Saturday 27th of April 2024

swiftly politicol......

MAGA World Is About to Meet Taylor Swift’s Fandom. It Won’t Go Well.
Swift expert Brian Donovan on why the political right is targeting a rich, heteronormative pop star.

Taylor Swift has many titles: cultural juggernaut; international pop star; billionaire businesswoman. She can now add MAGA conspiracy theory target to the list.

Far-right internet personalities and even a former Republican presidential candidate are spreading the notion that something is not quite right with Swift’s relationship with Kansas City Chiefs star player Travis Kelce — and that somehow the Super Bowl is rigged and it’s all leading up to a Swift presidential endorsement of Joe Biden.

Swift was once famously politics-averse, but she inched into the arena in 2018 when she endorsed Tennessee Democratic Senate candidate Phil Bredesen, and then she backed Biden in 2020. That may have first soured some conservatives on Swift, but in recent days, the right has seemingly launched a full-bore attack on her. It seems like incredibly foolish politics, particularly as the gender gap grows and Republican support with suburban women erodes.

To explore how Swift’s influence has grown and how the attacks could backfire on the GOP, POLITICO Magazine reached out to Brian Donovan, a University of Kansas professor who teaches a popular college course called “The Sociology of Taylor Swift.”

“The Swiftie fan is arguably the most immersive and intense fandom in the U.S. right now,” Donovan said. “And to anger them is just political folly. They are a political force that I don’t think anyone really should mess with.”

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Why is Taylor Swift suddenly at the center of the political conversation?

I think there is a cyclical reaction happening where we saw with the Barbie movie and with the Eras Tour, a kind of woman-centered cultural aesthetic take hold of the American imagination. And I think there’s a ton of backlash to that driven by real basic sexism and misogyny.

If you look at the history of Taylor Swift, if you go back 10 or 12 years, her main critics were actually coming from the left. There was a feminist discourse that argued that she was too heteronormative, that she is supporting the patriarchy by writing these love songs with a straightforward, boy-meets-girl, happily-ever-after kind of narrative. So you would think that the right would embrace that. And for a while, when Taylor was more quiet about her politics, they had this notion that she was secretly one of them. You saw this in around 2017, 2018 when literal Nazis like Andrew Anglin or folks from the GamerGate community like Milo Yiannopoulos, were posting these memes that were suggesting that Taylor was secretly a white supremacist.

And so the fact that she had this political coming out in 2018, and started to embrace leftist causes, that was the first moment when the right rejected her. And as she gained cultural power over the last year, I think that’s made her an easy target. You would think that her dating a football star would be something that would be satisfying to cultural conservatives — she’s playing out a standard conservative script of falling in love with a football star — but the fact that she’s not on their team is especially irksome for a lot of folks. On the right, it’s seen as a betrayal.

Sexism and a sense of betrayal — is there anything else that might be fueling this hate we’re seeing from the right? 

The intensity is coming from different levels. Again, it’s this basic sexism. She is unmarried. She is an extremely successful businesswoman. And I know that a lot of folks on the right probably do not aspire to be a pop star, but a lot of them aspire to be successful in business. And she has lapped them over and over. She has become a billionaire based on her own artistry. And so there’s a jealousy factor as well.

Another part of this is that she is not easily consumable as a sex symbol. What makes Taylor Swift so unique is that her celebrity persona, unlike pop stars of the past few decades — think of Madonna or Britney Spears — is not centered on the male gaze. She’s not denying or muting her sexuality, but her performances are not catering to men. Her persona is crafted around this kind of goofy, almost nerd-like relatability and I think that is also irksome because she is not playing out the standard, patriarchal playbook of being a consumable Barbie doll sex symbol.

There’s a growing gender divide in politics. Do you think the conservative attacks against Swift will further alienate women voters from the Republican Party?

Absolutely. What is fascinating to me about this whole spectacle is it seems like political suicide. She certainly has appeal among women, but she has such a broad demographic appeal — racially, in terms of age, in terms of socio-economic status. It just seems like attacking her, from a strategic political standpoint, makes no sense whatsoever.

And that’s why I think some of these attacks, they will be short-lived. Because the folks that have the money, that are putting resources behind these political campaigns, are going to talk to people like Vivek Ramaswamy and say, “This is not a good strategy for you.”

And it will alienate women voters in the long term, for sure, because Taylor’s politics, they’re not that radical. She’s not the kind of radical feminist figure that they are painting her to be, and I think a lot of women see themselves in Taylor. She is highly relatable. And she, through her songwriting, lets us feel like we have a bond with her. And so the rabid attacks against her are going to turn people away on a very deep level.

Tell me more about the demographics of Swift’s fan base. Are there any notable traits or political trends?

Morning Consult did a deep dive into her fan base demographics. And they found, not surprisingly, that her main fan base is primarily white, primarily women and primarily millennial.

What’s unique about Taylor Swift is the intergenerational appeal that she has. And you saw that over the summer with parents taking their daughters to the Eras Tour. She’s been a star for 17 years. There are folks that I’m interviewing for my book that have literally grown up with her. She was there for them through all the different turning points in their life. So she can draw younger listeners who are experiencing her music for the first time, listeners who are millennials that see themselves in Taylor Swift, and fans that are my age and older that see an element of nostalgia in Taylor. So what is really powerful and unique about her is that demographically she has this cross-generational appeal.

Based on the folks that I’ve interviewed, she has a way of writing that, coupled with her celebrity persona and media appearances, connects uniquely with the experiences of young women. The Swiftie fan is arguably the most immersive and intense fandom in the U.S. right now. And to anger them is just political folly. They are a political force that I don’t think anyone really should mess with.

What makes Taylor Swift’s fandom such a political force? 

It’s both the sheer number and the intensity of their devotion to Taylor Swift.

A lot of Swifties take their cues from Taylor Swift. During the pandemic, when she released the album “Folklore,” she changed her entire aesthetic from the multicolored “Lover"-era aesthetic — which was this psychedelic, 1960s vibe — to this cottage-core, flannel vibe. Swifties went right along with it and started buying flannel and started adopting that style. And so she is very influential on a cultural level.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/02/01/the-twisted-logic-of-the-taylor-swift-backlash-it-seems-like-political-suicide-00138924

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW..............

losing bums....

IN REGARD TO BUMS ON SEATS, IT IS MOST LIKELY THAT SWIFT IS GOING TO LOSE HALF OF HER AUDIENCE WITHOUT AFFECTING TRUMPO'S POPULARITY...

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.............

bidenomics.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_brWJVhShY

the price is rising....

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL_tmAfjQgk

Biden’s Greatest Accomplishments From 2023

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nizrLWbXDsg

THE "FACT CHECKERS" STRIKE AGAIN!!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8GgH3R0u_Y

THE MEDIA VS. REALITY!!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpqfuam14Oc

JOE BIDEN: DAZED AND CONFUSED...

 

READ FROM TOP.


COMPARE THIS WITH THE MAN FROM RUSSIA:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0cN_Y5fnqs

Putin promised that nothing would work out for the West!

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.............

agent swift......

Taylor Swift exposed as an agent of the Deep State – Weekly Roundup    By Ian McAuley Taylor Swift and conspiracy theories

Few media reported on an operation shrouded in secrecy, involving two staff of the Liberal Party secretariat, one who had a previous diplomatic posting in Jakarta, travelling to Indonesia with a wad of cash and a list of contacts provided by Indonesian police, in a campaign to bribe people smugglers to send boats to Australia. The idea came from the secretariat, rather than from Dutton, but he has supported the initiative.

Nor do people realize that in a deal between the government and Telstra, the 5G network incorporates artificial intelligence allowing the government to build a databank of oral and digital conversations critical of government, stored in a server in one of the secret tunnels in the Parliamentary Triangle built by the Labor government during the Pacific War.

In America there is a campaign, developed by the Democrat-aligned psychological spooks in the Pentagon, to mobilize voters’ support for Biden by bringing together the popular music culture and the football culture. Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are the two principal actors in this movement, their roles having been defined by Democrat powerbrokers. Part of their strategy is to feminise the football culture, a culture that has been a proud male domain.

So much for the fun, but I didn’t make up the third theory; it’s circulating in the Republican Party.

Conspiracy theories share three characteristics. First, they tend to be congruent, albeit in an extreme form, with our existing inclinations and prejudices. That is why they find fertile ground in politically polarized societies. Second, they are almost always non-falsifiable by any practical means. That is why they find fertile ground among those who haven’t honed their skills in critical thinking – skills that are often missed in school curriculums. And third, they usually involve detailed stories. If you’re starting a conspiracy theory, the more elaborate it is, the more likely people are to believe it – even though logically an elaborate story should be less credible than a simple one.[1]

On Schwartz media’s 7am podcast, Nikki McCann-Ramirez of Rolling Stone describes the Taylor Swift conspiracy theory, suggesting that it has become so ridiculous that some Trump supporters believe it may have gone too far.

Writing in The Conversation Matt Williams of Massey University, John Kerr of Otago University, and Matthew Marques of La Trobe University present us with empirical research on conspiracy theories: Out of the rabbit hole: new research shows people can change their minds about conspiracy theories. They track the changing beliefs in conspiracy theories about vaccines, the 9/11 attacks, fluoridation and other stories.

They find little evidence that conspiracy theories are becoming more prevalent. They also find that for most theories, while the total number of believers may be reasonably stable, there is usually a dynamic of converts replacing apostates. That means people can change their minds.

Almost by definition, a conspiracy requires human agency. It’s easier to motivate people against a group of people with evil intent, than to motivate people to react against a self-organizing mass movement. Kasey Symons, writing on the ABC website, describes how the Taylor Swift effect is changing sports fandom and the dark side of being a female fan. The sports culture may be becoming less blokey, less tribal, less violent, less misogynistic. That’s no conspiracy.

Symons quotes the Chiefs coach, Andy Reid:

If you had told me a year ago that the thing conservatives would hate most was a white heterosexual couple where the man is a football player and the woman is a country-pop star, I would've laughed in your face.

 

https://johnmenadue.com/taylor-swift-exposed-as-an-agent-of-the-deep-state-weekly-roundup/

 

"Taylor WHO?... Never heard of her... I mean I never heard one single song from her... May be I should..."

Modern philistine Gus

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW............