SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
imbalance game.....ONE MUST ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE WESTERN MEDIA HAS DONE ITS JOB MAGNIFICENTLY:
— WE HATE DONALD TRUMP
— WE HATE PUTIN (THE "MURDERER", ETC)
— WE LOVE BIDEN (SENILE, WARMONGER)
— WE HATED SADDAM (AND STILL DO)
— WE HATED GADDAFI (AND STILL DO)
— WE HATE ASSAD
— WE HAVE A SOFT SPOT FOR MBS (MURDERER, ETC)
— WE LOVE OBAMA (WARMONGER, MURDERER)
— WE HATE RUSSIA IN GENERAL (IT'S TOO BIG)
— WE BLEED FOR MACRON (NOBLE IDIOT, KILLER OF DEMOCRACY)
— WE LAUD OLAF THE NEW NAZI (MERKEL WAS THE BEST AT PLAYING THE DOUBLE-CROSS GAME)
— WE LOVE ZELENSKYYYYY (CORRUPT, DUMB-ASS, PUPPET, LIAR, NAZI, JEWISH, IDIOT, MURDERER OF CULTURE, STEPAN BANDERA FOLLOWER, UNINTELLECTUAL, BEGGAR, ETC...)
— WE HATE THE POOR...... (LAZY BASTARDS, GOOD FOR NOTHING, INCLUDING THOSE WE GIVE CHARITABLE "DONATION" TO)
Gus Leonisky CATOONIST SINCE 1951. -----------------------------
By Chris Hedges
The United States is undergoing the most vicious class war in its history. Social inequality has reached its most extreme levels of disparity in over 200 years, surpassing the rapacious greed of the era of the robber barons. The legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, along with the media and universities, have been seized by a tiny cabal of billionaires and corporations who pass laws and legislation that consolidate their power and obscene wealth at the peoples’ expense. Americans are sacrificial victims, whether on the left or the right, helpless before this modern incarnation of the Biblical idol Moloch. In 1928, the top 1 percent held about 24 percent of the nation’s income, a percentage that steadily declined until 1973. By the early 1970s the oligarchy’s assault against workers was accelerated in response to the rise of popular mass movements in the 1960s. The billionaire class and corporations poured billions into political parties, academia, think-tanks and the media. Critics of capitalism had difficulty finding a platform, including on public broadcasting. Those who sang to the tune the billionaires played were lavished with grants, book deals, tenured professorships, awards and permanent megaphones in the commercial press. Wages stagnated. Income inequality grew to monstrous proportions. Tax rates for corporations and the rich were slashed until it culminated in a virtual tax boycott. Today, the top 10 percent of the richest people in the United States own almost 70 percent of the country’s total wealth. The top 1 percent control 32 percent of the wealth. The bottom 50 percent of the U.S. population hold 3 percent of all U.S. wealth. These ruling oligarchs have Americans, not to mention the natural world, in a death grip. They have mobilized the organs of state security, militarized the police, built the largest prison system in the world and deformed the courts to criminalize poverty. Americans are the most spied upon, watched, photographed and monitored population in human history, and I covered the Stasi state in East Germany. When the corporate state watches you 24-hours a day you cannot use the word liberty. This is the relationship between a master and a slave. “These ruling oligarchs have Americans, not to mention the natural world, in a death grip.” The oligarchs have bought off intellectuals and artists to serve commercial interests. The machinery of corporate dominance is carried out by the college-educated, those who rise to the top of academia — such as the economist Larry Summers who pushed the deregulation of Wall Street under President Bill Clinton, or the political scientist Samuel Huntington who warned that countries like the U.S. and U.K. were suffering from an “excess of democracy” — those who manage the financial firms and corporate superstructures, those who provide the jingles, advertising, brands and political propaganda in public relations firms, and those in the press who work as stenographers to power and those in the entertainment industry who fill our heads with fantasies. Creating Pariahs It is one of the great ironies that the corporate state needs the abilities of the educated, intellectuals and artists to maintain power, yet the moment any begin to think independently they are silenced. The relentless assault on culture, journalism, education, the arts and critical thinking has left those who speak in the language of class warfare marginalized, frantic Cassandras who are viewed as slightly unhinged and depressingly apocalyptic. Those with the courage to shine a light into the inner workings of the machinery, such as Noam Chomsky, are turned into pariahs, or, like Julian Assange, relentlessly persecuted. Culture is vital to democracy. It is radical and transformative. It expresses what lies deep within us. It gives words to our reality. It validates the facts of our lives. It makes us feel as well as see. It allows us to empathize with those who are different or oppressed. It reveals what is happening around us. It honors mystery. “The precise role of the artist, then, is to illuminate that darkness, blaze roads through the vast forest,” James Baldwin writes, “so that we will not, in all our doing, lose sight of its purpose, which is, after all, to make the world a more human dwelling place.” “Ultimately, the artist and the revolutionary function as they function, and pay whatever dues they must pay behind it because they are both possessed by a vision, and they do not so much follow this vision as find themselves driven by it,” writes Baldwin. The central premise of mass culture is that capitalism is the unassailable engine of human progress, even as global capitalists have pumped nearly 37 percent more greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere since the first Convention on Climate Change in 1992. Speak of values and needs, speak of moral systems and meaning, defy the primacy of profit, especially if you only have the few minutes allotted to you on a cable television show to communicate back-and-forth in the usual thought-terminating cliches, and it sounds like gibberish to a conditioned public . Capitalism, as Karl Marx understood, is a revolutionary force. It is endemically unstable. It exploits human beings and the natural world until exhaustion or collapse. That is its nature. But those in society tasked with revealing this nature have been bought off or silenced. Truth is not derived from social values or ethics external to corporate culture. Social, familial and individual rights and needs, as well as the ability to focus on these rights and needs, are robbed from the population. “Capitalism, as Karl Marx understood, is a revolutionary force. It is endemically unstable.” There are their facts and there are our facts. Markets, economic growth, higher corporate profits and consolidations, austerity, technological innovation, deindustrialization and a climbing stock market are their facts. Janet Yellen’s need to orchestrate unemployment to bring down inflation is, for them, a vital fact. Our facts, the facts of those who are evicted, go to prison, are unemployed, are sick yet uninsured, the 12 million children who go to bed hungry, or live, like nearly 600,000 Americans, on the streets, are not part of the equation. Our facts do not attract advertisers. Our facts do not fit with the Disneyfied world the media and advertisers are paid to create. Our facts are an impediment to increased profits. Living the Dream One strives towards a dream. One lives within an illusion. And the illusion that people are fed is that there is never an impediment which can’t be overcome. That if we just dig deep enough within ourselves, if we find our inner strength, if we grasp as self-help gurus tell us that we are truly exceptional, if we believe that Jesus can perform miracles, if we focus on happiness, we can have everything we desire. And when we fail, as most fail in a post-industrial United States to fulfill this illusion, we are told we didn’t try hard enough.
Sigmund Freud wrote that societies, along with individuals, are driven by two primary instincts. One is the instinct for life — Eros, the quest to love, nurture, protect and preserve. The second is the death instinct. The death instinct, called Thanatos by post-Freudians, is driven by fear, hatred and violence. It seeks the dissolution of all living things, including ourselves. One of these two forces, Freud writes, is always ascendant. Societies in decline are seduced by the death instinct, as Freud observes in Civilization and Its Discontents, written during the rise of European fascism and World War II. The death instinct sees destruction as creation. The satisfaction of the death instinct, Freud writes, “is accompanied by an extraordinarily high degree of narcissistic enjoyment, owing to its presenting the ego with a fulfillment of the latter’s old wishes for omnipotence.” A population beset by despair, a sense of dethronement and powerlessness, is intoxicated by an orgy of annihilation, which soon morphs into self-annihilation. It has no interest in nurturing a world that has betrayed them. It seeks to eradicate this world and replace it with a mythical one. It retreats into self-adulation fed by self-delusion and historical amnesia.
READ MORE: https://consortiumnews.com/2023/04/05/chris-hedges-reclaiming-the-us/
SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6tUEaWEeoU
|
User login |
spiritual booze....
Roland Boer is a distinguished professor at the Faculty of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing.
.....
Second, Lenin reinterpreted Marx’s ‘opium of the people’ not as ‘opium for the people’ (as is commonly believed) but as a kind of ‘spiritual booze’. This term has many layers in Russian culture, all the way from Russian Orthodox theology to the complex role of vodka in Russian society. The main point is that ‘spiritual booze’ is not immediately a dismissal, but rather a grudging acknowledgement of the sheer complexity of religion itself.
Q…..and on the topic of religion and capitalism?
A. Let us go to the heart of the matter, with Marx (and leave aside the superficial efforts to see capitalism as a type of ‘religion’). The most thorough analysis of how religion works in capitalism comes through Marx’s reinterpretation of the idea of the fetish.
Over forty years, Marx turned this idea over and over. He was always aware of its religious dimensions, but he also transformed it (the German is Aufhebung) into a very useful way to understand the core functions of capital. To find this insight, we need to go to the third volume of Capital. After pointing out that fetishism attaches to every feature of capitalism, he then points out the key fetish: money produces money, capital produces profit or interest in and of itself. Or as his formula puts it: M–M1. Why is this the main fetish? It is both unreal and real, mystical and concrete. On the one hand, it obscures labour and production, pretending that money produces money; on the other hand, it is very real and profoundly oppressive. It is what would now be called the ‘financialisation of the market’. This is what he means by the ‘religion of everyday life’.
Q. The ebook that you’ve written for Culture Matters is on the topic of Christian communism. What are the biblical roots of Christian communism?
A. Let us begin with the socio-economic situation, because Christianity, like most religions, is a response to economic injustice and oppression in this world. In the Eastern Mediterranean, Rome’s imperialism was reshaping peasant agriculture, and the burdens of taxation and debt were growing, deeply affecting local economies, village communities, cultures and health – malaria, for example, was rife.
When the Romans eventually took possession of the Eastern Mediterranean, they found a colonial system that was working rather well – if one thinks in terms of the colonisers. They took over what the Greeks had already established for a few centuries and modified it in the light of their own preferences. This was a system of Greek ‘cities’ (polis), which marked the colonising presence of foreigners. These cities were Greek-speaking, with Greek culture, institutions and town planning.
Above all, they relied on all of the surrounding territory (called the chora) to supply everything the cities needed. Their ‘needs’ were substantial, transforming the economic structures of this chora.
But what was the chora? In a colonial situation, the chora was not the arable land around the city (as in Greece). Instead, it comprised all of the villages, land and peasants who worked the land. They spoke the local language, followed local customs and practices and saw the colonising cities as thoroughly foreign. Given the immense demands from the cities, the lives of the peasants were transformed. They were often forced to move into lower areas rife with malaria, with profound consequences for short lives – life expectancy was around 30.
Roman armies frequently cut swathes through this countryside, as ‘punishment’ for revolt. Mass enslavements took place, further reducing rural labour power. In a recently published book with Christina Petterson (Time of Troubles), we have described this as a ‘colonial regime’. The Romans gradually transformed the system they inherited. Even though the cities remained Greek in culture, they were also required to provide the relatively large city of Rome itself with even larger supplies of grain, and of course slaves.
READ ALL:
https://www.culturematters.org.uk/index.php/culture/theory/itemlist/user/235-rolandboer
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....
the holy grail.....
In the news in the western hemisphere today, the truth is like the Holy Grail. And like the cup of Christ, it too may be lost forever. Take any information about Russia or China, for instance. Reality is now shifted not only in the halls of power in Washington, London, and Brussels, but in journalism, academia, the nonprofit sector, business, and on the loading dock at break time at the Amazon warehouse. The lie is complete. The multi-trillion-dollar propaganda machine did its job. The stage is set.
What are the chances that every nation, every leader, every opinion poll, and every word from every mouth on the evening news is in love with what America is doing (has done) in the world? The situation is at its worst in the very places where intelligent humans are supposed to sort out the world’s problems. Take the Washington think tank, the Stimson Center. According to these sellout geniuses, India’s position on the Russia-Ukraine conflict is not a show of support for Russia. According to the authors Akriti (Vasudeva) Kalyankar, and Dante Schulz in the report “Continental Drift? India-Russia Ties After One Year of War in Ukraine,” said India is just walking a detente tightrope to keep from pissing off the Americans. As proof, the experts cited comments by General Manoj Pande, Indian Chief of Army Staff discussing India becoming more self-sufficient militarily and concerning supply chains.
The Stimson Center’s board of directors includes Kris M. Balderston, the General Manager of FleishmanHillard, and a former legislative director to Senator Hillary Clinton. Condoleezza Rice was also on the board from 1991 to 2001, which pretty much tells us the direction of thinking this think tank is going. Think “perpetuate the hegemony,” and you’ve got them pegged. If India joined a military alliance with Russia, against NATO, these people would claim Modi & Co. as posturing. The truth, the reality of international relations at these think tanks is conjured, stirred in a witch’s pot, brought to a boil, and cast with a magic media wand at anyone who will pay attention.
Over at the European Council on Foreign Relations, Europeans are united with Ukraine and against Russia like the Zulu were against the British in South Africa. Timothy Garton Ash Ivan Krastev and Mark Leonard say a new poll proves this unbreakable solidarity. The experts say “Americans and Europeans agree that Russia is their avowed adversary.” Mass demonstrations and reality aside, the propaganda machine has not worked as well in Europe, especially since U.S. Navy frogmen blasted the underwater prosperity fuel line from Russia to Germany. It’s the chiefs sending tanks, missiles, ammunition, and mercenaries to fight and die in Ukraine, not the souvenir salesman beneath the Eiffel Tower. Short version. These people are lying. A larger and more balanced poll would show the Europeans heavily against perpetuating the conflict in Ukraine.
“An increasingly multipolar world requires an entirely different kind of U.S. foreign policy: far from being unilateralist, it necessitates a complex form of power-sharing on both a global and regional basis.” – Author: Martin Jacques
I could go on, obviously. But we do have the “official” side of India-Russia relations direct from the Modi government. No one is reminding great thinkers in the western capitals about the India-Russia Defence Cooperation, the meetings between Russian and Indian pharmaceutical companies, or the 400% increase in imports to India from Russia in the past 12 months. It’s probably high time for free thinkers to begin reading Indian or Russian media, instead of choking down the information nonsense every editor, professor, diplomat, or general in the west keeps feeding us. This story from The Tribune, the largest paper in Northern India, is a good start. There’s the fact that Russia and China proclaimed a “new multipolar order” last month at the BRICS summit, and at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit.
And while western Cold War idealists try and focus on former India-China adversarial relationships, the fact is India envisages itself as a major pole in global politics. And rightfully so. Washington and its coconspirators would like nothing better than to drive new wedges between these Asian countries to deflect reality for some decades to come. Today, or should I say “this time,” it appears that the waking world is not falling for US lies anymore.
“China and India are friendly neighbors. We are also natural partners. Both of our countries stand for amicable and peaceful relations between countries and a multipolar world. The peaceful and friendly relations between our two countries is a blessing not just to Asia, but to also the whole world.” Li Keqiang
Phil Butler, is a policy investigator and analyst, a political scientist and expert on Eastern Europe, he’s an author of the recent bestseller “Putin’s Praetorians” and other books. He writes exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
READ MORE:
https://journal-neo.org/2023/04/05/the-wests-denial-strategy-and-the-surfacing-multipolar-world/
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....