Sunday 24th of November 2024

the stupidity of interventionism...

bidenbiden

The New ‘Russiagaters’: Right-Wingers Channel Hillary in Attacks on Biden  written by daniel mcadams



 "Bad" Vlad Putin only "took over" part of Ukraine because of President Biden's weakness. So says many in the US right wing. A "real man" president would have imposed costs so prohibitive that Putin would never have dreamed of recognizing what has been de facto reality since 2014: that the Russian-speaking part of Ukraine wants no part of the US-installed government in Kiev.

So goes the thinking of the armchair right-wingers. And I don't even mean neocons: plenty of those now scoring body blows on our president-on-the-ropes are Trumpers and even populists. The question to these "weak Biden" jaw-boners remains: what would you have done to show how "tough" you are that would sufficiently terrify the Russian president into accepting US missiles on (what would be) NATO-member Ukraine's soil? Nuke Moscow out of the blue? And sacrifice the United States in the process? 

That's "pro-America"? Killing America?

These are not serious people. In fact they are carbon copies of their supposed nemeses like Rachel Maddow and Adam Schiff.

Former (Trump) White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, who I am sure is pleasant enough, has dusted off her camos and is declaring war on Biden for "showing weakness" that invited Putin to rampage through Europe reconstituting the Third Reich...or something like that:

 


"There is no greater supporter of the Democrat Party than Vladimir Putin!”

“He got Crimea on Obama's watch, and now he's getting exactly what he wants on Biden’s watch!” @OutnumberedFNC @FoxNews ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/Gclhlg4cfd

— Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) February 22, 2022

 

Oh yeah...that old Putin. He's got a life-sized poster of Chuck Schumer in his bedroom. He's got a collection of Biden bobble-heads.

Of all people, McEnany should know how destructive it is to stomp up and down and scream "you're Putin's puppet!" After all, that exact mindlessness hobbled her own boss for four years, preventing him from fulfilling his campaign promise of "getting along with Russia." It may well have cost him re-election. Nevertheless, echoing the absolute lack of thinking on the American Right these days, she chooses to morph into Rachel Maddow.

Come on, Kayleigh. If you want to be taken seriously don't act so foolish.

Putin did not "get" Crimea and east Ukraine on Biden's watch because they're best buds. Crimea and eastern Ukraine were broken away from Ukraine because of the preposterously idiotic idea that there is any value to the United States in moving NATO to Russia's doorstep in the hopes of "regime-changing" Putin.

US foreign policy since at least the dawn of the Wolfowitz Doctrine - and arguably since Brzezinski's brilliant idea that creating, arming, and training a bunch of jihadists (who became al-Qaida) would be a swell idea because it would finally give then-USSR its Vietnam - has been a series of own-goals. In other words, what is achieved is the exact opposite of the stated aim. 

This brings up a larger question of why conservatives are in the main so awful on foreign policy (and even on "woke" ideology and, frankly, everything else). A brilliant Tweet from a long banned account best captures everything that is wrong with conservatives:

 

(see picture)



Conservatives of our era are woefully uneducated, uninterested, and uninformed. There are no Sobrans or Menckens among them because they willfully know nothing - and care even less - about that upon which they opine. 

They stand for nothing but cheap political points. Twitter "gotcha" points.

Right-wingers' favorite, Sen. Tim Scott, likewise repeats the "Putin invaded Ukraine because Biden is weak" talking point:

 

Russia’s heightened aggression against the territorial integrity of Ukraine is a clear violation of international law.

Unfortunately, for the second time in less than a year, the Biden administration’s weakness on the world stage has emboldened our adversaries. pic.twitter.com/AQAkllCAoO

— Tim Scott (@SenatorTimScott) February 22, 2022

 

The big secret is that with a few exceptions, Members of the House and Senate are dumb as dirt. The only thing greater than their lack of intelligence is their lack of interest in anything at all beyond power. Someone should ask Senator Scott what he would have done as Commander-in-Chief to prevent Russia from accepting the request for recognition of the two breakaway Ukrainian republics.

Better yet, someone should have shown him a map without place names and asked him to point out where these republics actually are. 

Here's the new rule: You can't call for war or sanctions on a country you can't find on the map.

The recently-embalmed looking Newt Gingrich also hits "weakness" as the reason for Russia's "invasion":

 

Gingrich blasts Biden for following 'Obama model' of weakness toward Russiahttps://t.co/9Ga5yyJmj3

— Fox News (@FoxNews) February 22, 2022

 

The "Obama model" of weakness? Obama overtly overthrew a democratically-elected government in Ukraine, from one seeking a friendly trade relationship with Russia to one chock-full of Nazi weirdos maniacally hostile to Russia. It's like China installing the Taliban into power in Mexico.

That's "weakness"? No, that's cajones. Insanely stupid and "America-last," but cajones nonetheless.

Republican candidate for Congress and favorite of the "pro-Trump" wing of the party Robby Starbuck also channels the delusional right-wing on Biden/Putin/Ukraine:

 

Democrats are truly masterful at mental gymnastics. Somehow I’ve read about 20 different takes from them on how it’s Trump’s fault that Russia might take Ukraine on Biden’s watch. Reality: Biden gave Putin his pipeline for nothing, Trump refused. Putin smells weakness & attacks.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) February 21, 2022

 

So Republicans believe that the US government has the right to cancel business deals between two non-American actors? That Washington has a say on how Germany gets its energy? 

This is the "party of small government"? A government so big that it can tell other governments where they are allowed to get their energy? 

It's "Putin's pipeline"? Tell that to Germans huddled in their cold apartments because putting a bunch of natural gas on ships from the US across the Atlantic is about as efficient as a Soviet five-year plan in producing consumer goods in 1975.

Why do these "free market" Republicans all sound like commies?

And come on: "Putin smells weakness & attacks"? You want to be taken seriously with such a stupid statement? Robby would deserve to lose his House bid for the crime of being too foolish for office, but sadly the bar is set far lower than this. 

Similarly, Chairman of the GOP Ronna McDaniel, who no one accused of being an intellectual, jumped on the neo-Russiagate bandwagon, Tweeting scorn on Biden for failing to keep Putin "in check":

 

Biden promised to keep Putin in check. He failed. pic.twitter.com/AfLJi1qF1k

— Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) February 22, 2022

 

Is that really the job of the US president? Putting other leaders "in check"? It's clear at this point that "American exceptionalism" is not only a mental illness, but a highly dangerous one.

Former President Trump himself also chimes in on how he would have been so tough on Russia that Putin would never have dared recognize a part of Ukraine disenfranchised by Obama's interventionism which rejected the fake government put in place by Victoria Nuland and her pals in 2014. Is it Stockholm syndrome in a president who was continuously whacked in the head by the 2X4 of "Putin's puppet" accusations?

There are literally hundreds of more examples of non explicitly neocon Republicans singing from the "Russiagate" songbook over developments in Ukraine.

None of them - with few exceptions like the Columbia Bugle and Darren Beattie - understand that "America first" means the opposite of "America tells the rest of the world what they can do." 

Once and for all: It's not President Biden's "weakness" that has botched up US relations with Russia and Ukraine and put us on the verge of war. It's the stupidity of US interventionism under Vice President Biden! Were it not for the US-backed coup in 2014 we wouldn't be talking about Crimea returned to Russia or the crisis in the Donbas. 

It's not weakness, but the stupidity of interventionism - a bipartisan affliction - that is the source of the problem!

We are led by a hopelessly corrupt political class. A duopoly of dunces. As I've oft-repeated, Patrick Buchanan's "two wings of the same bird of prey."

 Copyright © 2022 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given. READ MORE:http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/february/23/the-new-russiagaters-right-wingers-channel-hillary-in-attacks-on-biden/  FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

existential identity...

 

BY STAN GRANT

 

This is the sort of war the West does not know how to fight.

It is not just about territory, or borders, or resources, or power. It is existential — it is about identity. 

Vladimir Putin has made it clear Ukraine is part of the soul of Russia. And he is prepared to crush the souls of Ukrainians to achieve his ends.

Yes, Putin has made security demands, he wants the West out of what he sees as Russia's sphere of influence. He wants a cast-iron guarantee Ukraine can never join NATO.

LIVE UPDATES: Read our blog for the latest on Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

But it is the "why" that is more important than the "what" here.

Why? Because to Putin, there is no Ukraine without Russia. They are one.

Putin said so: there is no Ukrainian sovereignty. Putin sees Ukraine as Russian land essential to Putin's idea of Russkiy Mir (Russian World). It is about Russian language, culture; it is blood and soil.

It is mythological. Russkiy Mir is holy; central is Russian orthodox faith.

To Russian nationalists like Putin, Ukraine's capital Kyiv is the mother of all Russian cities. 

This is why Putin famously called the collapse of the Soviet Union "the greatest geo-political catastrophe of the twentieth century". It is oft repeated, not as often understood.

Putin wants Russia back

Putin doesn't want communism back, he wants Russia back. The catastrophe wasn't the collapse of Marxist-Leninism, it was the suffering of the people. 

Russian-speaking Slavic people were cut adrift — as Putin sees it — from mother Russia.

Why can't the West fight this? Because the West doesn't even understand it. The West is meant to be a place beyond identity. 

This is everything the West is not. The modern West grew out of Reformation and Enlightenment. It was about liberation. In the West we change citizenship, we move countries, we swap or abandon religions.

Pluralism and multiculturalism have been hallmarks of progress. We celebrate diversity as a strength. But the success of the West poses harder and harder questions. 

Liberal democracy is staggering under the weight of growing inequality, contested rights and political tribalism.

What binds us? We appear ever rootless, not rooted. 

Not everyone, of course. Roots matter to some, but liberal democracy can leave us unmoored: it hollows out our communities, it mocks tradition, banishes faith from the public square.

Liberalism elevates the individual to the point of alienation. The scholar, Patrick Deneen, charted this decline in his book, Why Liberalism Failed. It has lost its moral and political core, he argues:

"Today's widespread yearning for a strong leader, one with the will to take back popular control over liberalism's forms of bureaucratized government and globalized economy, comes after decades of liberal dismantling of cultural norms and political habits essential to self-governance."

The modern West is less village square than city centre. Yes, there are "somewheres", as the British writer David Goodhart put it, but inexorably we seem to be on a journey to "anywhere".

In the West, Putin sees weakness

This is a demographic, economic and cultural fault line that runs through the liberal pluralist West and it is increasingly political. It is a battle over what the West is, and who is prepared to defend it.

It cuts across religious freedom, LGTBQI rights, race, gender and class. It divides the rural from the urban.

And Vladimir Putin sees it as a weakness. He has castigated the West for its culture wars and its corrosive identity politics.

Read more as Russian troops enter Ukraine:

Meanwhile, Putin himself plays identity writ large. He plays it hard. When it comes to national identity, when it comes to Russian civilisation, Putin shows none of the self-doubt he sees in the West.

Putin is a product of our age. As globalisation has continued apace, there has been a blowback, a return to borders, tradition, religion, race. The return of the tribe.

And it has set the world ablaze. The Nobel prize winning economist Amartya Sen best summed this up with his phrase "solitarist identity". He means that our world turns toxic when we are reduced to one essential thing: our race or our religion or our nation. 

Then, we fail to see ourselves in each other. This, Sen says, is where identity meets violence. Solitarist identity, he says, "kills and kills with abandon".

The West has been dragged into the wars of identity. Think of the last few decades. The ethnic cleansing of Rwanda, the conflict in the Balkans and the break-up of the old Yugoslavia; the blood feud of Shia versus Sunni Muslim, Hindu against Muslim, the persecution of Rohingya in Myanmar.

"Who are you?" is the most dangerous question in the world.

These are wars never won. After two decades in Afghanistan, the US fled, leaving the Taliban to return to a country lacerated by identity conflict.

The West's War on Terror has not quelled the lure of radical Islam. A new generation of Muslims raised in the West, angry and disillusioned, have swelled the ranks of Al Qaeda and ISIS.

Breaking Ukraine's will, enacting revenge

The French philosopher Jacques Derrida spoke of those "who have bread of apocalypse in their mouths": those filled with vengeance and grievance, haunted by the past who see only unending catastrophe.

Western modernity holds no allure for them. Putin has Derrida's "bread of apocalypse" in his mouth.

He has unleashed a war of identity on Ukraine to stop its drift to the West, break its will, and in no small part to enact revenge on Western nations he believes have humiliated Russia.

 

Michel Eltchaninoff, the author of the book, Inside the Mind of Vladimir Putin, says vengeance explains much of his crackdown against dissidents inside Russia and his attacks on enemies outside Russia. After two decades in power, Eltchaninoff says, Putin was about "revenge — against those protesting his return to power and against the West".

As the West has battled the wars of identity abroad, those same battles have exploded within the West itself.

Nations like America face foes without and within. The most powerful country in the world is a nation unsure of itself. Certainly, it is unprepared at this point to fight Putin in Ukraine, and looking to redeem and rejuvenate a sense of its own identity.

America was always an idea; as Abraham Lincoln said, a nation "dedicated" to a "proposition". But the idea of out of many one, struggles to speak to the souls of those who seek only the one.

And watching this is Xi Jinping. The Chinese leader believes this is his time. His China Dream is within reach.

He believes in one people, one China, one identity. He has Taiwan in his sights. Potentially the mother of all identity wars.

 

 

Stan Grant is the ABC's international affairs analyst and presents China Tonight on Monday at 9:35pm on ABC TV, and Tuesday at 8pm on the ABC News Channel.

 

 

Read more:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-25/russia-ukraine-invasion-borders-power-vladimir-putin-identity/100858372

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

GUSNote: The West has been trying to steal Ukraine away from Russia. In 2014, the Maidan Revolution inspired by cash from the West given to the Ukrainian Nazis has irked Putin. Before hand, Ukraine and Russia had tiffs like a married couple but THEY WERE NOT DIVORCED FROM EACH OTHER. The Yanks have "enforced" a pseudo-cultural shift in Ukraine, in order to encircled the greater prize: Destroy Russia. This is at the core of the American Empire. DESTROY RUSSIA. Putin has preventing the collapse of Russia and now he has seen that "force" is the only way to protect "the motherland" from the US thugs.

 

Whether he is right or wrong isn't the question. Will he succeed in preventing the collapse of Russia from  attacks of the Empire all around? The Empire is tired and has been unable to win anything but booby prizes and we glorify this Empire stupidity... Putin wants security. The West DOES NOT WANT TO GIVE IT TO HIM BECAUSE WE ARE ARROGANT and still want to destroy "RUSSIA". We nearly succeeded in the 1990s... but a little guy came along. He's not Hitler nor Napoleon... He's more like Charles de Gaulle, but he is Putin first and foremost. He has understood the rotten dynamics of the Empire. Now, with his friend China, which we despise as well, and a Russian firepower equivalent to that of the Empire, the Empire can only offer stupidity and niggles. The Empire has to offer SECURITY TO RUSSIA and eat a bit of humble pie. But the Americans, fat with their self-importance and unable to sit up can only stuff themselves with more fatty hamburgers and fizzy sugary drinks that are destroying their lives. 

 

See also: https://yourdemocracy.net/drupal/node/35884

musk knows...

Musk names ‘real’ US President

 

Billionaire admits that the true leader is “whoever controls the teleprompter” 

Billionaire Tesla founder Elon Musk has written off US President Joe Biden as an ineffective puppet, insisting that while he has voted “overwhelmingly for Democrats” in the past, the party has spiraled downwards.

“The real president is whoever controls the teleprompter,” the SpaceX CEO observed during a Monday podcast, declaring “the path to power is the path to the teleprompter.”

“I do feel like if somebody were to accidentally lean on the teleprompter, it’s going to be like Anchorman,” he continued, referencing the 2004 film whose lead character read whatever was written on the teleprompter no matter how absurd or detrimental to his own career.

 

READ MORE:

https://www.rt.com/news/555634-musk-biden-democrats-inflation/

 

We've been on this subject since (or possibly before) Old Joe got the gig....

See

escape from the debacle...

and the toon at top as well.

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@