SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
a danger to the planet licked with 3-nitrooxypropanol......On November 26, 2024, Arla Foods, the U.K.'s largest dairy provider, launched an initiative with retailers Morrisons, Tesco, and Aldi to reduce methane emissions from cows. The initiative seeks to introduce Bovaer, a feed additive, to dairy cow feeding routines to reduce farming's climate impact. Bovaer achieves this by suppressing the enzyme in a cow's stomach that produces methane, a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. This results in reduced emissions. Misinformation sparked by Arla Foods methane-lowering project in the U.K. By: Nikolaj Kristensen
The announcement sparked misinformation on social media platforms, questioning the safety of Bovaer. Here's a roundup of all the misinformation narratives Logically Facts has fact-checked so far in the wake of the announcement. Bovaer has not been proven to be carcinogenicSeveral posts claimed Bovaer, scientifically named 3-nitrooxypropanol or 3-NOP, could cause cancer in humans. But there's no evidence to support this claim. Food safety authorities in the U.K., the U.S., and the EU found the feed additive safe and approved it for use. The U.K.'s Food Standards Agency risk assessment of Bovaer concluded that "the additive is non-carcinogenic and non-genotoxic." Read our fact-check here. Bill Gates is not behind the Arla Bovaer animal feed trials in the U.K.Many social media posts linked the Arla Foods initiative to Microsoft founder Bill Gates. In 2023, Gates invested in Rumin8, a company developing a dietary supplement for cows to reduce their methane emissions. However, Rumin8 is not connected to Arla Foods and is a rival start-up for methane-reducing animal feed supplements. We found no evidence that Gates is involved in Arla Foods' Bovaer project or is part of the Arla Foods company. Read our fact-check here. Feed additive to reduce cow methane emissions was approved by the EUOther posts claimed the feed additive that Arla Foods wants to trial in the U.K. hadn't been approved for use in the European Union. This, however, is mistaken as the EU authorized 3-nitrooxypropanol as an additive in animal nutrition in the spring of 2022. 3-NOP was also approved by the U.K. Food Standards Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Read the fact-check here. Arla injunction order predates methane-suppressing feed backlashOn X, users shared a screenshot of an Arla website page that states, "Arla has obtained a court injunction that prevents unlawful protests at a number of its sites." This led to confusion, with other users linking the injunction to the methane-reducing initiative. However, the court injunction is unrelated to the backlash against Arla's Bovaer trial. Arla obtained the injunction on August 31, 2022, prohibiting protesters from accessing Arla dairy processing facilities. Shortly after the order was obtained, an animal rights activist group blockaded four dairy farms, including the Arla Aylesbury milk factory in Buckinghamshire. The most recent iteration of Arla's injunction order dates back to July 26, 2024, preceding the methane-suppressing additive initiative. Read the fact-check here. Cow burps are not a 'non-existent problem' for the climateFollowing the Arla Foods announcement, users took to social media to downplay the impact of cows' methane emissions on climate change. "You may have seen a major dairy company is trialing a product called Bovaer to solve the non-existent problem of cow burps," said one post that has been viewed more than half a million times However, methane accounts for about 16 percent of global emissions. It is more than 28 times as potent as carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Livestock emissions from manure and gastroenteric releases – among them cow burps and flatulence — account for roughly 32 percent of human-caused methane emissions, according to the United Nations Environment Programme. Methane also breaks down in the atmosphere a lot faster than CO2, making methane emission cuts an impactful way of mitigating global warming. Read the fact-check here. No evidence milk from cows fed Bovaer causes infertility in menOn X, Facebook, and TikTok, a claim went viral that consuming dairy products from cows fed with Bovaer could damage male fertility and reproductive organs. However, while Bovaer's active ingredient, 3-nitrooxypropanal, can damage male fertility and reproductive organs when directly handled, it is metabolized by the cow's digestive system when fed to dairy cows and is no risk for the consumer. Read the fact-check here. With reporting from Anna Aleksandra Sichova, Arron Williams, Iryna Hnatiuk, and Christian Haag.
WE PREFER SEAWEED (‘Asparagopsis’) TO BOVAER..... BUT WE GUESS THAT PROFITS FROM BIG PHARMA ARE PARAMOUNT... LIKE WAR FOR THE PENTAGON... AND KEROSENE FOR TRAVELLING TO FUN ISLANDS....
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.
|
User login |
burning more fuel.....
European carriers have been struggling with longer and costlier flights to Asia due to the closure of Russian airspace as a result of Western sanctions on Russia, Politico EU reported on Tuesday.
Western countries closed their airspace to Russian airlines as part of the sanctions imposed after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. In response, Moscow banned aircraft from ‘unfriendly nations’, forcing EU planes to reroute and resulting in higher fuel consumption and increased costs.
The tit-for-tat sanctions have forced several European airlines, including Lufthansa, British Airways and Poland’s LOT, to suspend some routes between Europe and Asia. Meanwhile, Chinese and other non-European carriers have been boosting direct flights between the two continents since the sanctions do not affect them, the report said.
“It is a competitive disadvantage for the European carriers. That’s clear,” Berlin airport CEO Aletta von Massenbach told the outlet.
She noted that a German airline has to take a different route for flights between Berlin and Beijing than a Chinese carrier.
Politico cited recent research by the German Aerospace Center showing that sanctions had led to an increase in travel times and operational costs for European airlines, and eventually made airfares soar.
For instance, on Finnair’s Helsinki-Beijing flight, the significantly longer distance covered has resulted in an extra travel time of almost four hours.
In October, the CEO of Royal Dutch Airlines (KLM), Marjan Rintel, said that the EU should take financial measures to curb competition from Chinese airlines that can freely cross Russian airspace.
The European Commission has promised to study the issue of competition in international routes, but, according to Politico, the airline industry remains skeptical that Brussels will act.
The market share of Chinese airlines for routes between Asia and Europe has increased. China Eastern Airlines announced last summer that it was expanding European capacity to 19 routes and 244 weekly round trips. China Southern Airlines now reportedly serves 11 destinations in Europe. Air China, which is one of the main carriers connecting China and Europe, serving 32 routes and 53 daily flights, has exceeded its 2019 capacity deployment level by 116%, according to China’s Global Times.
The closure of Russian airspace “has nothing to do with safety, nor with security,” Willie Walsh, director general of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) airline lobby said, claiming that the European airlines are “the victims of politics.”
He voiced hope that the potential end of the Ukraine conflict will bring about a return to a “more normal environment.”
“Maybe that’s wishful thinking, but I would expect that that’s what everybody wants to see,” Walsh said.
https://www.rt.com/business/609131-european-airlines-russia-sanctions/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.
good-looking cows....
Also known by the acronym PPG, polypropylene glycol is a polymer, or large molecule, of propylene glycol. Like propylene glycol, it is used as a humectant and a delivery agent in cosmetics. Despite reports that it can be a skin sensitizer, researchers have found that it does not present a health risk for people when used in cosmetics.
Manufacturers use silica (SILICON DIOXIDE) to make everything from glass to cement, but it also has a use in the food industry as an additive and anticaking agent. This type of food additive prevents foods from caking or sticking together in clumps. This may help ensure a product’s shelf life, protect against the effects of moisture, and keep powdered ingredients from sticking together and helping them flow smoothly.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States also regulate how companies use silica in food.
The FDA regulations allow manufacturers to include silicon dioxide as a food additive if they only use the smallest amount they need, and the amount does not exceed 2% of the weight of the food.
MOST OF THE EARTH CRUST IS MADE OF SILICA....
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.
effing lactose....
by Duncan Graham
While Australian and Kiwi cattle farmers are hoping for a windfall, the Indonesian president’s pet project of serving milk to 83 million youngsters meets an easily foreseen obstacle. Duncan Graham reports.
A headline $45B public health and social welfare presidential initiative has been promised to boost the well-being of millions of school kids. It was also expected to lift Australian dairy farmers’ incomes; that hope looks doomed in the scheme’s present form because of an awkward medical fact.
Most Indonesians and other Asians don’t drink milk because they can’t – they’re lactose intolerant. It’s a genetic fault affecting two-thirds of the Republic’s 280 million population. The theory is that homo sapiens slowly adapted to lactose while domesticating oxen 10,000 years ago in North Europe’s cold climes. Dwellers of the tropics didn’t bother.
A seemingly little-known investigation by the University of Indonesia’s Department of Paediatrics is specific: “The prevalences of lactose malabsorption in pre-elementary, elementary and junior high school children were 21.3 per cent, 57.8 per cent and 73 per cent respectively.”
Drinkers rapidly sicken with abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhoea. Not a good invite to keep consuming.
Other academic studies also show lactose intolerance increases with age, hence some early schoolers may be able to drink and benefit.
Free lunch?The lunch plan to be launched next year aims to reduce stunting – a condition tragically common in parts of Indonesia, severely damaging development and often leading to early deaths among babes and toddlers.
The suggested solution was unexpectedly announced by cashiered former army general Prabowo Subianto earlier this year when he successfully campaigned to be Indonesia’s eighth president.
He wooed electors with a wholesome menu seemingly scribbled on a serviette during a TV debate ad-break, details to come later. Free food and milk for school kids – and who better to supply the dairy products than Australia and NZ, which have tariff-free export rights?
But planners and the media overlooked lactose intolerance, an awkward medical fact that will dash Australian farmers’ rides on the milk train despite already shipping 50 in-calf heifers this month. Not a big deal – a million cows are needed.
A Rp 71 trillion ($7B) trial of the scheme is planned for next month, targeting 15 million students. Malnutrition is a devilish problem impacting future generations. UNICEF claims the nation next door is struggling with micronutrient deficiencies. Only 40 per cent get “the minimum acceptable diet required for optimal growth and development.”
Existing campaigns to persuade mothers to continue breastfeeding and subsidies for the poor have helped, but an estimated one in 12 Indonesian children aged under five are wasted, and one in five are stunted.
Major health issueThe misery and national shame have drawn widespread outrage with demands for action. So Prabowo’s promise was applauded and probably a major reason he won the three-way contest in February with more than 58 per cent of the vote.
Earlier generations benefitted from the free milk deal introduced by the Menzies Government in 1951 and run for two decades. Older readers will remember ‘milk monitors’ lugging crates into classrooms and having to drink warm bottles as fridges were rare.
It was assumed the idea could migrate to Indonesia. The lactose intolerance reality has been known in nutritionists’ labs for decades, though embarrassingly not in newsrooms and policy nerds’ desks.
That’s why the milk part of the Prabowo strategy is quietly slipping off the menu, though lactose intolerance isn’t mentioned – only cost.
Minister of State Secretary Prasetyo Hadi has dampened expectations, telling the government’s news agency Antara: “Milk is one of the most expensive components in the nutritious meal programme … we need to think of other alternatives besides packaged milk.”
He suggested “liquid milk”, presumably meaning unsterilised, which is more dangerous.
“Some other countries have been doing this for decades. Hence, we seek prayers and support. Please understand that this may not be perfect in the first year.”
Lactose riskLactose, also called milk sugar, can be removed, but doing so adds to the cost. Soybean milk is lactose-free and common in Indonesia; it could be a healthy substitute if the cost is acceptable. But that won’t help Oz farmers.
The government claims 83 million youngsters should eventually benefit, though spending has already been slashed from Rp 15,000 ($1.50) a meal down to Rp 10,000.
Many dairy cows are held in smallholders’ barns and milked by hand, their owners cycling to wasteland to slash grass and carry to their beasts.
Big overseas-funded holdings using mechanised systems and specialised foods are developing, often helped by NZ investments and technology. But the bovines are rarely free range; they’re born in byres and die in the same jail cells. Animal welfare groups would be horrified.
The industry has improved through promotions by the late President Soeharto, who was a keen farmer. His artificial insemination scheme using foreign sperm has lifted stock quality, though rarely production.
The yields of Friesians and other European breeds used to mild weather drop in the tropics. Statistics Indonesia reports domestic milk production is less than a million tonnes a year from 585,000 cows.
Food securityPrabowo has made food self-sufficiency a national priority. But that ambition is moving out of reach as farmers to easier city jobs and productive land disappear forever under new suburbs’ concrete and bitumen.
Current Australian exports generally head to factories using skimmed milk powder for processed snacks.
By 2029, the annual cost of the President’s freebies could top Rp 450 trillion ($45 billion). That doesn’t account for budget blowouts and supply hassles in an archipelago of more than 6,000 inhabited islands where the need for nourishing foods is greatest.
Because so many fingers will be in the tucker box, corruption is almost certain. During the Covid crisis, the Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK – Corruption Eradication Commission) reported a loss of Rp 125B ($11.9m) through the scamming of a social help programme initiated by Prabowo’s predecessor, Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo.
Since then the mainstream media has widely reported that graft controls have weakened.
Supermarket shelves Down Under show shoppers’ priorities: Walls of fridges full of fresh milk with two-litre plastic bottles retailing for around $3 are commonplace in the cities, with the UHT long-life milk selling for $1.60 a litre.
This product in Indonesia costs more than $2 – so only sought by the upper classes. Street vendors sell unsterilised warm milk straight from udders to churns at around a dollar a litre, though often diluted with tap water. Hygiene practices are rarely controlled.
Telling the literal bellyachers to drink up because milk is good for them won’t work in this age, so the leftovers from lactose-intolerant kids’ lunch pails will result in huge wastage.
Not the sort of image Australian dairy farmers imagined.
https://michaelwest.com.au/prabowo-pet-milk-project-for-lactose-intolerant-indonesians/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.
carbon credits.....
Feb 27, 2007
RUSH: I have a Global Warming Stack that’s almost as big as the regular news stack. There’s some really great news in here about Algore. A blogger has uncovered that the carbon credits, the carbon offsets that Algore buys are actually from a company that he owns, and they don’t sell credits to anyone other than him! You can’t buy them off their website. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it’s even better than that. I just want to warn you: at the end of the program yesterday, I made this point. This carbon offset stuff, these carbon credits are just laying the groundwork for a future tax increase — perhaps an international or global tax increase on everybody for all of this.BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Dadelut dadelut dadelut dadelut! The new “peace movement,” is the global warming update crowd led by Algore.
(Playing of “Ball of Fire” parody update theme song.)
That’s our buddy Paul Shanklin as Algore, one of three update themes in the rotation for our global warming update: Ball of Fire, portrayed vocally by Algore. A blogger, ladies and gentlemen, has uncovered that the carbon credits — these “carbon offsets” that Al Gore buys — are actually from a company that he owns, and apparently they don’t sell these credits or these offsets to anybody other than Gore. You can’t buy them off of their website.
So Gore is paying…himself. Literally, Al Gore is paying himself to reduce his carbon footprint. His carbon footprint is not getting smaller. His carbon footprint, if anything, is enlarging — which is all bogus. I couldn’t care less, but he’s making a big deal out of it. The blogger is Ecotality.com. As one commenter posting on the few blogs covering the Gore story yesterday put it, The Gorical is chairman and founding partner of Generation Investment Management, LLP. That’s a boutique international investment firm that invests other people’s money for a fee in the stocks of green companies. So when Al Gore beats the drum for possible future global warming he’s also drumming up business, and he’s profiteering from hyping the global warming crisis.
In a nutshell, Algore consumes large amounts of carbon-based electricity while he trumpets the global warming crisis that drives up the value of green companies like the one in which he invests in their stocks, and carbon offsets are a dodgy way for someone to claim to be carbon neutral even as they consume large amounts of carbon-based energy. The notion that selling carbon offsets actually helps the environment is taken as a given by those who sell them and by those who buy them. But at this point it’s unproven. While some bloggers and pundits have likened carbon offsets to the indulgences of pre-Reformation Catholic church, sold to the wealthy so they could continue to sin, the writer of the blog The Virginian says that carbon offsets are more like the sumptuary laws of medieval times, laws that regulated and reinforced social hierarchies and morals through restrictions on clothing, food, and luxury expenditures. The bottoms line is that this company that Algore buys his carbon offsets from is owned by Algore. He’s investing in himself. He’s not losing any money at all in this, and nobody else can buy offsets from this company except Algore.
There is an update to all this, too — via the blog on the website of carbon offset marketer TerraPass, where it was recently found — a New York Times story that’s skeptical of carbon offsets. Some carbon-offset firms have begun to acknowledge that certain investments like tree-planting may be ineffective, and they are shifting their focus to what they say is reliable activity, like wind turbines, cleaner-burning stoves, or buying up credits that otherwise would allow companies to pollute. The whole thing is a scam, folks. It is a giant, 100% scam. This is a money-making routine for Algore and others involved in this whole thing, but here’s the important thing. It is a precursor for an international or global tax on the use of energy. The French are posing it. The United Nations has proposed it — and while you may laugh and poke fun at the idea of these offsets (and we have been doing that ourselves), these things are very ominous. They’re going to become expected. They’re going to be expected to be part of our daily lives.
It’s going to end up being an environmental tax on all of us as an extra cost of fuel or airfare or buying SUVs or whatever else the wackos claim is causing the greatest amount of pollution and thus global warming. If you cut down trees in your yard, you’ll pay a tax. If you don’t recycle you’ll pay a tax. If you pick paper or plastic you’ll pay a tax. If you don’t buy organic, you’ll pay a tax. Using Aqua Net, having nice homes, having second homes, all that could be subject to taxation based on this whole carbon offset problem and the size of your footprint. We’re now seeing the initial drumbeat for this. It’s the only way the leftists can assuage their guilt, but it’s going to be forced on all of us.
If you don’t snap to on this and understand exactly what this is about and the scope and the deeply rooted tentacles of this scam, it’s not going to go away. The little people — we, the little people, we are — about to be hosed again while the elite continue their lifestyles with righteous indignation for all that do not worship at the feet of the Earth Mother Gaia. Mark my words on this, folks. They will totally exempt themselves from any lifestyle changes just as libs always do with every policy they make. Two laws, two rules, two sets of them: one for you and me and one for them.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: It’s a good thing that I do not allow myself to be offended and it’s a good thing I do not allow myself to be hurt by others, because if I were of weaker fortitude, I would be crushed at this very moment. Because I just checked the e-mail, and there’s a bunch of subscribers to my website — and I know some libs have infiltrated there; they’ve purchased subscriptions for access to me — writing: Rush, how do you know Gore is buying carbon offsets from himself? You just make this up. Ladies and gentlemen, to have my honor challenged in such a fashion is absolutely ridiculous. There is no question. The name of the company is Generation Investment Management. Gore helped found it. It’s Generation Investment Management, through which he and others pay for carbon offsets. This firm invests money in solar, wind and other projects that supposedly reduce energy consumption around the globe. Guess who’s chairman? Algore! Algore is chairman of Generation Investment Management, and presumably draws an income, and presumably will make money on its investments if they prosper.
In other words, it’s exactly as I said: He’s buying his carbon offsets from himself through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to himself — and you can’t. You can’t buy carbon offsets from this outfit. As the NewsBusters puts it, Noel Sheppard: it’s not that he’s buying carbon offsets; he’s buying stocks in companies that this outfit invests in. These are not even carbon offsets. He’s just calling them that! He’s buying stock in companies, and he’s claiming that buying stock in these companies equals a carbon offset and allows him to continue to fly around with his giant jet, making a huge carbon footprint and so forth — and telling us that makes it all okay. More important than all this, he stands to benefit financially in a huge way if more and more people buy into this junk science. There’s hardly any evidence at all that Gore’s money is going to purchase carbon offsets at all, and even if it was, that’s a scam! Planting trees! Putting cork in the tailpipes of cows to block gas — farts, for those of you in Rio Linda!
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2007/02/27/algore_scam_buys_carbon_credits_from_himself-2/
GUSNOTE: ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL...
OUR POLITICAL SOLUTIONS ARE WONKY: THEY ARE DESIGNED TO KEEP THE POPULACE IN DOUBT BUT CARRY ON CONSUMING... SO THE RICH CAN COLLECT MORE CASH....
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.