Monday 23rd of December 2024

mischt sich immer im Namen seines Herrn, der USA, ein …

Das Europaparlament attackiert eine UN-Resolution, die Chinas UN-Mitgliedschaft regelt. Ziel ist die Aufnahme Taiwans in UN-Organisationen. Damit attackiert das Europaparlament zugleich eine rote Linie Beijings.

masterminds against China

 

The European Parliament is attacking a UN resolution that regulates China's UN membership. The aim is to admit Taiwan into UN organizations. In doing so, the European Parliament is also attacking a red line of Beijing

 

BERLIN/BRUSSELS/TAIPEI (Own report) – At the initiative of German politicians, the European Parliament is campaigning for Taiwan to be admitted to UN organizations and is fueling tensions around the island with the current trip of a parliamentary delegation to Taipei. Taiwan must be admitted to UN special organizations such as the WHO, according to a resolution passed by the European Parliament last week. The resolution is also effectively directed against UN Resolution 2758 from 1971, which excludes Taiwanese representatives from the United Nations and its organizations. At the same time, it is a frontal attack on the one-China principle, which is considered a red line in Beijing, and failure to comply with which would result in harsh reactions - even war. The resolution was initiated by members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) - a lobby organization active in three dozen countries that has the declared goal of countering the rise of the People's Republic of China. The IPAC has already initiated similar resolutions in other parliaments. A German IPAC member is currently leading a delegation from the European Parliament to Taiwan.

 

“Key partner” of the EU

 

Last week, the European Parliament adopted a resolution by a large majority – 432 votes in favor, 60 against and 71 abstentions – that takes a strong stance against China in the conflict over Taiwan and calls for measures that are suitable to support the island’s separation from the mainland. It says that Taiwan is a “key partner” of the EU with whom it must cooperate more closely in the future. For example, it is important not only to send parliamentary delegations to Taipei, but also to cultivate more intensive exchange “at all levels”, especially at the political level.[1] This should be supplemented by broad cooperation in science, education, culture and sport, new city and regional partnerships, and “structural technical cooperation” with the Taiwanese fire brigade and police; In addition, the EU Commission should initiate negotiations on a bilateral investment agreement "immediately". Above all, however, it is important to push for Taiwan's admission to international organizations, for example in special organizations of the United Nations such as the WHO and in intergovernmental associations such as Interpol. Taiwan must also be included in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

 

UN Resolution 2758

 

To justify the demand for Taiwan's admission to multinational organizations, the European Parliament refers to UN Resolution 2758 of October 25, 1971. Until that day, Taiwan had held China's place at the United Nations under the name "Republic of China", including its place on the UN Security Council. With Resolution 2758, the UN General Assembly changed this; it declared that from now on it would recognize the representatives of the People's Republic as "the only legitimate representatives of China at the United Nations" and accordingly exclude the representatives of the "Republic of China".[2] In order to make the transition to non-recognition of the "Republic of China" clear, UN Resolution 2758 only referred to the "representatives of Chiang Kai-shek", the then ruler in Taipei. Accordingly, Taiwan has no longer been entitled to representation at the United Nations and in its organizations since October 25, 1971. The European Parliament now falsely claims - apparently aiming to ensure that the word "Taiwan" is not used in Resolution 2758 - that the UN General Assembly has made no statement about the island's status at the UN. By referring to the resolution, Beijing is seeking to "distort history and international rules”.[3]

The US House of Representatives already pursued the plan to initiate a comprehensive attack on UN Resolution 2758 with false claims last year. At that time, it passed a Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which stated - just like the European Parliament resolution now - that UN Resolution 2758 made no statement whatsoever about Taiwan's representation at the United Nations and its organizations. Similar resolutions were passed by the Australian Senate on August 21, 2024, and by the Second Chamber of the Dutch Parliament on September 12, 2024. Further parliamentary resolutions of this kind can be expected, as the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) took up the issue in summer 2024. IPAC was founded in June 2020 on the initiative of, among others, the German Green politician Reinhard Bütikofer; One of its stated goals is to counter the rise of the People's Republic of China.[4] It brings together around 250 MPs from around 40 parliaments who regularly vote on new anti-Chinese measures. This makes it possible to have resolutions against Beijing passed in parallel in various parliaments, thereby creating the impression that there is widespread international discontent with the People's Republic.

 

The IPAC "model resolution"

 

At a meeting in Taipei at the end of July, the IPAC passed a "model resolution" in which it sought to reinterpret UN Resolution 2758 to mean that it does not oppose Taiwan's membership "in international organizations," including United Nations organizations.[5] It also advocates supporting "Taiwan's justified claims for deeper participation in UN agencies and beyond" to the best of its ability. As IPAC explains, the adoption of the aforementioned resolution by the Australian Senate was the work of two IPAC members - Senator David Fawcett of the conservative Liberals and Senator Deborah O'Neill of the Labor Party.[6] The resolution of the Second Chamber of Parliament of the Netherlands, it continues, was the work of Parliament and IPAC member Jan Paternotte (Democrats 66). The same applies to the resolution of the European Parliament, in the creation of which, according to IPAC, German IPAC members also played a leading role - especially Engin Eroglu, who sits in the European Parliament for the Free Voters, and CDU MP Michael Gahler. Central elements of the IPAC "model resolution" are easy to identify in the European Parliament resolution.

 

"Exploring opportunities for cooperation"

 

IPAC member Gahler is currently leading a delegation from the European Parliament that arrived in Taiwan on Sunday for a six-day visit. It includes, among others, the MP Bernard Guetta, who was elected to the European Parliament for Macron's Renaissance party. The delegation's visit program included talks with Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim and Deputy Foreign Minister François Wu, as well as a detour to the Taiwanese parliament. The aim is to discuss further expansion of economic relations between the EU and Taiwan, as well as "the geopolitical situation" and "to explore possibilities for future cooperation".[7]

 

Red lines

 

By declaring Taiwan's admission to UN organizations as its goal and at the same time beginning to shake up the island's status with its attack on UN Resolution 2758, the European Parliament is targeting a well-known red line of the People's Republic of China. We have known since February 24, 2022 what can happen if you ignore a state's red lines. It has been generally known since the end of October 1962 that war can be avoided by respecting red lines; At that time, the Soviet Union agreed to forego the stationing of missiles in Cuba, which it had originally wanted, in order to maintain peace. In view of China's red lines on Taiwan, the Western states will have to decide which path to take. Doing both - crossing red lines and preventing war at the same time - is not possible given the current situation.

[1] Joint Motion for a resolution on the misinterpretation of UN resolution 2758 by the People’s Republic of China and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan. europaparl.europa.eu 23.10.2024.

[2] Restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations. UN Resolution 2758. 25.10.1971.

[3] Joint Motion for a resolution on the misinterpretation of UN resolution 2758 by the People’s Republic of China and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan. europaparl.europa.eu 23.10.2024.

[4] S. dazu Der grüne Kalte Krieg.

[5] Initiative 2758. ipac.global.

[6] European Parliament Passes Motion on UN Resolution 2758. ipac.global 24.10.2024.

[7] European Parliament lawmakers arrive in Taiwan for visit. taipeitimes.com 28.10.2024.

 

https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/9737

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

„Es ist schwierig, Zeichentrickfilme ohne die Deutschen zu machen …“

         Gus Leonisky

 

 

versaute....

 

BY Tarik Cyril Amar

 

Ukraine and Germany have a kinky relationship
Kiev’s anti-diplomat of an ambassador is brazenly meddling in Berlin’s politics, again

Speaking as a historian, my future colleagues looking back on early 21st century European history will have much to discuss at their conferences.

Concerning geopolitics, they will argue about how post-Cold War Europe managed not to emancipate itself from the US but, on the contrary, became submissive as never before. Regarding economics, they will ponder the mystery of Europe’s decline – predicted, much lamented, and yet irresistible. The legacy of Israel’s Gaza genocide will, of course, have generated a whole range of literature about how most of Europe took part in perpetrating it or looked away.

But during the coffee breaks, there will be those moments of nerd humor that only fellow academics find funny, where a favorite game could be to ask which two states had the kinkiest relationship. Hands-down, every time, the winner of most-perverse-international-relationship is going to be the Germany-Ukraine couple.

Why, you ask? For one thing, there is the outstanding absurdity of a state, Germany, not only tolerating a massive eco-terrorist attack on its energy infrastructure and thus its economy and therefore politics (the 2022 Nord Stream explosions) but helping in the cover-up and generously rewarding the attackers, that is, Ukraine and friends. It is impossible to think of a more bizarro example of sadomasochism in international politics. Then there is the German political and media elites’ odd habit of letting themselves be publicly insulted and cajoled by the representatives of a Ukrainian regime that could not survive a day without Western, very much including German, support. Former ambassador Andrey Melnik was a past master at that sport, but as it turns out, his current successor, Aleksey Makeev, is no slouch either.

Recently, Makeev has felt the urge to tell his host country how to do democracy properly. No, really, that’s not a joke: The representative of Kiev’s Zelensky regime has lessons to teach and insights to share. Yes, that would be the same regime which has a leader who “missed” his last election, which lacks a functioning opposition or free media, conducts regular public manhunts to catch cannon fodder for the proxy war against Russia it is carrying out for the West,  and admits that Ukraine’s very, very far right has a veto on its foreign policy (and then some).

What stung Makeev into action is the fact that Germany’s rising new BSW party (Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance – Reason and Justice) is too successful for his taste. By combining socio-economically left-wing with culturally conservative positions in a manner clearly appealing to many Germans, the BSW has recently achieved electoral breakthroughs in three federal states: Saxony, Thuringia, and Brandenburg. Consequently, in accordance with the ordinary rules of German politics, the party now is in talks about joining coalitions to govern them.

One of the BSW’s conditions is that the coalition agreements must reflect its demand for a diplomatic solution to the Ukraine War as well as its rejection of the current plan to station new US missiles in Germany. While the BSW leadership realizes, of course, that state governments have little direct influence on foreign policy issues, there is nothing unconstitutional, illegal, or otherwise improper about articulating the will of its voters in this manner. In fact, it’s an exemplarily democratic expression of a very sensible position and the support it enjoys among German citizens. The fact that some of these negotiations and the compromises they involve have produced debates within the BSW itself makes no difference in this regard.

Makeev, however, does not like any of it. Not at all. And, unusually for a diplomat but well within the style of Ukrainian anti-diplomacy, he has not kept his misgivings to himself. On the contrary, he has taken a bullhorn to the German public sphere. Turning to the potential coalition partners of the BSW via one of Germany’s major news magazines, Stern, the ambassador has told them not to concede the BSW’s foreign-policy demands, which he decries as “slogans.” Accepting them, he has warned, is a sure way to defeat. That’s ironic if you think about it, because defeat is a thing his boss in Kiev knows a thing or two about, but Makeev is too self-important to notice.

While busy dishing out unsolicited advice, the anti-diplomat from Ukraine has admonished the “politicians of the democratic parties” in Germany to stand by their “values.” If that term in this context makes you fear things will be getting worse, you are right. Makeev explicated his generous instructions further by adding that CDU and SPD “must not” – note the voice of self-assured command: not even “should not” but “must not” – cede ground to “populists” by abandoning their “solidarity” with Ukraine.

Where to even begin? Let’s disregard the cheap use of the big bad word “populism” to scare us all. The BSW is a legal, democratic party. Makeev’s clear implication that it is not is baseless slander. What he really seems to mean by “populism” is that the BSW takes Germans seriously enough to offer them reasonable policies that many want to endorse. And then succeeds in elections; the kind his boss in Kiev is evading.

Makeev’s abuse of the word “solidarity” is equally dishonest: Like other NATO-besotted hawks and proxy war fans, he implies that standing by Ukraine means standing by the West and its client, the Zelensky regime, while they are using the country and people up in an attempt to take down Russia as a great power that is futile, geopolitically selfish and even counter-productive. True solidarity, though, is something entirely different, namely a firm “no” to devastating Ukraine – or any other country – for such perverse policies and an insistence on the search for negotiated solutions instead. Just as the BSW suggests.

But Makeev, in his ire, wasn’t done yet. Channeling Senator Joe McCarthy, he also derided the BSW as an “alliance of Leninist ideologists,” which, to anyone familiar with the party’s actual composition, program, and statements is a simply ridiculous statement, betraying either profound ignorance or the kind of provincial bigotry that mistakes everyone to the left of, say, Donald Trump for a reincarnation of Joseph Stalin.

Makeev also charged the BSW with “instrumentalizing the genocidal war of Russia against” Ukraine. That is a plain absurdity, because while there is a war, it is definitely not genocidal. If the Zelensky regime’s mouthpiece wishes to see genocidal warfare, he should look at Israel’s conduct. How exactly the BSW is supposed to “instrumentalize” the Ukraine conflict is also hard to imagine.

What Makeev seems to mean is that the party has the unheard-of temerity to prioritize peace. A peace that would benefit Ukraine and Ukrainians most of all. If he wishes to see some real instrumentalizing of war, he should look at Ukraine’s Western users and the Zelensky regime that is selling out his country to them. But he cannot do that, obviously, because it remains virtually impossible to make a man see a thing when his career depends on turning a blind eye.

As a matter of fact, every single statement made by Makeev in that Stern interview was either blatantly misleading or conceptually perverse. Not all can be addressed here, but one merits special attention. Makeev insisted that “the voice of Central and Eastern Europe must be really heard at long last.” What he has in mind, of course, is not the voice of Russia, although that country is elementary to eastern Europe – and, as it happens, Europe. For Zelensky’s man in Berlin, the voices to be heard are his, and in general that of Ukraine’s Zelensky regime as well as those eastern European NATO and EU members who have made it their mission to drag the rest of the West into ceaseless confrontation, if not war, against Russia.

The odd thing here is that, for years already, we have been made to obediently hear just those voices, especially from Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltics (including Poland’s open jubilation at Germany having its vital infrastructure bombed, for instance) to the point of being physically sick of them. Again, if Makeev would like to see what actually not being heard looks like, he should imagine himself as a Palestinian. As a Ukrainian official representing the Zelensky regime, the very last thing he has any right to complain about is a lack of attention.

Yet, apart from the jumble of entitlement, prejudice, and ignorance, in the head of yet another incompetent ambassador from Ukraine, there are serious issues here: For one thing, Makeev is obviously and openly meddling if not in elections than in their outcomes. Because coalitions are the results of elections. Therefore, arrogating to himself a bizarre right to tell Germans which coalitions they may or may not conclude is just as bad as election interference. Again, no one among the German elite circles seems to have the guts to tell Makeev to mind his business or get lost. But what about, then, the “voices”of German citizens and voters? What about their – to use a term once beloved by proxy war apologists – “agency”? Clearly, Kiev’s man in Berlin either doesn’t notice a problem or just doesn’t give a damn.

Ultimately, this kind of unprofessional and unacceptable behavior will damage Ukraine’s interests the most. Makeev and others from his school of anti-diplomacy may believe that the submissive Germans they encounter in politics and the media are all there is to Germany. Yet they are provoking a backlash. Sooner rather than later, ever more Germans will want to openly tell entitled and overbearing Zelensky regime bullies to cool it or take their endless demands elsewhere. And since Makeev cannot yet actually control what happens in German elections, that should worry him. But then, he does not come across as a man of foresight.

https://www.rt.com/news/606936-ukraine-germany-ambassador-relationship/

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

„Es ist schwierig, Zeichentrickfilme ohne die Deutschen zu machen …“

         Gus Leonisky

 

 

FEUER !.....

An investigation was underway on Sunday after a passenger train was engulfed in a large fire while stopped at a station on the outskirts of Berlin overnight. Five passengers still on board had to exit the train but were unharmed.

The fire department was initially unable to say where and why the fire on Saturday evening had started on the diesel-powered train.

What do we know about the fire?

Firefighters were called to the Ahrensfelde station on the border between Berlin and Brandenburg after the alarm was raised at about 9:50 p.m. local time.

The three-carriage train had been due to start its next trip to the town of Werneuchen when the train driver heard a bang.

Smoke appeared and flames were seen, prompting the driver and a female attendant to evacuate the train's five passengers.

The fire department extinguished the flames — which by then had engulfed all three cars — and no one was injured, a spokesman said. The train sustained major damage. 

https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-large-fire-destroys-passenger-train-cause-unclear/a-70676380

 

READ FROM TOP. BLAME OTHERS.....

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

„Es ist schwierig, Zeichentrickfilme ohne die Deutschen zu machen …“

         Gus Leonisky

 

singing in taipei....

 

Andy Lau’s song ‘Chinese People’ exposes fragility of ‘Taiwan independence’ secessionists: Global Times editorial       By Global Times

 

Recently, Hong Kong singer Andy Lau held a concert at the Taipei Arena, where he performed the well-known song "Chinese People." Created to celebrate Hong Kong's return to China, the song has been a staple in Andy Lau's concert tours for over 20 years. However, in Taipei, some politicians from the pan-Green camp (pro-secession in the island's political spectrum) reacted strongly, claiming that "Andy Lau is here to engage in united front work" and stating that the concert "is not worth seeing." 

This reaction reveals just how fragile the mind-set of "Taiwan independence" supporters truly is.

"Hand in hand, regardless of you and me; heads up high, walking forward; let the world know we are Chinese …" In the eyes of "Taiwan independence" secessionists, these lyrics have already made them feel "attacked." They resorted to their usual tactics, attempting to label Andy Lau as "pro-Communist" and unleashing a wave of hate-filled reports and comments to incite online attacks against him, thereby politicizing a normal cultural exchange. 

However, they likely overlooked the fact that both the lyricist and composer of this song are from Taiwan. During the concert, when Andy Lau sang "Chinese People," the chorus from the entire audience further demonstrated the sentiments of the people on the island.

"Taiwan independence" secessionists collude with anti-China forces by selling out Taiwan region's interests, while on the island, they are overly sensitive and view everything as a threat. Any association with the "mainland" or "motherland" is met with all kinds of suppression. 

For instance, foods like Huang Fei Hong spicy crispy peanut and Luosifen (river snail rice noodles) from the Chinese mainland have been banned by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities in the Taiwan region. While popular mainland dramas like Empresses in the Palace and Joy of Life enjoy a following on the island, many pan-Green camp politicians secretly watch them, yet the DPP authorities publicly label these shows as "tools for united front work." Mainland platforms such as iQIYI, Taobao, and Douyin are very popular among the Taiwan residents, leading to their ban.

The DPP authorities have employed all methods to obstruct and undermine cross-Straits cultural exchanges, fundamentally out of fear that compatriots on both sides will draw closer together. However, public sentiment cannot be suppressed. The DPP's clumsy "anti-China" tactics are not gaining traction among netizens on the island. 

This time, the frantic attempts of the pan-Green camp to sway public opinion online not only failed to yield any advantage but were also met with ridicule and criticism from netizens: "I just want to see my idol sing and perform; you guys are being too political," "Please, if you don't understand, don't make a fuss; everyone sings this song at KTV," "If Andy Lau is here for 'united front work,' why are there still pan-green camp legislators buying tickets to the concert?"

Compatriots on both sides of the Straits belong to the Chinese nation and are all Chinese; this is something that flows in our blood and is etched in our genes. The pan-green camp's attempts to manufacture opposition by promoting an "us vs them" mentality and seizing any opportunity for sensationalism - sometimes even fabricating and distorting facts - are bound to fail.

They should not forget that the mainstream public opinion on the island desires peace over war, development over regression, exchange over separation, and cooperation over confrontation. Attempting to obstruct cross-Straits exchanges is destined to be like trying to cut water with a sword; it will only lead to greater flow.

Both sides share the nourishment and cultivation of Chinese culture, which is a historical and cultural foundation that no political force can dismantle. Regardless of how the DPP authorities distort facts and create obstacles, people on both sides maintain ongoing interactions and cultural exchanges. The Chinese cultural genes flowing in the blood of the vast majority of Taiwan compatriots cannot be altered by the "Taiwan independence" forces' efforts to promote "de-Sinicization" or to undermine cultural exchanges across the Straits.

 

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202411/1322388.shtml

 

 

READ FROM TOP. BLAME OTHERS.....

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

„Es ist schwierig, Zeichentrickfilme ohne die Deutschen zu machen …“

         Gus Leonisky