not only "playing god", but patenting god and inventing evil viruses......

GUS DOES NOT BELIEVE IN GOD. BUT GUS THINKS THAT ANYTHING THAT IS ALIVE SHOULD NOT BE PATENTED. ESPECIALLY BY "AMERICA". THE "NEW" mRNA VACCINE IS A BIT OF AN ARTIFICIAL BASTARD THAT DOES NOT WORK EFFICIENTLY. MEANWHILE THE MEDIA WAS PUSHED TO EXTOLD THE VIRTUES OF THIS VACCINE AND NOTHING ELSE. CONSPIRACY?

AS SHOWN IN THE ARTICLE ABOVE, THE FIRST PATENT ON GENE MANIPULATION WAS PLACED IN 1972 AND ACCEPTED BY THE US SUPREME COURT IN 1980 — PLACING "LIFE" IN PRIVATE HANDS, LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE USA....

GENETIC MANIPULATION WAS BORN. GOD DIED....

Circa 8000 BCE: Humans use traditional modification methods like selective breeding and cross-breeding to breed plants and animals with more desirable traits.

1866: Gregor Mendel, an Austrian monk, breeds two different types of peas and identifies the basic process of genetics.

1922: The first hybrid corn is produced and sold commercially.

1940: Plant breeders learn to use radiation or chemicals to randomly change an organism’s DNA.

1953: Building on the discoveries of chemist Rosalind Franklin, scientists James Watson and Francis Crick identify the structure of DNA.

1973: Biochemists Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen develop genetic engineering by inserting DNA from one bacteria into another.

1982: FDA approves the first consumer GMO product developed through genetic engineering: human insulin to treat diabetes.

1986: The federal government establishes the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology. This policy describes how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) work together to regulate the safety of GMOs.

1992: FDA policy states that foods from GMO plants must meet the same requirements, including the same safety standards, as foods derived from traditionally bred plants.

1994: The first GMO produce created through genetic engineering—a GMO tomato—becomes available for sale after studies evaluated by federal agencies proved it to be as safe as traditionally bred tomatoes.

1990s: The first wave of GMO produce created through genetic engineering becomes available to consumers: summer squash, soybeans, cotton, corn, papayas, tomatoes, potatoes, and canola. Not all are still available for sale.

2003: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations develop international guidelines and standards to determine the safety of GMO foods.

2005: GMO alfalfa and sugar beets are available for sale in the United States.

2015: FDA approves an application for the first genetic modification in an animal for use as food, a genetically engineered salmon.

2016: Congress passes a law requiring labeling for some foods produced through genetic engineering and uses the term “bioengineered,” which will start to appear on some foods.

2017: GMO apples are available for sale in the U.S.

2019: FDA completes consultation on first food from a genome edited plant.

2020: GMO pink pineapple is available to U.S. consumers.

2020: Application for GalSafe pig was approved.

NOTE: THE FDA IS A BASTARD CHILD OF THE US GOVERNMENT FED BY BIG PHARMA AND OTHER SUCH INDUSTRIES...

John LaMattina

I Cover News On Drugs And R&D In The Pharma Industry

In touting an upcoming special issue of the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (JLME), Donald W. Light of the School of Public Health, University of Medicine & Dentistry of NJ, wrote an article entitled “Risky Drugs: Why The FDA Cannot Be Trusted”. Last week I discussed one aspect of this article, Light’s challenge that 90% of FDA approved drugs of the last 30 years are no more effective than existing drugs. However, the bulk of his essay focuses not on his views about pharma’s competence but rather on his issues with the FDA. While I found a number of his comments troubling, the following stood out.

“The forthcoming article in JLME also presents systematic, quantitative evidence that since the industry started making large contributions to the FDA for reviewing its drugs, as it makes large contributions to Congressmen who have promoted this substitution for publicly funded regulations, the FDA has sped up the review process with the result that drugs approved are significantly more likely to cause serious harm, hospitalizations, and deaths.”

This is a pretty damning comment. Basically, Light is saying that pharma paid congressmen to sponsor legislation that results in the FDA being beholden to pharma for funding for its work. Implicit in this is that, as a result of these large “contributions”, the grateful FDA is rapidly approving medicines that are harmful.

A bit of history would be helpful to show the actual reasons why the pharma industry makes “contributions” to the FDA. Few remember that back in the late 1980s there was a “drug lag” in the U.S. versus other parts of the world. Because of a lack of resources at the FDA, drugs were being approved at a much slower rate in the U.S. than in Europe. More than half of all drugs approved in the U.S. had been approved in Europe more than a year earlier. As a result, patients, physicians, advocacy groups, and pharmaceutical companies were all concerned that access to important new medicines was being denied to Americans.

To solve this problem, Congress enacted the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of 1992. PDUFA provided a mechanism whereby charges were levied on pharmaceutical companies for each new drug application (NDA) filed. The revenues from these “user fees” were used to hire 600 new drug reviewers and support staff. These new medical officers, chemists, pharmacologists, and other experts were tasked with clearing the backlog of NDAs awaiting approval. Consequently, the FDA was able to reduce review times of NDAs to 12 months for standard NDAs and to 6 months for priority applications that involved significant advances over existing treatment. As a result of PDUFA, the timing of U.S. drug approvals began to mirror that of the rest of the world.

Congress clearly likes PDUFA as the act has been renewed five times since 1992. PDUFA-V was approved in 2012. Undoubtedly, this legislation helps to support the FDA and fuel needed growth. In 1995, The actual user fee charged to each company filing an NDA in 1995 was $208,000. In 2014, the user fee will be $2,169,100. If you assume that as many as 50 NDAs are filed in a year, Congress is passing on $100 million of FDA funding costs to the industry.

Despite Light’s assertion, I can attest that pharma companies don’t relish making these payments. The FDA is a government agency and should be funded entirely by the federal government. But pharma companies don’t have a choice. If a company wants to bring a new medicine to patients, it has to pay the user fee just to get the drug reviewed. Furthermore, anyone who pays attention to FDA behaviors knows that the agency doesn’t automatically approve NDAs. Just in the last few months, the FDA has rejected, in the form of complete response letters, an insomnia drug from Merck, a migraine drug from Allergan, and a kidney cancer drug from Aveo. In fact, any suggestion of the FDA being beholden to the pharmaceutical industry due to the PDUFA user fees is comical to those familiar with the drug review process.

So, why should anyone care about Light’s views? Unfortunately, as an academic whose work is supported by the Safra Center for Ethics, his word carries a disproportionate amount of influence. These comments perpetrate the view that there is an unholy alliance between the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry, an alliance that threatens the health of patients. This might make for a Hollywood movie plot. Truth be told, such a conspiracy doesn’t exist.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2013/08/07/is-the-fda-being-compromised-by-pharma-payments/?sh=7711adb32830

WE KNOW THAT MANY "APPROVED" DRUGS HAVE HAD DANGEROUS EFFECTS, WHILE "NATURAL" REMEDIES ARE OFTEN POOPOOED BY THE FDA OR EVEN BANNED SUCH AS CANNABIS OIL FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN....

ukraine drug.....

BY Vladimir Platov

According to the European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), the volume of drug consumption in EU countries has increased markedly this year. And this is despite the fact that in Europe, as a result of the activities of law enforcement agencies, hundreds of illegal drug laboratories are being liquidated, and more than 150 people have been arrested in the recent period alone.

The EMCDDA estimates that around 83.4 million people aged 15 to 64 in the EU, or 29% of the population, use drugs today, with more men than women. Although cannabis remains the most popular substance, ahead of cocaine, MDMA and amphetamines, it has been noted that the range of available substances for drug addicts is expanding due to synthetic drugs.

Speaking about the increase in drug use, numerous experts and politicians have more than once linked this issue with several reasons, among which one of the most significant was the rise in immigration to the European Union. However, if in 2021 this situation pointed to the worsening crisis in Afghanistan and the need to prepare for the influx of migrants and drugs from this country, then in recent months there have been indications pointing to the influx of Ukrainian citizens, amongst whom there are various criminal structures of this country. Moreover, it is no longer a secret that the deterioration of the criminal situation in Europe has been largely due to the resale through the black market of all kinds of weapons coming to Ukraine from the United States and other NATO member states in large quantities, as well as other types of so-called “military assistance” of the West for the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU).

The belief that it is possible to fight not only with weapons, but also with drugs has long been entrenched in the minds of American and British military leaders. Back in the nineteenth century, this idea was actively “implemented” in China during the two opium wars, when over a hundred million Chinese died from drug overdoses and the country itself was cut out of world politics for more than a hundred years. However, back then Great Britain became extremely rich.

This “recipe” in the twentieth century began to be actively used by the United States. And wherever armed conflicts and wars were ignited at America’s initiative, the problem of drug trafficking emerged as well. A “winning combination” for the US military-political establishment in this regard was the war in Afghanistan, despite Washington’s military-strategic loss. Numerous scandals covered by the media can serve as confirmation of such drug-related business actively carried out by the US military. In particular, the case of the black gangster Frank Lucas, who supplied Asian drugs to the United States in the coffins of soldiers sent home, “earning up to one million dollars a day,” by his own admission. This drug business certainly continues today in many other parts of the world, where the US sends its warplanes and immeasurable “military aid.” And Ukraine is no exception.

But there is another aspect to the active drug use by the United States in the army. Having studied in detail the practice of warfare by the Vikings, who before battles took a decoction of hallucinogenic mushrooms, and by Wehrmacht soldiers, who were given Pervitin during the occupation of Czechoslovakia, the “bright military minds of the United States” also introduced the practice of using drugs in the Armed Forces. In recent years, this has even become one of the priority ways to increase combat activity and fearlessness of American soldiers, which has already been tested in the wars in Vietnam, the Middle East and Afghanistan. Joe Biggs, a former US Army sergeant who participated in the Afghanistan war, claimed in 2013 that every soldier was given pills before a given military operation “for fearlessness,” after which some began experiencing withdrawal cravings and thus, there was the need for regular use.

Washington began to actively disseminate this “experience” among the Armed Forces of allied countries, to which Ukraine has recently been included. The United States, aligning the Armed Forces of Ukraine to its own practice of carrying out military operations in various regions of the world, has already begun to accustom Ukrainian soldiers to the use of various narcotic stimulants. As a result of this, the Ukrainian army is now addicted to drugs and psychotropic substances. It was there, during recent hostilities, that a significant amount of “narcotic stimulants” began to arrive, which, like other “Western military aid for the Armed Forces of Ukraine,” immediately began to enter Europe through smuggling channels.

It was not difficult for the United States to connect the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the country as a whole to drug trafficking, especially if we take into account the repeated references by various media outlets and, in particular, reports by Ukrainian blogger Anatoly Shariy, that even the head of the country Vladimir Zelensky himself has long been suspected of using drugs. These suspicions were also confirmed by the sources of the “Strana.ua” publication, noting that MP Nikolai Tishchenko acquired prohibited substances for Zelensky.

Starting in 2014, the Donbass militias have been reporting the use of “narcotic stimulants” by the Armed Forces of Ukraine that block the feeling of pain and increase the aggressiveness of Ukrainian militants. After the start of the special military operation in 2022, the supply of narcotic drugs to the Armed Forces of Ukraine became even more pronounced. On the battlefield, cases were repeatedly registered when Ukrainian militants who received very severe injuries continued to fight without noticing them, which was explained only by the use of large doses of potent narcotic drugs. This is confirmed by the regular discovery (by the people’s militia fighters of Eastern Ukraine and Russian military personnel) of drugs, used syringes and a significant amount of various narcotic drugs at after-battle sites. Ukrainian prisoners of war themselves also willingly state that they receive drugs to “raise morale,” in connection with which well-established logistics chains have already been built for the supply of “combat chemicals” from the West. What is more, in Ukraine itself, the production of a number of narcotic drugs on an industrial scale has also been established. And one of the confirmations of this has been the recently revealed drug lab in the village of Sopino near Mariupol after the city’s liberation from the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The drug lab belongs to the “Right Sector” (a terrorist formation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine banned in the Russian Federation) and it was responsible for producing illegal drugs.

As evidenced by several experts, including the former head of the Department for Combating Drug Crime of the National Police of Ukraine, and now an MP of the Verkhovna Rada, Ilya Kiva, drug trafficking in Ukraine has increased markedly in recent years due to the fact that it is controlled at a high level.

The fact that the number of drug addicts in Ukraine has increased significantly in recent years is of no concern to the current Kiev regime, and there are no rehabilitation programs for soldiers who have gone through armed conflicts. As Ukrainian prisoners of war admit, the leadership of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is clearly determined to use Ukrainian soldiers only as cannon fodder, which can be disposed of. Even now, Ukraine is filled with thousands of drug-addicted people capable of killing, many of whom are unlikely to live to see the end of the special military operation. However, not a single member of the criminal Kyiv regime cares about this nor the rising scope of drug trafficking within the country, which then reaches Europe, especially considering that the president of the country himself is not opposed to using drugs…

Vladimir Platov, expert on the Middle East, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

https://journal-neo.org/2022/12/19/drugs-flood-europe-through-the-armed-forces-of-ukraine/

meanwhile, kids' genitalia.....

by The AIMSIB editorial staff

Nothing should be able to surprise us anymore with the lamentable spectacle that successive health policies give us to contemplate, day after day. After the industrial delirium of anti-covid vaccines which is finally beginning to take a turn for the worse, here comes the President of the French Republic who is going to the front to promote an anti-cervical cancer vaccine to be administered to both sexes and on a compulsory basis1 !

Naturally, the fact that the European distribution of this Gardasil is carried out by Serge Weinberg2, one of the largest financial contributors to the election campaigns of the said president, can only put on the tinsel of chance.

As well as the eruption of Agnès Firmin Le Bodo in the government as Minister Delegate to the Minister of Health and Prevention, it was also a coincidence that this pharmacist was already defending a bill to make Gardasil compulsory in... 20183. AIMSIB wants to remind you of everything we have published about this terrible vaccine. To be consulted calmly and methodically from beginning to end. Merry Christmas to all, except to the people we mentioned above, and happy (re)reading.

« The dice were loaded, we knew it, Gardasil the cervical cancer vaccine must become a compulsory vaccine for both boys and girls, if Sanofi wants it, the French Ministry of Health will get it! » (Aimsib, Jul 7, 2019)

https://en.reseauinternational.net/gardasil-vos-enfants-comme-du-betail/

We have now reached a huge milestone in cervical cancer prevention: every woman in Australia aged 35 years and younger is better protected against HPV than ever before. HPV – the human papillomavirus – is the cause of virtually all cervical cancers, so this is a truly remarkable feat.

University of Queensland researcher and 2006 Australian of the year Professor Ian Frazer first started developing a vaccine for HPV in the 1990s, along with his colleague, the late Dr Jian Zhou.

In 2006, the TGA approved Gardasil, and only a year later, Australia became the first country that rolled out a national HPV vaccination program. In 2013, the Australian government extended the vaccination program to include teenage boys.

In the decade since its commercial release, the HPV vaccine has significantly lowered the risk of HPV-related cancers for thousands of women around the world, with over 200 million doses distributed in 130 countries to date.

The HPV vaccine has been extremely effective. In girls and young women aged nine to 26, the vaccines have been proven to protect against two types of HPV that cause about 70 per cent of cervical cancers (if women have not already been exposed to these types), and two more types that cause about 90 per cent of genital warts. The vaccine also protects against about 70 per cent of vaginal cancer cases and up to 50 per cent of vulva cancer cases.

Just to give you an idea of the impact the vaccine has had – in the first four to five years after the program started, we observed a 77 per cent decrease in the number of 18-24-year-old women with HPV (for the HPV types covered by the vaccine). Precancerous abnormalities also decreased – by 34 per cent in 20–24 year-olds, which means they will be at a much lower lifetime risk of ever developing cervical cancer. There was also a marked decline in anogenital warts in women in their early 20s, and a decline in the rates of genital warts in young heterosexual men, even before they were included in the vaccination program.

https://www.cancercouncil.com.au/news/australian-success-story-hpv-vaccine/

READ FROM TOP......

THE DEBATE ISN'T ABOUT THE EFICIENCY OF THE VACCINE, BUT OF MAKING IT COMPULSORY.... HENCE VACCINATING EVERYTHING INCLUDING CATTLE, EXCEPT LAMPPOSTS (SO FAR).....

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW………………..

https://yourdemocracy.net/drupal/node/45958

By Gus Leonisky at 20 Dec 2022 - 9:32am
Login or register to post comments

Primary links

Search

Recent comments

Democracy Links

Member's Off-site Blogs