SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
EU not very relevant on global stage....
Sloppy decision-making and an inability to agree on key issues have rendered the EU effectively irrelevant on the global stage, the bloc’s former foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has argued. The former top diplomat made the remarks in an interview with Belgian broadcaster RTBF on Friday, somewhat echoing the stance of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The top official, who has been in power since 2019, has repeatedly urged the bloc to remove individual member states’ veto powers and move to qualified majority voting on foreign policy and defense issues. The bloc’s decision-making process has become inadequate in its ability to react to the ever-shifting global situation, Borrell has said, arguing the EU “was not designed for the world in which we live today”in the first place. “The decision-making rules are not compatible with the acceleration of history. We continue to want to decide unanimously on events that are happening too fast and are very important, and we almost never reach an agreement,” he said, adding that the current system makes the bloc “not very relevant to international politics.” Unlike von der Leyen with her majority voting approach, Borrell called for the creation of a new core group within the bloc to advance the EU’s positions on the global stage. “We need to build a union within the union. A union within the union means that with 27 members, even with unanimity, we won’t go any further. We’re held back. With 27, we won’t accomplish much. So we need to find another core group. Not the 27,” he said. The former top diplomat, however, did not outline the exact criteria for the potential members of said group, stating it should be composed of the “few who truly want to move forward with political, economic, and military integration” and those “who want to go further, faster.” Last week, the idea to abandon the EU’s unanimity principle was backed by Berlin, with German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul arguing that a switch to a qualified majority voting would “make the EU capable of acting in areas where it currently has to remain at a standstill.” The initiative has already been backed by at least 12 EU member states, according to Wadephul. https://www.rt.com/news/640078-eu-not-very-relevant/
THE CHOICES MADE BY THE BRUSSELS MAFIA HAVE BEEN DETRIMENTAL TO EUROPE... VON DER LEYEN IS A CORRUPT HORRORBLE FASCIST, KALLAS IS A DUMB BLOND AND MOST OF THE "LEADERS" OF EU COUNTRIES ARE AS POPULAR AS AN INVASION OF CANE TOADS IN AUSTRALIA. UNTIL A NEW CROP OF INTELLIGENT LEADERS [RIGHT LEFT OR MIDDLE] COMES TO TERMS WITH BEING NICE TO RUSSIA AND CHINA — INSTEAD OF BEING PATHETIC AND WARMONGERING — EUROPE WILL GO DOWN THE DRAIN OF IRRELEVANCE... EUROPE SHOULD STICK TO ITS RULES AND NOT TRY TO BE SMART BY FIDGETING WITH ITS CONSTITUTION. EUROPE SHOULD REJECT SUPPORTING THE NAZIS OF YUCKRAINE — A SUPPORT WHICH HAS BEEN THE MAIN OBSTACLE TO ITS WELL-BEING....
PLEASE VISIT: YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005. Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951. RABID ATHEIST. WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….
|
User login |
waning....
Europe’s sluggish drift into irrelevance
by Dr Ranjan Solomon
Europe is currently experiencing a profound and rapid decline in its global political and economic influence, characterized by a shift toward irrelevance on the world stage, internal fragmentation, and economic stagnation. Europe is no longer shaping the global order; it is increasingly reacting to forces shaped elsewhere. This deterioration is marked by widespread voter discontent, a growing reliance on U.S. leadership, and an inability to assert decisive influence in major global decisions.
Europe is having to deal with multiple drivers of decline. To begin with, there is the reality of economic stagnation and the gradual erosion of political confidence in the European project itself.
As of mid-2026, widespread voter discontent is driving a significant and ongoing shift in Europe’s political landscape, with populist and far-right parties consolidating power across the continent. This surge is fuelled by a combination of weak economic performance, anxieties over immigration, rising living costs, and deep dissatisfaction with traditional political elites. The cumulative effect of these crises has been the normalization of populist politics across much of Europe.
Populist, nationalist, and far-right parties expanded their influence following the 2024 European Parliament elections, where they secured roughly 36% of seats and established a formidable presence in national politics. Far-right or populist parties have topped polling or made significant gains in major countries including Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, and parts of Eastern Europe. In the United Kingdom, projections through early 2026 also indicated a volatile political shift marked by declining confidence in established parties.
Voters are increasingly directing their frustration toward ruling governments. High-profile leaders continue to suffer severe declines in public approval, including France’s President Emmanuel Macron and successive coalition governments in Germany. Immigration remains a politically explosive issue, with record numbers of migrants entering the European Union triggering fears around social cohesion, economic competition, and security. Populist parties have successfully transformed these anxieties into powerful electoral narratives.
Add to these tensions the reality of serious economic strain. While some modest recovery is expected in certain sectors, structural weaknesses, inflationary pressures, energy insecurity, industrial decline, and persistently high living costs continue to fuel public frustration. Europe’s once-admired social model is increasingly under pressure from austerity measures, demographic decline, and mounting fiscal constraints.
As of May 2026, political analysis confirms a period of severe political paralysis and low leadership approval in France and Germany, accompanied by a surge in far-right influence that is reshaping political norms. Right-wing populists in both countries have gained substantial traction, in some instances surpassing traditional parties in regional and national polling. Fragile coalition governments continue to navigate tensions within the European Union while struggling to maintain domestic legitimacy.
Bulgaria’s political scene has similarly witnessed a rise in anti-establishment rhetoric centred around opposition to corruption and what critics describe as a “mafia state.” Across Europe, the cumulative effect of these pressures has triggered a realignment of political alliances, forcing traditional centre-right parties to reconsider long-standing political “firewalls” against cooperation with far-right forces. What once appeared politically unthinkable is increasingly entering the mainstream.
President Emmanuel Macron today stands among the least popular leaders in the G7, with approval ratings falling into the low teens and disapproval levels hovering near 75 percent. Following his controversial 2024 decision to dissolve the National Assembly, Macron now governs within a fragmented parliament divided among three ideologically hostile blocs—centre, left, and far-right—making stable governance increasingly difficult. Marine Le Pen’s National Rally continues to rise steadily in polling, with many analysts now considering a far-right victory in the 2027 French presidential election a plausible outcome rather than a distant possibility.
Because of the absence of a stable parliamentary majority, Macron’s government has increasingly relied on constitutional manoeuvres to bypass parliamentary resistance. Critics view these methods as technocratic and authoritarian, deepening distrust toward political elites even as Macron attempts to maintain a forceful international image. Analysts suggest that weak leadership and declining democratic legitimacy across Europe have created what some describe as a “culture of comfortable expediency,” where governments manage crises rather than solve them.
The rise of the far-right is placing immense pressure on Europe’s traditional democratic consensus, particularly in France and Germany. The old assumption that liberal democratic institutions could indefinitely contain extremism no longer appears secure.
Europe is also confronting a steep demographic decline. Nations such as Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Greece are projected to lose substantial portions of their populations by the end of the century. Aging populations, declining birth rates, and outward migration are creating labour shortages and threatening long-term economic sustainability.
Many of Europe’s geopolitical and security concerns are further intensified by its dependence on the United States. Despite rhetoric around “strategic autonomy,” Europe has repeatedly fallen back on Washington’s leadership during major crises, particularly in relation to the war in Ukraine. The conflict exposed Europe’s military weaknesses, energy vulnerabilities, and strategic dependence on NATO and U.S. security guarantees.
The continent is struggling with internal divisions that hinder a unified response to external threats, including those posed by Russia and China. The Ukraine war has highlighted Europe’s weakened geopolitical position, while the urgent need to rebuild military capabilities now threatens the sustainability of the European welfare model itself. To combat decline, some analysts advocate reducing welfare spending, integrating capital markets, increasing defence expenditure, and fostering a more aggressively competitive business environment. Yet such measures face considerable public resistance and risk further social fragmentation.
Yet it would be premature to write Europe off entirely. The European Union remains one of the world’s largest economic and regulatory blocs, with substantial influence over global trade, environmental standards, consumer protections, and diplomacy. European universities, research institutions, technological innovation, and welfare systems continue to command global respect. Despite repeated crises – from Brexit to the Eurozone debt turmoil – the EU has also demonstrated greater institutional resilience than many observers once predicted. However, these enduring strengths increasingly coexist with political fragmentation, strategic dependence, demographic decline, and a growing inability to project unified geopolitical power.
Despite the bleak outlook, some within the European Commission and broader policy establishment continue to argue that Europe could yet emerge stronger and more united if it succeeds in overcoming internal stagnation. But without drastic structural and political renewal, Europe risks becoming a geopolitical bystander in a world increasingly shaped by the United States, China, and rising powers such as India.
Analysts increasingly attribute Europe’s political instability to a deepening disillusionment with democratic processes and established parties. Large sections of the electorate no longer believe traditional political institutions are capable of addressing economic insecurity, cultural anxiety, or geopolitical uncertainty. Populist movements have capitalized on this vacuum by promising quick solutions, strong leadership, and national restoration. The “new normal” in European politics is therefore one of chronic voter dissatisfaction, fragmented coalitions, and growing pressure on liberal democratic norms.
Europe’s global influence has undeniably waned, and its founding post-war vision increasingly appears exhausted by recurring crises. For centuries, Europe stood at the epicentre of global power. Its empires shaped the modern world, while its philosophy, culture, scientific revolutions, and industrial transformation radiated outward to redefine civilization itself. But after 1945, Europe gradually ceded primacy – first to Washington and Moscow during the Cold War, and later to an emerging global order increasingly dominated by the United States and China.
The European Union was born out of an ambitious historical vision: to overcome centuries of fratricidal conflict, to reconcile victors and vanquished, and to rebuild a shattered continent through economic integration and political cooperation. The founding fathers – Robert Schuman, Jean Monnet, Konrad Adenauer, and Alcide De Gasperi – dreamed not merely of peace, but of preserving Europe’s relevance and moral authority in the post-war world. Yet those aspirations today appear increasingly strained by fragmentation, dependency, and declining collective confidence.
Europe’s crisis is therefore not merely electoral or economic. It is civilizational: a continent uncertain of its identity, dependent on external power, internally fractured, and increasingly unable to translate its ideals into geopolitical relevance.
https://countercurrents.org/2026/05/europes-sluggish-drift-into-irrelevance/
READ FROM TOP.
PLEASE VISIT:
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
RABID ATHEIST.
WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….