Monday 16th of December 2024
Home » Blogs » Gus Leonisky's blog

world champs.....

A new study was released in recent days that should have been newsworthy, but it escaped the media's attention in Australia.

It showed Australian police are world leaders at arresting climate and environmental protesters.

According to the study, more than 20 per cent of all climate and environment protests in Australia involve arrests, which is more than three times the global average (6.3 per cent).

Australia's arrest rate was the highest of 14 countries in the global study.

It's higher than policing efforts in the United Kingdom (17.2 per cent), Norway (14.5 per cent), and the United States (10 per cent).

The research makes it clear that Australia's political leaders have joined the "rapid escalation" of efforts to criminalise and repress climate and environmental protest, while sovereign states globally fail to meet their international agreements and emissions targets.

But it shows killings and disappearances of activists in Australia are rare.

Between 2012 and 2023, it says there were over 2,000 killings of environmental defenders globally, with large numbers occurring in Brazil (401), the Philippines (298), India (86) and Peru (58).

In those countries, the arrest rates of climate and environment protesters are much lower than in Australia, the UK, Norway and the US.

Researchers say that's a trend worth highlighting. They say countries with the lowest rates of arrests of activists often have the highest rates of police violence and killings of environmental defenders, which suggests something about the social and legal reality in those countries.

However, overall they say Australian efforts to repress climate activism are part of an alarming global trend to squash dissent. They characterise that trend as a "threat to both the environment and liberal democratic systems."

They also say groups like Extinction Rebellion, which operates in Australia and the UK, are running head-on into that clampdown, because they are intentionally employing tactics that may result in arrests "to the point that being arrested becomes part of their strategy for change."

It's worth reading.

New anti-protest laws in Australia and overseas

The study, Criminalisation and Repression of Climate and Environmental Protests, was published last week by researchers at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.

It follows a 2024 position paper from the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Environmental Defenders that warned of the growing urgency of the "triple environmental crisis of pollution, biodiversity loss and climate change," and the global increase in civil disobedience in environmental activism in response to those crises.

I

t also follows a major report in 2021 from Australia's Environmental Defenders Office (EDO), that was a collaboration with the Human Rights Law Centre and Greenpeace.

That EDO report warned of "a worrying proliferation of anti-protest legislation in Australia," the "systemic repression faced by climate activists across the country," and the "unregulated political influence of the fossil fuel industry driving that repression."

The new study from Bristol University draws on data from three databases. 

It makes extensive use of quantitative data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data (ACLED), and supplements it with data from Global Witness, covering disappearance and killing of land and environmental defenders, and the Climate Protest Tracker, funded by the Carnegie Endownment for International Peace.

It analyses quantitative data on repression and criminalisation globally, and then looks more closely at trends and new legislation from a smaller group of 14 countries in different parts the world.

Those countries include Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, India, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Russia, South Africa, Turkey, Uganda, United Kingdom, and the United States.

It says since 2019, there have been 22 pieces of new legislation introduced in those 14 countries that have been designed to limit people's ability to protest. 

READ MORE: 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-15/australia-leads-world-in-arresting-climate-environment-activists/104721294

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.

green to kaka.....

 

Trump election impacts global green lobby

BY Lucas Leiroz

 

Donald Trump’s return to the White House is expected to have a profound impact on global environmental policies, especially with regard to the role of the United States in international initiatives to combat climate change. Trump’s victory brings with it a return to the positions adopted during his previous presidency, with a clear focus on fossil fuel development and an active opposition to multilateral agreements aimed at sustainability. This change in leadership in the United States is likely to allow a collapse in the global agendas defended by so-called “progressive” forces, both in the Democrats and in the foreign allies of the European Union, resulting in a reconfiguration of global climate strategies.

Soon after his election, Trump began to reaffirm his commitment to increasing fossil fuel production. The “Drill, baby, drill” policy that marked his previous administration is about to be put into practice again, with possible new permits for oil and gas exploration in previously protected territories. This stance of prioritizing fossil fuels over renewable sources has been a key feature of Trump’s agenda – as he is a proxy politician for the more old-fashioned elites when it comes to “clean” energy. For him, domestic energy production is vital to the economic security of the United States, as well as being a means of promoting job growth in the traditional manufacturing sector, which seems to be more worthy of attention than subjective environmental issues.

Trump’s 2024 victory has also raised “concerns” about a further US withdrawal from global climate commitments. His decision to abandon the Paris Agreement during his first term is about to be reaffirmed, and the country will certainly return to adopting a policy of isolation from major climate change discussions. The refusal to join the Paris Agreement and the deregulation of domestic environmental policies have not only weakened the US’ leadership role in international climate negotiations, but have also dealt a significant blow to the credibility and effectiveness of these efforts. The imposition of a nationalist and protectionist agenda on environmental issues has had a negative effect on global collaboration, with other nations seeking to pursue their own agendas, often without the coordination needed to achieve common climate goals – and all of this is expected to happen again now.

This stance has not only affected US commitments, but also had direct implications for the climate policies of the European Union and countries that have traditionally supported global sustainability initiatives. For the EU, which has been firmly aligned with the European Green Deal and the 2050 net-zero carbon targets, Trump’s victory represents a significant challenge. Trump’s policies, focused on defending fossil fuels and rolling back clean energy policies, contrast with European efforts to create a renewable energy market and promote investment in green technologies. The relationship between the United States and the European Union, especially on climate change, will become more tense, with European nations forced to take the lead in negotiations without the support of the declining American hegemon.

Furthermore, Trump’s victory in 2024 was a significant blow to the progressive agendas of the Democrats, who have advocated aggressive policies to combat climate change. Under Trump’s leadership, the Republican Party will maintain an agenda that favors the interests of the fossil fuel industry and rejects global climate commitments. This scenario will generate an internal impasse in the United States, with the Democrats facing an administration that not only rejects their climate policies, but also actively works to reverse the progress made in previous terms. The contrast between Trump’s Republican stance and progressive demands on climate justice has generated increasing polarization, with the two sides increasingly distant in the search for solutions to environmental challenges – and this will worsen substantially from 2025 onwards.

At a global level, Trump’s victory in 2024 is already having an impact on the flow of investment in renewable energy. Under his presidency, the US government will once again move away from financing green projects and reduce tax incentives for clean energy. These expectations are creating uncertainty in the market, especially regarding the future of investment in sustainable technologies. The global momentum for investment in clean energy, which was being driven by decarbonization policies and growing pressure from investors and consumers, is being hampered by Trump’s pro-fossil fuel stance.

Nevertheless, despite all these environmental blows, it is important to note that the global climate movement was not completely dismantled under Trump’s previous term. Many states and cities in the United States, as well as corporate initiatives, have continued to adopt progressive environmental policies independently of federal policies—and often using them as an anti-Republican political agenda. Popular pressure for climate solutions, especially among younger generations, has also continued to grow, forcing some changes at the local and state levels. In addition, pressure from the international community and private sectors seeking sustainable alternatives may continue to push the United States toward greater consideration of climate issues, albeit in a more fragmented and slower manner, even under a Trump administration.

In short, Trump’s election in 2024 is likely to cause a significant obstruction in global climate policy, affecting the United States’ position on the Paris Agreement and renewable energy financing. On the positive side, the continuation of his pro-fossil fuel agenda and the weakening of international climate policy could lead to a collapse of the globalist and (pseudo-) environmentalist agendas advocated by the Democrats and the European Union, profoundly impacting the global “green” lobby. However, growing pressure from local governments, civil society and the private sector could still keep the debate and action on climate change alive, even though in a context of greater fragmentation and uncertainty.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/12/12/trump-election-impacts-global-green-lobby/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.