Should Harris secure her seat in the Oval Office, it is expected that she will follow Biden’s foreign policies, the German news agency Deutsche Welle reported.

US President Joe Biden officially bowed out of the 2024 US presidential race Sunday, following months of assertions he would not drop out. Biden endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, to take his place as the Democratic Party's nominee.

Former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama endorsed Harris for president Friday, the Washington Post reported, and a “phone call” from the former president and first lady was released in a campaign ad posted to social media. In the ad, the Obamas thorw their support behind Harris who thanked the two for their “friendship”.

Dan Lazare, an independent investigative journalist and author, joined Sputnik’s The Critical Hour program on Friday, suggesting Harris may seem appealing to voters for stepping up to the plate at the last minute. However she faces an uphill battle as Americans continue to overpay for basic needs and blame Bidenomics for their empty wallets, he argued.

“Kamala Harris is in the honeymoon period. So she's glamorous. Everything she does is right. It's just perfect. You know, everyone loves her,” Lazare explained. “And this will last, I don't know, what? A few more days? A few more weeks? Certainly not beyond Labor Day, and that's where the real mud wrestling starts.”

“And she's got her vulnerabilities,” he added. “She gave a nice little talk after meeting with Netanyahu, but unfortunately it didn't make any sense. And she did manage to throw in an attack against Iran, which is completely bonkers. She accused Iran of backing Hamas; well, yes, Iran has backed Hamas. But the implication is that Iran was somehow behind October 7th and there is absolutely no evidence in support of that. In fact, there's a good deal of countervailing evidence against that.”

On July 2, CNN reported that three-quarters of US voters said the Democratic Party would have a better chance of holding onto the White House were Biden to drop out of the race and have someone else on the ticket.

“[Harris] talks out of both sides of her mouth, but then again, Biden does the same thing. He comes up with a few words of concern for the plight of the Palestinians even as he ships more bombs off to Israel. And she is equally two-sided, but joining in on this attack against Iran is really dangerous because Israel wants to drag America to a war with Iran, but Iran is not part of this conflict,” Lazare emphasized.

Should Harris secure her seat in the Oval Office, it is expected that she will follow Biden’s foreign policies, the German news agency Deutsche Welle reported. "Harris's policy appears to pursue a conflicted de-escalation with Iran by trying to reach, if not a new nuclear deal, at least a new agreement or understanding that would pause Iran's nuclear weapon development," said Arman Mahmoudian, a lecturer and international affairs analyst at the University of South Florida.

However, Harris will also be interested in influencing a new generation of “human rights-oriented policies toward Iran, specifically improving women’s rights,” said Mahmoudian.

Harris has consistently defended the nuclear agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which was achieved during Obama’s presidency, the report said. Trump’s policy of “maximum pressure” on Iran resulted in him pulling out of the deal because he thought he could negotiate a “better deal” than his predecessor.

“Iran does not want a war. It doesn't want a wider war. In fact, the new president, who's just been elected, clearly wants to avoid that at just about any possible cost,” said Lazare.

“It's really outrageous. I mean, I expect nothing from Harris on the war. I think she'll have a few kind words to say. She'll throw out a few cliches about the importance of sparing civilian casualties. In the end, she will satisfy Israel's every need for war. She will back it to the hilt until Netanyahu decides this operation is over. So, I expect her to respond exactly the same way as Biden has responded.”

On Tuesday, Harris visited the key battleground state of Wisconsin and quickly went on the offensive. "I know Donald Trump's type," Harris said, recounting her days as a prosecutor who pursued fraud cases, according to The New York Times.

The Vice President touted the prospect of representation for younger generations of Americans as well as her promise to protect access to abortion. Age has often been considered a weakness for both Trump, 78 and Biden, 81. Harris is 59 years old, six years younger than the average US retirement age of 65.

“She will appeal to the hardcore Democrats and she will appeal much less to those wavering in between, and that is the crucial population. She has Bidenomics to worry about. How the hell can she get out from under that albatross? I mean, the economy has hurt all working people of all colors,” Lazare said.

“Inflation is a killer. Housing costs, automobile costs, insurance costs have been devastating. Every single voter out there has suffered the consequences and the poorer you are, the more you have suffered. So, yeah, the educated elite will go for Harris, but the ones who have taken it on the chin, I think, will respond very differently.”

https://sputnikglobe.com/author_manley_mary/

GUSNOTE: FAILED BIDENOMICS AND BIDEN'S DISASTROUS FOREIGN POLICIES WON'T CHANGE UNTIL BIDEN IS OUT (BY JANUARY 2025) AND SHOULD KAMALA BE THE "ONE", OBAMA WILL STILL HOLD THE PUPPET STRINGS.... OBAMA HIMSELF IS UNDER THE SPELL OF THE DEEP STATE THAT IS RUN FROM THE PENTAGON... ON BEHALF OF THE RICH AMERICAN ELITE — EAGER TO CONQUER THE WORLD ENTIRELY....

READ FROM TOP.

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrZXRYBckfQ

German Gorraiz Lopez

After Biden's forced resignation from the Democratic race, Donald Trump reportedly woke up to an unexpected black swan that seriously threatens his triumphant return to the White House after the November election, the new shining star of the Democratic firmament, Vice President Kamala Harris.

Signs of Biden's senility, the fentanyl crisis, the high cost of living, increasing citizen insecurity and the immigration issue have reportedly caused Biden's popularity to plummet to historic lows and polls predicted a triumphant return of Donald Trump to the White House.

Therefore, after Biden's disastrous debate against Trump and the failure of the legal offensive against Trump, an assassination attempt against Donald Trump took place. After Trump became a hero and was nominated by acclamation at the Republican convention held in Wisconsin.

However, following Biden's resignation from the Democratic race, Donald Trump reportedly woke up to an unexpected black swan that would seriously threaten his triumphant return to the White House after the November election. The term "black swan" refers to an unexpected and unpredictable event that produces large-scale consequences that can only be explained after the fact. In Trump's case, this black swan would have taken the form of an ugly duckling ignored by the new Democratic swans and would have become the new shining star of the Democratic firmament, Kamala Harris.

Thus, after receiving the blessing of the Party establishment, Kamala managed to awaken among the voters the hope of a democratic victory. The Commission has been working on a number of proposals for the European Commission's White Paper on Employment and Social Security, which it has proposed to create. It hopes to be nominated by acclamation.

The American military-industrial complex envisaged, over the next five years, the reestablishment of the United States' role as global policeman through an extraordinary increase in American military interventions abroad to regain unipolarity on the geopolitical level. world, in accordance with the Wolfowitz doctrine, which attracted “a policy of unilateralism" and "preemptive military action to suppress possible threats from other nations and prevent dictatorships from being elevated to superpower status».

After several corrections, his idea was taken up in what is called the Bush Doctrine or Doctrine of Positive Aggression, which implied "the use of military force by the United States and its allies to consolidate governments around the world in accordance with American interests". These paradigms gave rise to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and the current war against Russia in Ukraine where the continuation would be championed to the extreme by Kamala Harris.

However, a Trump victory in November would mean the end of the Atlanticist strategy of Biden and Soros determined to throw Putin from power as well as to initiate the subsequent signing of a peace agreement in Ukraine and also the return to the doctrine of peaceful coexistence with Russia. This would mean the induction of the G3 (United States, Russia and China) as “primus inter pares» in global governance, with the EU, India and Japan remaining stone guests in the new geopolitical scenario.

Thus, the next presidential elections in November will mark the design of the new global geopolitical architecture of the next five-year term, because the victory of Donald Trump would be the return of the American isolationist doctrine against the Wolfowitz doctrine defended by Harris and the globalists which emphasizes on the supremacy of the European Union and the United States of America.

According to the latest monthly Gallup survey, illegal immigration is at the top of Americans' list of concerns. Concretely, the arrests of immigrants would have gone crescendo, going from the figure of 1 million arrests under Trump to 2,47 million in 2023 with Biden, according to figures from the Department of Homeland Security, so after Biden's withdrawal, illegal immigration is the central axis of the Trump's election campaign.

Thus, during his visit to the border with Mexico, Trump said in Eagle Pass (Texas) that “the United States is invaded by Biden's migration crime". The issue of illegal immigration and the construction of the wall will be at the center of his campaign against the so-called “Border Czar”, Kamala Harris.

The term “Border Czar” is used by Republicans against Harris in a pejorative manner since 2021, with the aim of making her an easy target for criticism of government management of migration. But although his role is not directly tied to the daily reality at the border, Trump's campaign against Vice President Harris will be focused on the border crisis narrative.

For Trump, “Kamala Harris is a crazy left-wing radical who will destroy America". "For three and a half years, Kamala Harris has been the ultra-liberal driving force behind every Biden disaster. She's a radical leftist lunatic who will destroy our country if she ever gets a chance to gain power. We're not going to let her do it» he hammered.

Additionally, on the second day of the Republican National Convention, Kamala Harris became a major target of criticism from speakers, calling out her role on the migration issue, preparing anti-Harris ads, and crafting a new line of attack against Trump's potential rival.

Trump is an expert at forcing the limits of the Overton window to introduce questions that lie outside the framework and, initially, considered unacceptable by public opinion and which, once in the debate, can be perceived as tolerable, which would be the paradigm for building the wall to contain illegal immigrants. Trump's campaign against Vice President Harris will thus be refocused on the story of Kamala's failure to manage the border.

source: Observatory Continental

https://en.reseauinternational.net/kamala-harris-est-elle-le-cygne-noir-de-donald-trump/

READ FROM TOP....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFC63gfrMAw

READ FROM TOP.

MEANWHILE:

Russia has no illusions about Trump – Kremlin
Praise for victories over Napoleon and Hitler aside, the Republican is still part of a Russophobic US elite, Dmitry Peskov has said

Donald Trump may be clear-minded when it comes to Russian history, but he also imposed a large number of santions on with Moscow, President Vladimir Putin’s press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, has said.

In a Fox News interview earlier this week, Trump pointed out that the Russian “war machine”defeated both Napoleon and Hitler and as such stopping the Ukraine conflict has to be a priority for him if reelected.

Meanwhile, his former secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, outlined “a Trump peace plan” in the Wall Street Journal that seemed at odds with the Republican candidate’s stated position.

Commenting on both matters, Peskov complimented Trump for “knowing history in such depth” as few other Americans seem to, but maintained that he is still “a representative of the US political elite that is now definitely suffering from total Russophobia.”

“Of course, we saw this article and various other statements. We have never worn rose-colored glasses,” Peskov told reporters.

The Kremlin press secretary reminded reporters that the US introduced “a huge number of sanctions” against Russia during Trump’s presidency, so “there isn’t much of a difference” between him and other American politicians, from Moscow’s standpoint.

“He shows a little more wisdom in terms of maintaining channels of dialogue, but this does not have much of an influence on anything,” Peskov concluded.

Pompeo’s op-ed blamed the Ukraine conflict on the “weakness” of  current US president, Joe Biden, and accused him of leaving Ukraine “without the means to win” and having “no strategy for victory.” 

According to the former State Department head, a plan for peace through strength would involve revitalizing the US economy; imposing “real sanctions” on Russia; creating an anti-Iranian bloc in the Middle East; “revitalizing” NATO; and giving Ukraine $500 billion worth of “lend-lease” military equipment, while lifting all restrictions on its use.

The terms he proposed for ending the Ukraine conflict involve freezing the current front line while not recognizing any of Russia’s “occupation and claimed annexation,”handing Ukraine Russia’s frozen central bank reserves as reparations, “demilitarizing” Crimea, and admitting Kiev to NATO and the EU, whereupon the sanctions on Russia might be gradually lifted.

During the first Trump administration, Pompeo headed the CIA and later the State Department. He has not been involved in Trump’s 2024 campaign and there is no indication his proposal reflects the Republican candidate’s thinking on ending the conflict.

https://www.rt.com/russia/601723-kremlin-trump-pompeo-ukraine/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVxgpuRUsno

Independent Journalist Sam Husseini noted that while we've long known about Biden's apparent cognitive decline, the Democratic Party establishment's decision to suddenly care about it shows that this entire "crisis" was manufactured, especially as the DNC made the highly unusual move of pushing a debate before its delayed convention, which set everything in motion…

SO, THE DEMOCRATS' PLAN WAS TO SHOW THAT BIDEN (MINUS THE TELEPROMPTER OF COURSE) WAS A BASTARD CASE OF SENILITY (STILL IS) AND HAD TO DROP OUT AFTER HAVING PROTECTED HIM TILL THE LAST MINUTE... SO, STILL AT THE HELM OF THE UNITED STYROFOAM OF ANNOYANCE HE WAS RELUCTANTLY PUSHED OFF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS WITH A BIG NUDGE FROM THE MACHINE, TO BE REPLACED BY KAMALA — THE PRINCESS OF BRILLANT WOKE DARKNESS (AND URINE DAMAGED LAMPPOSTS IN SAN FRAN) WITH A GLOWING SET OF TEETH PERMANENTLY SET ON HAPPY LAUGHTER... A CREDIT TO HER DEMOCRAT DENTIST...

SHE CAN ONLY WIN AGAINST A CLOWN, CAN'T SHE?

REWAD FROM TOP.