SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
from horrible under morrison to gutless under albo.....Sorry to tell you that I’m finishing this year most unimpressed by Anthony Albanese and his government. I’m still reeling from his last two weeks of parliament, pushing through 45 bills just to show how much he’d achieved and give himself the option of calling an election early next year should he see a break in the clouds. We’ve entered the era of gutless government By Ross Gittins
Some of the measures pushed through at breakneck speed merited much more scrutiny, while some reforms that should have been put through were abandoned. One measure he’d hoped to rush through, fortunately, didn’t make it. It all left me more conscious of his government’s weak performance, capping off 2 ½ years in which Labor turned its mind to many of the problems left by its Liberal predecessors, did a bit to help, but never nearly enough. Why not? Because there were powerful interest groups Labor didn’t want to offend. And because it lives in fear of what the Libs might say. The two-party duopoly has painted itself into a corner, with neither side game to do what needs to be done. Take the greatest threat to our future: climate change. Labor was elected in May 2022 partly because it seemed to be genuine in its determination to see Australia play its part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, whereas the Coalition seemed only to be pretending to care. In government, Labor kept its promise to legislate its target of reducing emissions by 43 per cent by 2030. It strengthened its predecessors’ “safeguard mechanism”, limiting emissions by major industries. It made speeches about how nice it would be for Australia to become a world superpower, using clean electricity to manufacture green iron, green aluminium and other things, then export them to Asian countries with far less sun and wind than we have. So clearly, we’ve now accepted that our industries exporting coal and natural gas will start to phase down and out. What? Gosh no. No, no, if the coal industry wants to extend its mines, that’s fine. If the West Australians want assurance of the need for offshore gas beyond net zero emissions in 2050, that’s fine. Under the shiny new slogan of Nature Positive, Labor had promised to end further degradation of our natural environment, including by setting up a federal environment protection authority. This was opposed by the Coalition, proudly proclaiming itself to be the mining industry’s great friend, but the necessary legislation could go through thanks to a deal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek had reached with the Greens. But then the WA premier phoned Albanese to advise that the state’s miners were most unhappy about further efforts to protect the environment, so the deal was squashed. But not to worry. Should Albo decide against an early election, the bill would be back on the drawing board when parliament resumed for a short sitting in February. In his timidity, Albanese has introduced to politics the each-way bet. Strong support for the move to renewables? Of course. Continuing support for the use and export of fossil fuels? Of course. Welcome to the era of gutless government. From the greatest threat to our future on this planet to the greatest example of populist cynicism. To great applause from voters – and with the whole world watching this Aussie reform, up there with the secret ballot – Albanese rushed through his bill banning children under 16 from using social media. Had he figured out a foolproof way of enforcing the ban? Could the kids soon find ways around it? Would we all be forced to provide trustworthy tech giants such as Facebook and TikTok with documentary proof of our age? No. Let’s just push the bill through and worry about such details later. And never mind the experts saying what’s needed is to train our young people how to detect misinformation and disinformation. This is politicians acting on their cynical maxim that “the appearance is the reality”. They don’t need actually to fix a problem, just create the appearance of fixing it. Just do something the unthinking punters, and the shock jocks who lead them on, happily imagine will fix things. The promised measures that were dropped from Albanese’s frenetic bill-passing included action to curb the advertising of sports gambling and the plan – announced in February last year – to raise the tax on superannuation balances over $3 million (a needed reform despite what it would have cost a poor battler such as me). One bit of good news was the disappearance of Labor’s bill to reform election fundraising. Although it included various valuable changes, its claim to be taking “big money” out of politics was a thinly disguised plot to knock out Clive Palmer and the teals’ funding from Climate 200 while ignoring the political duopoly’s funding from the unions and big business. Fortunately, the duopolists couldn’t agree to push it through. The sad part of Albanese’s unimpressive performance is that there’s little reason to believe the Peter Dutton-led Coalition would do any better at fixing the many problems the Morrison government left for Labor to deal with. One of which, of course, was the cause of what soon unfolded after the May 2022 election to become the “cost-of-living crisis”. Much of the surge in prices came from overseas disruptions to supply. The rest, according to the Reserve Bank’s reasoning, came from the stimulus applied by the Morrison and state governments that turned out to be far more than needed. Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers have done a good job in managing the unfinished return to low inflation, but they have no control over when the Reserve will decide to start cutting interest rates. If, as seems likely, Labor loses seats at next year’s election, that will be voters punishing it for the cost of living, over which it had little control, not for its weak performance in so many other areas.
Republished from The Sydney Morning Herald, December 11, 2024 https://johnmenadue.com/weve-entered-the-era-of-gutless-government/
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.
|
User login |
expectations....
Everyone, it seems, is getting stuck into Anthony Albanese. Its not as though he has done much that is wrong. He hasn’t gone back on his promises, except, perhaps, in not delivering improved environmental legislation, and of course he failed to deliver on the Voice, though he tried.
The problem is, he hasn’t lived up to expectations about what he could do if he was elected.
On Wednesday the Sydney Morning Herald headlined an opinion piece by Ross Gittins, ‘Era of gutless government is here’. That’s one common strand of the critique of the Prime Minister and his government. Perhaps the mood was best captured by The Shovel, which included on the cover of its annual for 2024, ‘How to disappoint friends and underwhelm people, by Anthony Albanese’.
It not just the commentators. The Australian on Monday ran the results of its latest polling of what it called ‘character traits’. The Prime Minister’s approval went backwards (from previous polling) in eight of the nine categories including experience, being decisive and strong, having a vision for Australia, caring for people, being in touch with the people, being trustworthy.
Mind you, the shift in some categories was just a point or two and the report didn’t get round to mentioning that in some categories, the Prime Minister fared better than the Opposition Leader. For example, while the percentage of people who though Albanese was trustworthy fell from 49 to 46 six months ago, only 41 percent thought Dutton was trustworthy.
Also, 55 percent of those polled found the Prime Minister ‘likeable’ while only 40 percent thought that of the Leader of the Opposition. When it comes to voting, this trait really matters. In 2019, the fact that a majority of voters didn’t like the then Labor Leader, Bill Shorten, cost Labor votes, and contributed to its failure to win government.
What is really interesting about ‘Albo’s “weak” leadership’ as the Australian headlined its story, is that polling of voting intentions has changed very little in the past six months, and according to the Australian’s poll, although Labor’s primary vote is down to 30 percent, after preferences are distributed both Labor and the Coalition have 50 percent of the vote. Such a result might tip Labor out of majority government but it would stay in power with the support of the Greens and possibly one or two independents.
The polling reported for the Sydney Morning Herald is slightly different, giving the Coalition a slight lead over Labor, 51 to 49. But its polling also recorded solid wins for the Opposition over Labor on such issues as which party was likely to make them better off over the next three years, and whether, as Albanese is trying to tell the electorate ‘We have your back’.
There is no doubt that there is a serious level of dissatisfaction in the electorate with the performance of the Labor Government. Returning again to the Australian’s polling, only 40 percent of those polled were satisfied with Albanese’s performance while 55 percent were dissatisfied. Dutton had similar scores, 39 per cent satisfied and 51 per cent dissatisfied.
But where the two leaders were directly compared – Who do you think would make the better Prime Minister – Albanese held a solid lead, 45 to 38.
The election is still months away. The carping about Albanese’s leadership may have a galvanic effect on him and the government generally. But in the last week we have seen an important shift in the way politics is being played and presented. The government is not going to rest on its legislative achievements. It has already begun spruiking what it intends to do is it is re-elected – for example, in the field of subsidised childcare.
Last election, the Labor Party kept its policy promises to a minimum. More was expected of it once elected but that expectation went unrealised.
The next election won’t be about the consequent disappointment in the electorate. Voters will be asked to choose between what Labor and the Coalition are offering for the future. And particularly how those policies will impact on households battling inflation.
https://johnmenadue.com/a-casualty-of-expectations/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.
SEE ALSO:
Australia turns to rugby to curb China influence in PNG