Saturday 20th of April 2024

the new cat called "risky" at number 10......

The Conservative (“Tory”) Party has been in power in the United Kingdom for 12 years, with a long line of forgettable Prime Ministers surfing over restive voters who demanded Brexit, reduced immigration, and more national sovereignty [How long have the Conservatives been in power and who were the Prime Ministers, by Caroline Westbrook, Metro, October 20, 2022].

 

But in what can only be considered pure spite on the part of the British Ruling Class, the UK will now be governed by a caricature of Politically Correct “Conservatism”—an Indian hedge fund manager, Rishi Sunak, who used to work at Goldman Sachs and is worth more than King Charles III [Rishi Sunak, the new UK prime minister, is yet another Goldman Sachs alumnus, Business Insider, October 24, 2022].

 

BY James Kirkpatrick

 

Almost as if on purpose, the Conservative Party has broken apart its winning coalition to pursue policies that favor no one except Sunak’s former colleagues. Gleeful Labour supporters and Celtic separatists are poised to inherit frustrated working-class voters and the existence of the Union itself is in jeopardy. Underpinning all of this: the baffling, enraging, and totally self-defeating Tory policy of increasing immigration in direct defiance of what voters want.

Let’s recall that the major reason the United Kingdom has an immigration problem now is that Labour deliberately opened the gates to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity,” to use Labour apparatchik Andrew Neather’s phrase. That’s about as close to a smoking gun in the “Great Replacement” debate as can exist: the Labour Party wanted to replace the British electorate. It did this as a conscious choice. It was treason.

What’s remarkable is that the Tories now want to rub their own voters’ noses in the filth, with outgoing PM Liz Truss running against immigration during the leadership race and then promptly calling for more immigration afterward.

Prime Minister Sunak was softer than Truss during the leadership race and has a record of immigration enthusiasm [Chancellor Sunak Expected To Increase Immigration Routes To UK In Budget, by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, March 2, 2021]. His supposedly “pragmatic” approach to immigration suggests that we can discard any rhetoric about border control and look for more immigration for supposedly economic reasons, i.e., more cheap labor [What Rishi Sunak could do about the cost of living, the NHS, immigration, energy, and Brexit, by Fionnula Hainey, Manchester Evening News, October 24, 2022].

It would also be in keeping with recent Conservative policy. Despite party members repeatedly identifying immigration as a key concern, and Brexit being carried to unexpected victory as a kind of proxy for the immigration issue, the Tories havedeliberately and consciously increased non-European immigration into the United Kingdom.

Thus, at the end of the second Elizabethan Age, we have the poetic irony of a Third Worlder from the former Raj taking the helm of what can only be called an Occupation Government in which the rights of free speech, self-defense, and freedom of association simply do not exist [Once Great Britain Under Occupation, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, December 1, 2017].

Some Indians, quite rightly, see this as a kind of conquest of their former overlord. As the popular newspaper Dainik Jagran put it (via Google Translate), “Rishi Sunak will become the Prime Minister of Britain, the command of the country that ruled India for years is now in the hands of an Indian, October 24, 2022].

Still, focusing on Sunak’s identity as an Indian might be the wrong way to look at it. It’s not that he’s some Indian revanchist; he’s more of a citizen of nowhere. There are many whites just like him.

In truth, Sunak’s racial heritage is less salient to most Britons than another fact about him—how rich he is. He owns a mansion in West London; a house in Santa Monica, California; and a Georgian-era home in Yorkshire with an ornamental lake and a swimming pool

Sunak’s wife, the fashion designer Akshata Murthy, is even richer. She is the heir to an Indian telecommunications fortune, and the revelation in April that she was a “non-dom”—a foreign national who paid a £30,000 flat fee in lieu of millions of pounds in income tax on earnings outside Britain—nearly sank her husband’s political career. (To add to the Rishi Register of Cringe, the legitimate media attention on his wife led Sunak to declare that he sympathized with Will Smith’s defense of Jada Pinkett Smith. “At least I didn’t get up and slap anybody, which is good,” he added.) The same month, it emerged that Sunak had held a green card until October 2021, allowing him permanent residency in the United States. Questions about how committed he was to living the rest of his life in Britain have bubbled through back channels and social media.

[Rishi Sunak, Scion of Britain’s New Ruling Class, by Helen Lewis, The Atlantic, October 24, 2022. Links in original]

It’s not (just) that Sunak is Indian or that the Tories have open contempt for their voters, it’s that England itself seems to have utterly lost its identity, with British identity consisting of no more than a passport [Sangita Myska dismantles caller’s claim that Rishi Sunak ‘isn’t even British,’ by Adam Solomons, LBC, October 22, 2022]. Having lost their faith and their Empire and having opened their doors to the Third World, British identity has become a costume. England itself is just a neutral battleground between brawling mobs of non-Europeans [Why are mobs fighting on the streets in Leicester, UK, The Indian Express, September 21, 2022].

Americans may sneer at the English who have lost their country and say they are simply behind the times when we should be pursuing globalism and free trade.

But note that, in a supposedly democratic country, the English have in fact made bold electoral choices against their Establishment. They gave the Tories a potentially stable coalition as a National Conservative party. The Conservatives, led by Boris Johnson, broke Labour’s “Red Wall” by focusing on patriotism, immigration restriction (and its economic benefits), and appealing to Labour’s traditional working-class voters. In2019, this led to a crushing victory for the Tories (see Conservative Victory In UK Shows Path Forward For Trump’s GOP, If They Have The Wit To See It ) and the possibility of a generational realignment.

Yet, amazingly, the Tories have undone their victory. Matthew Goodwin, one of the best scholars of National Populism, reports that the Conservatives have failed to win over the new voters they attracted in 2019 with their pro-worker, patriotic message.

It’s so extraordinary and so self-evidently destructive that it challenges one of the very premises of democracy. Apparently, Conservative leaders value mass immigration and globalism more than even keeping power. Voting is pointless because your chosen representatives won’t just ignore you but will do the exact opposite of what you requested.

This is not overstatement; if King Charles III unironically exercised direct power and ruled instead of reigned, it would be more representative than what exists now. His subjects would at least know where sovereignty lies and who should be held accountable in case of failure.

The Tory trick of mobilizing a bunch of “diverse” Members of Parliament—themselves a product of the party managers’ imposition of Politically Correct minorities on the local nomination process c.f. Herschel WalkerTim Scott—to force through an agenda that their voters don’t want will lead the party to disaster, perhaps dissolution. Labour now holds the greatest lead in 25 years [Rishi Sunak faces biggest Labour poll lead in 25 years, by Ian Jones, PA Media, October 24, 2022]. The Scottish National Party has said it may treat the next General Election as a de facto independence referendum [SNP could treat general election as independence vote, says Ian Blackford, by Mark McLaughlin, The Times, October 22, 2022]. The phony nationalists of the SNP just want to be part of the European Union megastate, but they could conceivably win a second referendum, not least because the Tories squandered its coalition after Brexit [UK Top Court to Hear Scottish Independence Vote Bid, Reuters, October 7, 2022].

The United Kingdom faces economic ruin, not least because of surging energy prices and a spiraling budget crisis because of the country’s peculiar determination to fight a proxy war with Russia in lockstep with the U.S. [UK will match record Ukraine support in 2023, Prime Minister’s Office, September 20, 2022]. Because the UK’s leaders apparently want to pretend they are playing “The Great Game” with the Tsar, they are losing the British Isles themselves.

You can’t reason with people who won’t even support their own political survival. There are many reasons why they are so determined to destroy the United Kingdom. It could be bribery, racial resentment, or just sheer stupidity or short-sightedness. It doesn’t matter. What’s needed is a new patriotic force that can deliver on the promises of Brexit, offer relief to British workers, and maintain the unity of the United Kingdom.

Perhaps only Nigel Farage can lead such a movement, given that the Tories seem determined to go down with the ship [‘Nothing is going to change!,’ Farage explains why Sunak will be ‘disaster’ for Tories, by Tom Watling, Daily Express, October 24, 2022].

Absent that, I question (as a supporter of Scottish independence) whether King Charles III will even have a United Kingdom to preside over when his coronation takes place in May 2023. The British people are stateless and unpresented. The fecklessness and cowardice of the Tories over the past decade have rendered the great victories and sacrifices of their forebears in all the centuries past completely pointless. Alfred the GreatMarlborough, Nelson, or Wellington might as well not have existed given that the island will be handed over to the Third World anyway. Outright Viking conquest would have been less destructive.

Will there “Always Be An England?” as iconic British songstress Vera Lynn sang during World War II?

No. There’s not one now. There’s only the hope of Restoration, and that won’t come from the Conservative Party. They’d rather lose than stand for their people.

Whatever explains this British failure also explains the spiritual rot that exists within the rulers of the U.S. and the entire Western world—a class that seems not just indifferent to their subjects, but actively hateful.

 

 

James Kirkpatrick [Email him | Tweet him @VDAREJamesK] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc. His latest book is Conservatism Inc.: The Battle for the American Right. Read VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow‘s Preface here.

 

 

READ MORE:

https://www.unz.com/article/new-uk-prime-minister-rishi-sunak-a-triumph-for-globalists-immigration-enthusiasts-of-course-uk-may-not-survive-but-like-us-ruling-class-hates-it-anyway/

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.................

political redemption......

By Kate Whannel & Becky MortonBBC News 

No 10 has said Suella Braverman has "strong relationships" with the security services, following concerns about her return as home secretary. 

Reports have emerged suggesting that, as attorney general, she was investigated over the leak of a story involving MI5. 

Ms Braverman was reappointed as home secretary just days after she resigned over separate data breaches. 

Several Conservative MPs have raised questions about her reappointment.

Mark Pritchard - a former member of Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee - said in a tweet: "MI5 need to have confidence in the home secretary, whoever that might be.

"It's a vital relationship of trust, key to the UK's security and democratic oversight of MI5. Any breakdown in that relationship is bad for the security service and the government. It needs to be sorted asap."

 

Asked whether Prime Minister Rishi Sunak believed MI5 had confidence in Ms Braverman, his official spokesperson said: "Yes, the home secretary continues to have strong relationships with all the operational bodies that report into the Home Office and are focused very much on keeping the country safe."

Asked if Mr Sunak was concerned security analysts might be reluctant to share information with the Home Office, the official said: "No, and any suggestion of that would be entirely false." 

In January, the Daily Telegraph reported that Ms Braverman was seeking an injunction to block a BBC story about a spy working for British intelligence.

The briefing received by the newspaper damaged the government's argument that publishing details of the court case could harm national security.

Mr Justice Chamberlain said it would be a "matter of concern" if Ms Braverman was seeking to hold part of the hearing in private while, at the same time, the government was briefing the press. 

The senior judge said he had been provided with no evidence to undermine the inference that a government source was responsible for briefing the paper.

 

The High Court later ruled the BBC could publish the story, though an injunction still bars the corporation from identifying the man.

An inquiry was launched to find out who had leaked confidential details of the court case to the Telegraph.

The High Court permits publication of the fact there was a leak inquiry, but the government has so far refused to comment.

The Cabinet Office has not responded to the BBC's questions about the leak inquiry including whether or not Ms Braverman was questioned, if the police were involved, or if anyone was arrested or questioned under caution. The attorney general's office also did not respond to queries.

Labour is calling for a probe into the reports in the Daily Mail that Ms Braverman was investigated over the leak. 

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: "The prime minister needs to say whether he knew about these allegations when he reappointed her. Ignoring warnings about security risks when appointing a home secretary is highly irresponsible and dangerous. We need answers now."

 

Raising the matter in the House of Lords, former Home Secretary Lord David Blunkett told peers the security and intelligence services could be reluctant to brief the home secretary and that other international security agencies would be reluctant to share information with the UK "if they're fearful that information will be passed out from government itself".

Separately, opposition parties and some Tory MPs have also questioned Ms Braverman's reappointment as home secretary after she admitted sending an official document to someone not authorised to receive it. 

She stepped down from her cabinet position last week in the final days of Liz Truss's premiership. 

In her resignation letter, she admitted committing a "technical infringement" of the rules.

"I have made a mistake; I accept responsibility; I resign," she wrote.

However, just six days later Mr Sunak reappointed Ms Braverman as home secretary.

It came two days after Ms Braverman had thrown her support behind him in the contest to replace Ms Truss, in what was widely seen as a significant endorsement by an influential figure on the right of the Conservative Party.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer accused the new prime minister of giving Ms Braverman a job in exchange for her support.

Both Labour and the Liberal Democrats have called for inquiries into Ms Braverman's appointment.

Caroline Nokes - Conservative MP for Romsey and Southampton North - agreed there should be an inquiry, saying their were "big questions" hanging over the issue. 

"To be frank I would like to see them cleared up so that the home secretary can get on with her job," she told BBC Radio Solent.

Jake Berry - who served as party chairman under Ms Truss but was fired by Mr Sunak - has also questioned Ms Braverman's return to the cabinet, saying there had been "multiple breaches" of the rules. 

He told Talk TV that Ms Braverman had sent a document "from a private email address to another MP, she then sought to copy in that individual's wife but accidentally sent it to a staffer in Parliament". 

"To me, that seems to be a really serious breach - the cabinet secretary had his say at the time. I doubt he has changed his mind in the last six days," he added. 

A No 10 spokesperson has denied reports that Cabinet Secretary Simon Case - the head of the civil service - was "livid" about the appointment.

New party chairman Nadhim Zahawi defended Ms Braverman's reappointment, telling the BBC he believed in "redemption".

"The prime minister looked at this case and he decided to give her a second chance," he added.

The BBC has been told that the home secretary has requested further briefings on email security.

 

READ MORE:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-63410737

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

SOUNDS MORE LIKE.... ARRRK. I WON'T SAY IT, BUT THE WORD "MAFIA" FEATURES IN IT.....

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.................

escape from taxdom.....

...Problematic ties

Mr Sunak and his wife continue to maintain a flat in Santa Monica, which they regularly visit. But his ties to the US have at times caused an outcry.

This year, it emerged he had retained his Green Card, giving him the right to live and work in the US as a permanent resident. He returned it in October last year, ahead of his first American trip as a government minister.

The disclosure occurred around the time it was revealed his wife did not pay taxes as a UK resident.

The controversies have been used to raise questions about Mr Sunak's commitment to the country, despite his being born and raised in the UK, said Victoria Honeyman, professor of British politics at the University of Leeds. 

"There are legitimate questions - if you are chancellor of the exchequer, should your wife have non-dom status? Should you own a green card? The problem is that it gets tied up with a lot of issues that are not necessarily valid," she said, adding: "I'm not sure a white politician would have to make those kinds of justifications to the same degree."

But such controversies are low-level compared to the economic and political crisis he now faces as prime minister, said Rod Dacombe, director of the Centre for British Politics and Government at King's College London. 

"The thing that's going to make or break him isn't the kind of story that he presents or his ties to America.

"It's going to be how he deals with the almost impossible economic situation that he's going to face," he said. "Is it going to be fixed in time for the next election? Probably not."

 

READ MORE:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63402491

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

THIS ARTICLE BY THE BBC IS ABOUT LAZILY POLISHING A GOLDEN TURD TO MAKE IT ACCEPTABLY DEBONAIRE TO A NAIVE UK PUBLIC... WE ARE TOLD:

The years in the US also informed his decision to back Brexit, he told the BBC in 2019.

"The pace of change is just accelerating around the world - that was my experience being in California," he said. "My general broad view was given the pace of change... being independent and having the flexibility and nimbleness to react would be of enormous value to us."

 

HEY, MORONIC ENGLISH PEOPLE... THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE DONBASS PEOPLE WANT: OUT OF AN INCOMPATIBLE MARRIAGE TO KIEV THAT HAD BEEN CONCOCTED IN 1922 BY A COMMUNIST REGIME OF THE USSR...

 

FREE JULIAN. ASSANGE NOW, MR SUNAK.......... STOP SUPPLYING AID AND WEAPONS TO THE NAZI KIEV REGIME....