It's hard, sitting on the other side of the office table from which Naomi Chazan is picking at her modest hummus and salad snack lunch, to believe that the amiable 63-year-old university professor with a self-deprecating sense of humour has suddenly become the most discussed, not to say demonised, woman in Israel.

Ms Chazan is president of a long-established agency with large numbers of Jewish donors in the US and Britain, which is committed to fighting for "social justice and equality for all Israelis". The New Israel Fund has over the last 30 years disbursed some $200m to around 800 charitable, social and human rights groups, and justly claims much of the credit for building modern Israel's still vibrant civil society.

But in the last fortnight the former Knesset member who by her own account loves her native Israel "without reservation" has been sacked as a columnist on the Jerusalem Post after 14 years, had rowdy demonstrators outside her house brandishing a chilling caricature of her with a horn obtruding from her forehead, and most far-fetched of all, been accused, in a newspaper article circulated to foreign journalists by the Government Press Office, of "serving the agenda of Iran and Hamas".

Quoting the above article.

 “Americans have been induced to believe that the Zionist state is an ally. We are not alone in viewing Israel as a legitimate nation and a noble experiment to provide a "homeland" for a victimized people. That alluring storyline victimized the broader Jewish community while also laying waste to the nation that was first deceived to extend to Zionists the hand of friendship.”

 Fact:  The Jews were allies of the Germans prior to WW I but betrayed them when victory by the German side alone was most unlikely.  When the successful peace pact of 1917 was about to be ratified by Germany, France and Britain, the Jews betrayed their allies and took the opportunity to make a deal with Britain – one as disgraceful and dishonorable as any government of that time could ever imagine.

It was to use their influence to bring America into the war on the side of France/Britain. As they anticipated, this tipped the balance of this unprecedented, unnecessary war of Monarchial pride in favor of Britain etc.  In France both sides had fought themselves to a standstill without any obvious chance of a significant victory – and commonsense was about to prevail for the innocent citizens of that area as well as the military that had only learned the waste of total war and in the hardest possible way.

By the way, Ben Gurion formed his own Jewish group and they had 25 killed!!!

With flag flying the young Americans were conned and forced into a dishonorable war that had nothing to do with them.  And by no less an enemy than their own President and his dealings with the Jews.

My Father left me the records of Australia in WW I and the war, caused by a relatively minor crime and the false pride of the “born to rule”, would shock any civilized person.  And that was mostly the Australian and New Zealand involvement.

Now having written this, IMHO I can painfully imagine how a decorated German Corporal must have felt when (along with the entire army) contrary to what they had expected; they marched home to a devastated country devoid of any hope, where their sacrifice was not even enough to put food on the table for their families.

There was not a massive “exodus” of German Jews to the illegally “auctioned” nation of Palestine as one would have expected.  Were the opportunities more attractive in the devastated Germany?  And was the betrayal of the Jewish Organizations well known at that time.

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

It always appears to me that when truth comes out, no matter how mildly and protective of the perpetrators it may be, it is usually for the purpose of removing "saddle burrs" from some political slobs in or recently in, a government.  Especially the US and the bum-kisser Britain.

Mind you I am not a great reader - mostly a talker - however it took me over seventy years to learn of the Jewish betrayal of the Germans in 1917! And the reason Hitler was so vicious in his decision for all Jews to be banished or put into concentration camps for (as he put it) in the "national interest".  Sounds like Howard and Costello doesn't it?

If ever there was a race that was universally hated over many many centuries, it is the Jews.  Why?

I have looked at their history and it appears that most of the wonderful stories were, and had to be, fairy tales.  Or religious zeal.  All have portrayed the Jews as a suffering race - ostracized for no reason other than their race and/or religion.  They have played on the sympathy for the "underdog" to a point where you have to wonder at the intelligence and integrity of all the world's forms of communication.

Was their treatment a form of punishment for crimes committed in their host nation?  Because when you are ordered to leave a country in which you have even been born as a citizen, you have a right to rebel against such injustice. But when you start being locked up, like the Jews in the concentration camps who would not leave, or the Palestinians who are still living in squalor camps and brutal treatment after leaving peacefully as ordered by the Zionist Jews - it is unpreasant.

There has never been any doubt in my mind that "the victors write the history of war".  If that has any currency at all, why would the victors bother to heap pity on the "victimized" Jews?  Suggesting that their victory was a "Gaza Holocaust"? Like most of their claims, it just doesn't ring true.

The only obvious differences that I can find between the crimes of the Nazis and those perpetrated by, and being continued by, the Zionist Jews - is the level of cruelty!  As an instance, the Nazis did tests on the inmates of the Concentration camps ostensibly for the benefit of "humanity".  The Zionists took the bodies of their innocent invasion victims, including children, and took body parts for the benefit of Jewry.  And then with typical callous behavior, delivered the bodies to the Palestinians in a state not fit for burial under their religious rules.

I feel that the independent historians have given us a reasonable take on the so-called injustice against the Jews, by the Romans, the English, the Spanish and the Germans et al – so I would like to pursue the principle that the Hebrew was a race that would not owe any loyalty to any host nation?  As such they were treated accordingly – not nicely – but according to the laws of that nation?

I don’t know why the Jews have so much power over the US, or in fact during WW I - but their influence is real, it is tangible, it is even terrible.

As with most of the Hebrew history, their leaders have at some stage used their Gold-n-Power to control the Gentiles or even the entire Goyim.

Personally, I welcome the news, finally available, as to the illegality of the Netanyahu mob and await a precise action against them - commensurate with that which the other Semite nations would expect.

I have never supported war but, if the Zionists had performed in Queensland exactly as they have in Palestine, I would still raise a gun against them.

So shall ye sow – so shall ye reap! He who lives by the sword…..!

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

7. In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled. The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to self-government for a certain length of time for that people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes.

8. Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes - in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: IT IS IN OUR POWER. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not - it goes to the bottom. (America)

9.

10. Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more favor with the people, whose powers of reasoning are superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, traditions and sentimental theorems, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance of political secrets, puts forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy.

11. The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the GOYIM

While these are denied by the Zionists – may I say that there is an element of commonsense in some of it.

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

How ashamed the decent American people must feel.

This picture spells a thousand words and it does indicate that the FINAL star of the much maligned American flag is the "Star of David".

I feel that the American people have always been oppressed by the fear of invasion. 

Sun Yat Sen once said "keep your enemies close but your friends closer".

This picture of the now despised American flag does itself a further disservice by being seen that some 5 million Jews are an equal to the three hundred million Americans.  Why?

For better or for worst, Australia has been close to America - too close I believe.

If the yanks believe that we need them in an international war, WHY haven't they given us the same nuclear power as they gave to India, Pakistan and the Occupation forces in Palestine. 

When they compare us with the Mythical Israel, do they trust us less?

Time for America to go back to where they were as an independent nation.

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

Continuing Protocol 1 of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

12. Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.

13. Where does right begin? Where does it end?

14. In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right - to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism.

15. Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invincible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.

16. Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.

17. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labor of many centuries brought to naught.

TO BE CONTINUED.  Interpret this as you would a daily newspaper?

COMMENT:  My intention in printing these "Protocols" is because I perceived a definite change in Hebrew behavior when they conquered Canaan but - still mediated with the Priests of Mount Zion?  As though their birth as a race was dependent on the deal they made with those priests.  Why?  What deal?

Perhaps understanding the indoctrination by the Priests of Zion will give us a way to stop the disease of unrestrained war and the renewed belief in a superior race.

God Bless Australia.  NE OUBLIE.

As sure as the sun will rise tomorrow - I hope - the Jewish principles of control i.e., the financial affairs of the host nation, will raise the hopes and aspirations of any peaceful nation which has become their target for a takeover to make a profit.

In isolation, that business principle is sound but, when it is the organized action of a huge financial religious enterprise,  like that of the world wide Jewish organizations, it can only lead to a domination of industry which will eventuate in the World Trade Organization being dictated by one enormous cartel.

I have always wondered at the riots in France and others about the WTO - and the  attacks on the World Trade Centre by a US Marine and the Saudi Arabian Bush allies who supposedly committed the "sneak" attack (like Pearl Harbour) of 9/11.  We are really mushrooms aren't we?

The most powerful media in Australia is Jewish which means that only .22% of the world's population is able to control the financial affairs of targetted nations and when the biggest economy in the world (the American) for a time at least - they will have the opportunity that the Bush/Cheney administration has given to them.

So, God Bless Obama or any leader of the most confused and powerful nation in the current world which advocates wars of choice.

God Bless Australia and protect us from the US/Zionist alliance.  NE OUBLIE.

21. It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is savage, and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery.

22. Behold the alcoholic animals….

23. Our countersign is - Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty.

24. Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our super-government. It is enough for them to know that we are too merciless for all disobedience to cease.

COMMENT:  With the escalating crimes of the Zionists over some 62 years being exposed (partly at least) is it possible that these "well-healed" international murderers will continue to enjoy the complete ignorance of international law or even the basic principles of civilisation?  And who is their sponsor?  Surely G.W. Bush was their "Don"?  With all of his efforts to regain some respect for the US - I pity Obama. He must cringe at the arrogance of Netanyahu in dictating to him that "you must deal with Iran or I will".

So ye sow - so shall ye reap. He who lives by the sword....

God Bless Australia and protect us from the US/Zionist scourge.  NE OUBLIE.