which they would have the right to levy and collect taxes from the citizenry during the ensuing year, to recover their ‘investment’ and make a profit. The theory was sound; the practice brutal. These so-called Jews would create, levy and collect taxes in kind and volume that would stagger the imagination and eventually bankrupt an entire nation. Many a monarch would discover the tax collections progressing without limit until the entire kingdom was on the verge of a revolution, at which point these so-called Jews would be expelled from the country, sometimes permitted to take their booty with them, sometimes it being confiscating on exit. In every case, this “Jewish” diaspora pushed matters to the point where a mass expulsion was considered the only salvation of a country.

We have been for generations exposed to tales of ‘the Jews’ being expelled from various nations for reasons of anti-Semitism, but this was never true. First, and again, these people were not Jews, and they were expelled for their crimes and their greed, unrelated to their (false) ethnic origin. It seems unknown today that the expulsions never really ceased. Cuba expelled all the Jews after the revolution. Japan expelled all the Jews in two waves prior to WWII, and Mao’s first act on assuming power was to expel all the Jews from China. Germany attempted the same (to Madagascar) prior to WWII, but failed. These were all for similar reasons, and many more such exist today.

The Roots of Revolution

We can imagine that these repeated expulsions from dozens of countries perhaps every 50 years or so, for hundreds of years would become inconvenient and tiresome. The primary issue was that people were subject to the whim of a monarch – of one man – who had the power and the might to expel them and confiscate their assets at his pleasure. Subversion and revolution may not have been so difficult when we consider that monarchs were often uncompromising and brutal to their own populations as well.

The Jews produced two rounds of revolutions in Europe when they sensed the expulsion winds blowing, the first set producing no lasting benefit to our Khazars, one unfriendly monarch quickly being replaced by another of similar sentiment and with similar concerns for his own longevity.

The Khazarian Jews found a better way. The conception was brilliant, the process simple, the theory eminently seductive. “We don’t need a king. A country is easy to manage. We can form a government from the people. We can rule ourselves. No more useless wars, no more punishing taxes, no monarch living in luxury while we starve. We can do this ourselves, and be free.” And of course, the Jews could guide the people to the formation of an effective government, primarily by creating two “parties” from which the people could choose, and with the ability to eject one party if unsatisfactory and select the other, thus keeping them “honest”. We know how that turned out.

The peasants were ecstatic with visions of sugar plums dancing in their heads, while the elites were even more ecstatic because they realised from the outset that government leaders could come only from their group. These so-called Jews were offering the elites total control of their entire country, and were willing to finance the transition. How could you refuse an offer like this? To put this into perspective, the entire story unfolded over 200 or more years, involved thousands of Khazars, sometimes acting independently but often in concert, and with mistakes, lapses and learning before the final product was firmly established. So, in this sense, it is a bit simplistic to simply say “The Jews created democracy”. Nevertheless, this is how it happened. This was the genesis of democracy, at least of the multi-party form of electoral system we have today.

The reason it happened this way is because a multi-party electoral system is the only government system that can be completely corrupted and controlled from behind the scenes with that corruption and control institutionalised in perpetuity. It is true that any kind of government can be corrupt, but the multi-party “democratic” system was created to be corruptible in all its constituent elements and where each individual politician could be bought, with the entire population being exploited, this process having now been developed to a fine art. At first, party leaders developed a machine, each to impress its views on the people, but quickly “the party machine” took charge of the process and all control was assumed by those in charge of that machine. The result was that neither the politicians nor the people today have any influence in the process which is controlled in the background for everything from financing to policy.

This is the reason the Jews, through their control of the media and publishing, have promulgated “democracy” ceaselessly as a religion so holy that even to examine or question it constitutes blasphemy of the highest order. It has been so successful that there are precious few “democracies” today that are not effectively controlled by Jews in the background – our so-called “Deep State”. The US is widely-known as a Jewish state, but Canada, Germany, Sweden, Ukraine, the Netherlands, England, France, Italy, Australia, and all the others are not better. Even Japan is factually a Jewish colony.

The Color of Revolutions

Our revolutionary picture is muddy and clouded because we have had several other categories of Jew-induced revolutions, some of which coincided with the removal of a monarch (notably the French Revolution) while others were for a vast social upheaval and the replacement of any government with a Communist elite (Russia, Germany, Hungary, Austria, Spain). There is yet another entire category which we can loosely call “Color Revolutions” which were meant to replace existing (non-Jewish) governments with new ones that would be controlled by Jews. One of the greatest such attempts was the violence in China in 1989, the so-called “Tiananmen Square Incident”, which was entirely a (failed) organised attempt by Worldwide Jewry at a Color Revolution in China. If you are interested to know more, I believe this is recognised as the definitive article on the subject.[6]

 Ukraine was another (successful one), and there were many more such attempts.

There are other categories too. The American Revolution was unrelated to slavery but was really a “War of Financial Disobedience” inflicted on the US by the European Jewish bankers, primarily Rothschild. There are others, as well as wars instigated, Presidential assassinations committed, and other mortal sins, all from the same source and for similar political reasons.

The truth is that in all the past revolutionary movements there is plain evidence of a common design. This was true of the two series of European revolutions meant to depose existing monarchies, of the long series of Communist revolutions meant to replace the existing social orders, of the series of so-called “Color Revolutions” meant to replace existing governments with new regimes under Jewish control. To this we could add the 50 or so so-called ‘revolutions’ where the European Jewish bankers in the City of London replaced functioning legitimate governments with brutal dictatorships (Latin America, Africa), for both financial and political gain, in all cases using the US CIA and military as the Bankers Private Army. Today, they destroy countries to “make the world safe for democracy”, but first they needed to destroy countries to make the world safe for the Jews.

Prior to and following WWI, there was a long series of serious revolutionary outbreaks in Portugal, Prussia, Bavaria, Hungary, Holland, Switzerland, France, Denmark, Turkey, and many more. In all of these instances, the same “foreign influence” was primarily responsible but history seems to have deleted not only the instigators but the events themselves.

Benjamin Disraeli, in his book “Coningsby”, written in 1844, wrote “that mighty Revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and which will be, in fact, a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is yet known in England, is developing entirely under the auspices of Jews.” And of course, the two Jews primarily behind that ‘reformation’ were Ferdinand Lassalle and Karl Marx. “Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to use as a bait to attract the masses of the people so as to crush those in authority.”

Winston Churchill, Britain’s future Prime Minister, railed against “the schemes of the International Jews” as follows:

“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer Mrs. (Nesta) Webster has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”[7]

Many books have been written on this topic from the late 1800s to the middle and late 1900s, but these books are no longer in vogue, are not referenced or cited by anyone, and probably not read by academics anywhere, their attention having been directed to more “approved” topics. Thus, the knowledge falls out of the world’s consciousness. Some people today try to tell us, but few listen. Carroll Quigley uncovered and revealed part of the plot, but the printing plates to his books were destroyed and publishers forbidden to resurrect them.

Henry Ford and The Protocols

Henry Ford’s long series of essays titled “The International Jew – The World’s Foremost Problem”,[8]

 written in the early 1920s, tried to bring public attention to the matter of Jewish-instigated revolutions and much more, his writings being of perhaps even more importance today. Benjamin Freedman, who had been an advisor to five US Presidents, wrote some articles that revealed much of the buried history of the Jews.[9]

[10]

. An exceptionally-informed book titled “The Cause of World Unrest” was written by Howell Arthur Gwynne, the Editor of the London Morning Post from 1911 to 1937, one I have used in part as a reference for this article and which is eminently worth reading.[11]

Gwynne wrote:

“Lately there has been published both in America and England a translation of a work entitled “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” It is difficult to say whether or not it is a genuine document. But today, after our experience of the War, the Peace Conference, and the doings of the Jews in Russia, it has received everywhere a great deal of earnest study and consideration. Many of its prophecies are being fulfilled before our eyes and, because of this, we are justified in giving to it a greater credence than could have been possible ten years ago. Jewish writers and newspapers have denied with indignation the authenticity of the protocols. But even if indisputable proof were adduced tomorrow that they are a forgery, there would still be asked the same question which the protocols have provoked and are provoking every day. Have the Jews a foreign policy of their own with a definite end in view? It would be difficult to deny to that section of Jewry which is best described as political, a definite national policy.”

“And if we consider the internal evidence fairly it amounts to this: that the document predicts a world revolution, and a world revolution carried out by a Jewish organization, and that the revolution now in progress — the Bolshevist Revolution — is in fact carried on mainly by Jews, and is an attempt at a world revolution. There we must leave it. If our readers believe that such a prophecy could have been made without foreknowledge by some anti-Semitic fanatic, then, of course, they will not accept the document as genuine. If, on the other hand, they believe that such a hypothesis is untenable, then there is only the alternative that the document is genuine.”

Gwynne writes further: “Time and again they have been used with most barefaced effrontery as a means of producing results which they themselves never desired.” This much is certainly true. There is no question the Jews in the City of London wanted to cause the breakup of Yugoslavia, and that they used the auspices of Harvard University’s “Albert Einstein Institution”, Gene Sharp being the facilitator. Sharp’s Otpor Manual, a pathetically-fictitious instruction for “non-violent struggle” that culminated in one of the most violent episodes in our Earth’s recent history, beginning with the destruction of Serbia but ending with countless hundreds of thousands of deaths and one of the greatest programs of ethnic cleansing we have ever seen. When we think of the breakup of Yugoslavia, the deaths and migrations, there is no one who wanted that or foresaw the result, except for the Jews who initiated it. Talking today to those young people in Serbia who so eagerly adopted Sharp’s Satanic mission, none wanted the result that was actually achieved, and in fact were horrified to witness what they had unleashed. They were, as are university students everywhere, merely unwitting and manipulated tools in someone else’s grand scheme.

Gwynne again: “We are seeing today how the exploitation of the people can be achieved with comparative ease because the people throughout the civilised world is enfranchised and there is no one to stand between the exploiters and the exploited. If we look back in history, we shall find that the disappearance of this intermediate influence has not been altogether fortuitous. . . [There are] threads of a conspiracy engineered by people whose main object has been to destroy utterly anything – kings, governments, or institutions – which might stand between them and the people they would exploit.”

“The famous protocols may or may not be genuine, but even the most skeptical must admit that they are the abstract of a philosophy which may be devilish, but which is certainly coherent, and that in many important points they not only anticipate, but explain, some of the ills from which the world is at present suffering.” I would add that the US government and military studied this document extensively at the time (around 1920) and pronounced it genuine.

The World’s Revolutions

This is an enormous topic which would require a library to do it justice. I will simply touch on some of the revolutions and revolutionary attempts, and which can do no more than provide some indication of the vastness, on the content and intent of those plans. I will omit the so-called “Russian Revolution” from this discussion because it deserves its own exposition and, more menacingly, illustrates the enormous savage brutality of the instigators. I say ‘so-called’ Russian Revolution because it was in no sense Russian but instead was entirely a Jewish Revolution against Russia. It may not have escaped the notice of readers that another such ‘revolution’ is in the planning today – and by the same people.

We already know about Iraq and Libya with their now totally Jewish-controlled governments and central banks, and we see what is happening in Syria, Yemen and other nearby nations. The main obstacles still preventing worldwide control are China, Russia and Iran, so it is not a surprise that all current media venom is directed against these three countries which must either be taken over or destroyed. Revolutions would appear to be a non-starter. The Jews tried to launch a “Jasmine Revolution” in China a few years ago, with the only result being then-US Ambassador Jon Huntsman putting his tail between his legs and running for cover from an angry mob in downtown Beijing. Indeed, popular domestic support for the leaders is very high with at least 80% in Russia and 90%-95% in China and Iran. This leaves World War Three as the only possible solution, one that would hopefully destroy these three nations in the process, leaving the field clear for a new World Government.

“Let Them Eat Cake” – The French Revolution

Lord Acton, in his Essays on the French Revolution, wrote “The appalling thing is not the tumult but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization. The managers remain studiously concealed and masked, but there is no doubt about their presence from the first.”

My recollection from High School of this part of history is that the peasants revolted against Royalty and the elite class, for various wrongs that included lack of food bordering on starvation – the most notable propaganda representing which, would be the above comment attributed to Marie Antoinette – and the callous lack of concern thereof.

The above quote supposedly would reflect Queen Marie Antoinette’s obliviousness to the condition of the people but, while it has been commonly attributed to her, there is no record of these words ever having been uttered by her. They appear in Jean-Jacques Rousseau‘s “Confessions”, his autobiography, whose first six books were written in 1765, when Marie Antoinette was nine years of age. (Rousseau was Jewish). It is worth noting that these words were never cited by opponents of the monarchy at the time of the French Revolution, but seemed to acquire great symbolic importance in subsequent histories when pro-revolutionary historians sought to demonstrate the obliviousness and selfishness of the French upper-classes at that time.

However, the French Revolution itself produces serious evidence of not having been a spontaneous event in any sense, but instead having been conspired, planned, and executed by various parties entirely for their own ends. It doesn’t require much cynicism to observe that this really seems, at least superficially, a case of blaming the victims for the crime. There now appears a significant portion of history telling us that the Masonic Lodges and various Jewish groups – both international and in France – actively planned this revolution.

According to the emerging historical evidence, the food shortages in France at the time were intentionally created to trigger the Revolution. The claims are made, and they appear substantial, that grains and other food stocks were purchased by those with money and removed from the market – stored and hidden – to deliberately lead the population to the brink of starvation and thereby promoting a widespread revolt. A group of Jewish bankers bought up and put into storage the entire grain crop of France, and refused to let it onto the market at any price. The people literally had no bread to eat. Hence, our revolution. As Henry Ford wrote in one of his articles: “For five generations the world has lived in a false light supposed to be shed by the French Revolution. It is now known that that revolution was not the Revolution of the French People, but the disorders of a minority who sought to impose upon the French People the very Plan which is now being considered.

It was the French People who ultimately put down the so-called French Revolution. [But] France, as a result of that upheaval of a well-organized minority, has been bound by Jewish control ever since.”

The Little Engine That Couldn’t – Emma Goldman and the Failed US Revolution

Goldman emigrated from Russia as a teen-ager and soon began promulgating various models of society based primarily on the two pillars of political anarchy and promiscuous sex. Her widespread and excessively vocal promotion of these ideals earned Goldman the label of being one of the two most dangerous anarchists in America. Goldman’s actual purpose was to foment a Communist revolution in the US, following the pattern these people had laid with their revolutions in Russia, Hungary, Germany, and other countries. But, in the end, Goldman didn’t accomplish as much anarchy as she might have done, mostly because she discovered she was more interested in sex than politics.[12]

Goldman and her lover Berkman (a kind of political Bonnie and Clyde) conspired to kill then-US President William McKinley.[13][14] The police were never able to link Goldman directly to McKinley’s murder, though the assassin had frequently met with her and claimed to have acted under her instructions. It wasn’t only a US President who was targeted by Goldman and her group. They attempted to kill several other public figures, their plan to bomb John D. Rockefeller’s mansion in New York City failing only because the bomb exploded prematurely, killing a dozen or so anarchists while destroying much of Goldman’s home in the process. One of Goldman’s anarchists named Carlo Valdinoci blew up the front of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer’s home in Washington, D.C., also blowing himself up in the process when the bomb exploded too early.[15] And some other good tries.[16][17]

The US was at the time panicking over the Russian and other European Revolutions and was not blind to the fact that so many Jewish Communists were migrating to the US – many under pressure from the Jewish lobby which was already powerful enough to demand that only the nationality of these immigrants be recorded and not the fact that they were either Jews or Communists. In any case, the fear of these communists was the starting point of McCarthyism in the US. It is true that McCarthy went too far, but America had very good reasons to have a dread fear of the Communists and their incipient domestic Communist Revolution. But the unforgivable deception was that all this fear and hatred of what were in fact Jewish Communists – mostly from Russia – was subverted and turned onto Russia itself and the USSR, instead of remaining with the primarily Jewish Communists who were responsible for the entire mess of upheavals in Europe for a period of 20 or 30 years.

One article titled, “Fear of Dissent: The Case Against the “Reds”, by the US Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, clearly outlines the dangers being faced to US society, morals and religion, seeking to replace them with the same perverted “values” as done by Bela Kun in Hungary. He states pointedly that “communism in this country was an organization of thousands of aliens who were direct allies of Trotsky”, without mentioning that Trotsky was Jewish and that all these “direct allies” were also Jewish. In the end, everything was blamed on “Russia”, although Russia as a country was innocent of the Bolshevik Revolution imposed upon it by Trotsky and his band of Jewish revolutionaries shipped there from the USA.

Other American Revolutions

Andrew Jackson was no sooner elected President than he was the target of an assassination attempt by a gunman named Richard Lawrence, who confessed to the police that that he had been “in touch with the powers in Europe”. Despite the obvious danger to his life, Jackson refused to renew the bank’s charter and the US national debt went to zero for the first and last time in the nation’s history. But in retaliation, the Bank’s president Nicholas Biddle, an agent for the Paris-based Jacob Rothschild, immediately cut off all funding to the US government and plunged the country into a deep depression. Simultaneously, the same bankers plunged the US into a war with Mexico, greatly exacerbating the economic hardship and once again offering the US president an opportunity to clarify his thinking.[18]

The bankers’ incitement of wars of clarification in America included the US civil warwhich, contrary to popular belief, was not about slavery but about political and financial control of the US. There is more than ample evidence that the severe divisions within the country which led to the American civil war were deliberately inflicted upon the US by these same bankers, who were fulfilling their warning delivered more than ten years earlier that disobedience would be punished by the crafting and imposition of a civil war. Their plan, which succeeded admirably, was “to exploit the question of slavery and thus to dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic”, thereby throwing the new nation into a bitter civil war with the intent of ending with two weak and easily-controlled republics instead of one strong one.

Germany’s Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck claimed the European bankers were responsible for the American Civil War, stating “The division of the United States was decided by the high financial powers of Europe”, and van Helsing wrote “The reasons leading to this civil war were almost completely due to the Rothschild agents”, one of whom was George Bickly who persuaded the Confederate States of the advantages of secession from the Union, thereby precipitating the American civil war. All American history texts attribute the civil war to slavery disputes, constituting one of the greatest lies and historical revisions existing in any nation.

In any case, the bankers did succeed in their incitement to violence, and the Civil War was unleashed on the US, with the London bankers backing the Union and the French bankers backing the South. Everyone made a fortune and by 1861 the US was $100 million in debt. At this time, Abraham Lincoln became the new President and snubbed the bankers by issuing US government currency popularly known as Greenbacks to pay Union Army bills without incurring debt to the Rothschilds.

At the time, the Rothschild-controlled Times of London wrote: “If that mischievous policy, which had its origins in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

Canada

This history has been mostly deleted and few even in Canada are aware of the Jewish Communists’ “program of violence and hypocrisy” in Canada, where the [Communist] movement was very closely connected with the powerful revolutionary organisations in the US. Toronto and Winnipeg (cities with heavy Jewish populations) had many Bolshevik societies, of which the members were almost entirely Russian Jews. They organised extensive riots in many cities, aligning their revolutionary intent with unrelated protests by war veterans. They created sufficient violence that the protests eventually had to be terminated by considerable force from the Canadian RCMP. Their program was based on a demand for the overthrow of what they called the “damnable trinity of Religion (Christianity), Government, and Capitalism.“[19]

[20]

England and World Revolution

“Before a revolution can take place in any country, much preparatory work must be done. A revolutionary situation must first be created, and if the natural conditions of society do not tend in this direction, efforts must be made to force them into the right channel for revolution. This is the purpose of the revolutionary Socialists and Syndicalists in this country. Our revolutionaries, working in conjunction with foreign revolutionaries, who are mainly International Jews, have to find ways and means of creating in Great Britain an industrial crisis of such a magnitude that a revolution will be practically inevitable. This is the immediate problem of the revolutionary movement.” It is notable that much of the direction of these Communist revolutions appears to have come from the Netherlands – which has always been a Jewish colony.

After the Russian Revolution, the Jewish Press displayed an alarming affection for Communist ideology in England, and openly encouraged “a dangerous campaign” of Bolshevik propaganda. “It was admitted by Trotsky and by Dr. Hermann Gorter, author of ‘The World Revolution’, that their plans for a worldwide revolution could not be successful so long as there was a united British Empire. This was also the opinion of Karl Marx. The problem of the international organizers of revolution consists of (a) how to destroy Britain’s industrial prosperity, and (b) how to break up the British Empire.” And of course, the two World Wars accomplished precisely this. In the first war, England lost a full 40% of her Empire, and the second war completed the process with the Empire gone and England facing bankruptcy.

England was spared because of the incestuous relationship between the British Royal Family and the Rothschilds (primarily), who became partners in looting the world – primarily India and China, with Britain’s Royal Family (Queen Victoria, most notably), sharing in the wholesale looting of India and the profits from the opium travesties of Rothschild and Sassoon. Ireland and Scotland also both had periods where the Jews tried to put their Bolshevik theories into practice, but failed.

Ireland

The Jewish Communists had a strange fixation on Ireland as a focal point for revolution. Marx wrote: “Ireland is the stronghold of English landed aristocracy. The exploitation of this country is not only the main source of the national wealth, it forms likewise England’s greatest mora] strength. It represents, in fact, the domination of England over Ireland. Ireland, therefore, is the great expedient, by means of which the English aristocracy maintains its domination in England itself. On the other hand, withdraw the English Army and police from Ireland tomorrow and you will straightway have an agrarian revolution in Ireland. The fall of the English aristocracy in Ireland, however, needs must imply and inevitably leads to their overthrow in England. Through this the primal condition for the proletarian revolution in England would be fulfilled.”

“For no country is this more true than for Ireland. If Ireland should become independent, Great Britain would be struck to the very foundations. Now, therefore, it is the duty of all British Communists to demand the complete independence of Ireland, and to take all the measures required to bring it about, and for the entire Third International this is of the utmost importance. Again, England is the rock on which Capitalism is firmly rooted, the bulwark of world Capitalism, the hope of all counter-revolution and all reaction. But Ireland is the Achilles’s heel of England. For the revolution on the European continent, therefore for the world revolution, it is a vital question that British Capital should be hit there.” And, of course, Jewish money was pouring into Ireland to encourage a political rebellion that could cause the breakup of Great Britain. The Irish have suffered so much at the hands of the Jews, beginning with the near-depopulation of Ireland due to Jewish white slave-trading – a topic they are now desperately trying to discredit as an “anti-Semitic meme”.

Scotland

Aside from attempts at a Communist revolution in Scotland, there is the most unusual fact of “Scottish Masonry” which seems to rear its head in the most unusual places, inevitably in connection with Jewish crimes. One such was the creation of the HSBC bank, somehow “created in Scotland” but entirely owned and managed by Jews. David Sassoon was the first Chairman of the Board, the bank created solely to launder the Jews’ drug money – a specialty it still proudly carries today. Another such is Jardine and Matheson, seemingly being ‘Scottish Jews’ and heavily involved in the opium trade which even the Jewish encyclopedias tell us was “entirely a Jewish business”.

The Austrian Revolution

A Jewish lawyer in Budapest, Ernst Bettelheim, obtained funding from the Comintern to set up an Austrian Communist Party. Bettelheim and his followers planned to seize control of the main nerve centers of Austria’s government, while Bela Kun sent his Communist Hungarian army to the Austrian border (only two hours’ march from Vienna), ready to invade to support their comrades. However, the night before the planned revolution in June of 1919, the Austrian police arrested all of the Austrian Communist leadership except for Bettelheim. They didn’t go down without a fight; a group of about 4000 Communists (mostly Jews) assembled to free the leaders, but withered and ran under police fire. That was the end of the Austrian Communist revolution, essentially strangled at birth. Vienna’s Jews were also at the forefront of the earlier Austrian revolution of 1848, when they had planned massive changes to the social and political structure of the country, as well as to the wealth of Austrian Jews.

The Hungarian Revolution

There is a part of Hungary’s history that seems to receive little attention, and that is the takeover of the country by the Jewish Communists led by Bela Kun who had been heavily involved with the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia.

In November 1918, Bela Kun, with several hundred other Jewish Hungarian Communists, and with huge financing from the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia, returned to Hungary and formed the Hungarian Communist Party. Kun got himself into power in 1919 by feigning a coalition, but then immediately betrayed it and proclaimed a dictatorship of the proletariat with himself as dictator. One of his first decrees was to nationalise almost all private property and to announce that private commerce would be punished with the death penalty. He immediately began by confiscating and nationalising all industry and land, and attacking religion while making great efforts to undermine and in fact to destroy all public morality as well as concepts of God and religion.

Following a popular anti-communist coup attempt a month later, Kun organized a response in the form of a Red Terror, carried out by secret police and mostly Jewish units. Red Tribunals arbitrarily condemned many hundreds prominent Hungarians to death. The Hungarian Jew Georg Lukacs wrote a “History and Class Consciousness” in which he wrote, “I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution”.

“As Deputy commissar for culture in Bela Kun’s regime, Lukacs put his self-described demonic ideas into action in what came to be known as cultural terrorism.” As part of this terrorism, he instituted a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools. Children were instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the outdatedness of monogamy and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasures. Women too were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time by engaging in open promiscuity. Lucacs’ purpose in promoting licentiousness among women and children was to destroy the family, the core institution of Christianity and western culture”. These “Communists” knew if they could destroy the West’s traditional sexual morals, they would have taken a giant step toward destroying Western culture itself – and that would appear to have been the definite aim.

According to author and historian Brenton Sanderson, “the Jews involved in these communist regimes were engaged in actions opposed to the traditional peoples and culture of these societies, while typically maintaining their own ethnic commitments.” In other words, the destruction of society, morals and religion was reserved for the Gentiles while the Jews remained as before.

Bela Kun was certainly one of the more despicable Jewish “revolutionists” to have ever appeared anywhere. Fortunately for Hungary, Kun’s Communist regime lost all support when the Romanian army marched into Hungary and occupied Budapest. Kun’s regime collapsed and was removed from power after this, and Kun and his Communist followers fled to Austria, then to Russia, looting numerous art treasures and the entire gold stocks of Hungary’s National Bank when they left. Among the Hungarian population, all these events led to a deep feeling of dislike against the Jews since most members of Kun’s government were Jews. The feelings were so strong they resulted in a wave of reprisals in which many Jewish Communists were executed.

It would be easy, as I believe is too often done, to blame these reprisals on feelings of “anti-Semitism”, but both evidence and logic would indicate the purges were directed against evil and savage oppressors rather than being based on race or religion. I am unaware of evidence that the resentment was against the Jews for being Jews but rather against specific people for the attempted destruction of their country, society, morals and religion.

I once referenced this in another article and was bitterly attacked by the entire Hasbara tribe, one person claiming that Hungary had only “a few months of mild unrest”. Sadly, the Hungarians suffered about two full years of the most intense social attacks, from every quarter, that few countries have experienced.

A former Hungarian Prime Minister, M. Huszar, the editor of the Nenzeti Ujsag, emphatically declared that “Bolshevism in Hungary could be explained alone by the fact that its moving force was the tenacious and secret solidarity of the Jews“. It is worthy of note that Gwynne identified the Khazarian Jews as instigators of the turmoil in Hungary: “A particular race of Jews, the Khozar (Khazar), took a prominent part in this movement. Bela Kun, the leader of the Hungarian Bolsheviks, was a Jew, and nearly all his ministers, like Friedlander, Wertheim, Dorscak, and Kohn, were also Jews.

The campaign led by the Bolsheviks against Hungary was “extraordinarily malevolent and widespread”. “Bela Kun’s Jews, imported from Russia, carried out appalling atrocities during their tenure of power and, on his expulsion, there were some sporadic massacres organized by infuriated Hungarian officers, whose womenfolk had been shamefully maltreated. But the Government did, and is doing, all in its power to check any such excesses. Notwithstanding that fact, the pro-Bolshevik papers in Europe, including those in England, were deluged with lurid accounts of atrocities committed by the anti-Bolshevik Hungarians”. The atrocity tales, like all such stories the Jews promulgate so frequently, were all proven to be false.

Upheavals in Germany

With the end of World War I, Communist-inspired power seizures were seen all over Germany. Most significant of these were the Spartacist Berlin rising, and the establishment of a Soviet republic in Bavaria. The history books tell us there was a minor event in Germany where a “dissident group” took over the Reichstag, but it is not widely known that the persons involved, led by Rosa Luxembourg, were all Communist Jews. Rosa Luxembourg was a much nastier Revolutionary than typically portrayed. It is true their coup was short-lived and they were evicted and killed after only a few days, but that may indicate only that they overestimated their strength and support and overplayed their hand.

This “revolution” – in reality, a Lenin-style coup d’etat – petered out fairly quickly, although about 1200 people died during a week of street fighting. Luxemburg and Liebknecht went into hiding with a third comrade, Wilhelm Pieck. It was not long before the army tracked them down. Luxemburg and Liebknecht were killed shortly thereafter. A second Communist-inspired coup in Bavaria had far greater success. It began with the seizure of power by one Kurt Eisner. As usual, force was necessary: “a movement of war-tired and anti-Prussian peasant soldiers brought the local leader of the U.S.P., Kurt Eisner, into power” in November of 1918 (Franz Borkenau, World Communism). Elections held in January showed that Eisner’s radical Independent had minimal popular support. Pressure was on Eisner to resign, and it appears that he would have done, were he not assassinated first.

The Jewish Bolsheviks were involved in Germany from the start. Lenin “dispatched a team of his most able revolutionaries to infiltrate Germany: Karl Radek, one of the most powerful men in the Comintern; Nikolai Bukharin, second-in-command of the Comintern; Christian Rakovsky, a Bulgarian who was a signatory at the founding of the Comintern; and a mysterious man called Ignatov, who probably was Alexander Shpigelglas, an official of the Cheka’s Foreign Department who had a record of assassinations during the Terror..” Independent Soviet Republics were to be set up all over Germany, and these showed all the signs of the Jews’ world-revolution policy – the disintegration of the State, the subversion of authority, the destruction of society, morals and religion.

The Spanish Civil War – 1936-1939

Nationalist General Francisco Franco led a rebellion against the government in Spain. The country was deeply divided, with Socialists, Communists, and liberals fighting for the government, with Nationalists, conservatives, and the Catholic Church favoring Franco. The war became a proxy war between Nationalism and Globalism. Germany, Portugal and Italy provided military aid to Franco while the Communist Soviets sent arms to the Spanish government.

The Comintern sent volunteers to fight for the Spanish regime. As usual, the Jewish Communist fighters carried out sickening atrocities against civilians, such as setting fire to the wives and children of Nationalist officers after dousing them with petrol. The Communists were so determined to stamp out Christianity that they raped nuns, tortured priests, and set fire to churches with the worshippers locked inside.

Portuguese Revolution

Here, again, there is overwhelming evidence that the force at the back of the Revolution was European Jewish Freemasonry. Dr. Friedrich Wichtl, in his book Weltfreimatterei, Welt Revolution, Welt-republik, says: “Some readers may ask us which were then those circles which contributed the most to the downfall of the Portuguese Royal family? They are the leading families of the Castros, the Costas, Cohens, Pereiras, Ferreiras, Teixeiras, Fonsecas, etc. They have many widespread branches besides Portugal, also in Spain, Holland, England, etc., and in America, where they occupy prominent positions. They are all related to each other, they are all united by the mutual ties of [Jewish] Freemasonry and . . . the Alliance Israelite Universelle.” The violent anti-Christian character of the Republic, particularly in its early days, is too well-known to need recapitulation.

The Turkish Revolution

The Turkish Revolution was the real death-knell of the Turkish Empire and was, emphatically, almost entirely the work of a Masonic-Jewish conspiracy. The following quotation from the well-known French Masonic review Acacia (October, 1908, No. 70) explains succinctly what was going on: A secret Young Turk Committee was founded, and the whole movement was directed from Salonika, as the town which has the greatest percentage of Jewish population in Europe – 70,000 Jews out of a total population of 110,000 – was specially qualified for this purpose. There were at the time many Jewish Freemason lodges in Salonika under the protection of European diplomacy. The Sultan was defenseless against them, and he could not prevent his own downfall. The Jews in Constantinople were closely linked with those in Moscow and Budapest, and terrorism and intimidation of every kind followed.

Wikipedia and many history books now term this event the “Turkish War of Independence”, with sufficient slanted historical facts to bury forever the truth of what really happened. But it is clear from the facts of the events that the purpose was the creation of a Judeo-Turkish State which would subjugate the many other populations in the Turkish Empire.

The Mongolian Revolution

Thus, the Jewish Communist revolutions failed in Hungary, Austria, and Germany. They also failed in Russia itself. in Finland and the Baltic countries, separatists defeated Communists and set up independent non-Communist governments. But escaping world notice was the establishment of the world’s second Communist dictatorship in the independent country of Mongolia.

Unlike the haphazard power seizures in Europe, the imposition of Jewish Bolshevik power upon Mongolia was carefully planned. First, a small number of Mongols were trained in Communist theory and practice in Moscow and Irkutsk. These Communist Mongols set up the First Congress of the Mongolian People’s Party in Kyakhta, just north of the Mongolian border, and proclaimed a Provisional Revolution Government. Then the Mongolian Communists formed a minuscule Mongolian army, and in 1921 this tiny force marched into Mongolia. The Red Army followed close behind, which guaranteed victory to what would have otherwise been the movement of a few hundred malcontents. The Red Bolshevik Army was now in Mongolia, and used standard techniques to seize total power under the guise of national self-determination. The Mongolian People’s Republic would be the first Soviet satellite state. It would not be the last.

The incipient Chinese Communist Revolution

The Russian Bolsheviks were intensely interested in China, and Lenin and Trotsky saw China as a place where they could inflict another blow as they had done to Mother Russia. In order to advance their interests, they sent Gregory Voitinsky to China to make contact with leftist intellectuals, especially Chen Duxiu. The actual process of forming the infant Communist Party can be mostly attributed to Voitinsky’s influence.

China did indeed have its own revolution, but in the end it was commanded by its own people who meant to save China rather than destroy it. Happily, they succeeded. What Voitinsky proposed to Mao was essentially the same program that had been followed by the Jews in Russia – which was the extermination of the entire middle class, the educated, the wealthy, the commercial class, leaving only a small (Jewish-controlled) elite and hundreds of millions of hapless peasants.

The reason that the Chinese brand of “Communism” is so different from all others was that Mao rejected more or less in totality the savagery of the Jews. His only point of agreement was in a desire to eliminate much of the class structure, which was the cause of China’s “cultural revolution” and Mao sending educated professors to work on farms. Ever since the failure of the Jews’ version of Communism in China, they have incessantly portrayed Mao as an evil monster, failing to note that his only “crimes” were in following the prescriptions of those same Jews.

Of particular note are the decades-old accusations of Mao killing millions of Chinese, when Mao actually never killed anyone. The Jews later inflicted several worldwide food embargoes on China, then attributed the resultant deaths from famine as indicative of Mao’s inhumanity. Propaganda is easy when you control the media.

One of the acts of that “revolution” was the expulsion of all Jews from China, something that can hardly be criticised when we consider the unconscionable damage and humiliation these same Jews had inflicted on the country. Many tens of thousands of Jews were expelled immediately by Mao after assuming power, these expulsions unrelated to the fact that the victims were ethnic Jews. Instead, it was primarily related to their devastation of China by their exclusive franchise for importing opium into China under the protection of the British military. And subsequently with their using their opium profits to buy up most of Shanghai and many other cities, as well as using those same profits to help finance the Japanese invasion of China.

The Jews may no doubt have felt “persecuted”, but that serves only to trivialise one of the greatest crimes against humanity every inflicted on a country – the persistent evisceration of the social fabric of an entire nation by the forced imposition of a deadly addictive drug – in this case entirely by Jews.

As a closing note on this point, many Jewish websites extol the wealth and virtues of the Sassoons, the Kadoories, the Hartungs and more, without caring to specify the criminally evil source of their great wealth.

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

READ MORE:

https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/jews-and-revolutions/

RAD FROM TOP.

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW......