Monday 29th of April 2024

why the chinese won't invade taiwan in the near future.....

rogue US...rogue US...

The Americans don't need the help of the Aussies to "contain China"... Dutton the idiot acts like a 6 year-old ankle-biter (below the age of reason) coming to help a 400 pound-professional wrestler versus another big guy, by shouting insults. 

 

CHINA WON'T TRY TO INVADE TAIWAN WHILE UKRAINE IS BEING GIVEN A SOUR STICK TO SUCK ON...

 

(Gus: I could be wrong, but I don't think so)

 

In a show of force, America has been deploying troops and warships in Asia and the Pacific over the past few months...

 

It also deployed nuclear capable bombers to its military base in Guam.

 

This sent a message to China that the US will continue to carry out patrols as China continues to "militarize" the islands, officials said.

A total of 400 US military bases, packed with warships, nukes and bombers, have now been set up across the Pacific region, including in South Korea and Australia.

 

Read more: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2331190/us-readies-for-war-with-china-with-400-bases-of-ships-and-nukes-to-create-perfect-noose-around-superpower-rival/

 

This was in 2016. Since then, the US has gone a few notches further in their "FULL-SPECTRUM WAR machinations...

 

Meanwhile the sinophobia is going full blast in the Western nations which, under the mesmorising illusion of the US Empire, dream of winning a nuclear conflict...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAfeYMONj9E

 

See at 45:23…. Theodore H White, a historian "advisor the the White House", describing the “Chinese mind”…

 

His were UGLY racist WORDS…

 

 

Conservative author William F. Buckley, Jr. wrote an obituary of [Theodore H] White in the National Review in which he described that "conjoined with his fine mind, his artist's talent, his prodigious curiosity, there was a transcendent wholesomeness, a genuine affection for the best in humankind.” 

Buckley praised White, saying he "revolutionised the art of political reporting." Buckley added that White made one grave strategic mistake during his journalistic lifetime: "Like so many disgusted with Chiang Kai-shek, he imputed to the opposition to Chiang thaumaturgical social and political powers. He overrated the revolutionists' ideals, and underrated their capacity for totalitarian sadism."

In her book, Theodore H. White and Journalism As Illusion, Joyce Hoffman contends that White's "personal ideology undermined [his] professional objectivity" (according to the review of her work in Library Journal). She states "conscious myth-making" on behalf of his subjects, including Chiang Kai-shek, John F. Kennedy, and David Bruce. Hoffman concludes that White self-censored information embarrassing to his subjects to portray them as heroes.

But White wrote:

 

There is the question of civil liberties and minority rights, which lie at the root of America's concept of democracy. During the war the Communists championed all that was good in Chinese life; they fought against Kuomintang dictatorship and in so fighting fought for the liberties of all other groups. But up to now the Communists have been in opposition to the dominant regime, and their base has lain in the backward villages, where opposition has been nonexistent. How will they react to the organized opposition of the large cities where the Kuomintang middle class is firmly established and where, with money and influence, it can command a press that will present an alternative program? Will the Communists, if they govern large and complex industrial cities, permit an opposition press and opposition party to challenge them by a combination of patronage and ideology? They say that they will, for they believe that in any honest contest for the vote of the people, the people will vote them and their allies a majority against the candidates of the landed and well-to-do minority. But if the Communists are wrong in their calculations and are outvoted, will they yield to a peaceful vote? Will they champion civil liberties as ardently as they do now? This is a question that cannot be answered until we have had the opportunity of seeing how a transitional coalition regime works in peace time practice. 

 

Contemporary critics on the left have strongly criticized a 1967 made-for-TV documentary that White wrote called China: The Roots of Madness as a "callous and condescending" portrayal of Chinese. White's reporting was described as "self-important, sanctimonious and he gave voice to no more than an American viewpoint", wherein he portrayed the Chinese as merely pawns in the Cold War, blinkered by their Communist ideology. Film Threat remarked that White never attempted to take on board the Chinese viewpoint, and points out there were unconfirmed rumors that the CIA was involved in the film's making.

 

Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_H._White

 

See also:

 

misunderstanding china as a backward country for the last 40 years...

 

https://yourdemocracy.net/drupal/node/35424

 

https://yourdemocracy.net.au/drupal/node/37019

  

when the reds are a shade of cold steel blue…

 

the beginning of a new reality: teaching others the lessons we never learnt...

 

the bad, the ugly and the crazies...

 

a fragile planet...

 

blatant violations of the UN charter...

 

battle ready-ish...

 

death of the bourgeoisie…

 

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW….

the china mirage...

James Bradley introduces us to the prominent Americans--including FDR's grandfather, Warren Delano--who in the 1800s made their fortunes in the China opium trade. Meanwhile, American missionaries sought a myth: noble Chinese peasants eager to Westernise.

 

The media propagated this mirage, and FDR believed that supporting Chiang Kai-shek would make China America's best friend in Asia. But Chiang was on his way out and when Mao Zedong instead came to power, Americans were shocked, wondering how we had "lost China."

  

From the 1850s to the origins of the Vietnam War, Bradley reveals how American misconceptions about China have distorted our policies and led to the avoidable deaths of millions. THE CHINA MIRAGE dynamically explores the troubled history that still defines U.S.-Chinese relations today.

 

 

 

Read more:

miragemirage

 

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

western misunderstandings.....

US media have claimed ever since Russia launched its special operation in Ukraine last month that Moscow had secretly coordinated the decision with Beijing, provoking calls for sanctions against China to punish them for doing so.

 

“There have been claims that China had prior knowledge of Russia’s military action and demanded Russia delay it until the Winter Olympics concluded. Recent rumors further claimed that Russia was seeking military assistance from China. Let me say this responsibly: Assertions that China knew about, acquiesced to or tacitly supported this war are purely disinformation,” Chinese Ambassador to the United States Qin Gang wrote on Tuesday in an op-ed published by the Washington Post.

 

“Had China known about the imminent crisis, we would have tried our best to prevent it,” Qin said. He noted China had “made huge efforts” to encourage peace talks and to help with the humanitarian situation created by millions of Ukrainians fleeing from the conflict.

 

The article was provoked by persistent claims in the US media that China had helped coordinate the timing of Russia’s special operation aimed at rendering Ukraine a neutral country instead of a prospective NATO ally, which began on February 24.

 

One widely-cited article in the New York Times on March 2 claimed that “senior Chinese officials told senior Russian officials in early February not to invade Ukraine before the end of the Winter Olympics in Beijing,” which ended on February 20. The report cited anonymous “senior Biden administration officials and a European official.”

 

Of course, before the Olympics began, US officials claimed China wanted Russia to “invade” Ukraine before they started on February 4 or after they ended, and then during the Olympic games they claimed Russia might do so before the games ended, too.

 

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian told reporters last week that the NYT’s claim was a “downright lie.”

 

“The US has been disseminating disinformation about China on the Ukraine issue, with the attempt to shift blame, stoke confrontation and profit from the issue,” Zhao said. “The practice is despicable and malicious … The more it racks its brains to discredit China with lies and hype things up, the more it exposes its credibility deficit to the international community.”

 

 

Since 2017, Washington has regarded “great power competition” with Russia and China as its primary strategic focus, inaugurating new de facto alliances like AUKUS and waging an all-out information war to demonize the two countries and their inhabitants. Both US activists and the Chinese government have decried a sharp spike in violent attacks on Asian-Americans and Asians in the US as being driven by US anti-Chinese propaganda, and Russophobia has become far more prevalent in the US in recent weeks.

 

As a consequence, Russia and China have grown increasingly close, with Zhao saying there was “no limit, no forbidden zone and no ceiling to China-Russia cooperation” following an early February summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. While the two nations have never declared a formal alliance because they oppose creating exclusive political blocs, the New York Times didn’t hesitate to accuse them of forming an “alliance of autocracies” and “A New Axis,” comparing them to the 1930s alliance between Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy that prepared the ground for World War II.

 

Qin noted that all parties, including NATO, must change their policies and behavior if “long-term peace and stability” is to be achieved in Europe.

 

“As a Chinese proverb goes, it takes more than one cold day to freeze three feet of ice,” the ambassador wrote. “There must be a balanced, effective and sustainable European security architecture.”

 

 

Taiwan, Ukraine ‘Totally Different Things’

 

Another theory floated among political commentators and military elites alike is that China may try to use the situation in Ukraine to launch an invasion of Taiwan, which Beijing regards as a Chinese province in rebellion. In his Tuesday op-ed, Qin addressed this “mistake,” pointing out the differences in the two situations.

 

“These are totally different things. Ukraine is a sovereign state, while Taiwan is an inseparable part of China’s territory. The Taiwan question is a Chinese internal affair. It does not make sense for people to emphasize the principle of sovereignty on Ukraine while hurting China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity on Taiwan. The future of Taiwan lies in peaceful development of cross-Strait relations and the reunification of China. We are committed to peaceful reunification, but we also retain all options to curb ‘Taiwan independence,’” the Chinese envoy wrote.

 

Qin added that the US should “earnestly abide” by the one-China principle that it agreed to when the US and China normalized diplomatic relations40 years ago, which means not supporting the government in Taiwan or encouraging its independence from Beijing by sending weapons or political visits.

 

“To ensure long-term peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, China and the United States must work together to contain ‘Taiwan independence,’” Qin said.

 

Yet another such theory was promulgated in the media on Wednesday, beginning with a report by Taiwan Central News Agency before making its way into US media. According to the report, a Russian dissident in France published letters purported to be from an analyst in Russia’s FSB intelligence service claiming China had been "considering taking over Taiwan in the fall,” but their plans were thrown off by Russia’s Ukraine operation. The report claimed Xi wanted to use the operation as a popularity booster ahead of seeking an unprecedented third term as president.

 

 

read more:

https://sputniknews.com/20220316/chinas-us-envoy-says-beijing-wouldve-tried-our-best-to-prevent-ukraine-conflict-in-wapo-op-ed-1093936663.html

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW ¶•••∞∞∞∞∞∞∞@!

silly strongmen...

 

It is utter hubris that Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton continue to fan the flames of war with China discourse, writes Paul Begley.

BUSINESS STRATEGIST and former Chief Executive of General Electric, Jack Welch, was always happy to offer a few cautionary words for high-fllying executives wanting to cut corners by masquerading as "strongmen".

To those who might be conned by tough-talking rhetoric, Welch had two pieces of advice: first, "face reality as it is, not as it was, or as you wish it to be"; and second, "if you don’t have a competitive advantage, don’t compete".


Summed up, those two cautions were about survival. Ignoring them would not simply lead to trouble in Welch’s estimation, but would become pathways to self-immolation and annihilation.


Listening to the language of Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Defence Minister Peter Dutton in recent times is a reminder of Welch’s cautions. We are being told the Morrison Government can manage an economy that, under its watch, has gone from a national debt of $191 billion after the global financial crisis in 2011 to a projected $923 billion by June this year.


Much of that debt was accumulated by profligate borrowing before the onset of the 2019 pandemic under successive Treasurers Joe Hockey, Morrison and Josh Frydenberg.

 

READ MORE:

https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/australias-war-with-china-featherweight-versus-heavyweight,16161

 

READ FROM TOP

 

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!