SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
hatred of the russians, after having flogged the blacks....THE STORY OF SCOTT RITTER’S DAUGHTER AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY WHERE SOME OF THE FUTURE LEADERS, OFFICERS AND PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE TRAINED IN FULL-BLOWN RUSSOPHOBIA IS FRIGHTENING. I KNEW OF THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE CIA AND THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM IN AMERICA… AS WE’VE DISCOVERED RECENTLY WITH THE ELECTION OF TRUMP BY THE “GARBAGE”, EDUCATED PEOPLE TEND TO VOTE DEMOCRATS AND APPEAR ON “THE VIEW” — WHILE THE OI-POLOI VOTED “republican” WHICH WAS NOT SO MUCH FOR THE loony REPUBLICANS BUT FOR A DECLARED FELON, A SEXIST, A RACIST BOMBASTIC CLOWN WHO DOES NOT CARE MUCH FOR THE “AMERICAN CONSTITUTION” ACCORDING TO EDUCATED JOURNALISTS… UNWASHED PEOPLE LOVE THAT. THEY DISTRUST EDUCATED DEMOCRATS WHO KNOW EVERYTHING.
SO WE HAVE RE-WRITTEN THE RAISON D’êTRE OF THIS OLDEST CATHOLIC UNIERSITY IN THE USA: GEORGE TOWN UNIVERSITY: We’re a LOUSY research university with AN ANTI-RUSSIA heart. Founded in the decade that the U.S. Constitution was signed, we’re the nation’s oldest Catholic and Jesuit university. Today we’re a BACKward-looking, NARROW MINDED community devoted to DESTROYING RUSSIA, restless IGNORANCE and DISrespect for each RUSSIAN’s individual needs and talents IN RUSSIA (AND UKRAINE). (OUR RUSSOPHOBIA IS LEGENDARY) You’ll come to Georgetown to deepen your ANGER and ANTI-RUSSIA beliefs — AND DEVELOP AN ANTI-RUSSIA PERSPECTIVE SHOULD YOU HAVE NONE… You’ll leave as the person you were always meant to be: AN ANTI-RUSSIA BASTARD. Your heart and mind will CLOSE-UP as you connect with a community that shares a commitment to DESTROY RUSSIA BEYOND SMITHEREENS…
THIS IS THE CURRICULUM OF ALL AMERICAN COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, BUT WE DO IT BETTER!
------------------ MEANWHILE: From Georgetown to Langley: The controversial connection between a prestigious university and the CIA
By Alan MacLeod
If you have ever wondered, “where do America’s spies come from?” the answer is quite possibly the Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS) at Georgetown University. It is only a modestly-seized institution, yet the school provides the backbone for the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, State Department, and other organs of the national security state. From overthrowing foreign governments and conducting worldwide psychological operations to overseeing drug and gun smuggling and a global torture network, the CIA is perhaps the world’s most controversial and dangerous organization. All of which begs the question, should an educational institution have any formal relationship with it, let alone such a storied school as Georgetown? Yet, with more than two dozen ex-CIA officials among its teaching staff, the school tailors its courses towards producing the next generation of analysts, assassins, coup-plotters and economic hitmen, fast-tracking graduates into the upper echelons of the national security state. The CIA has also quietly funded the SFS, as journalist Will Sommer revealed. The agency, based in Langley, VA, secretly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund the department’s work, despite Georgetown insisting on its website that this money came from anonymous donations from individuals. SPY FACTORYAny number of “how to join the CIA” articles suggest studying at the School of Foreign Service, and the university itself leans into its reputation as a spy factory. “We have global thinkers in Georgetown… They are attractive to the intel community in both the public and private sectors,” Anne Steen, then-executive director of the SFS’ graduate career center, told CNBC in 2018, adding, “There are elements to intelligence that didn’t even exist ten years ago whether it is cyber or artificial intelligence, and our students are on the cutting edge.” There were 377 SFS graduates in academic year 2021, pursuing courses in security studies, foreign service, or a range of area-specific degrees, including Arab, Asian, Latin American or Eurasian and East European Studies. Perhaps the most CIA-specific degree on offer is security studies, with Georgetown itself claiming that “we offer a multidisciplinary master’s degree designed to prepare graduates for positions within the defense and security fields” and that the staff “recognize the benefit of having students who are currently working or interning in the security field.” In other words, CIA agents often go back to Georgetown to acquire skills that an academic environment can offer. According to Georgetown’s own reports, 47% of security studies graduates “quickly go into the public sector,” the lion’s share finding work in intelligence or the military. The CIA is the number one public employer of security studies grads, followed by the Department of Defense, Department of State, the Army and the Navy. The top private-sector employers are largely military contractors, including Booz Allen Hamilton, SAIC and Northrop Grumman. The report claims that those working in the world of intelligence and security consider a School of Foreign Service security studies degree to be a “must have” credential. This Georgetown-to-Langley pipeline is so well-established that the university even publisheda guide to applying to the agency on its website, filled with useful lists of dos and don’ts. Meanwhile, the School of Foreign Service offers its students the opportunity to hold one-to-one meetings with CIA recruiters, although it notes that these interviews are reserved for students who are not already in contact with the agency themselves. Last month, the SFS invited current CIA Director William J. Burns to campus, where it presented him with the Trainor Award for Excellence in the Conduct of Diplomacy. Burns turned the event into a recruitment drive, stating in his speech: “Nothing has ever given me greater pride than to serve my country with honor. It’s a lesson that I’ve learned and relearned over the past four decades, and I hope all the students in this audience will explore its promise.” Burns’ words echoed those of his CIA predecessor Leon Panetta, who, in addition to being the agency’s chief, was also Secretary of Defense. During a speech at Georgetown, Panetta praised the institution’s “leadership in the study of global security.” As he explained, I have had a deep and abiding respect for Georgetown throughout the almost 40 to 50 years that I’ve been involved in public service. And I have a deep respect for the generation of leaders that have gone forward from this campus to serve our nation.” Panetta added that, throughout his time in the national security state, he was surrounded by Georgetown graduates, describing them as: Talented, young individuals who have been at my side every day for the last four years, at both the CIA and the Pentagon, and I am deeply grateful for their work on behalf of me and on behalf of the nation. And I’m deeply grateful to Georgetown for training such extraordinary public servants.” In addition to training spies, the SFS also produces many of the country’s top journalists, including alternative media host Saagar Enjeti. When Enjeti left his job as host of The Hill’s show, “Rising,” he was replaced by another SFS graduate, Emily Miller. Interestingly, Enjeti himself was a replacement for original host Buck Sexton, a former CIA analyst. SPOOKS AND STUDENTSIt is not just the students, however, that are associated with the Central Intelligence Agency. Studying the faculty, MintPress found at least 25 staff at the School of Foreign Service alone who once worked for or with the agency. There were many other former CIA agents in other departments, while other SFS staff also worked at different institutions within the national security state. Although the full extent of their activities remains classified and unknown to the public, many of these academics’ biographies hint at a dark past. For example, Michael Walker spent 29 years at the CIA before joining the SFS’ Center for Security Studies (CSS) as an adjunct professor, During the 1980s, Walker was stationed in Afghanistan, where he presumably played a role in Operation Cyclone, the CIA’s arming and training of Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen to oppose the Soviet invasion. Bin Laden would later use his skills to attack the U.S. on September 11, 2001. Walker would later return to Afghanistan to help the CIA oversee the U.S. occupation of the country. He eventually became the CIA’s Near East and South Asia Director, putting him directly in charge of CIA operations across the region. Around six million people have been killed and between 37 and 59 million displaced as a result of American actions in the region in the past two decades. Another CSS academic with a similarly dark past is Douglas London. London enjoyed a 34-year stint at the CIA, where he worked as a senior operations officer, a chief of station, and the agency’s counterterrorism chief for South and Southwest Asia. During London’s time in that region, the CIA was involved in attacking Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria and the bombing of Pakistan and Yemen. Perhaps most infamously, however, it also oversaw the notorious Abu Ghraib prison, where CIA officers routinely tortured and raped victims, including children. Manadel al-Jamadi was beaten and tortured to death inside the prison. His identity and fate were completely unknown until 2004 when images of grinning U.S. officials posed with their thumbs up beside his body. While there is no evidence that London was directly involved with Abu Ghraib, the fact that he was a CIA leader during the darkest days of the post-9/11 wars in the Middle East should be a black mark against him, not an asset that gets him a job at one of America’s most prestigious universities. Other CIA-linked academics at the School of Foreign Service include: • Paula Doyle. Currently an adjunct professor of practice at the SFS’ Center for Security Studies (CSS), in 2016, Doyle retired from an 18-year career at the agency, where she rose to become associate deputy director of operations. Between 2012 and 2014, she was deputy national counterintelligence executive and oversaw the U.S. response to the Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning leaks. • Burton Gerber. Another CSS professor, Gerber spent 39 years in the CIA. His work focussed on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. He was the CIA chief of station in three former Warsaw Pact countries. • Scott Modell. In his 13-year career, which saw him become a senior officer in the CIA’s National Clandestine Service, Modell specialized in Iran and Latin America, where he served multiple tours. After leaving the agency, he worked as a special advisor to U.S. Special Operation Command and as a fellow of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a hawkish Washington think tank. An SFS graduate himself, since 2019, he has taught security studies at Georgetown. • Sue Terry. Another former CSIS fellow, Terry was a senior analyst for the CIA between 2001 and 2008, specializing in Korean issues. She later joined the National Security Council and was deputy national intelligence officer for East Asia and Oceania. Today, she teaches Asian Studies at the SFS. • Dennis Wilder. Wilder spent more than 30 years working in intelligence, the culmination of which came in 2015 when the CIA appointed him deputy assistant director for East Asia and the Pacific. A Georgetown graduate, he now teaches at the SFS. • David Robarge. Robarge joined the CIA in 1989 and became a political and leadership analyst on the Middle East. He was appointed chief historian of the agency in 2005. He is now an adjunct professor within the CSS. • Paul Pillar. Currently a non-resident senior fellow at the CSS, professor Pillar spent 28 years in the U.S. intelligence community, serving in a number of senior roles, including as the executive assistant to the CIA director William Webster. • Paul Miller. Not to be confused with Paul Pillar, Paul Miller is a Professor in the Practice of International Affairs at the SFS. A White House staffer under both the Bush and Obama administrations, he also worked for the National Security Council, as an intelligence analyst for the CIA and in military intelligence for the U.S. Army. • Joseph Gartin. After a long career, Gartin retired from the CIA in 2019, where he served as deputy associate director for talent and as chief learning officer. To this day, however, he is the managing editor of Studies in Intelligence, the CIA’s in-house journal. At Georgetown, he is a practitioner in residence of the university’s master of science in foreign service program. • Matthew Kroenig. Before joining academia, Kroenig held a wide range of senior positions in the U.S. national security state, including in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and at the CIA. In addition to being a professor in the SFS, he is a senior member of the Atlantic Council, a NATO think tank. • Anand Arun. With nearly two decades of experience in the field, Arun is a senior intelligence officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency and an adjunct assistant professor at the CSS. Between 2018 and 2020, he worked at CIA headquarters in Langley, VA, as the President’s Daily Briefer to the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. • Kenneth Pollack. Pollack began his career as a Persian Gulf military analyst at the CIA and was later Director for Near East and South Asian Affairs and Director for Persian Gulf Affairs. He currently teaches at the CSS. • Andrew Borene. In addition to being a CSS adjunct assistant professor, Borene is currently the associate vice president of research at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence University. His Georgetown biography notes that he worked as an advisor to leaders at the CIA. • Catherine Lotrionte. Lotrionte is the director of the Institute for Law, Science and Global Security and a visiting assistant professor of government and foreign service at Georgetown. Prior to that, she was Assistant General Counsel at the CIA’s Office of General Counsel and a counsel on the president’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board at the White House. • Laura Manning Johnson. Early in her national security career, Manning Johnson was a biological warfare analyst at the CIA. After 9/11, she was detailed to the White House as the first Director of Central Intelligence Representative to the Office of Homeland Security, as well as a member of Vice-President Dick Cheney’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Review. She is now an adjunct professor at the SFS. • John Gentry. Gentry teaches an undergraduate course at Georgetown on the U.S. intelligence community. He has extensive experience in the subject, having spent 12 years at the CIA working as an intelligence analyst. • Jonathan Massicot. In addition to his role at the CSS, Massicot is the senior political-military advisor on Russia for the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Between 2008 and 2021 worked as a senior analyst at the CIA. • Bruce Hoffman. A tenured professor at the SFS, Hoffman was scholar-in-residence for counterterrorism at the Central Intelligence Agency between 2004 and 2006 and also an advisor on counterterrorism to the Office of National Security Affairs. • Russell Rumbaugh. Rumbaugh left his position at the CSS in January to become Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller). Between 2004 and 2005, he was a military analyst at the CIA. • William Costanza. Now an adjunct assistant professor at the CSS, Costanza came to Georgetown after a 25-year career as a CIA case officer, where he specialized in targeting and intelligence collecting. • Candice Frost. Colonel Frost completed a war college fellowship at the CIA and then served as the Director of Foreign Intelligence for the Army G-2 at the Pentagon. She currently teaches at the CSS. • Richard Schroeder. After a long career as a CIA officer, Schroeder became an adjunct associate professor at Georgetown, teaching a number of graduate and undergraduate courses within the SFS. • Marie Harf. Harf began her career with the CIA in 2006, first serving as a Middle East analyst, then as the agency’s media spokesperson. Between 2013 and 2017, she worked as the State Department’s deputy media spokesperson. Today, she is the executive director of external relations and marketing for the SFS. The biographies of many of these individuals suggest that they were intimately involved in many of the CIA’s most infamous operations. Added to that, the sheer number of spies teaching at the Georgetown School of Foreign Service suggests that their role is to train, oversee and select the next generation of operatives, all done in the rarefied confines of an elite university campus. A BLOODY HISTORYAlthough Georgetown presents the organization as a respectable group defending freedom and advancing liberty, since its founding in 1947, the CIA has repeatedly been implicated in many of the worst modern-era crimes against humanity. The agency has played a central role in countless U.S. attempts to overthrow foreign governments, many of them democratically elected ones. In Iran in 1953, the CIA successfully overthrew the secular reformist government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and installed the Shah as a dictator. Twenty years later, in Chile, it helped to overthrow the democratically elected socialist government of Salvador Allende and shored up the brutal rule of fascist military dictator Augusto Pinochet. More recently, the organization has been implicated in numerous regime change attempts against the government of Venezuela. Maintaining America’s place as a global hegemon is no easy task and often relies on extreme cruelty. To this end, the CIA operates a worldwide network of “Black Sites”—prison camps where captives are tortured. Some of the agency’s torture techniques were directly copied from the Nazis, many of whom the CIA assisted in escaping punishment after the Second World War. Gun- and drug-running are also key parts of the CIA’s repertoire. During the 1980s, the agency worked closely with its Pakistani counterpart, the ISI, to funnel $2 billion worth of arms and assistance to Afghan militants, including the now-infamous Osama bin Laden. The agency also sold weapons to Iran and used the proceeds to fund death squads in Nicaragua that would go on to carry out countless massacres against peasants, women, schoolchildren and other “soft targets.” The CIA allegedly helped fund this dirty war against the Nicaraguan people through the sale of crack cocaine in black neighborhoods across the United States, linking far-right paramilitary armies with U.S. drug kingpins like Rick Ross. In this light, then, some might see so many ex-CIA officials at Georgetown training the next generation in their craft as deeply problematic. Another key CIA role is to spread disinformation. Investigators in the 1970s found that over 400 American journalists were secretly either CIA agents or on its payroll, and the agency had secretly set up a wide array of magazines, newspapers and journals and published a huge number of books. This penetration of the media has likely only become more extensive in recent times. MintPress News investigations have found the presence of dozens of “former” CIA agents working in key positions in big tech companies such as Google and Facebook, effectively deciding what the entire world sees in its newsfeeds. A LONGTIME PARTNERSHIPThe cozy relationship between Georgetown and the CIA is not a new phenomenon. In 1980, a student magazine, The Georgetown Voice, published an article discussing what it called a “special relationship” and an “unholy alliance” between the university and the CIA. In the eyes of Father Richard McSorley, a Jesuit priest and professor of Peace Studies at Georgetown, this partnership was a “disgrace,” and it was “harmful for Georgetown University to have persons on campus who represent an organization guilty of severe violations of law, morality and human dignity.” McSorley wrote the CIA off as nothing more than a “club of assassins, saboteurs and coup directors.” Despite McSorley’s denunciations, the relationship persevered. A 1986 New York Times article noted that Georgetown was the number one school for agency recruits. Going even further back, President Nixon was known to grumble about his National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger and his “Georgetown set.” Kissinger was a professor at the School of Foreign Service and filled the White House and the State Department with handpicked students he had taught. To this day, the national security state is filled with Georgetown graduates. This includes no less than five living former CIA directors, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, current Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, ex-White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, and arch neoconservative war planner Frank Gaffney (although not all of them attended the SFS). In 2020, Politicoreported that Georgetown was also the top feeder school to the State Department. If Georgetown is CIA-U, then it is perhaps unsurprising that In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capitalist wing, is full to the brim with its graduates as well. In-Q-Tel was set up to nurture and sponsor new hi-tech companies that will work with the CIA to provide them with cutting-edge technology. Searching through employment databases and social networks such as LinkedIn shows dozens of individuals who have gone through the Georgetown-to-CIA pipeline. These include Vishal Sandesara, In-Q-Tel VP of Operations, Deputy General Counsel Jeremy Joseph, Senior Partner Brian Smith, Vice President Russel Ross, and Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President Matt Strottman. Washington, D.C., is full of spies; the D.C.-based International Spy Museum estimates that there are 10,000 in the city. Locals and tourists alike can even book a walking tour called “the spies of Georgetown,” led by a former CIA officer. Like so many before them, a good deal of these individuals will have started their professional careers at the School of Foreign Service. While some may balk at such a prestigious institution being used as a spy school, Georgetown has found a lucrative niche, and it is sticking to it. Georgetown University did not respond when asked to comment on this article. Monthly Review does not necessarily adhere to all of the views conveyed in articles republished at MR Online. Our goal is to share a variety of left perspectives that we think our readers will find interesting or useful. —Eds. About Alan MacLeodAlan MacLeod is a MintPress Staff Writer as well as an academic and writer for Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. His book, Bad News From Venezuela: Twenty Years of Fake News and Misreporting was published in April.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
SEE ALSO: https://thehoya.com/guide/slavery/ Built by Slaves and Jesuits By Suzanne Monyak • January 30, 2015Established in 1789, Georgetown University is an institution 226 years in the making. From its more historic buildings like Healy Hall and Old North to its newer additions like the Rafik B. Hariri Building and Regents Hall, the campus flows with longstanding tradition mixed with modern change. In its post-Revolutionary War years, the makeup of Georgetown’s community was far from diverse. Populated by Jesuits and an all-male, white, Christian student body, and supported by plantations run on African slave labor, Georgetown was indeed a product of its time. Yet, as the university battled with perpetual debt and the changing tide of public opinion in the beginning of the 19th century, its own perspective gradually shifted. Slowly, the racial paradigm transformed and the long-held institution of slavery collapsed from the top down, fusing the fate of African culture and the Jesuit tenets held by the university in dynamic and completely unexpected ways. As modern African-American studies historian Thomas Murphy, S.J., puts it, slavery was an institution that signified “the assertion of their own right and the right of Catholic layman in the colony to be accorded the full rights of English subjects.” Slave owning was also seen as a push for religious liberty — an extension of their Jesuit mission and an opportunity to spread Catholicism. By owning slaves, Jesuits believed they were protecting them from crueler Protestant slaveholders, who often denied their slaves the sacrament of baptism. Jesuit slave owners raised their slaves Catholic and allowed them to be baptized, receive the Eucharist and marry. Jesuits believed that slaveholding brought them closer to God, using Loyola’s “Spiritual Exercises” as justification and inspiration for slaveholding practices. Beneath these well-intentioned beliefs was a dogged adherence to the racial status quo. Maryland Jesuit Br. Joseph P. Mobberley S.J., addressed the issue of religion and slavery in an essay he wrote in 1818. He, like many other Jesuit slave owners at the time, saw the abolitionistmovement as a Protestant movement that threatened to destroy established religious and social culture. “Can a man serve God faithfully & possess slaves? Yes. … Is it then lawful to keep men in servitude? Yes. I know there is at this time a prevailing opinion in the U. States, ‘that all men are free; that God never made one man to serve another; that it is against the divine law to possess slaves, and that it is much more criminal to sell them.’ This opinion is nothing less than a compound of Presbyterianism, Baptism [sic], Quakerism and Methodism,” he wrote. Another Maryland Jesuit, Francis Dzierozynski, S.J., echoed Mobberley’s sentiment, calling the Jesuit plantations a “perpetual good” and the slaves “children whose well-being has been given to us by God.”
|
User login |
in berlin....
A major Berlin university canceled a public lecture by Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian territories, following pressure from the Berlin mayor. Many academics are outraged.
Controversy has erupted in Germany after two major universities cancelled events featuring the UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, following pressure from state governments. Several academics and organizations have condemned the decision as a violation of academic freedom.
Francesca Albanese was due to speak at the Free University (FU) in Berlin on February 19 along with Eyal Weizman, the British-Israeli director of the research agency Forensic Architecture. But university authorities decided to cancel the public event after what FU President Günter M. Ziegler described as "massive criticism of the two guests from different directions."
Another lecture by Albanese, at the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich, had already been canceled a few days before.
The criticism in Berlin included statements from the Israeli ambassador to Germany and the city's conservative Mayor Kai Wegner, who told the Bild tabloid newspaper earlier this month: "I expect the FU to cancel the event immediately and take a clear stand against antisemitism."
Anti-Defamation League criticizes special rapporteurAlbanese has previously been condemned by the US-based Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for using what it calls antisemitic tropes. The ADL particularly objected to posts on social media platform X in which Albanese drew historical parallels between Israel's military actions in Gaza and the Nazi era, in which she wrote: "Our collective obliviousness to what led, 100 years ago, to the Third Reich’s expansionism and the genocide of people not in conformity with the 'pure race' is asinine. And it is leading to the commission of yet another genocide..."
The ADL also condemned a post by Albanese in which she denied that the Hamas attack was motivated by antisemitism, in a response to a statement by French President Emmanuel Macron: "The greatest antisemitic massacre of our century? No, @EmmanuelMacron. The victims of 7/10 were not killed because of their Judaism but in response to Israel's oppression."
There has also been anger over an X post in which Albanese appeared to respond approvingly to a post that set images of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Adolf Hitler next to each other. Albanese later clarified that her comment was about how a person who commits crimes against humanity is sometimes received with honors by the public.
Eyal Weizman's Forensic Architecture, meanwhile, has attracted criticism from Israel's supporters for its long-term data investigation of the military action in Gaza, entitled "A Cartography of Genocide."
There were accusations that the FU Berlin was giving a platform to antisemitism from the German-Israeli Society (DIG), whose president Volker Beck wrote in a statement on February 9, "At the Free University of Berlin, one gets the impression that freedom is only given to antisemitic positions, and that antisemitism is not consistently challenged and countered."
Berlin's Science Minister Ina Czyborra also chimed in, saying, "In my view, Ms. Albanese's statements meet all the criteria of antisemitism, and I question whether the safety of Jewish students can be guaranteed at an event planned in this way."
Czyborra's office did not respond to a DW request to clarify which statements or which criteria of antisemitism she was referring to.
Both the FU Berlin and the LMU in Munich are members of the German Rectors' Conference (HRK), which in 2019 resolved to adopt the working definition of antisemitism set out by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). That definition is considered controversial by many, including Israeli civil society organizations, as they believe it protects the Israeli government from legitimate criticism.
The events also come against the backdrop of a resolution titled "Antisemitism in Universities and Schools" passed in late January in the German parliament, intended among other measures to "prevent the activities of groups that spread Israel-related anti-Semitism"; the resolution also came under heavy criticism by Jewish and non-Jewish groups alike, who said it could stifle academic freedom and lead to silencing and censorship.
'We will sit outside the university if necessary'German universities have become the focus of rows over the conflict in Gaza and German society's response to it. The FU Berlin's leadership caused controversy last year when it called in the police to clear a protest camp that had been set up on the university grounds. That decision prompted a letter of protest from around 100 Berlin academics at the time, which itself triggered angry statements from many German politicians.
FU President Ziegler said that activist groups had advertised and "taken over" the event where Albanese was due to speak, to the extent that they had given the impression they were co-organizers or partners of the university. This, he said, meant that there was an "acute danger" of a "large conflict in the hall."
In the current situation, Ziegler added, it was therefore impossible to "sensibly guarantee the safety" of participants. As an alternative, the FU offered to move the event behind closed doors and make it accessible online. That idea was dismissed by Weizman, who posted on X that they would show up at the university at the appointed time anyway:
"We will be there and will engage whoever comes to attend, whether inside or outside the building. We refuse to turn this into a closed door meeting," he wrote. "We will sit outside the university if necessary, wherever freedom still exists in Germany."
Another Berlin event scheduled for Tuesday featuring Albanese and Weizman was forced to switch venues on the same day, after the original, larger venue was subjected to what the organizers, political party Diem25/Mera25, called "immense pressure from German politicians and the Berlin police to cancel the event."
The private event went ahead with a heavy police presence, with police and translators standing next to the stage, monitoring the content of all of the presenters, including Albanese.
"The fact that [the universities] deny the possibility to speak to a UN official, a UN independent expert, is very serious," Albanese told DW. "It has not happened in any other place."
Albanese discussed having fulfilled her mandate in countries all over the world but was surprised that two German public universities succumbed to apparent pressure from various actors to cancel her appearances.
"I was not expecting again universities to give in," she added. "If universities stop being spaces where we can also afford discussing difficult issues, painful issues, respectfully, in a dignified way, all the more as I speak about international law, international legal development, factual development — this is very serious. This is censorship."
Legal expert: Cancellation 'scandalous,' 'extraordinary'The FU Berlin's decision mirrored the one by the LMU in Munich a few days earlier, where Albanese had been due to speak about "colonialism, human rights, and international law" on February 16. That lecture was canceled by LMU citing alleged security concerns.
Such excuses appear to be unclear, according to some legal experts.
"The security concerns were never specified, so one must be afraid that they are spurious, and just a pretext, and the real reason is the pressure from the press, from interest groups, and indeed from the mayor of Berlin," said Ralf Michaels, director of the Max Planck Institute for comparative and international law in Hamburg, about the cancelation at FU Berlin.
Michaels called the cancellation "scandalous."
"Even among events that get canceled in Germany, this one is extraordinary," he told DW. "First, opposing Albanese's right to speak is also a kick in the eye for the United Nations and for public international law. Secondly, the fact that the political branch, the mayor of Berlin himself, demands to have a say in what events take place [at] the university, is a gross violation of the autonomy of universities."
'Pernicious' nature of political 'censorship'Weizman was also outraged by the cancellation.
"The event in question appears to have been cancelled because the Israeli embassy and the office of the mayor of Berlin now dictate the curriculum for students in Germany," he said in a statement to DW.
Weizman added: "Politicians are encouraging universities to censor esteemed international voices for the rule of law, based on pernicious and manipulative interpretations of the statements and actions of those individuals, and universities are taking full part in that censorship. How much louder must the warnings from history be?"
"The speakers are by no means radicals," Michaels added. "One is a special rapporteur of the UN human rights council; the other is a widely regarded and prizewinning researcher in his field. So whatever one thinks of their opinions, they are certainly not mere political ideologues."
Robert Brockhaus, attorney at KM8 Lawyers in Berlin and a member of the advisory board of the online legal media platform Verfassungsblog, said that the compromise the university offered — to hold the event online and behind closed doors — betrayed its inconsistency.
"If Albanese is an antisemite and is not allowed to speak, then that should also be true for an online event," he told DW. "It takes away the very function of the university — to be a public space of public debate and exchange — to move an event into a small room with a handful of people."
Edited by: Kyra Levine
https://www.dw.com/en/germany-anger-over-cancelled-talks-by-un-special-rapporteur-for-palestinian-territories/a-71662122
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
HYPOCRISY ISN’T ONE OF THE SINS OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.
HENCE ITS POPULARITY IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS…