Tuesday 21st of March 2023

bigger than the drone catastrophe....

An attack on a Russian aircraft in neutral space would be a declaration of war, said Anatoly Antonov, Russia's ambassador to Washington.

« Intentionally attacking a Russian aircraft in neutral airspace is not only a crime under international law, but also an open declaration of war against the greatest nuclear power. “, he warned.


by Bruno Bertez


« An armed confrontation between Russia and the United States would be radically different from the proxy war that the Americans are waging from a distance against us in Ukraine..

Is the Capitol prepared to expose American citizens and the international community to the risk of all-out nuclear war? »

The ambassador commented on threats by a number of US lawmakers, in particular Senator Lindsey Graham, to shoot down Russian planes in international airspace if they come near US military equipment.

source: Bruno Bertez








US boots on the ground in ukraine....




make a peace deal.......

by Jean Michel Regnier

My general,

I read with great interest your answers to the questions that Marc Baudriller (Boulevard Voltaire) asked you on February 22nd under the title: “ We switch to a just war, these are the most dangerous ».

On the other hand, I must admit that one paragraph caught my attention:

« It has also now been proven that therussian army is of poor quality, that it maneuvers badly, masters the logistics badly and that it is badly commanded. It's still an army of yesterday... »

I happen to have been interested in the conduct of operations in Ukraine since December 2021, when V. Putin asked for some security guarantees in Europe. Request rejected by the West and one of the starting points of the current conflict.

You undoubtedly have much more information than I do, so how do you explain that this army, generally presented as an "army of barefoot muzhiks", poorly motivated, poorly equipped, poorly commanded, without the support of a solid industrial base, lacking ammunition and missiles, manages to hold its own, ALONE, NATO forces for more than a year, controls 20% of the territory, has "consumed" the equivalent of two Ukro-NATO armies and is about to inflict the same fate on the third?

If I believe the report of the Mossad via a Turkish media, most likely released with the green light from Uncle SAM who is currently looking for an escape route out of this conflict, the losses are colossal!



The icing on the cake, if I may say so, this "poor [RUSSIAN] army" succeeded in drain the reserves of materials and ammunition (artillery and anti-tank) of the thirty NATO countries!

Even America is reduced to taking shells from its pre-positioned strategic reserves in Israel and South Korea!

Last but not least, by MJ Stoltenberg's own admission, Secretary General of NATO, it turns out that the military-industrial complex of NATO is not able to react and replenish stocks in less than two, two and a half years.

You may agree with me that this "poor quality armydoesn't defend itself too badly. “ONE” could have seen worse. So I have the impression that Western analyzes of the situation have some “quirks”:

  • “We” predicted that Russia would never attack with an unfavorable initial ratio of 1/5 or even 1/6: RUSSIA did!
  • "ONE" predicted that it was going to seize kyiv and invade all of Ukraine: It didn't!
  • "ONE" predicts a major winter offensive: RUSSIA still hasn't launched it although the thaw is fast approaching...
  • "ONE" predicted that RUSSIA would be defeated in about fifteen DAYS: A year later, it still has the initiative!
  • “ONE” predicted an economic collapse of Russia: It has still not taken place and worse, the IMF predicts a balance sheet to come that makes many Western countries green with envy.
  • "ONE" wanted a "regime change": The polls show that the Russian people follow their leader and adhere to his objectives.

Also, I must admit to being a bit skeptical. On the other hand, I fully subscribe to your concept of "just warcarrying all the dangers. The two protagonists are at the same stage. Only, perhaps, their motivations diverge:

  • One fights for the "golden calf" stamped "$";
  • The other (RUSSIA) fights for “HUMANITY, ITS roots and ITS culture”.

At one time or another, you will have to choose your side. As for the ways out of the crisis, I fear that we are at the stage of biblical times, of Sodom and Gomorrah, at "quarter to midnight" of being transformed into "pillars of salt" by nuclear fire of a US strike first followed by a Russian reply… which would be perfectly in line with their respective employment doctrines.

The US has done it before, it will do it again…unless… something falls apart. That, for example, the fight ceases lack of fightersreinforcements and / or lack of ammunition ?

IN REGARD to France, I sincerely hope that the staffs of our armies and the government come will learn the lessons of this conflict to build the armies that France needs to regain its place in the concert of Nations. For the moment, you are right: We are not on the level. We are two or even three wars behind! There is an EMERGENCY because you have to keep in mind that you STILL NEED 25 years to [EVEN] train a chef de corps.(commanding a regiment)

My respects, General.

Lcl(er) REGNIER Jean-Michel

source: officer one day via Strategika