SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
do this thing quietly, not bombastically....Employee unions are challenging the Trump administration’s moves to fire vast swaths of the federal workforce, saying they violate regulations for carrying out mass “RIFs” across government. In a new lawsuit filed in federal court Wednesday, five employee unions allege the administration’s moves to initiate reductions-in-force and lay off probationary employees are illegal. The lawsuit specifically challenges President Donald Trump’s “workforce optimization initiative” executive order signed Tuesday. The EO directed agency heads to prepare for “large-scale reductions in force.” It gives agencies 30 days to submit reorganization plans to the White House. The EO also further institutionalizes the role of the “Department of Government Efficiency” in overseeing agency hiring decisions. The plaintiffs in the new lawsuit include the National Treasury Employees Union, the National Federation of Federal Employees, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, and the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America. Is your IT team ready to solve a potentially network-crippling problem? Learn tips and tactics for a successful resiliency strategy in our new ebook, sponsored by PagerDuty. Their suit argues that the Trump administration’s “mass firing of employees and the attempt to force resignations across the federal civilian workforce violate separation of powers principles.” It additionally alleges that agencies are violating the Administrative Procedures Act by instituting RIFs “contrary to regulations.” The suit points to regulations also cited by the Office of Personnel Management in its guidance on RIFs. Those regulations set out specific terms governing how and when agencies should engage in RIFs. The union suit argues, for instance, that the language in Trump’s EO directing agencies to prioritize employees who would be deemed “nonessential” during a government shutdown violates established RIF regulations. The Justice Department has yet to respond to the lawsuit. This latest suit from federal employee unions comes shortly after a judge in a separate case allowed the Trump administration’s “deferred resignation program” to move forward. The judge in that case ruled the three federal unions that had challenged the program lacked the standing they’d need to meet the legal standard for a temporary restraining order. It also comes as OPM on Thursday advised agencies to fire their probationary employees with less than a year on the job. While the Trump administration is moving quickly to reduce the federal workforce, Michael Fallings, a partner at Tully Rinckey, said they’ll have to follow established regulations for RIFs. The regulations also require agencies to give employees at least 30 days notice before they’re laid off. The EO is also trying to prioritize certain classes of employees, as far as employees that are connected to DEI or probationary employees, and that’s not necessarily matching with the current regulations on reductions in force,” Fallings said. “So I think this executive order, and the other executive orders, show an intent by this administration to just quickly get to the goal of reducing the government even though it doesn’t align with the well-established federal regulations on layoffs and buyout offers.”
SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX5vImHP9LA Tom Friedman Examines the Beginning of the Second Trump Term: A Charlie Rose Global Conversation
We talk of many things including the US election, the new Trump administration, executive orders and constitutional challenges, the global economy and tariffs, Elon Musk, JD Vance, cabinet appointments and Democratic resistance, Israel and Palestinians, Europe and NATO, Iran and North Korea, Greenland and Panama, and big tech like artificial intelligence and big ideas like the end of the post-World War II liberal order, and the rise of new imperialism.
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
|
User login |
policies....
Democrats Keep Convincing Themselves Their Problem Is Podcasts (It’s Their Policies)
BY: EDDIE SCARRY
Over the next month, The New York Times is running conversations with Democrat leaders on one of its podcasts about how the party will “win back the voters who moved toward” Donald Trump. I’ll just go ahead and summarize what each subject is likely to say, which is some variation of “We need better messaging and media strategy, and regarding our policies, no changes necessary.”
Such was the series’ inaugural episode, in which freshly sworn-in Democrat Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona did the same dance his party has been doing since November. On the one hand, he claimed that Democrats failed to “meet the moment,” and on the other, he didn’t name a single one of his party’s policies that voters rejected.
Like every other Democrat leader, Gallego hung the party’s defeat on everything but its grotesque policies that directly ignited wild inflation, flooded the country with millions of destitute migrants, and sparked two foreign hot wars that are sucking enormous U.S. attention and resources.
My favorite parts of the interview were when Gallego, who won his election by less than 100,000 votes (against Kari Lake), theorized on the best ways for his party to speak with voters — which is always described by Democrats as if they’re trying to learn how to communicate with nonverbal prehistoric tribesmen. “I mean, so one of the things I did is I would host morning tacos at work sites, right, during the election,” he said. “So I would go set up, knowing when the 5:30 a.m. shift was coming off, and I’d set up tacos. And I’d hand out tacos to the dudes, and I’d talk to them about life. And we have to understand where they are. We have to understand what they’re hearing.”
Gallego went on to say working-class Latino men are forming their political opinions by “hearing it from the one dude that heard it from WhatsApp, or the one dude that’s listening to talk radio.” He said, “There’s no one saying like, Well, actually, I heard from another guy that Democrats are actually doing this. Doesn’t happen. It just doesn’t happen because there’s no way for us to give them that information, because we’re not going to where they are.”
This is the irksome language Democrats excel at when they either have no idea what they’re talking about, or, more commonly, don’t want to admit they’ve made a royal mess on the mattress. Democrats don’t have talk radio and WhatsApp to plead their case? Yes, they do. They’re not at some difficult disadvantage of the medium. They’re invited everywhere. But fewer and fewer voters are interested in what they’re selling.
In another portion of the interview, Gallego offered up my favorite excuse for the Democrat electoral failure of 2024: They weren’t busy showing up on podcasts. “What else is the difference is that the way Trump communicates is actually more apt to get younger Latino men voters, because where they gather their information, where they listen to politics, is where Trump is more often, versus where we are,” he said. “He’s on podcasts all the time. He’s at U.F.C. fights. He’s at all these things where they actually see him being a real quote unquote man. I also warned Democrats about that. We needed to get out there.”
Gallego also said he had “wanted President Biden to go to the Copa America game and sit next to some Latino celebrity.” Of Democrats, he said, “Let’s go to some boxing matches, right? Let’s take some Democrats to boxing matches where a lot of Latinos are.” It would have been fun to watch, if not for the reasons the senator had hoped for. (The thought of Charles Schumer and Nancy Pelosi pretending to enjoy mingling with minorities is hilarious.)
It’s all the same. They insist their problems were rooted in being unable to speak some undefined but apparently highly complicated language (“quote unquote man”) and say nothing of how they ruined everything with the destructive policies they enacted.
Sending Joe Biden to a cage match was not going to make him popular. Trotting Kamala Harris out to sell empanadas was not going to change anything. There isn’t a podcast in the world that would have convinced middle-income voters their personal finances were solid.
There will be a different Democrat interviewed by the Times at the end of this week. He will say the same thing as Gallego.
Eddie Scarry is the D.C. columnist at The Federalist and author of "Liberal Misery: How the Hateful Left Sucks Joy Out of Everything and Everyone."
https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/17/democrats-keep-convincing-themselves-their-problem-is-podcasts-its-their-policies/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.