by Jean Michel Regnier

My general,

I read with great interest your answers to the questions that Marc Baudriller (Boulevard Voltaire) asked you on February 22nd under the title: “ We switch to a just war, these are the most dangerous ».

On the other hand, I must admit that one paragraph caught my attention:

« It has also now been proven that therussian army is of poor quality, that it maneuvers badly, masters the logistics badly and that it is badly commanded. It's still an army of yesterday... »

I happen to have been interested in the conduct of operations in Ukraine since December 2021, when V. Putin asked for some security guarantees in Europe. Request rejected by the West and one of the starting points of the current conflict.

You undoubtedly have much more information than I do, so how do you explain that this army, generally presented as an "army of barefoot muzhiks", poorly motivated, poorly equipped, poorly commanded, without the support of a solid industrial base, lacking ammunition and missiles, manages to hold its own, ALONE, NATO forces for more than a year, controls 20% of the territory, has "consumed" the equivalent of two Ukro-NATO armies and is about to inflict the same fate on the third?

If I believe the report of the Mossad via a Turkish media, most likely released with the green light from Uncle SAM who is currently looking for an escape route out of this conflict, the losses are colossal!

The icing on the cake, if I may say so, this "poor [RUSSIAN] army" succeeded in drain the reserves of materials and ammunition (artillery and anti-tank) of the thirty NATO countries!

Even America is reduced to taking shells from its pre-positioned strategic reserves in Israel and South Korea!

Last but not least, by MJ Stoltenberg's own admission, Secretary General of NATO, it turns out that the military-industrial complex of NATO is not able to react and replenish stocks in less than two, two and a half years.

You may agree with me that this "poor quality army" doesn't defend itself too badly. “ONE” could have seen worse. So I have the impression that Western analyzes of the situation have some “quirks”:

• “We” predicted that Russia would never attack with an unfavorable initial ratio of 1/5 or even 1/6: RUSSIA did!
• "ONE" predicted that it was going to seize kyiv and invade all of Ukraine: It didn't!
• "ONE" predicts a major winter offensive: RUSSIA still hasn't launched it although the thaw is fast approaching...
• "ONE" predicted that RUSSIA would be defeated in about fifteen DAYS: A year later, it still has the initiative!
• “ONE” predicted an economic collapse of Russia: It has still not taken place and worse, the IMF predicts a balance sheet to come that makes many Western countries green with envy.
• "ONE" wanted a "regime change": The polls show that the Russian people follow their leader and adhere to his objectives.

Also, I must admit to being a bit skeptical. On the other hand, I fully subscribe to your concept of "just war" carrying all the dangers. The two protagonists are at the same stage. Only, perhaps, their motivations diverge:

• One fights for the "golden calf" stamped "$";
• The other (RUSSIA) fights for “HUMANITY, ITS roots and ITS culture”.

At one time or another, you will have to choose your side. As for the ways out of the crisis, I fear that we are at the stage of biblical times, of Sodom and Gomorrah, at "quarter to midnight" of being transformed into "pillars of salt" by nuclear fire of a US strike first followed by a Russian reply… which would be perfectly in line with their respective employment doctrines.

The US has done it before, it will do it again…unless… something falls apart. That, for example, the fight ceases lack of fighters, reinforcements and / or lack of ammunition ?

IN REGARD to France, I sincerely hope that the staffs of our armies and the government come will learn the lessons of this conflict to build the armies that France needs to regain its place in the concert of Nations. For the moment, you are right: We are not on the level. We are two or even three wars behind! There is an EMERGENCY because you have to keep in mind that you STILL NEED 25 years to [EVEN] train a chef de corps.(commanding a regiment)

My respects, General.

Lcl(er) REGNIER Jean-Michel

source: officer one day via Strategika

READ MORE:

https://en.reseauinternational.net/une-armee-russe-de-mauvaise-qualite-reponse-au-general-v-desportes/

READ FROM TOP.

PLEASE, MAKE A PEACE DEAL NOW!!!!!!!!!!

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

WF: Russian Armed Forces Missile Strike Destroyed Shadow NATO Officers in Bunkers in Ukraine

Russia's barrage of missile strikes on Ukraine not only involved Daggers, but wiped out a camouflaged bunker with a shadowy headquarters of NATO officers, WarFiles investigators write. pic.twitter.com/z3UkN2vuF3

As reported on March 12 [SEE AT TOP] by the Greek portal of political and military information Pronews, citing American sources, in the course of an operation to retaliate for a provocation in the Bryansk region, a Russian hypersonic missile “Dagger” struck at a joint Ukrainian-NATO command and communications center.

According to Pronews , “dozens of NATO officers” were killed in a “terrifying strike” by a Mach 12 missile. In all likelihood, we are talking about the defeat of the “shadow General Staff” of NATO in Ukraine. The secret underground bunker, built at a depth of 400 feet (120 meters), housed several NATO officers (retired) and advisers. In total, more than 300 people. To date, according to the portal, 40 people have been pulled out from under the rubble of the underground headquarters, but most of those who died under the rubble have not yet been found.

It is not known, the portal continues, exactly how many Western citizens and how many Ukrainians were killed as a result of the “Dagger” strike. “Most of them, ”  according to Pronews, “are British and Poles, but there were also Americans and representatives of private companies that support communication and data transmission. In the coming days, it will be seen to what extent this will affect the conduct of Ukrainian and Western operations and attempts to stop the final phase of the Russian offensive on Bakhmut.

READ MORE:

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2023/03/14/horrific-slaughter-russia-finally-admits-to-destroying-natos-deep-underground-command-bunker-in-kiev/

READ FROM TOP.

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

For well over 40 years I’ve read the print edition of the New York Times almost every morning, trying to keep myself informed on important world matters. Until recently, I read it very carefully, but in the last few years I’ve noticed such a tremendous decline in its quality that these days I usually just glance at most of the articles, saving myself close to an hour a day. Other knowledgeable people seem to have reached similar conclusions, even including former Times editors.

With our leading mainstream outlets having become so unreliable, many of us now draw our information from alternative sources, but unfortunately these are often just as bad if not worse. As a result wildly exaggerated or incorrect stories can easily propagate across the Internet, including outright hoaxes.

Our own very lightly moderated website attracts many agitated commenters, and a few weeks ago some of them began claiming that a hypersonic Russian missile strike on an underground military bunker in Ukraine had killed dozens of NATO officers including American generals, a hugely important story that was being suppressed all across the Western media. This report struck me as typical Internet-nonsense and I paid absolutely no attention to it.

READ MORE:

https://www.unz.com/runz/did-a-russian-missile-strike-kill-200-nato-officers-in-a-ukrainian-bunker/

READ FROM TOP.

AS I WOULD HAVE SAID AT TOP, WE HAVE NO WAY TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION ABOUT NATO OFFICERS DYING UNDERGROUND.

THE INFORMATION WAS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE WEST, THOUGH IT SEEMS THE RUSSIANS ADMITTED TO BOMBING AN UNDERGROUND BUNKER WITH SOME FOREIGN ADVISORS IN IT. HOW MANY WE DO NOT KNOW. WE WILL NEVER KNOW. THE WEST KNOWS THAT IT IS LOSING THIS CONFLICT. "UKRAINE" MILITARY LOSSES ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE.

SAME BLACK-OUT WITH THE PIPELINE STORY.... THE RUSSIANS KNOW WHO DID IT BUT THEY WANT AN INTERNATIONAL INQUIRY... THE AMERICANS DON'T WANT ONE BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHO DID IT....

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

EASY.

THE WEST KNOWS IT.

AND FREE JULIAN ASSANGE FOR HISSSAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!