[GUSNOTE: THOUGH THE RUSSIANS ARE READY, THEY ARE DOING EVERYTHING TO AVOID IT, WHILE THE CRAZIES (NEO-CONS) IN WASHINGTON ARE PUSING HARD TOWARDS CREATING WW3.....]

The Armavir Incident – the destruction on 23 May of a key part of Russia’s nuclear defence – means the Doomsday clock is ticking closer to midnight.

The Armavir Incident – the destruction on 23 May of a key part of Russia’s nuclear defence – means the Doomsday clock is ticking closer to midnight.  Most people don’t even know that a long-distance Ukrainian/NATO drone attack on the Armavir radar station north of Georgia knocked out a Voronezh-DM radar which is designed to detect incoming intercontinental ballistic missiles from as far as 6,000 kilometres away. It is one of three similar attacks in recent weeks.

The strike, trumpeted by Newsweek as a great success, may have robbed the Russians of a couple of minutes of warning time, in the event of a strike coming up from the south.

“Map Shows Ukraine’s Record-Breaking Hits on Russian Nuclear Warning Sites”  Newsweek reports.  The article, triumphalist in tone, fails to address the central issue: how crazy do you have to be to compress Russia’s decision-making window before it must decide whether to launch nuclear weapons at you?  And who thought this was a good idea at the very time that nuclear-capable F16s are about to arrive in Ukraine and the US, along with a clutch of client states, has announced their missiles will strike mainland Russia in the coming days or weeks?  Never in history has a nuclear power been attacked in this way.  Even at the height of the Cold War neither side was brainless enough to do what the Western countries are doing now: attack detection facilities and launch missile strikes on a nuclear power.

We actually need the Russians to have really good missile detection systems; it keeps us safe.  The Americans have a superior system to the Russians: they have more geosynchronous satellites that hover over specific regions 24/7 and can pretty much instantly detect the heat signatures of missiles at launch.  Ground systems, like the Voronezh-DM at Armavir have to wait for the missiles to gain altitude and enter the radar fan (think of the beep-beep-beep sweep of a submarine sonar).  American nuclear scientists estimate that the time available to the Russian military and political decision makers may only be a third of that which the US enjoys. In the time it takes you to drink a cappuccino they have to decide if they need to empty their missile silos then go through all their launch procedures before they are incinerated.

This may explain President Putin’s recent statement that all necessary decisions and authorisations have been made in respect to Russia’s preparedness.  It suggests a delegated decision structure that no longer requires political sign off.  There just won’t be time.

He’s just bluffing right?  Certainly America’s greatest military minds like Generals Hodges and Petraeus believe so; yet they have been wrong on pretty much everything to do with Ukraine, Iraq and Afghanistan.  Another US general worth quoting is Mark Milley, recent Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  He speaks of the “nuclear paradox,” that the closer the Russians come to losing in Ukraine, the higher the nuclear peril. Which begs the question: what do the Americans think they are doing? Is there any sound, discernible strategy guiding all this violence, all this escalation? Or are they doing what they did in Vietnam, in Iraq and in Afghanistan – fighting on, knowing they can’t win, but unable to admit it before the next Presidential election?

Let’s be clear: even the conventional gear we are talking about is serious: German Taurus missiles, French Scalp missiles, British Storm Shadow missiles and an array of US missiles are hugely powerful.  They will do immense damage and kill a lot of Russians in Russia.  You might think that’s a good idea but imagine if any of these countries were hit in return by similar missiles.

This morning I listened to Russian military analysts discussing what they saw as the need to hit British bases if Britain pushes ahead with plans to unleash Storm Shadows on Russian territory.  President Putin has also warned that missile strikes on Russia would result in counter-strikes. Is this posturing, empty threats and blackmail, as Western spokespeople claim, or are we about to witness something that could imperil us all?

In war, what happens when an enemy shoots at you?  You shoot back, right?  What would happen if Russia fired missiles into the US?  They’d fire straight back, right?  So why is the West about to fire missiles into a nuclear-armed state and think they won’t fire back?

The NATO decision to strike mainland Russia with missiles comes as Ukraine is losing on the battlefield and is at risk of a major frontline collapse. Western analysts acknowledge the country has almost run out of trained reserves, is funnelling conscripts to the front with minimal training, soldiers now have an average age of 43, they are suffering a 7:1 or perhaps even 10:1 shell deficit and are completely outmatched in airpower, missiles, tanks, drones and electronic warfare.

The US response to the looming failure of its Ukraine strategy is to escalate. The plan was to crush Russia with sanctions, pour in hundreds of billions of dollars of weapons, take back all territory, turn Sevastopol into a NATO port and trigger regime change in Moscow – all these have clearly failed.

So what has changed since President Biden said he would not trigger WWIII by authorising nuclear-capable F16s? What we are witnessing is classic escalation but with a frisson of nuclear fission thrown in.

The New York Times, normally a compliant outlet for Pentagon opinion said: “Until now, Mr. Biden has flatly refused to let Ukraine use American-made weapons outside of Ukrainian borders, no matter what the provocation, saying that any attack on Russian territory risked violating his mandate to “avoid World War III.”

Biden, the NYT said, had “ clearly crossed a red line that he himself drew.” Joe is the first US leader in history to authorise missile strikes against a nuclear power – supposedly within a limited geographic range north of Kharkiv; he is joined by the Germans, and the British and French who say “the Ukrainians” can strike anywhere on Russian territory.

Military experts dismiss the fiction that these missiles will be unleashed by Ukrainians. German Taurus missiles, French Scalp missiles, British Storm Shadow missiles and various US missiles use super-sophisticated dynamic guidance and navigation systems to enable command and control centres in Western Europe or the US to support things like terrain contour matching, evasion and target confirmation. These are all run by elite, highly trained personnel from each of those countries.  Open war between NATO and Russia could erupt as a consequence.

How has the media responded to the risk that Western countries may trigger missile strikes against their own territories? Let’s look at the headlines:

“Last chance to impress for Olympic hopefuls”, “Three suburbs might get a metro”,  “Exclusive: Rupert Murdoch’s new wife excited about Australian visit”,  “What is the point of Super Rugby bonus points?”, “Starmer on ropes over £2000 tax rise”.

You get the point.  Our media is keeping us in a deep, deep sleep. We need facts, analysis and an insistence on dialogue and diplomacy before it is too late. George Orwell knew all about this problem. Homage to Catalonia, written the year before the outbreak of WWII, finishes with this description of his train journey back to London:

“Down here it was still the England I had known in my childhood: the railway-cuttings smothered in wild flowers, the deep meadows where the great shining horses browse and meditate, the slow-moving streams bordered by willows, the green bosoms of the elms, the larkspurs in the cottage gardens; and then the huge peaceful wilderness of outer London, the barges on the miry river, the familiar streets, the posters telling of cricket matches and Royal weddings, the men in bowler hats, the pigeons in Trafalgar Square, the red buses, the blue policemen – all sleeping the deep, deep sleep of England, from which I sometimes fear that we shall never wake till we are jerked out of it by the roar of bombs.”

https://johnmenadue.com/are-you-ready-for-wwiii-the-russians-are/

SEE ALSO, PLEASE OH PLEASE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xV5qVEV-HY

Col. Larry Wilkerson on Scott Ritter and Russia's Devastating Warning to NATO

Col. (ret.) Lawrence Wilkerson's last positions in government were as Secretary of State Colin Powell's Chief of Staff (2002-05), Associate Director of the State Department's Policy Planning staff under the directorship of Ambassador Richard N. Haass, and member of that staff responsible for East Asia and the Pacific, political-military and legislative affairs (2001-02).
-
Before serving at the State Department, Wilkerson served 31 years in the U.S. Army. During that time, he was a member of the faculty of the U.S. Naval War College (1987 to 1989), Special Assistant to General Powell when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1989-93), and Director and Deputy Director of the U.S. Marine Corps War College at Quantico, Virginia (1993-97). Wilkerson retired in 1997 and began work as an advisor to General Powell. He has also taught national security affairs at the George Washington University.

READ FROM TOP

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

WE KNOW THAT THE AMERICAN EMPIRE, A DERIVATIVE OF THE ANGLO/SAXONS, HAS INHERITED THE WISH TO CAPTURE THE ENTIRE WORLD BY WHATEVER MEANS, INCLUDING DIRTY TRICKS. THIS IS WHY SOMEONE LIKE JULIAN ASSANGE IS IN PRISON... THUS BASED ON THE MACKINDER GEOPOLITICAL PLAN TO ACHIEVE THIS FEAT, THE AMERICANS HAVE VOWED TO DESTROY RUSSIA SINCE AT LEAST 1917.... 

THE AMERICANS HAD ALREADY WON THE RIGHT TO CONTROL SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA, WITH THE MONROE DOCTRINE. THEY ALSO FOUGHT MEXICO TO GET TEXAS AND CALIFORNIA.

SO, DESPITE SOME RETICENCE BY THE AMERICANS TO JOIN IN WW2, THERE WAS ENOUGH MOMENTUM TO SEE ADVANTAGES, INCLUDING CAPTURING EUROPE, LIKE IT DID WITH SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA.

THUS SOMETHING WAS CONCOCTED: AMGOT.

The Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories (originally abbreviated AMGOT, later AMG) was the form of military rule administered by Allied forces during and after World War II within European territories they occupied.[1]

US President Franklin Roosevelt insisted that an AMGOT should be implemented in France, but this was opposed by both Henry Stimson (US Secretary of War) and John J. McCloy (US Under-Secretary for War), as well as Allied Europe Supreme Commander, General Dwight Eisenhower, who had been strongly opposed to the imposition of AMGOT in North Africa. Eisenhower, unlike Roosevelt, wanted to cooperate with Charles de Gaulle; he secured a last-minute promise from Roosevelt on the eve of D-Day that the Allied officers would not act as military governors and would instead cooperate with the local authorities as the Allied forces liberated French territory.[citation needed] De Gaulle would, however, later claim in his memoirs that he blocked AMGOT.[4]

The AMGOT would have been implemented in France after its liberation if not for the Free French establishing control of the country per the Provisional Government of the French Republic in the name of the Free French Forces and the united French Resistance (FFI) following the liberation of Paris by the French themselves instead of the Allies, in August 1944.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_Military_Government_of_Occupied_Territories

REMEMBER THAT CHARLES DE GAULLE HATED THE AMERICANS AND THE ENGLISH... WHY? HE KNEW WHAT THEY WERE AFTER: EUROPEAN SUBMISSION TO THE AMERICAN EMPIRE AND CONQUER THE WORLD. DE GAULLE FOUGHT THIS AND EVENTUALLY PAID OFF THE CAPITAL OF THE MARSHALL PLAN IN FULL TO THROW THE AMERICANS OUT. THE GERMANS HAVE NOT BEEN "SO LUCKY" AND STILL CARRY MORE THAN 40 AMERICAN BASES ON THEIR SOIL...

BUT THE AMERICAN/ANGLO DEVIOUSNESS WENT UNDERGROUND AND CULTIVATED THE NEW POLITICAL GUARD IN FRANCE, SUCH AS MACRON, HOLLANDE AND SARKOZY — WHO ALL BETRAYED THE DE GAULLE INDEPENDENT FRENCH SPIRIT BY BECOMING AMERICANISED. 

THIS IS WHY EUROPE'S MAIN COUNTRIES, FRANCE AND GERMANY, JUMP WHEN WASHINGTON SAYS JUMP. 

NEXT STOP, MOSCOW.... PUTIN IS IN THE WAY. THE AMERICAN EMPIRE HAS HAD TO DEMONISE PUTIN AND RUSSIA... UKRAINE HAS BEEN THE LAUNCHING PAD OF THE ASSAULT ON RUSSIA SINCE ABOUT THE COLLAPSE OF THE USSR...

HERE IS AN INTERESTING ARTICLE BY LACROIX-RICE....

AMGOT is the acronym for Allied Military Government of the Occupied Territories, which was a plan defined by the United States, and which aimed to impose in countries "liberated from the Nazi occupier" (a financially and materially assisted occupier by major American banks, see also “What we will never tell you about June 6, 1944» …), an allied military government, in order to ensure a transition for a return to “democracy”.

Supported by the immense majority of French people, de Gaulle, leader of the resistance, however managed to avoid the AMGOT and install a provisional French government (the GPRF) to ensure the return to democracy. This is a whole section of history – and not the least important one – which is curiously not taught to us in history textbooks! If we compare these facts to those that occurred in Iran, Libya, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Pakistan, Syria, Ukraine, etc., etc., etc., in total around 70 countries since their Declaration of Independence, the doubt is Is it still allowed?

The watchman

by Annie Lacroix-Rice

It is a little-known page in the history of the Second World War: from 1941-1942, Washington had planned to impose on France – as on the future vanquished Italy, Germany and Japan – a protectorate status, governed by an Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories (AMGOT). This American military government of the occupied territories would have abolished all sovereignty, including the right to mint money, on the model provided by the Darlan-Clark agreements of November 1942.

According to certain American historians, this project was due to the hatred that Franklin D. Roosevelt felt for Charles de Gaulle, the “apprentice dictator” whom he wanted to spare post-Pétain France. This thesis of an American president concerned with establishing universal democracy is attractive, but erroneous.1

At the time, the United States especially feared that France, although weakened by the defeat of June 1940, would oppose their views on two points, at least if De Gaulle, who claimed to restore its sovereignty, directed. On the one hand, having fought after 1918-1919 against Washington's German policy, Paris would use its possible power of nuisance to hinder it again. On the other hand, France would be reluctant to let go of its empire, rich in raw materials and strategic bases, while the Americans had from 1899 demanded – for their goods and their capital – the benefit of the “open door” in all empires. colonials.2

This is why the United States practiced both a veto against De Gaulle, especially when his name contributed to unifying the Resistance, and a certain complacency mixed with rigor towards Vichy. Like the Latin American regimes dear to Washington, this hated regime would, in his eyes, have a more flexible back than a government with a strong popular base.

Thus progressed an American “Vichy without Vichy”, which was supported, in its successive forms, by the French elites, clinging to the State which had restored to them the privileges begun by the republican “old regime” and anxious to negotiate without damage the transition from the German era to the Pax Americana.

Preparing since December 1940, well before their entry into the war (December 1941), their landing in Morocco and Algeria with Robert Murphy, special representative of President Roosevelt in North Africa and future first advisor to the military governor of the American occupation zone in Germany - the bane of the Gaullists - the United States attempted to regroup around a symbol of defeat, General Maxime Weygand, Vichy general delegate for Africa until November 1941.

When the affair failed, they turned, just before their landing on November 8, 1942, to General Henri Giraud. Then came the turn of Admiral François Darlan, then in Algiers: this herald of state collaboration at the head of the Vichy government, from February 1941 to April 1942, had remained with Pétain after Pierre's return to power. Laval.3

On November 22, 1942, American General Mark W. Clark made the “returned” admiral sign “a singular agreement” stating “North Africa at the disposal of the Americans"and making France"a vassal country subject to “capitulations”". Americans "assumed exorbitant rights" on the "territorial extension of France»: movement of French troops, control and command of ports, aerodromes, fortifications, arsenals, telecommunications, merchant marine; freedom of requisitions; tax exemption; right of extraterritoriality; “administration of military zones established by them”; certain activities would be entrusted to “mixed commissions” (maintenance of order, day-to-day administration, economy and censorship).4

Laval himself was preparing his American future while proclaiming that he “wished Germany to win” (June 22, 1942): assisted by his son-in-law, René de Chambrun, a collaborationist business lawyer with American and French nationality, he believed promised by Washington to a prominent role in the aftermath of a German-Anglo-American “separate peace” against the Soviets5. But supporting Laval was as incompatible with the French balance of power as said “peace” was with the contribution of the Red Army to the crushing of the Wehrmacht.

After the assassination, on December 24, 1942, of Darlan, in which the Gaullists were involved, Washington returned to Giraud, de Gaulle's fleeting second in the French Committee of National Liberation (CFLN) founded on June 3, 1943. The Vichy general had rallied, especially since Stalingrad, senior civil servants (such as Maurice Couve de Murville, director of external finances and foreign exchange at Vichy) and industrialists (such as the former hood Lemaigre-Dubreuil, Lesieur oils and Printemps, who had played since 1941 on the German and American paintings) and collaborating bankers (such as Alfred Pose, general director of the National Bank for Commerce and Industry, feal of Darlan).

It is this American option that Pierre Pucheu embodied by joining Algiers and Giraud: what a symbol of the maintenance of Vichy that this minister of industrial production, then of the interior of Darlan, delegate of the Worms bank and the Comité des Forges , former leader and funder of Jacques Doriot's French Popular Party, champion of economic collaboration and anti-communist repression in the service of the occupier (designation of the Châteaubriant hostages, creation of special sections, etc.).

Released by Giraud and imprisoned in May 1943, he was tried, sentenced to death and executed in Algiers in March 1944. Not only to please the communists, whom Pucheu had martyred: De Gaulle thus issued a warning to the United States and Great Britain. -Brittany. He sowed fear among those who were waiting for the American rescue to follow the German “bulwark”:

«The French bourgeois, sneered a policeman in February 1943, [has] always considered the American or British soldier to be at his service in the event of a Bolshevik victory».6

Painting de Gaulle both as a right-wing dictator and a puppet of the French Communist Party and the USSR, Washington nevertheless had to give up imposing the dollar in the "liberated territories" and (with London) recognize, on October 23, 1944, its Provisional government of the French Republic: two and a half years after the Soviet recognition of the “government of the real France”, a year and a half after the immediate recognition of the CFLN, two months after the liberation of Paris and shortly before De Gaulle signed with Moscow, on December 10, to counterbalance American hegemony, a “treaty of alliance and mutual assistance” which he described as “beautiful and good alliance».7

Removed from Yalta in February 1945, dependent on the United States, France fully integrated into their sphere of influence. The vigor of its internal and external resistance had, however, removed it from their protectorate.

A document on a Study and Research Group on Resistance and Deportation provides us with other eloquent details. On September 7, 1943, the Commissioner for Foreign Affairs, René Massigli, sent the following letter to MM. MacMillan and Murphy:

«Mr. Minister, I have the honor to send you, attached, the text of a draft agreement between the Government of Her British Majesty (or the Government of the United States) and the French Liberation Committee national which aims to specify the modalities of cooperation to be established, from the day the allied forces land in France, between these forces on the one hand, the authorities and the population on the other hand».

From this extract of the letter, we can assume that General de Gaulle had been aware of the existence of a secret memorandum "concerning French participation in the administration of the liberated territory in metropolitan France". This agreement committed the United States and Great Britain and declared, essentially:

«Article 1: The liberated territory in mainland France will be treated as a friend. However, the Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Forces will have all rights of military occupation resulting from the war. He will act on the basis that there is no sovereign government in France. He will not negotiate with the Vichy government except to transfer authority into his own hands».

«Article 2: French civil servants and judicial personnel would be appointed, or confirmed, by the Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Armies and by his authorized delegates».

«These measures aim to create, as soon as possible, conditions which will allow the re-establishment of a representative French government consistent with the freely expressed wishes of the French people.».

We already knew that AMGOT was preparing its action by training the executives of its structure in centers like Yale or Charlottsville. Everything was planned; thus the future mayor of Cherbourg was already appointed to this team. 1552 officials of this body were ready to leave for Normandy taking with them “Francs de la Libération” notes, printed in advance…

Document provided by Jacques Loiseau – complete document on ffi33.org

postscript: Note that the term “annexation” contained in the title is a nod to the Western propaganda of the moment striving to describe in this way the situation in Crimea, facing the Russian “invader”, who turned out to be our real ally, and without whom this prefabricated war would surely have had a very different end...

source: The Diplomatic World via Geopolintel

https://en.reseauinternational.net/histoire-secrete-amgot-ou-quand-les-americains-ont-tente-dannexer-la-france/

ONE HAS TO KNOW THE DEVIOUS PERFIDE ALBION. JULIAN ASSANGE IS STILL IN PRISON IN ENGLAND FOR NO GOOD REASON... BUT THE ENGLISH HAVE HAD A BAD DEVIOUS BUT CLEVER WAY TO GET WHAT THEY WANT. WW1? THE ENGLISH WANTED WW1...

SO ONE HAS TO ALSO KNOW THAT THE "ALLIES" DURING WW2 SECRETLY PUSHED HITLER TO ATTACK RUSSIA, DESPITE THE NON-AGGRESSION PACT BETWEEN RUSSIA AND GERMANY PRIOR WW2. THIS WAS TO ACHIEVE TWO MAIN AIMS: 

ONE, TO DESTROY RUSSIA, WHICH WAS "MILITARILY WEAK" AT THE TIME

SECOND, TO WEAKEN THE STRENGTH OF GERMANY ON THE WESTERN FRONT.

MEANWHILE, MANY FRENCH AIRFORCE PILOTS WENT TO WORK FOR RUSSIA UNTIL VICTORY DAY.

IN REGARD TO WHAT THE BRITS ARE DOING TO JULIAN ASSANGE, TORTURE BY ISOLATION AND OTHER PSYCHOLOGICAL MEANS, ONE HAS TO REMEMBER WHAT THE ENGLISH DID TO NAPOLEON 1, AFTER HE WAS CAPTURED.....

WHAT FOLLOWS IS BY GAIL BELL... Gail Bell is an Australian author of short stories, two non-fiction books, travel writing, book reviews, critical essays and long form journalism. Her books and essays have won acclaim and prizes.

Napoleon's hair

A CONTROVERSIAL CASE for murder by arsenic was made jointly by three doctors in 1961. Their subject was Napoleon I, said to have died of 'stomach cancer' on 6 May 1821, while exiled on St Helena.

The cancer story had been disputed from the start, principally by Napoleon's own physician, who diagnosed longstanding severe hepatitis.

What alerted the modern doctors to arsenic was the non-linear progression of Napoleon's symptoms. The horrors came and went. He was worse when being cared for by English doctors, then improved when he was moved on board a ship, or into a simple cottage with a friend and his son.

When the attacks came back (coinciding with the reappearance of an English doctor, so it was said) they lasted a week, and his legs collapsed under him. His swollen feet were permanently cold, his teeth ached, he coughed, had liver pains, developed pimples around his mouth and generally looked as if he were about to die. From March 1821 his gums bled, his teeth loosened, his sight faded, he had a burning thirst and a coated tongue.

The three doctors who looked at the case studied the ups and downs as an entity rather than as a sequence of unrelated and overlapping illnesses. They deduced that Napoleon had been suffering from longstanding slow arsenic poisoning, interrupted by bouts of short sharp doses of the poison.

Arsenic leaves its calling card in hair shafts. It can be measured in the hair roots within half an hour of ingestion. The technology to read the deposition of poison in hair, like layers in sedimentary rock, was perfected in the 1960s just as arsenic was beginning to disappear off the scene. By an extraordinary bit of luck, the scientists had access to a family heirloom — a bundle of genuine, authenticated hairs taken from Napoleon's head, knotted and attached to a piece of paper. They set to work with a nuclear reactor and Geiger counter to track and graph the arsenic-16 isotope, and yes, the tests showed intermittent exposure to arsenic, with abnormally high exposure over a four-month period.

The idea was intriguing, but difficult to prove without exhumation and a second autopsy. The hypothesis lies around in the literature like Cleopatra's hair combs, highly suspicious but impossible to verify.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/392559.The_Poison_Principle

BUY THE BOOK.....

READ FROM TOP.

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW — AWAY FROM THE CLUTCHES OF THE ANGLO/SAXON HEGEMONY........

SEE ALSO: