SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
horror movie .....
On the critical issue of Iran's uranium-enrichment program, Tehran and Washington are now engaged in a game of geopolitical chicken, which favors hard-liners on both sides, making compromise more difficult, escalation more likely and war - by accident, if not by design - a greater possibility than before. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, after stepping up defiance of U.S.-led efforts to compel Iran to halt enrichment, this week appeared to gain greater domestic influence over the issue with the replacement of Iran's pragmatic top nuclear negotiator by a key Ahmadinejad ally. After President Bush invoked the specter of World War III to press the urgency of stopping Iran, the Administration followed up with another round of punitive measures."It looks like a slow-motion train wreck," said Barbara Slavin, author of a new book, Bitter Friends, Bosom Enemies: Iran, the U.S. and the Twisted Path to Confrontation. "Neither side is willing to back down and the chances for conflict are growing over the nuclear program and Iran's support for U.S. adversaries in the Middle East."
|
User login |
No evidence...
From the ABC
No evidence Iran building nukes: UN watchdog chief
UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed El Baradei said he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding "fuel to the fire" with recent bellicose rhetoric.
"We haven't received any information there is a parallel, ongoing, active nuclear weapon program," the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) told CNN.
"Second, even if Iran were to be working on nuclear weapons... they are at least a few years away from having such weapon," he said, citing Washington's own intelligence assessments.
"My fear is that if we continue to escalate from both sides that we will end up into a precipice, we will end up into an abyss. The Middle East is in a total mess, to say the least. And we cannot add fuel to the fire."
Piano, piano...
Soften the Talk on Iran, ElBaradei Urges U.S.
BY BRIAN KNOWLTON
The New York Times
Published: October 29, 2007
WASHINGTON, Oct. 28 — Mohamed ElBaradei, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, urged the Bush administration on Sunday to soften its statements about Iran while maintaining diplomatic pressure to halt the nuclear enrichment that could lead to the production of a nuclear weapon.
But American lawmakers appearing on Sunday television talk programs were divided on whether efforts to influence Iran had been helped or hindered by the administration’s tough talk.
small and big potatoes
Patrick Wintour, political editor
Friday November 2, 2007
The Guardian
Gordon Brown is considering a Saudi plan to limit the supply of uranium to potential nuclear weapons states and will call for new EU sanctions against Iran in the next few weeks, most probably in the form of an end to export credit guarantees.
US-allied Gulf states said yesterday they were planning a consortium to provide enough enriched uranium for Iran's civil nuclear programme, which they believe could be a deterrent against the development of nuclear weapon.
---------------
Gus: the AWB giving bribes to Saddam to pale into insignificance...
the great false hope .....
President Barack Obama shepherded a unanimous vote through the United Nations General Assembly yesterday to halt the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world. The vote will allegedly curb the proliferation & testing of nuclear weapons & underpin moves toward total global disarmament.
With classical yankee hypocrisy, the saviour of the world predictably went on to say that the most immediate challenge to halting the proliferation of nuclear arms is the nation of Iran, which formally notified the IAEA this week of the existence of a second, previously undisclosed uranium-enrichment facility southwest of Tehran.
Using typical yankee language, Obama clumsily claimed that: "Iran has been building a covert uranium enrichment facility... for several years. We expect the IAEA to immediately investigate this disturbing information" (even though America itself has known about the facility for years according to one senior official).
Elsewhere, Madam Lash, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, egged-on by our own ever predictable Milky Bar Kid, gave the press a brief reaction to news of Iran's so-called concealed & still-under-construction nuclear facility near Qom:
"This is further evidence of Iran's continued defiance of IAEA and the United Nations obligations. Iran is breaking rules that all nations are expected to follow." .... which nations are those Dillary?
Of course, the fact that the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, America, France, the UK, China & Russia, possess over 98 percent of the more than 20,000 nuclear weapons in the world isn't seen to be an existential threat to the world the way Iran is.
Whilst the Americans and the International Atomic Energy Agency demand access to Iran's facilities for inspection, they have done nothing to reduce their own arsenals. Indeed, in recent years, the yankees have renewed & upgraded their own stockpiles, whilst fostering proliferation by both India & Israel, whilst ignoring the games played by Pakistan, amongst others, in the nuclear black market.
Perhaps if the great false hope was to call for a nuclear-free middle east & seek the removal of the existential threat that Israel represents to its neighbours in the region, he & his criminal accomplices might actually be taken more seriously?