SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
I cannot commit war crimes against humanity because I'm not human....
Donald Trump risks turning America into a "rogue state," a former U.S. ambassador for war crimes issues warned Wednesday after the president threatened to bomb power stations and desalination plants in Iran. Stephen J. Rapp, who served as U.S. ambassador-at-large for war crimes issues from 2009 to 2015, said he was disturbed by Trump's threats to Iran if it does not reopen the Strait of Hormuz and agree to end the war the United States and Israel launched a month ago.
Trump's Iran threats alarm war crimes experts CHANTAL DA SILVA
"It makes us a rogue state," said Rapp, who served as chief of prosecutions at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda from 2001 to 2007 and the chief prosecutor of the Special Court for Sierra Leone from 2007 to 2009. He and two other experts in international law who spoke to NBC News said Trump's threats alone could represent a possible war crime. On Monday, Trump said that if an agreement was not reached and if the Strait of Hormuz, a key trade route through which 20% of the world’s oil supply passes, was not immediately reopened, he would destroy civilian energy infrastructure “and possibly all desalinization plants," which he said the U.S. had "purposefully not yet ‘touched.” “Great progress has been made but, if for any reason a deal is not shortly reached, which it probably will be, and if the Hormuz Strait is not immediately 'Open for Business,' we will conclude our lovely 'stay' in Iran by blowing up and completely obliterating all of their Electric Generating Plants, Oil Wells and Kharg Island (and possibly all desalinization plants!), which we have purposefully not yet “touched,”” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Tehran has denied progress in talks. Trump said the attacks would be carried out "in retribution for our many soldiers, and others, that Iran has butchered and killed over the old Regime’s 47 year 'Reign of Terror'." Asked for a response to some experts' assessments that Trump’s comments about targeting civilian infrastructure risk turning the U.S. into a “rogue state,” a White House official said, “The terrorist Iranian regime has brought upon egregious human rights abuses for 47 years, including brutally killing its own people for merely speaking out against its oppressive rule. By achieving the military objectives stated under Operation Epic Fury, President Trump is making the entire region safer and more stable by eliminating Iran’s short- and long-term threats to our country and our allies.” Trump, who is expected to address the nation Wednesday night for an update on the war, said Tuesday that the U.S. planned to leave Iran within two or three weeks, with or without a deal, though it was not clear whether he planned to uphold his threat to destroy civilian infrastructure. On Wednesday, he claimed Iran was seeking a "ceasefire" in the war, which he said the U.S. would consider once Hormuz was reopened. Tehran did not immediately respond to this assertion either. 'Not much question'To attack desalination plants, upon which millions of people across the Middle East rely for drinking water, Rapp said, "would definitely be a war crime." “Not much question about that,” he said. Kenneth Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, agreed, adding in separate comments: “Even attacks on power plants are war crimes.” He noted that Iran has a unified electrical grid, meaning its military uses the same electricity as civilians. “The harm to civilians ... is clearly disproportionate to any military benefit,” he added. Under international humanitarian law, civilian sites cannot be made the “object of attack or of reprisals." The only exception is if they are used for military purposes, but attacks must still adhere to the principles of international law. In his threat, Trump said that such attacks on civilian infrastructure would be carried out as “retribution” for the deaths of U.S. military members, with at least 13 service members killed in the war, while two more have died of noncombat causes. More than 3,000 people have been killed across the region in the war, with at least 1,900 people estimated killed in Iran under Israeli and American strikes and more than 1,300 killed in Lebanon, while 19 people have died in Israel. Human rights groups have said that in addition to the U.S., Israel and Iran have committed possible war crimes during the monthlong conflict. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on criticisms of Trump’s threats to target civilian infrastructure in Iran. During a news conference Tuesday, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, appeared to try to downplay Trump’s threats. Hailing the U.S. military as “the most professional force in the world,” Caine said it had “numerous processes and systems to carefully consider the whole range of considerations, from civilian risk to legal considerations.” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt separately said Monday that the U.S. military would always operate within the “confines of the law.” David J. Scheffer, who served as the first U.S. ambassador-at-large for war crimes issues and led the American delegation to the United Nations talks for establishing the International Criminal Court, said he wouldn't necessarily call America a "rogue state." However, the “entire international community” will be watching the conduct of U.S. forces in the Iran war — "and will reach conclusions that could easily identify the United States as a nation that is not complying with international law,” he said. The U.S., Israel and Iran are not signatories to the International Criminal Court, which investigates and tries crimes of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Threats as war crimes International law experts also said that under international law, threatening to carry out a war crime can be considered a war crime in and of itself, although threats alone were unlikely to be prosecuted. "Even if the threat is not deemed a war crime in itself, it would be evidence of criminal intent, as opposed to an erroneous misfire, if the attack is carried out," according to Roth. While Rapp said Trump's comments could be put down to "bluster," he felt the president was “tearing up” Washington’s historic role in leading efforts to prosecute war crimes on the world stage, including in the Nuremberg trials, which saw top Nazi leaders prosecuted for their crimes during the Holocaust. Meanwhile, he warned that Trump's threats also risked creating a “permission structure for others to threaten or commit similar crimes.” Shadow of GazaThree former U.S. officials who resigned from the Biden administration over America's support for Israel's war in the Gaza Strip said the gravity of Trump's threats should not be downplayed. Josh Paul, who resigned from his role as director of congressional and public affairs for the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs in 2023, said there appeared to be a growing "willingness to commit" possible war crimes, "whether by the U.S. or certainly by some of its partners." "The fact that Trump feels he can use this in what almost seems like an idle threat, I think is part of what's so alarming about it ... given the context of Israel's absolute destruction of almost all civilian infrastructure in Gaza," said Annelle Sheline, who resigned the following year from the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor for the same reasons as Paul and whose work focused on the Middle East. Another expert expressed a similar view. "Once, you know, hospital after hospital, school after school, got bombed, journalist after journalist got killed, it became so normalized," said Hala Rharrit, a U.S. diplomat and veteran foreign service officer who stepped down from the State Department in 2024. "Now, when Trump makes the threat of attacking civilian infrastructure, many people don't even bat an eye." Israel rejects allegations that it has committed war crimes in Gaza, where at least 72,285 people have been killed across two and a half years of war, according to figures from the Palestinian Health Ministry. https://www.aol.com/articles/trumps-iran-threats-alarm-war-184840610.html
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951. RABID ATHEIST. WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….
SEE ALSO: wrong rose....
|
User login |
not new....
Trump earns new title: War criminal
May 17, 2019
BY ALBERT BENDER
Donald Trump, who has been called almost everything—racist demagogue, vulgar sexist, inept businessman, pathological liar, and moron—now assumes a new mantle: War Criminal.
His latest steps into the inner sanctums of infamy involve his granting a pardon on May 6 to an ex-soldier, First Lt. Michael Behenna, who shot to death a naked Iraqi civilian, Ali Mansur in 2009. The Iraqi man had been detained by U.S. military officials on suspicion that he had had knowledge of a roadside bombing that killed two American soldiers. After being interrogated by intelligence officers, however, Mansur’s release was ordered because of lack of evidence.
Behenna was ordered to drive Mansur home. But instead of taking the prisoner home as ordered, Behenna took Mansur to a railroad culvert, stripped him naked, questioned him at gunpoint, and shot him in the head and chest. This case attracted widespread attention across the U.S., bringing focus on the treatment of prisoners by the American military overseas.
Behenna was tried and sentenced to 25 years in prison, of which he served five, for unpremeditated murder in a combat zone. He was released on parole in 2014.
“This pardon is a presidential endorsement of a murder that violated the military’s own code of justice,” Hina Shamsi, the ACLU’s national security project director, said in a statement first reported by The Hill. Legally, this makes Trump an accomplice after the fact to a war crime. Legally, this makes Trump himself a war criminal. Also, this intervention amounts an obstruction of justice—sound familiar?
Trump’s pardon of Behenna is part of a larger trend of him intervening in cases of soldiers who have committed war crimes.
On March 30, Trump ordered the U.S. Navy to remove Edward Gallagher from Naval Consolidated Brig in Miramar, California, to less restrictive conditions. Gallagher, a Navy Seal, is accused of the grisly killing of a wounded teenage ISIS prisoner in 2017 and also of shooting Iraqi civilians and performing his re-enlistment ceremony next to a dead body. “I got him with my hunting knife” boasted Gallagher, allegedly texting a photo of himself cradling the dead teenager’s head in one hand while holding a knife in the other. He allegedly murdered the wounded prisoner by stabbing him in the neck and body. What next, a picture with a decapitated head?
Gallagher is facing a war crimes trial at the end of May. In March, Trump announced that Gallagher would be moved to “less restrictive confinement” pending his court date. He now has the freedom to move around the base until the trial.
Turning back the clock, the plot thickens as Trump has shown himself to be a shameless, brazen advocate of war crimes. In defending his CIA nominee, Gina Haspel, in 2018, Trump took a position in support of torture—a war crime under both international and U.S. law. Haspel was in charge of a secret prison in Thailand, where she reportedly carried out a grisly torture program, including the waterboarding of detainees. She also was allegedly responsible for the destruction of dozens of tapes recording episodes of torture.
Dubbed “ Bloody Gina” by protesters to her nomination, in June of 2017 the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) called on the Public Prosecutor General of Germany to issue an arrest warrant against Haspel involving claims she oversaw the torture of terrorism suspects. The criminal complaint and the follow-up submissions are under consideration by German prosecutors as part of a preliminary examination. Haspel is currently the Director of the CIA—a war criminal and international fugitive now heads the agency!
In July of 2017, Trump closed the U.S. war crimes office. This was the Office of Global Criminal Justice which advised the Secretary of State on cases involving war crimes and genocide. It was established by Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, in 1997. Its closing evoked a chorus of outrage from human rights advocates worldwide and presaged more support of war crimes by this iniquitous U.S. administration.
During his presidential campaign in 2015, Trump went so far to say he would force the U.S. military to commit war crimes. “The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families,” Trump said on Fox and Friends on Dec. 2, 2015. “They care about their lives, don’t kid yourself. When they say they don’t care about their lives, you have to take out their families.”
This brings to mind the many massacres of Indigenous women, children, and the elderly by the American military in the 18th and 19th centuries. Trump then said he would instruct the military to initiate interrogation torture practices far worse than waterboarding. He’s in favor of it because “we have to beat the savages.” Torture and retaliatory murders are both war crimes under international law.
“Don’t tell me it doesn’t work — torture works…. Waterboarding is fine, but it’s not nearly tough enough, ok?” he said.
The U.S. armed forces have been trained that an order to commit a war crime is not a legal order and must not be obeyed. Trump said on the campaign trail, “They won’t refuse. They’re not going to refuse me. If I say do it, they’re going to do it.” In effect, Trump said he would force the U.S. military to commit war crimes.
Next, in April of this year, the Trump administration revoked the visa of International Criminal Court (ICC) Chief Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, as part of a U.S. government effort to impede the tribunal’s investigation into alleged war crimes committed by the U.S. military in Afghanistan. The ICC is an international tribunal headquartered in The Hague, Netherlands, that prosecutes individuals for crimes of aggression, crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes—but only when other countries are unwilling to pursue these violations of international law.
At present, 124 nations have ratified the Rome Statute and are members of the ICC Assembly of States Parties. While the U.S. played a role in the establishment of the Rome Statute that created the ICC, the U.S is not a State Party. The Trump administration actively opposes its jurisdiction on the international stage.
The ICC’s decided not to pursue the investigation, and Trump called the panel’s ruling a “major international victory” for the U.S. military and targeted intelligence officers, as well as for the rule of law. Trump signaled that the current visa sanctions will remain in place and threatened to issue new ones if there are any “attempts to target Americans, Israeli, or allied personnel for prosecution.”
The U.S. public has to know the full extent of the lawlessness and racist animus of this executive who sits in the Oval Office. This monster who heads the U.S. government envisions a lawless regime that would rival Hitler’s Germany. Although substantial numbers of racist whites still support him, the saving grace for this country is that they are not the majority and that the U.S. is a multiracial country with a multiracial military.
As Democratic Congressman from California Adam Schiff recently said on the Sunday morning news program This Week with George Stephanopoulos, “The U.S. cannot survive four more years of Trump.”
Trump’s got to go.
https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/trump-earns-new-title-war-criminal/
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
RABID ATHEIST.
WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….